Advice or experience required - Moving files from DVD backups to external d

By Orange Battery
in General Discussion

 Share

Recommended Posts

Grand Master

Orange Battery

Posted
Posted

Back in 2004 I was a bit stupid and didn't really pay much attention to backups, I had them but they had no order or routine. One day I was very clever and deleted a partition containing most of my files.. recovery was limited as I used the partition for an XP install or testing Linux - maybe something else I was up to at the time.

I got everything that was important back, and realised the importance of CD and DVD backup. I now have around 300 data DVDs, everything on my system is backed up to DVD and a lot of my newer files from the last 4 or 5 years are on external drives as well. Instead of keeping files on DVD, I want to move them all to another external drive so they are easy to access, store and protect.

Im going to be using one of my old rigs to copy the data from each disc onto a new external drive which I purchased last week and secured via TrueCrypt.

What i would like to know is, how would you do this?

Do I put each disc in and copy the contents to its own disc specific folder?

Do I create ISO images of each disc and store them?

How do I make sure files have been copied correctly?

Is there software paid or free that can give me some automation?

Any experiences appreciated

Grand Master

ozgeek

Posted
Posted

I used to burn to DVDs but that's so ancient and chubbersome so I bought a couple external drives. I have 4 Seagate Expansion drives (one has been converted into an internal). two 1TB and two 2TB drives.

What I do is use the internal as my main data drive and then when I feel I need to back up, I just copy the contents of the data drive to each external drives. There's plenty of space left for TV recordings or downloads.

What you should do is to try to consolate all your dvds into one common folder (with subfolders) so you can just drag-copy this folder to other location.

Grand Master

Hum

Posted
Posted

I would still keep the DVDs as back-ups -- they are in many ways more reliable than today's hard/SSD drives.

Not sure if this will be helpful:

MD5 Checksum Verifier is files integrity checker based on the time proven MD5 algorithms.

With it you can easily create checksums of files and verify their integrity in the future. The operation is very easy, just two steps, make check file and verify check file.

http://www.tucows.co...ecksum-Verifier

Do I put each disc in and copy the contents to its own disc specific folder?

I would, to make sure that you copied all the discs.

Later, you can seperate the files into different folders, such as pictures, music, documents, etc.

Grand Master

xendrome

Posted
Posted

I'd use dropbox or carbonite to keep any data you want to keep from the DVDs and future backup. DVD media life isn't great after about 8-10 years, especially if the discs were written on with any type of non-water based marker

Community Regular

roguekiller23231

Posted
Posted

i created some backups back in 2004, all on dvd, the worst mistake i ever made, each disk takes about an hour to get the data off, some of the disks that claimed they would last '100 years' had become unreadable because the metal data area had curroded and blistered.

if i was you, create 1 folder, take everything off the disks and put them into that folder, then organizing everything that you have backed up (since you say you just backed up without thinking of organization) into separate folders.

the only discs that you should use for backups are archival type discs, which can be expensive if you need a lot of them, a HDD will be much better if stored correctly.

i keep 1 2TB drive for backups only, i don't compress or zip the files, dont create iso files, just organized the files into folders, this way if there is any data corruption only a few files will be effected rather than a whole iso/zip file of backups.

if you want to be sure that all the data off the discs has been transfered over use this

CD recovery toolbox

http://download.cnet.com/CD-Recovery-Toolbox-Free/3000-2352_4-10646814.html

you will have to select all the files you want to 'recover' and it will copy them all over, any that are bad/currupted/unreadable will try to recover and copy.

Grand Master

Orange Battery

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Thanks for the info everyone. I have decided to use SyncBack Pro (mainly because I already own it). I am copying each desk into its own folder based upon the time that the original DVD was created, I am then running a MD5 checksum to confirm all data was copied across (Syncback has this ability but is so slow).

Once the process is complete, I will have data on my internal drives, backed up to two separate external drives.

Grand Master

+Warwagon MVC

Posted
  • MVC
Posted

Thanks for the info everyone. I have decided to use SyncBack Pro (mainly because I already own it). I am copying each desk into its own folder based upon the time that the original DVD was created, I am then running a MD5 checksum to confirm all data was copied across (Syncback has this ability but is so slow).

Once the process is complete, I will have data on my internal drives, backed up to two separate external drives.

Good Man. I love syncback pro. I backup small important files to DVD (and external drives) everything else gets put on internal / external drives. Just don't forget to also have off site external drive backups. Always plan for the worst. My personal rule of thumb is that if I buy a 1 or 2 TB data drive I buy 2 of them 1 for the data one for the backup. For Cheap external off site drives, I would recommend an e-sata dock. As it makes it cheap because you can buy regular internal drives, and fast because you can just stick one of those drives in the sata dock, back it up and pull it out.

if you really want to go overboard you can get a safety deposit box at the bank and every month rotate your backups. That's my preferred offsite backup method. As well as with carbonite, but I don't save all my large iso's to carbonite.

My personal rule is that the offsite backup is never at my house at the same time as my other external drive backup. Which is why once a month I backup to my second 3TB drive and take it to the bank to swap them out. I have 2 3TB drives

Offsite 1-1

Offsite 1-2

One stays at the bank and one stays at my house and every month they get swapped.

Also in my computer is another backup drive which backups up all my large stuff nightly.

I also have an external USB drive for my mom. Every Sunday I go to their house for breakfast. I take that drive and plug it into her computer run sync back then disconnect it and take it home with me. She also has an external nightly backup drive on her desk.

Proficient

JJ_

Posted
Posted

Warwagon, I admire your effort. I've held off buying new larger drives but I'm going to have to take the plunge soon. I used to be a huge Seagate fanboy but ever since they moved production to China their drives have been getting terrible reviews. What make/model are your 3TB drives?

Grand Master

+Warwagon MVC

Posted
  • MVC
Posted

Warwagon, I admire your effort. I've held off buying new larger drives but I'm going to have to take the plunge soon. I used to be a huge Seagate fanboy but ever since they moved production to China their drives have been getting terrible reviews. What make/model are your 3TB drives?

WD Green.

I just really like the easy WD RMA procedure. I know that's planning on the drives dying, but if they do under warranty they make it a far less painful procedure as others.

Grand Master

Orange Battery

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Good Man. I love syncback pro. I backup small important files to DVD (and external drives) everything else gets put on internal / external drives. Just don't forget to also have off site external drive backups. Always plan for the worst. My personal rule of thumb is that if I buy a 1 or 2 TB data drive I buy 2 of them 1 for the data one for the backup. For Cheap external off site drives, I would recommend an e-sata dock. As it makes it cheap because you can buy regular internal drives, and fast because you can just stick one of those drives in the sata dock, back it up and pull it out.

if you really want to go overboard you can get a safety deposit box at the bank and every month rotate your backups. That's my preferred offsite backup method. As well as with carbonite, but I don't save all my large iso's to carbonite.

My personal rule is that the offsite backup is never at my house at the same time as my other external drive backup. Which is why once a month I backup to my second 3TB drive and take it to the bank to swap them out. I have 2 3TB drives

Offsite 1-1

Offsite 1-2

One stays at the bank and one stays at my house and every month they get swapped.

Also in my computer is another backup drive which backups up all my large stuff nightly.

I also have an external USB drive for my mom. Every Sunday I go to their house for breakfast. I take that drive and plug it into her computer run sync back then disconnect it and take it home with me. She also has an external nightly backup drive on her desk.

Great stuff. I have been surprised by DVD. I started using Datawrite discs back in 2004 and every single one of them has been fine, Im now into 2007 and still not one problem.

Definitely gonna keep them, but not back so much up on them in future.

  • 1 month later...
Proficient

JJ_

Posted
Posted

WD Green.

I just really like the easy WD RMA procedure. I know that's planning on the drives dying, but if they do under warranty they make it a far less painful procedure as others.

Damn, the greens and Seagates latest offering have some bad reviews which is why I've been putting off getting a new drive for a while. Looks like I'll have to get 2 identical drives instead and mirror them in raid 1 instead of tempting faith.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Posts

    • Why Delta Chat is the best decentralized messenger you have probably never tried

      By Nas · Posted

      Oh, I did. And it's even worse than I was hoping! Besides a lot of techno-babble jargon (yes I understand 100% of it but it's still all just techno-babble) there's 2 key points that make me super-weary about even considering testing this out. -- By default, after installation, a relay is automatically set up, so you do not need to care about that. * Non-chatmail apps use email servers as a long-term message archive while chatmail clients use email servers for ephemeral instant message relay. * Supporting the full variety of classic email setups would require considerable development and maintenance efforts, and complicate making chatmail-based messaging more resilient, reliable and fast. -- Basically, the end-user device is the 'server' (relay) so there is NO ARCHIVING whatsoever because every message is necessarily ephemeral. Great for techno-paranoia (and for illicit activities preferring no tracks to cover) but terrible for everybody else. It's also ironically contradictory to engineering principles of redundancies besides the transport layers due to the explicit absence of any persistent storage. Instead of 'classic email address' retaining multi-GB messaging archives on its server, now every device must retain 100% of those storage demands. (Email messages were originally meant to be short correspondences, not the multi-MB attachments boondoggle that now exists with unlimited spam engines flooding every potential recipient.) Any device swap or reset (or loss) makes the entire message history go bye-bye forever... lest there's an off-device auto-archival "relay" mechanism that's really a separate server that holds onto all transported messages (an email server) that utilizes 'chatmail email address' identities (like an email server) and its own persistent storage archive (like an email server). But... this solution is hoping to exist alongside real-world email address identities (based on the email server relay pathway) but simply render messages in chat thread format in an ephemeral manner (with contents being encrypted, and messages auto-expiring) ... In the end, it's a chat app/experience for the Web3/P2P-at-all-costs zealots. (I have accts on all sorts of federated web3 services so I understand the technical and non-technical alike.) For any practical users, however, it's just another service to download/install, register, cross-share id cards/qr codes, but know that there's no history/archive whatsoever (by design) so no account/message recovery whatsoever... update the device, install a bummed update patch, or dare upgrade your device... all history, poof, gone. Ya gotta start everything over again like they're a brand new person.
    • You've tried DuckDuckGo and Brave Search, now get serious with SearXNG

      By zikalify · Posted

      You've tried DuckDuckGo and Brave Search, now get serious with SearXNG by Paul Hill Over the last decade, it has become quite trendy to dump Google Search in favor of privacy-preserving alternatives such as DuckDuckGo, Startpage, and Brave Search. These search engines have done a very good job at highlighting dodgy practices by Google, such as adjusting search results based on what it thinks you’ll like (filter bubble) and stalking you around the web to advertise to you. While these search engines are good starting points when compared to non-private services like Google, there are still quite a few issues with them. For example, both DuckDuckGo and Brave Search require running non-free JavaScript in your web browser, which is comparable to running proprietary software on your computer, meaning you can be sure about what it’s actually doing in the background. Another issue is that these search engines are hosted on the respective companies’ servers, and you are using a service that you don’t control. Finally, DuckDuckGo, while offering privacy features, relies heavily on Microsoft’s infrastructure for its results and, in the past, has permitted Microsoft tracking scripts. If you are looking for a more private search solution than DuckDuckGo, Brave Search, and Startpage, then I recommend taking a look at SearXNG. It is a privacy-respecting metasearch engine that can be used via different public instances, which is useful for mobile users, or you can install it on your computer or server and run it locally with maximum control. Unlike Google, Bing, or Brave Search, which crawl the web and have their own search indexes, SearXNG is a metasearch engine, meaning it taps other search engines, stripping your identifying data, such as IP address, user agent, and cookies, in the process. Your search query is sent to the other search engines you enable before aggregating the results. SearXNG has deployment flexibility. If you are a casual user or a mobile user and don’t want to run SearXNG locally, you can use a public instance that is hosted by someone else. The main problem with this is that you are putting trust in the maintainer of the instance regarding stuff like logs that they may keep; good hosts should have a privacy policy explaining their policies. If you are trying to use SearXNG, you can also install the software on your device and then head to 127.0.0.1:8080 in your browser and search from there. While you don’t have to worry about a third-party admin like the public instances, search engines could ultimately block your IP address if they frown on you pulling in their search results locally. If you want to run it locally, it’s a good idea to use proxies or VPNs to hide your actual IP. You don’t have to worry about this with a public instance, as search engines never see your IP address. The main privacy benefit of using SearXNG is that it isolates your identity from the underlying engines that it’s capable of searching, such as Google and Bing. These search engines will only see requests coming from a generic server, so they can’t profile you and create a bubble filter that influences what results you see. This also ensures that your search engine doesn’t turn into an echo chamber that prevents you from reading alternative points of view. As a free software project, you are allowed to inspect SearXNG to make sure there are no negative features bundled inside. This sets it apart from the privacy search engines mentioned earlier because you can’t check their source code. As a meta search engine, you are not restricted to getting results from one source. Due to the fact that it scrapes content from other websites, your SearXNG instance will periodically get blocked from different providers, so it’s good to select a range of sources as a backup. While enabling all of the services will give you great results, this can make searching slower. I am personally happy with slower searches for the best results, but you can always check which providers are slowing down your search from the search results page and disable them to speed things up. If you want decent results quickly, enable the main search providers such as Google, Brave, DuckDuckGo, Qwant, Bing, and Yahoo. This way, you get wide coverage without the latency. On the Engines tab in Preferences, do note that there are different tabs, such as General, Images, and Videos, with their own providers that can be toggled and are not covered by "Enable all" while on the General tab, so be sure to dig into each. Just a note, if you want to enable everything, press "Enable all" in one tab, then hit save at the bottom of the page, then do the next tab, and so on. If you press "Enable all", then do that in each tab, and then save, nothing will stick. When I had just some of the search engines enabled, I searched “define nefarious” and results came back with the definition of “define” - obviously that was a sucky result. However, when I had everything enabled, it found dictionary pages for the word “nefarious” and even had an inline definition on the sidebar, which is quite nice too - that was delivered by WolframAlpha for anyone wondering! Probably the worst thing about this meta search engine is that the engines you select are saved with a cookie, so you must enable them on every new device you use SearXNG on, including if you decide to go into incognito mode with your web browser. Honestly, I would say this is the most annoying aspect, and perhaps if your browser lets you choose a separate private browsing search engine, then it would be best to use DuckDuckGo for this portion of your browsing. Another weakness of SearXNG is the random blocking of it by search providers. When you are on the results page, expand the “Response time” box, and it will show things like “Suspended: too many requests” or “access denied”. This is why it is good to enable several providers so that there is always a fallback to get results from. I won’t pretend SearXNG will be for everyone, however, if you enable all of the providers and put up with the slower response time, the results can be really amazing. Even if you don’t want to use it as your daily driver, keeping a bookmark handy that links to it is a good idea if you ever feel like doing a deep dive into a niche topic where other search engines are just failing to bring up any good result, due to the amount of sources it looks on. If you’re interested in radical user control over the software you use, installing SearXNG locally can also be a good idea, but be prepared to be temporarily blocked from sites if you trigger bot sensors without a VPN. Personally, I’ve opted to use a public instance, rather than install it myself. If you want to use it via a public instance, head over to searx.space to find a provider. Let us know in the comments if you have used SearXNG or its predecessor, Searx. What do you think about the quality of the results?
    • Windows 11 is getting redesigned taskbar settings in new build

      By Captain_Eric · Posted

      Dear Neowin, If it is not too much trouble, can you start using the new-ish designations for Insider Preview? "Experimental" is different than "former Dev" as it can apply to different models, eg 26H1 or 26H2 etc, right? No need to seed confusion IMHO. And, please "finally" update your graphics. OK?
    • Why Delta Chat is the best decentralized messenger you have probably never tried

      By zikalify · Posted

      Did you see their FAQ, its quite good. Have a look in the Advanced section. https://delta.chat/en/help
    • Apple MacBook Neo is a blessing for Windows users, here's why

      By Pandadriver · Posted

      Just install Linux Mint that is a real blessing and many times cheaper because you can continue using your old Windows computer/laptop with the latest Linux updates.

  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      tuben earned a badge
      Week One Done

  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      502
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      226
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      158
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
    Show More

  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!