-
Posts
-
.thumb.png.d61bbc678107f4e0e9d82b277997a816.png)
By MrElectrifyer · Posted
It certainly is a waste of time clicking it if you're not interested in Windows 11's development. If that were the case for you, you could easily ignore the headline and move on given the headline makes it clear that's what the article is about. Instead, you're contradicting yourself here calling it a waste of time yet clicking on the headline and commenting... If it were a totally different topic being presented than what's stated in the headline, then you'd certainly have a point, 'cause that's totally deceptive and unavoidable if not actually interested. However here, you can totally avoid it if you're truly not interested. -
By Elliot B. · Posted
No, it did not work. I did not read the article. I saw the title in my Feedly feed and came to continue putting pressure about such titles on a website I used to love. In fact, based on your reply, it seems you think it's fine to visit click bait title articles to find out what it's about, to waste people's time. That's up to you, mate. I remember when news websites had pride in their content and therefore didn't need to resort to cheap tactics. -
By Michal H. · Posted
you could disable web results in EU for years -
By MrElectrifyer · Posted
Nothing misleading nor deceptive about it, just sensationalized and catchy to grab reader's attention, and it's clearly working... -
By Dalekevj · Posted
I think they will try and benchmark base it at £100 as being the premium product and then have extras on top. The issue will be who can play it and who will pay for a every more expensive late stage console now
-
-
Recent Achievements
-
Almohandis earned a badge
Dedicated
-
JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
Dedicated
-
DrWankel earned a badge
First Post
-
DrWankel earned a badge
Reacting Well
-
Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
Week One Done
-
-
Popular Contributors
-
Tell a friend
.thumb.png.d61bbc678107f4e0e9d82b277997a816.png)
.thumb.png.b7089ebbdf00d96b3b92dddbd04bac02.png)
Question
Sandor
The company I work for manages email for our clients via a 3rd party hosting company. The generic way in is via http://mail.domain.com for which client it is. It's running off Squirrelmail.
Most clients however use Outlook on their PCs and one of them asked if it was possible to set either SquirrelMail or Outlook (2007) to only leave copies of sent messages on the server for a specific length of time - eg 1 day.
I know there are settings that seem to relate to incoming mail so that it is deleted off the server when received but does anyone know of any settings in either Outlook or SquirrelMail that relate to Sent Items. The issue is the client never really uses SquirrelMail so sent items accumulate on the server and eventually start clogging it up (only has 100MB quota).
Perhaps it's a simple thing I'm missing or perhaps it isn't possible.
Thanks
Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1126982-leave-sent-emails-on-server-for-1-day/Share on other sites
1 answer to this question
Recommended Posts