Server + HTPC combined - What do you think?


Recommended Posts

I currently have a WHS 2011 serving a small HTPC. I was thinking of moving from WHS 2011 to Windows 8 and using my server as an HTPC. These are my server specs...

Intel Q6600

8GB RAM

Asus Formula board

ATI 5570

I used the board, cpu and RAM from an old PC build. Lately I've been thinking that this is way overkill for a server and because the server is always on whenever the HTCP is on I figured it might make sense to combine them.

About the only drawbacks I can think of are that the server is a bigger box and a little noisy. The former I can deal with but the latter I'll have to figure out how to quite things down.

Can you guys think of any other drawbacks?

It will simplify dvr funcitionality (getting rid of cable boxes and using Silicon Dusts 3 tuner) as well since I won't have to worry about how to set the htpc to record and drop onto the server for viewing elsewhere.

Thinking of also...

Continue using Drivebender for storage

WHS 2011 running within Virtualbox for pc backups

Server+HTPC combined is a great combo. one I run myself.

I use a bigger silverstone HTPC case with room for a ton of HDD's. and with a good silent PSU and a passive graphics card you won't need to worry about sound, the HDD mount also came with rubber rings to use between the disks and frame for dampening vibration. they've kind of "rotted" up pretty fast though, but could be replaces by any rubber washer anyway, and well, the HDD's don't make any noise on my rig anyway. One suggestion to improve

One suggestion for improvement though, make one auto logon acount for the actual media center, with Media Portal or Plex(plex is easier, but Media Portal is more powerful and is faster to update the libraries with live scans of the folders, and it has folder browsing for videos as well as the movie and tv series libraries). And another Account for remote management and server and potential legal download duties. To make this work you need to google a registry hack that allows you to have multiple simultaneous logons. that way you can log on to your server part and manage that without disrupting the media center.

Oh since you'll also be using a tv tuner and using it as a sat/cable box with PVR, You'll be using Media Portal over Plex anyway.

I have a very similar setup with almost the same machine specs, except I have a Radeon HD 5770 and run CentOS. I love it! Also, I vote for XBMC as your media center.

He's lookingfor a HTPC not a Media Center. XBMC has no tuner so it's useless. also XBMC's absolutely useless requirements for how to set up series in folders and naming for the library to show them properly makes all the other good things about it invalid.

He's lookingfor a HTPC not a Media Center. XBMC has no tuner so it's useless.

My mistake. I interpreted HTPC as media center. According to Wikipedia its more of a superset of what I was thinking of:

A Home Theater PC (HTPC) or Media Center computer is a convergence device that combines some or all the capabilities of a personal computer with a software application that supports video, photo, music playback, and sometimes video recording functionality.

also XBMC's absolutely useless requirements for how to set up series in folders and naming for the library to show them properly makes all the other good things about it invalid.

This I definitely disagree with. Library setup and naming convention is personal preference, but even if I disliked the way XBMC handles that aspect, its other features would still make it by far the best media center I've ever used.

Well except that Media Portal does everything XBMC does, and in some aspect better, especially the fact you can just dump all files for different series in a folder, the XBMC will instantly add them to the library with folder watching, and ad them to the correct series, with the correct season and episode and with fan art and all that. Plex, is easier to set up than MP, though it requires use of the Web interface, is a little bit slower with updating the library, but handles series just as fine from a single folder, as a bonus it has mobiel and tablet apps that can stream from your media server. of course plex doesn't have TV tuner capability so it loses out.

as such both MP And Plex are better alternatives than XBMC that does everything else just as good and handles series far far better. Not having to spend a lot of time organizing series into special folders would be a deciding factor even if both these alternatives where in some way worse than XBMC

either way, OT.

Thanks for the feedback guys!

TPreston - I live in an apartment. I did think of moving the server to my 2nd bedroom but it really isn't a big deal to leave it in my living room

Hawkman - I don't personally distinguish between HTPC and Media Center. And I actually used both WMC and XBMC in Windows 7. With Windows 8, I only really need WMC for TV viewing. I've also never really had any issues with setting up XBMC for metatags. I do use Metabrowser for tagging / media info though which I think makes a huge difference

Current beta of XBMC also supports tuners but I'll more than likely stick with WMC till it's final

So looks like I have a project to work on this weekend :) But first, I need to image my current setup in case I decide to go back

I use the following for mine:

  • Server 2012 Standard (Hyper-V Enabled)
  • Silverstone Grandia GD06 case in black
  • AMD Phenom X4 2.2Ghz / 8GB DDR2
  • 2x 1Gbit LAN (1x onboard, 1x PCI)
  • GeForce 650 GTX 1GB
  • 2xWD 3TB
  • 2xSamsung 1.5TB
  • 1x Samsung 1TB
  • Fortuna MCE Remote
  • Xbox 360 Wireless Controller Adapter

Used for Media File Server, XBMC (Hooked up to 42" Toshiba LCD TV), Hyper-V (running Linux, XP, Win7, Win8, Server2012), web server, domain controller, active directory, DNS, DHCP, backups, file server, software repository, ISO library, LogMeIn, RDP/RDS, media transcoding, audio encoding, Steam (Big Picture Mode).

Sits next to the Xbox 360 under the TV and isn't too loud at all (certainly a lot less noisy than starting up the Xbox).

I recommend Silverstone cases if you want it to look great in the living room whilst providing a good balance between noise and cooling.

Not to hijack this thread, but is there a way to get a tuner to run on a Windows 2012 Server Essentials VM (with WMC addon, haven't attempted to install it yet) that is hosted on ESXi 5.1?

I'm not clear on what you're trying to do. You're trying to install WMC to 2012 Server Essentials? I don't think you can

I use the following for mine:

  • Server 2012 Standard (Hyper-V Enabled)
  • Silverstone Grandia GD06 case in black
  • AMD Phenom X4 2.2Ghz / 8GB DDR2
  • 2x 1Gbit LAN (1x onboard, 1x PCI)
  • GeForce 650 GTX 1GB
  • 2xWD 3TB
  • 2xSamsung 1.5TB
  • 1x Samsung 1TB
  • Fortuna MCE Remote
  • Xbox 360 Wireless Controller Adapter

Used for Media File Server, XBMC (Hooked up to 42" Toshiba LCD TV), Hyper-V (running Linux, XP, Win7, Win8, Server2012), web server, domain controller, active directory, DNS, DHCP, backups, file server, software repository, ISO library, LogMeIn, RDP/RDS, media transcoding, audio encoding, Steam (Big Picture Mode).

Sits next to the Xbox 360 under the TV and isn't too loud at all (certainly a lot less noisy than starting up the Xbox).

I recommend Silverstone cases if you want it to look great in the living room whilst providing a good balance between noise and cooling.

I actually have 4 2TB drives with intentions of adding more at some point

Hyper V - why do you have all those OS's?

My server is in this case...

http://www.lian-li.c...=38&ss_index=95

In Black. Aesthetically I think it's fine. Just that it's a full tower

EDIT - didn't realize you have 5 drives. Do you have room for more? I should have room for about 8 drives I think

Thanks for the feedback guys!

TPreston - I live in an apartment. I did think of moving the server to my 2nd bedroom but it really isn't a big deal to leave it in my living room

Hawkman - I don't personally distinguish between HTPC and Media Center. And I actually used both WMC and XBMC in Windows 7. With Windows 8, I only really need WMC for TV viewing. I've also never really had any issues with setting up XBMC for metatags. I do use Metabrowser for tagging / media info though which I think makes a huge difference

Current beta of XBMC also supports tuners but I'll more than likely stick with WMC till it's final

So looks like I have a project to work on this weekend :) But first, I need to image my current setup in case I decide to go back

Honestly, while WMC works great, I would suggest you give MP a go. it works as a server/client solution as well so you can connect to it with other computers running the client, you can have a far better EPG experience by setting up WebEPG to download the EPG as far ahead as you want instead of the cable/satellite epg. it's also fully skinnable with great skins, and has been a round since XBMC (it started as a fork, but has hardly any XBMC code left now) so it's solid and stable. And of course it gives you everything in one system that can be fully navigated with a remote. also WMC is pretty much standing still and has been still since win7 release.

I actually have 4 2TB drives with intentions of adding more at some point

Hyper V - why do you have all those OS's?

My server is in this case...

http://www.lian-li.c...=38&ss_index=95

In Black. Aesthetically I think it's fine. Just that it's a full tower

EDIT - didn't realize you have 5 drives. Do you have room for more? I should have room for about 8 drives I think

Application development, testing, lab, compatability.

Windows 8 VM is used when I need to get to something running at home from a remote location (RDP or LogMeIn). I also use it for "Play To" to the other Xbox 360's in the house as it doesn't suffer from MCE lag and doesn't seem to care what format/resolution the media is. Windows 7 lives for MCE but doesn't get used a lot now. Server 2012 is used for my RDS Gateway & connection broker.

I have a 2.5" bay free for which I have a 640GB drive for but haven't installed it yet. Will move the host OS VHD onto it to free up read/writes to the 1TB drive. I don't have any more official bays unless I make my own drive cage CPU side of the case. I do have a USB 3.0 enclosure at my disposal but I don't have an USB3.0 card installed anymore due to the bloody huge GTX over hanging the PCI-E 1x slot.

The Lian-Li's are very nice cases. For my choice I did a lot of research as I wanted a purpose built HTPC case that could live under the TV in a living room environment.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Yup, that's a doozy right there 😄
    • It's a bundle of tools created by a variety of people, so things can go wrong sometimes. It's a great addition to Windows, and I use a lot of the tools on a daily basis. Also, it's still a 0.**** release so quick updates are to be expected 😉
    • Oh, I did. And it's even worse than I was hoping! Besides a lot of techno-babble jargon (yes I understand 100% of it but it's still all just techno-babble) there's 2 key points that make me super-weary about even considering testing this out. -- By default, after installation, a relay is automatically set up, so you do not need to care about that. * Non-chatmail apps use email servers as a long-term message archive while chatmail clients use email servers for ephemeral instant message relay. * Supporting the full variety of classic email setups would require considerable development and maintenance efforts, and complicate making chatmail-based messaging more resilient, reliable and fast. -- Basically, the end-user device is the 'server' (relay) so there is NO ARCHIVING whatsoever because every message is necessarily ephemeral. Great for techno-paranoia (and for illicit activities preferring no tracks to cover) but terrible for everybody else. It's also ironically contradictory to engineering principles of redundancies besides the transport layers due to the explicit absence of any persistent storage. Instead of 'classic email address' retaining multi-GB messaging archives on its server, now every device must retain 100% of those storage demands. (Email messages were originally meant to be short correspondences, not the multi-MB attachments boondoggle that now exists with unlimited spam engines flooding every potential recipient.) Any device swap or reset (or loss) makes the entire message history go bye-bye forever... lest there's an off-device auto-archival "relay" mechanism that's really a separate server that holds onto all transported messages (an email server) that utilizes 'chatmail email address' identities (like an email server) and its own persistent storage archive (like an email server). But... this solution is hoping to exist alongside real-world email address identities (based on the email server relay pathway) but simply render messages in chat thread format in an ephemeral manner (with contents being encrypted, and messages auto-expiring) ... In the end, it's a chat app/experience for the Web3/P2P-at-all-costs zealots. (I have accts on all sorts of federated web3 services so I understand the technical and non-technical alike.) For any practical users, however, it's just another service to download/install, register, cross-share id cards/qr codes, but know that there's no history/archive whatsoever (by design) so no account/message recovery whatsoever... update the device, install a bummed update patch, or dare upgrade your device... all history, poof, gone. Ya gotta start everything over again like they're a brand new person.
    • You've tried DuckDuckGo and Brave Search, now get serious with SearXNG by Paul Hill Over the last decade, it has become quite trendy to dump Google Search in favor of privacy-preserving alternatives such as DuckDuckGo, Startpage, and Brave Search. These search engines have done a very good job at highlighting dodgy practices by Google, such as adjusting search results based on what it thinks you’ll like (filter bubble) and stalking you around the web to advertise to you. While these search engines are good starting points when compared to non-private services like Google, there are still quite a few issues with them. For example, both DuckDuckGo and Brave Search require running non-free JavaScript in your web browser, which is comparable to running proprietary software on your computer, meaning you can be sure about what it’s actually doing in the background. Another issue is that these search engines are hosted on the respective companies’ servers, and you are using a service that you don’t control. Finally, DuckDuckGo, while offering privacy features, relies heavily on Microsoft’s infrastructure for its results and, in the past, has permitted Microsoft tracking scripts. If you are looking for a more private search solution than DuckDuckGo, Brave Search, and Startpage, then I recommend taking a look at SearXNG. It is a privacy-respecting metasearch engine that can be used via different public instances, which is useful for mobile users, or you can install it on your computer or server and run it locally with maximum control. Unlike Google, Bing, or Brave Search, which crawl the web and have their own search indexes, SearXNG is a metasearch engine, meaning it taps other search engines, stripping your identifying data, such as IP address, user agent, and cookies, in the process. Your search query is sent to the other search engines you enable before aggregating the results. SearXNG has deployment flexibility. If you are a casual user or a mobile user and don’t want to run SearXNG locally, you can use a public instance that is hosted by someone else. The main problem with this is that you are putting trust in the maintainer of the instance regarding stuff like logs that they may keep; good hosts should have a privacy policy explaining their policies. If you are trying to use SearXNG, you can also install the software on your device and then head to 127.0.0.1:8080 in your browser and search from there. While you don’t have to worry about a third-party admin like the public instances, search engines could ultimately block your IP address if they frown on you pulling in their search results locally. If you want to run it locally, it’s a good idea to use proxies or VPNs to hide your actual IP. You don’t have to worry about this with a public instance, as search engines never see your IP address. The main privacy benefit of using SearXNG is that it isolates your identity from the underlying engines that it’s capable of searching, such as Google and Bing. These search engines will only see requests coming from a generic server, so they can’t profile you and create a bubble filter that influences what results you see. This also ensures that your search engine doesn’t turn into an echo chamber that prevents you from reading alternative points of view. As a free software project, you are allowed to inspect SearXNG to make sure there are no negative features bundled inside. This sets it apart from the privacy search engines mentioned earlier because you can’t check their source code. As a meta search engine, you are not restricted to getting results from one source. Due to the fact that it scrapes content from other websites, your SearXNG instance will periodically get blocked from different providers, so it’s good to select a range of sources as a backup. While enabling all of the services will give you great results, this can make searching slower. I am personally happy with slower searches for the best results, but you can always check which providers are slowing down your search from the search results page and disable them to speed things up. If you want decent results quickly, enable the main search providers such as Google, Brave, DuckDuckGo, Qwant, Bing, and Yahoo. This way, you get wide coverage without the latency. On the Engines tab in Preferences, do note that there are different tabs, such as General, Images, and Videos, with their own providers that can be toggled and are not covered by "Enable all" while on the General tab, so be sure to dig into each. Just a note, if you want to enable everything, press "Enable all" in one tab, then hit save at the bottom of the page, then do the next tab, and so on. If you press "Enable all", then do that in each tab, and then save, nothing will stick. When I had just some of the search engines enabled, I searched “define nefarious” and results came back with the definition of “define” - obviously that was a sucky result. However, when I had everything enabled, it found dictionary pages for the word “nefarious” and even had an inline definition on the sidebar, which is quite nice too - that was delivered by WolframAlpha for anyone wondering! Probably the worst thing about this meta search engine is that the engines you select are saved with a cookie, so you must enable them on every new device you use SearXNG on, including if you decide to go into incognito mode with your web browser. Honestly, I would say this is the most annoying aspect, and perhaps if your browser lets you choose a separate private browsing search engine, then it would be best to use DuckDuckGo for this portion of your browsing. Another weakness of SearXNG is the random blocking of it by search providers. When you are on the results page, expand the “Response time” box, and it will show things like “Suspended: too many requests” or “access denied”. This is why it is good to enable several providers so that there is always a fallback to get results from. I won’t pretend SearXNG will be for everyone, however, if you enable all of the providers and put up with the slower response time, the results can be really amazing. Even if you don’t want to use it as your daily driver, keeping a bookmark handy that links to it is a good idea if you ever feel like doing a deep dive into a niche topic where other search engines are just failing to bring up any good result, due to the amount of sources it looks on. If you’re interested in radical user control over the software you use, installing SearXNG locally can also be a good idea, but be prepared to be temporarily blocked from sites if you trigger bot sensors without a VPN. Personally, I’ve opted to use a public instance, rather than install it myself. If you want to use it via a public instance, head over to searx.space to find a provider. Let us know in the comments if you have used SearXNG or its predecessor, Searx. What do you think about the quality of the results?
    • Dear Neowin, If it is not too much trouble, can you start using the new-ish designations for Insider Preview? "Experimental" is different than "former Dev" as it can apply to different models, eg 26H1 or 26H2 etc, right? No need to seed confusion IMHO. And, please "finally" update your graphics. OK?
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      503
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      226
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      158
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!