Windows Home Server 2011 or Windows 7


Recommended Posts

I have a spare PC and am thinking of using it for back ups and streaming media to the PS3, I have a spare Windows 7 licence and an OEM licence for Windows Home Server 2011, which would people use? As stated PC will mainly be used for storing backups of the other PC's, torrents, some movie conversions and streaming to PS3.

Have read that the backup feature in WHS2011 is slow as hell so I would use another program I have to back up things

I agree with remixed, either windows server 2008 r2 or windows server 2012

the home server iterations were always lacking and didn't run well in certain situations (like backups which you mentioned)

you could get what you need out of Windows 7 but some of the things wouldn't be as easy to set up as on windows server

I have a spare PC and am thinking of using it for back ups and streaming media to the PS3, I have a spare Windows 7 licence and an OEM licence for Windows Home Server 2011, which would people use? As stated PC will mainly be used for storing backups of the other PC's, torrents, some movie conversions and streaming to PS3.

Have read that the backup feature in WHS2011 is slow as hell so I would use another program I have to back up things

It is? WHS2011 has been fantastic for me. Perhaps whoever told you that needs to stop pretending Atoms are worthwhile processors.

I agree with remixed, either windows server 2008 r2 or windows server 2012

the home server iterations were always lacking and didn't run well in certain situations (like backups which you mentioned)

you could get what you need out of Windows 7 but some of the things wouldn't be as easy to set up as on windows server

Agreed - Windows Server 2012 (which actually replaces WHS) makes WAY too much sense, even (if not especially) for a home server.

I dual-boot Windows 8 and Server 2012 today, with a mind to actually build a separate server once I upgrade my desktop - the advantage that Server 2012 has it that it can run on the same hardware that supports 7 (or 8, of course) with no changes whatever - how many *server* OSes can say that?

  • Like 2

Server 2012 is a little out my price range atm, not to mention I would have to get AV for it as well......will need to think on this

no you don't, both Windows 8 and Server 2012 have an anti-virus built in

$500 for a copy of 2012 "essentials" is a bit over the top for a home budget.

The lic he has for whs 2011 would work just fine for his needs - and yes there are a few replacements for drive extender, I use drive pool from stablebits, and its rock solid and only $20

And never had any issues with backups - are you trying to do them over wireless B or G while your running torrents over the same wireless network or something and running folding on your PC your trying to backup?

no you don't, both Windows 8 and Server 2012 have an anti-virus built in

Should have said effective AV ;)

$500 for a copy of 2012 "essentials" is a bit over the top for a home budget.

The lic he has for whs 2011 would work just fine for his needs - and yes there are a few replacements for drive extender, I use drive pool from stablebits, and its rock solid and only $20

And never had any issues with backups - are you trying to do them over wireless B or G while your running torrents over the same wireless network or something and running folding on your PC your trying to backup?

So with that I wouldnt need to use raid10 or is it better to use raid if I can?

$500 is a bit steep to say the least for a whole OS just for home, only thing I don't like about WHS2011 is that is wants to take 60GB just for itself

I upgraded from WHS v1 to Windows 8 - If all you are using it for is basic stuff then you should be alright, so far Storage Spaces seems to be a good replacement for Drive Extender. Not sure about backing up all of your other pc's, however with the money you would save buying something like Windows Server 2012 Essentials you could buy a third-party program that should cover your needs.

At the moment you can upgrade your Windows 7 license to Windows 8 for ?25, runs out at the end of January though.

"wants to take 60GB just for itself"

And where did you come up with that? That is min install size if I recall, not what it uses.

With what you wouldn't need to use raid 10? why would you need to use raid 10 in a home setup for ever?? That is OVERKILL for storing anything in your home.. You do understand that RAID is not a backup!

What could you possible have in home network that could not survive an outage for restore from backup? If you are running raid 10 in the home - your wasting money IMHO! I just don't see how to justify it.

Drive pooling/extender is not a raid. Its a way to access all the space of the disks under a share. So I access //storage/media and I have access to all 3 drives in the pool. I don't really care which one a specific file gets written too, is stored on. I can add to this storage by just buying the best sized disk, be it 1TB, 2, or 3 or even 4TB and just add it to the pool. Does not have to be the same speed either, etc.

If I have files that I want to survive a disk loss so that I don't have to restore from my backup, then you can set directories to have copies on more than 1 disk, etc. There are plenty of advantages to this method, and yes windows 8 spaces is along the same lines.

I can use different size disks, I don't waste space on parity when what I am storing does not require it. Sorry but my media files don't need parity - I can just rerip them if drive fails. I have them on digital storage because its easier to access that way.

Now my critical files like home video/pictures are BACKED UP!! In multiple locations on multiple disks and media. So copy on my computer, copy on the storage box (2 different disks in the pool) in the cloud on my webhost space, on dvd on my shelf in my home - and another dvd copy at my sons house in case my house its taken to OZ in the next big storm, etc.

"wants to take 60GB just for itself"

And where did you come up with that? That is min install size if I recall, not what it uses.

With what you wouldn't need to use raid 10? why would you need to use raid 10 in a home setup for ever?? That is OVERKILL for storing anything in your home.. You do understand that RAID is not a backup!

What could you possible have in home network that could not survive an outage for restore from backup? If you are running raid 10 in the home - your wasting money IMHO! I just don't see how to justify it.

The fact that when I used WHS2011 that is how it set up the drive 60GB for C:\ the rest of the drive was left for me to do what I liked, ahve looked at that drive pool app, looks good, so I may change from raid to that, seeing as it will do much the same thing :)

I am aware raid is not a back up that is why I have backups of backups and seeing as this pc came with 4 500gb hard drives it wasnt a waste, as it was in with the price, that is why I am posting here, to ask for advice on what people think based on the needs I have put up, if raid is overkill then I can change it, but unless I ask the questions how am I to get the answers ;)

What about encryption, do people think that is overkill for a home environment?

So your pc came with 4x500GB drives and then you setup up for raid 10 and got 500GB of usable space -- and you don't think that was a waste? When you could of had multiple different setups for better use. Shoot you could of done 500GB for your OS drive, and then put the other 3 in raid 5 and still had parity and gotten 1TB of space on your array with 500GB to use for your OS and installed programs, copy of files you didn't want to have to restore from backup in case you lost a drive in array, etc..

As to encryption - encryption of what? Who has physical access to the storage? Does the device with private information on it leave the home? Are you worried about theft of the device from someone breaking into your home? Do you plan on encrypting your backups that are also in your home - kind of pointless to encrypt your stuff and then have clear copy on external drive or optical media on the shelf, etc.

If someone stole your PC, does it matter that got copies of your home videos?

Comes down to what your trying to mitigate risk of?? Encryption is really only warranted when you don't have physical control of the device. Ie I wouldn't walk around with your thumbdrive with all your passwords in clear text for example - that could get lost or you could get mugged very easy. Now if they are sitting on your PC that does not leave your home, and your not worried about your house mates looking at them, etc. Then encryption might not be warranted??

Encryption is a great way to lower the risk of loss of your information in your files - it is also a great way to lock you out of your own data if you don't pay attention and understand what that AES 256 encryption your picking actually means.. Sorry there is not a back door, sorry but no your not going to be able to just run a crack on it and get your files in a few days. Your out of luck if you don't backup your keys and you use EFS, and then reinstall your OS overwriting your keys, etc..

Now me personally the only thing I have that really warrants encryption is my passwords. If someone broke into my home and stole my PC - this is the only thing I would be worried about them accessing. The passwords to my online accounts. So this is the only thing that I have encrypted using lastpass and keepass as my storage of such things. Now I don't have my browser storing passwords, etc.

Thanks for the advise budman - I use robo form for my online passwords and they have a password on them, so the only fear I have is people breaking in to the house, I guess it is unwarrented, although I do have the laptop encrypted as that has business info on, I bought the program you advised, looking forward to using it, looks extremely helpful :)

Server 2012 is a little out my price range atm, not to mention I would have to get AV for it as well......will need to think on this

If you qualify for Website Spark (depressingly easy to do), you can get Server 2012 Standard for $0USD (except download time).

If you qualify for Website Spark (depressingly easy to do), you can get Server 2012 Standard for $0USD (except download time).

Thanks!! Did as you suggested and as you say they let anyone in :) downloading en_windows_server_2012_x64_dvd_915478.iso now and at 7meg/sec download not a lot of time to wait :)

no you don't, both Windows 8 and Server 2012 have an anti-virus built in

Thought this was important to point out, since it looks as though OP is downloading Server 2012: Server 2012 does not include Windows Defender (anti-virus). Windows 8 does, but server does not.

I'm using WHS 2011 for over a year now, and it's very good. After initial setup it was one of the few "set it and forget it" installations that actually worked.

I'm checking once in while to see if all is good, and indeed all is good.

- I restored a PC that had a bad hard drive, and it went great. Also, I restored a single file from the backup, and it worked great.

- I'm streaming music to my windows phone, which is nice

- I can stream Blu-Ray rips without any problems

- XBOX streams MP4 video files

- I can remote access it from the web, and upload files - which is handy.

The only thing to uncheck is the MP3 tags feature, that "fix" your MP3 tags...

It's also super cheap... 49$....

Last time I tried the backup function of Windows Home server 2011 - on a Gbit network I was getting 4meg a second, when I did it manually using another program I was getting 70meg/sec to and from it, also I got Windows Server 2012 Standard for $0 - you cant get cheaper than that :p

I will try it out and see what happens, I have it Imaged so shouldn't be too much of an issue

If you qualify for Website Spark (depressingly easy to do), you can get Server 2012 Standard for $0USD (except download time).

Yeah that great -- but clearly doing what he wants with it is in violation of the EULA

"You may not use this software to: ? Develop or maintain Your own administrative or IT system"

Might as well have told him to warez it -- that is a FREE option as well.

I hate so suggest something else but I use Unraid for my server. It is free to have two storage drives and one backup drive. The beauty of Unraid is that it runs off a USB stick and you can backup several drives with only one backup drive. For example you could have 5 3TB drives full of videos and back them up with only one 3TB drive. The thing to keep in mind is that this only is effective if any one drive goes out. If two go out at the same time then you have a problem. There are people using it for twenty drives. It streams video very well for me.

Here is a link to it

http://lime-technology.com/technology

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Yup, that's a doozy right there 😄
    • It's a bundle of tools created by a variety of people, so things can go wrong sometimes. It's a great addition to Windows, and I use a lot of the tools on a daily basis. Also, it's still a 0.**** release so quick updates are to be expected 😉
    • Oh, I did. And it's even worse than I was hoping! Besides a lot of techno-babble jargon (yes I understand 100% of it but it's still all just techno-babble) there's 2 key points that make me super-weary about even considering testing this out. -- By default, after installation, a relay is automatically set up, so you do not need to care about that. * Non-chatmail apps use email servers as a long-term message archive while chatmail clients use email servers for ephemeral instant message relay. * Supporting the full variety of classic email setups would require considerable development and maintenance efforts, and complicate making chatmail-based messaging more resilient, reliable and fast. -- Basically, the end-user device is the 'server' (relay) so there is NO ARCHIVING whatsoever because every message is necessarily ephemeral. Great for techno-paranoia (and for illicit activities preferring no tracks to cover) but terrible for everybody else. It's also ironically contradictory to engineering principles of redundancies besides the transport layers due to the explicit absence of any persistent storage. Instead of 'classic email address' retaining multi-GB messaging archives on its server, now every device must retain 100% of those storage demands. (Email messages were originally meant to be short correspondences, not the multi-MB attachments boondoggle that now exists with unlimited spam engines flooding every potential recipient.) Any device swap or reset (or loss) makes the entire message history go bye-bye forever... lest there's an off-device auto-archival "relay" mechanism that's really a separate server that holds onto all transported messages (an email server) that utilizes 'chatmail email address' identities (like an email server) and its own persistent storage archive (like an email server). But... this solution is hoping to exist alongside real-world email address identities (based on the email server relay pathway) but simply render messages in chat thread format in an ephemeral manner (with contents being encrypted, and messages auto-expiring) ... In the end, it's a chat app/experience for the Web3/P2P-at-all-costs zealots. (I have accts on all sorts of federated web3 services so I understand the technical and non-technical alike.) For any practical users, however, it's just another service to download/install, register, cross-share id cards/qr codes, but know that there's no history/archive whatsoever (by design) so no account/message recovery whatsoever... update the device, install a bummed update patch, or dare upgrade your device... all history, poof, gone. Ya gotta start everything over again like they're a brand new person.
    • You've tried DuckDuckGo and Brave Search, now get serious with SearXNG by Paul Hill Over the last decade, it has become quite trendy to dump Google Search in favor of privacy-preserving alternatives such as DuckDuckGo, Startpage, and Brave Search. These search engines have done a very good job at highlighting dodgy practices by Google, such as adjusting search results based on what it thinks you’ll like (filter bubble) and stalking you around the web to advertise to you. While these search engines are good starting points when compared to non-private services like Google, there are still quite a few issues with them. For example, both DuckDuckGo and Brave Search require running non-free JavaScript in your web browser, which is comparable to running proprietary software on your computer, meaning you can be sure about what it’s actually doing in the background. Another issue is that these search engines are hosted on the respective companies’ servers, and you are using a service that you don’t control. Finally, DuckDuckGo, while offering privacy features, relies heavily on Microsoft’s infrastructure for its results and, in the past, has permitted Microsoft tracking scripts. If you are looking for a more private search solution than DuckDuckGo, Brave Search, and Startpage, then I recommend taking a look at SearXNG. It is a privacy-respecting metasearch engine that can be used via different public instances, which is useful for mobile users, or you can install it on your computer or server and run it locally with maximum control. Unlike Google, Bing, or Brave Search, which crawl the web and have their own search indexes, SearXNG is a metasearch engine, meaning it taps other search engines, stripping your identifying data, such as IP address, user agent, and cookies, in the process. Your search query is sent to the other search engines you enable before aggregating the results. SearXNG has deployment flexibility. If you are a casual user or a mobile user and don’t want to run SearXNG locally, you can use a public instance that is hosted by someone else. The main problem with this is that you are putting trust in the maintainer of the instance regarding stuff like logs that they may keep; good hosts should have a privacy policy explaining their policies. If you are trying to use SearXNG, you can also install the software on your device and then head to 127.0.0.1:8080 in your browser and search from there. While you don’t have to worry about a third-party admin like the public instances, search engines could ultimately block your IP address if they frown on you pulling in their search results locally. If you want to run it locally, it’s a good idea to use proxies or VPNs to hide your actual IP. You don’t have to worry about this with a public instance, as search engines never see your IP address. The main privacy benefit of using SearXNG is that it isolates your identity from the underlying engines that it’s capable of searching, such as Google and Bing. These search engines will only see requests coming from a generic server, so they can’t profile you and create a bubble filter that influences what results you see. This also ensures that your search engine doesn’t turn into an echo chamber that prevents you from reading alternative points of view. As a free software project, you are allowed to inspect SearXNG to make sure there are no negative features bundled inside. This sets it apart from the privacy search engines mentioned earlier because you can’t check their source code. As a meta search engine, you are not restricted to getting results from one source. Due to the fact that it scrapes content from other websites, your SearXNG instance will periodically get blocked from different providers, so it’s good to select a range of sources as a backup. While enabling all of the services will give you great results, this can make searching slower. I am personally happy with slower searches for the best results, but you can always check which providers are slowing down your search from the search results page and disable them to speed things up. If you want decent results quickly, enable the main search providers such as Google, Brave, DuckDuckGo, Qwant, Bing, and Yahoo. This way, you get wide coverage without the latency. On the Engines tab in Preferences, do note that there are different tabs, such as General, Images, and Videos, with their own providers that can be toggled and are not covered by "Enable all" while on the General tab, so be sure to dig into each. Just a note, if you want to enable everything, press "Enable all" in one tab, then hit save at the bottom of the page, then do the next tab, and so on. If you press "Enable all", then do that in each tab, and then save, nothing will stick. When I had just some of the search engines enabled, I searched “define nefarious” and results came back with the definition of “define” - obviously that was a sucky result. However, when I had everything enabled, it found dictionary pages for the word “nefarious” and even had an inline definition on the sidebar, which is quite nice too - that was delivered by WolframAlpha for anyone wondering! Probably the worst thing about this meta search engine is that the engines you select are saved with a cookie, so you must enable them on every new device you use SearXNG on, including if you decide to go into incognito mode with your web browser. Honestly, I would say this is the most annoying aspect, and perhaps if your browser lets you choose a separate private browsing search engine, then it would be best to use DuckDuckGo for this portion of your browsing. Another weakness of SearXNG is the random blocking of it by search providers. When you are on the results page, expand the “Response time” box, and it will show things like “Suspended: too many requests” or “access denied”. This is why it is good to enable several providers so that there is always a fallback to get results from. I won’t pretend SearXNG will be for everyone, however, if you enable all of the providers and put up with the slower response time, the results can be really amazing. Even if you don’t want to use it as your daily driver, keeping a bookmark handy that links to it is a good idea if you ever feel like doing a deep dive into a niche topic where other search engines are just failing to bring up any good result, due to the amount of sources it looks on. If you’re interested in radical user control over the software you use, installing SearXNG locally can also be a good idea, but be prepared to be temporarily blocked from sites if you trigger bot sensors without a VPN. Personally, I’ve opted to use a public instance, rather than install it myself. If you want to use it via a public instance, head over to searx.space to find a provider. Let us know in the comments if you have used SearXNG or its predecessor, Searx. What do you think about the quality of the results?
    • Dear Neowin, If it is not too much trouble, can you start using the new-ish designations for Insider Preview? "Experimental" is different than "former Dev" as it can apply to different models, eg 26H1 or 26H2 etc, right? No need to seed confusion IMHO. And, please "finally" update your graphics. OK?
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      503
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      226
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      158
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!