Will this bundle work with a 300 watt power supply?


Recommended Posts

I am looking to rebuid a desktop with this bundle, which includes a Motherboard, Processor, RAM, and graphics card. I am not looking to replace the power supply or any other major component. I just want to know if it will work with a 300 watt power supply before I shell out the $250 for the parts :p

Thanks in advance.

Judging by the spec I would say 300W is comfortable.

The processor will be the biggest draw, at 125W. The graphics card shouldn't draw a lot. Under 30W. So on that basis I'd say you'll be fine.

However, just to be safe.. is it a decent power supply? :p

I am looking to rebuid a desktop with this bundle, which includes a Motherboard, Processor, RAM, and graphics card. I am not looking to replace the power supply or any other major component. I just want to know if it will work with a 300 watt power supply before I shell out the $250 for the parts :p

Thanks in advance.

Some older ones that are 300w don't have the extra the 4pin 12v CPU power connector that the bundled motherboard requires. You might want to ensure it's a 24pin power connector too. Lastly, the board is SATA only, so you'll need to ensure it has SATA power connections for your drives (or use adapters).

If it has all of the above, you should be good to go.

550-600w to be sure. Also depends on upgrades you may do later and also if you plan on having a lot of HDD or optical drives.

In crazy land. I don't even have that and I have three hard drives and a GTX 660. :laugh:

FYI, here's a calculator. http://www.extreme.outervision.com/PSUEngine

300W (assuming, as noted above, it has all the necessary connectors) should pass until you do another upgrade.

In crazy land. I don't even have that and I have three hard drives and a GTX 660. :laugh:

FYI, here's a calculator. http://www.extreme.o...n.com/PSUEngine

300W (assuming, as noted above, it has all the necessary connectors) should pass until you do another upgrade.

It's gonna past probably. But not sure it's a good idea to use 226$ of new hardware on an old probably cheap generic PSU. Also PSUs work best when they are not loaded. The PSU can be a cause of hardware failure. The older they are and the more loaded they are the more chance you have for them to fail and kill almost the whole machine. Doesn't happen often with high brand PSU like Corsair and OCZ but i've seen many computers killed by cheap no brand low wattage PSU.

Unless it's a high quality 300W PSU to be safe i would try to buy a new 30-40$ 400-450W PSU by Antec, Corsair, OCZ, Thermaltake, ect ...

550-600w to be sure. Also depends on upgrades you may do later and also if you plan on having a lot of HDD or optical drives.

Overkill, I'd go with 400 - 450W Max if you aren't planning on putting a more powerful graphics card in.

Remember, a quality 300w will be more stable and just plain better than a cheaper 500w

This can't be stated enough.

Sizing a power supply and choosing a quality unit are the MOST important things to do when building a computer. Think about it - every other component in your system connects to the power supply - every single one. And a bad power supply can cause all kinds of havoc with your components.

The most common mistake people make is choosing a power supply that is over-rated for their needs.

This is bad for several reasons:

1) Running a power supply at half it's rated capacity is very inefficient. On the flip side, running it at near full capacity for extended periods is also bad. Aim for somewhere in the 70-90% range (at load) depending on how much headroom you want. You should look for units that are 80+ certified. Though there are issues with the 80+ certification (which you can Google for more info), this certification from a quality manufacturer shows they've put the development time and effort into producing a quality power supply that will maintain certain efficiencies across its load range.

2) Often someone will choose a supply that is over-rated for their needs and wind up buying a cheaper model. Now not only do they have an inefficient supply, they have also purchased one made with cheaper components that, if they're lucky, will simply die, if not, could take other components with it when it does die.

Use a power supply calculator to rough out the size of supply you need given all the components you have. You may not be able to account for everything, or choose the exact components, so add maybe 50W to the calculated value. The biggest factors to account for are going to be the CPU and GPU.

Then buy a quality unit at that value (Seasonic, Corsair, PC Power & Cooling, Enermax) and don't spend the same or less for a higher rated, but cheaply built unit.

  • Like 2
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Stellarium 26.2 by Razvan Serea Stellarium is a free open source planetarium for your computer. It shows a realistic sky in 3D, just like what you see with the naked eye, binoculars or a telescope. It is being used in planetarium projectors. Just set your coordinates and go. Stellarium key features: Realistic simulation of the sky, sunrise and sunset Default catalogue of over 600,000 stars Downloadable additional catalogues for up to 210 million stars Catalog data for all New General Catalogue (NGC) objects Images of almost all Messier objects and the Milky Way Artistic illustrations for all 88 modern constellations More than a dozen different cultures with their constellations Solar and lunar eclipse simulation Photorealistic landscapes (more are available on the website) Scripting support with ECMAScript (a few demo scripts are included) Extendable with plug-ins: 8 plug-ins installed by default, including: artificial satellites plug-in (updated from an on-line TLE database) ocular simulation plug-in (shows how objects look like in a given ocular) Solar System editor plug-in (imports comet and asteroid data from the MPC) telescope control plug-in (Meade LX200 and Celestron NexStar compatible) The major changes of this version: Added new sky culture Added new plugin: Planes Many improvements in plugins Many improvements in Core and GUI Many updates in sky cultures. [full release notes] Download: Stellarium 26.2 (64-bit) | 456.0 MB (Open Source) View: Stellarium Home Page | Other Operating Systems | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • NASA: This asteroid may not kill us but it probably won't be far off either by Sayan Sen Image by Zelch Csaba via Pexels New observations by NASA's James Webb Space Telescope have eliminated the last remaining impact threat posed by asteroid 2024 YR4, ruling out the possibility that the near-Earth object could strike the Moon in December 2032. NASA said observations collected by Webb on February 18 and 26, 2026, enabled scientists to refine the asteroid's orbit enough to "rule out a chance of lunar impact on Dec. 22, 2032." Instead, asteroid 2024 YR4 is now expected to pass the Moon at a distance of about 13,200 miles (21,200 km). The agency stressed that the update "reflects improved precision in our understanding of where the asteroid is expected to be in 2032 rather than a shift in its orbital path." The announcement closes a remarkable chapter in planetary defence that began in late 2024, when the approximately 60-metre-wide asteroid briefly became the most closely watched near-Earth object in the world. Discovered on December 27, 2024, by the ATLAS telescope in Chile, 2024 YR4 initially appeared to have a small chance of colliding with Earth on December 22, 2032. As astronomers gathered more observations, the impact probability briefly climbed to around 3%—the highest ever recorded for an asteroid of its size—before steadily falling as its orbit became better understood. By early 2025, international observations had ruled out any significant risk to Earth. However, astronomers were left with another possibility: a roughly 4% chance that the asteroid could instead strike the Moon. "The probability that asteroid 2024 YR4 will strike the Moon on 22 December 2032 is now approximately 4%," the European Space Agency (ESA) had said last year, noting that "there is a 96% chance that the asteroid will not impact the Moon." ESA said such an impact, while unlikely, would have presented an extraordinary scientific opportunity. "It is a very rare event for an asteroid this large to impact the Moon – and it is rarer still that we know about it in advance. The impact would likely be visible from Earth, and so scientists will be very excited by the prospect of observing and analysing it," said Richard Moissl, Head of ESA's Planetary Defence Office. "It would certainly leave a new crater on the surface. However, we wouldn't be able to accurately predict in advance how much material would be thrown into space, or whether any would reach Earth," he added. The asteroid also exposed an important blind spot in planetary defence. Because 2024 YR4 approached Earth from the direction of the Sun, it remained hidden from ground-based telescopes until after its closest approach. "We looked into how Neomir would have performed in this situation, and the simulations surprised even us," Moissl said. "Neomir would have detected asteroid 2024 YR4 about a month earlier than ground-based telescopes did. This would have given astronomers more time to study the asteroid's trajectory and allowed them to much sooner rule out any chance of Earth impact in 2032." He added, "As an infrared telescope, like Webb, Neomir would have also immediately given us a much better estimate for the asteroid's size, which is very important for assessing the significance of the hazard." The latest NASA observations underscore the value of space-based infrared telescopes in tracking faint asteroids. According to NASA, Webb made "among the faintest ever observations of an asteroid," extending the object's observational record by nearly eight months at a time when it had become too faint for other telescopes. That additional data allowed scientists to eliminate the remaining uncertainty surrounding its 2032 flyby. Although asteroid 2024 YR4 is now confirmed to pose no threat to either Earth or the Moon, scientists say its discovery remains one of the most significant real-world tests of the international planetary defence system, demonstrating how continued observations can rapidly transform an object once considered hazardous into one whose future path is known with high confidence. Source: NASA, ESA This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Yup. Google is just scraping the entire internet for their own ad profits without sharing revenue with the sources. It's obviously stealing, but since these sites depend upon Google's search scraps to survive... As for me, I just stopped using Google for anything except Reddit searches. If Reddit's own search wasn't complete crapola, I'd never use Google search again.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      Admir earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      First Post
    • Apprentice
      daryld went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Contributor
      Carltonbar went up a rank
      Contributor
    • One Month Later
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      418
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      170
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      130
    4. 4
      Xenon
      69
    5. 5
      neufuse
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!