Recommended Posts

Internal IP you can just setup a static IP address on your computer, or do it on the router. with Windows 7 it is very easy, go into the properties on your network adapter and manually enter a static IP address.

post-120066-0-77165700-1356792858.png

Internal IP you can just setup a static IP address on your computer, or do it on the router. with Windows 7 it is very easy, go into the properties on your network adapter and manually enter a static IP address.

^^ This

I'd do it in the router though by assigning an IP to your Mac address so you don't get any IP conflicts.

DHCP shouldn't assign an IP to any device if another device on the network has that IP, be it static or Automatically Assign

I have static on my PC and Automatic on just about everything else and never get a conflict

"DHCP shouldn't assign an IP to any device if another device on the network has that IP, be it static or Automatically Assign"

It shouldn't no - but its a VERY VERY BAD idea to setup static IPs on the host that fall within the dhcp scope.

So for example if your dhcp server hands out 192.168.1.100 to .150, and you want to setup a static on the host itself then it is better option to use 192.168.1.1 to 99, or .151 to .254

Keeping in mind whatever other statics you might have set, your routers static IP, etc.

Yes depending on your dhcp server and and even dhcp client, you should not hand out dupe IPs. Your dhcp server could check for them before it hands out, or even the client when gets an offer for specific IP can check to see if any other host has that IP and then send the dhcp server a decline message

DHCPDECLINE

Sent by a client to a specific server in response to a DHCPACK message, which contain parameters which the client has determined are not in fact valid. For example, the client might test an IP address it has received by sending an ARP (Address Resolution Protocol) message on its shared LAN to see if any other host has been assigned this address; if it discovers that another host is in fact using this address, it must send a DHCPDECLINE message to the server which supplied the address. This both allows the server to release the resources it has allocated to this client, and inform a system administrator of the problem. (Such a problem might arise in a situation in which a host has been manually configured by an administrator with an IP address, but the DHCP server hasn?t been informed that this address is no longer available in its pool. Though it is suggested that a server test an address before allocating it to a client [1, section 3.1, point 2], for example by ?pinging? the address to see if another host is using it, it may be that the test or the response to it is lost, incorrectly suggesting to the server that the address is available.)

But not all dhcp clients support this, nor do all dhcp servers -- the dhcp servers in soho routers are normally very limited in features, etc..

Normally its a better idea to setup a reservation on your dhcp server to always hand out same IP to host normally based on its mac yes. This way host can get other updated info you might hand out in dhcp, dns, gateway, local domain, ntp server, etc. etc. But either works be it you set the static on the host or setup a reservation.

"DHCP shouldn't assign an IP to any device if another device on the network has that IP, be it static or Automatically Assign"

It shouldn't no - but its a VERY VERY BAD idea to setup static IPs on the host that fall within the dhcp scope.

So for example if your dhcp server hands out 192.168.1.100 to .150, and you want to setup a static on the host itself then it is better option to use 192.168.1.1 to 99, or .151 to .254

Keeping in mind whatever other statics you might have set, your routers static IP, etc.

Yes depending on your dhcp server and and even dhcp client, you should not hand out dupe IPs. Your dhcp server could check for them before it hands out, or even the client when gets an offer for specific IP can check to see if any other host has that IP and then send the dhcp server a decline message

DHCPDECLINE

Sent by a client to a specific server in response to a DHCPACK message, which contain parameters which the client has determined are not in fact valid. For example, the client might test an IP address it has received by sending an ARP (Address Resolution Protocol) message on its shared LAN to see if any other host has been assigned this address; if it discovers that another host is in fact using this address, it must send a DHCPDECLINE message to the server which supplied the address. This both allows the server to release the resources it has allocated to this client, and inform a system administrator of the problem. (Such a problem might arise in a situation in which a host has been manually configured by an administrator with an IP address, but the DHCP server hasn?t been informed that this address is no longer available in its pool. Though it is suggested that a server test an address before allocating it to a client [1, section 3.1, point 2], for example by ?pinging? the address to see if another host is using it, it may be that the test or the response to it is lost, incorrectly suggesting to the server that the address is available.)

But not all dhcp clients support this, nor do all dhcp servers -- the dhcp servers in soho routers are normally very limited in features, etc..

Normally its a better idea to setup a reservation on your dhcp server to always hand out same IP to host normally based on its mac yes. This way host can get other updated info you might hand out in dhcp, dns, gateway, local domain, ntp server, etc. etc. But either works be it you set the static on the host or setup a reservation.

Thanks for the explanation, just realised that I have done exactly that, DHCP from .100 with maximum 50 clients, main PC static on .3

Also running DD-WRT so hopefully had I not done that, would have been slightly more advanced than the average firmware and managed to avoid my static :)

My router has something called "static DHCP" accessed from the following RCP area:

More settings>Network Settings>LAN settings>Set Static DHCP>

It has the following options:

  • IP Address:
  • MAC Address:
  • Comment:

Description: Reserve an IP address for a specific user. Enter the IP Address that you would like to use and enter the MAC Address for the user that will be associated to this IP address .
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Linux 7.2's first release candidate gets off to a good start by Paul Hill Credit: Larry Ewing It has been a few weeks since the release of Linux 7.1, and in that time, the Linux 7.2 merge window has been open, where developers can submit their features and patches ready for the upcoming release. That window is now shut, and the release candidate phase has begun so that new features can be tested and further fixes applied. According to the founder of Linux, Linus Torvalds, this week’s release candidate looks “reasonably normal”. Although we are super early in the release candidates, this is a good sign as it makes it more likely that an eighth release candidate will not be needed. Torvalds even mentioned that the update’s stats are only larger than they really are because there was another AMD header drop with a third of the patch just being AMD GPU register definitions, which aren’t big changes but make the code contributed look larger overall. In addition to this, he noted that just over half the patch is drivers, even when excluding the AMD register dump. The rest of the changes are spread out over architecture updates, tooling, documentation, and core kernel updates. In the next week, Torvalds says that he will be chilling out, taking the week “mostly off”. Despite this, he will be reading emails and keeping up with things, so if he is slow responding, now you know why. He said he is hoping for a calm week, but we will just have to see if the second release candidate is actually like that. We should expect seven or eight release candidates before Linux 7.2 is released, so expect it around the end of August. If you missed it a few weeks ago, be sure to check out our coverage of Linux 7.1's release.
    • Ridiculous claim that the labor cost difference of $6000 annually would increase cost per phone by $200. The employees produce 3 phones per month or what?
    • Sparkle 2.20.1 by Razvan Serea Sparkle is a free, open-source Windows optimization tool designed to make your PC faster, cleaner, and more private. With Sparkle, you can easily debloat Windows by removing unnecessary apps and services, disable Microsoft tracking to enhance privacy, and apply performance tweaks to boost speed. Its cleaner removes junk and temporary files, while every change is safe and fully reversible. Sparkle also features a modern, user-friendly interface with automatic updates, making system maintenance simple. Explore over 39 tweaks, from disabling telemetry and hibernation to optimizing network and game settings, all aimed at customizing and enhancing your Windows experience. Sparkle supports Windows 10 and 11. Sparkle 2.20.1 changelog: You can now change the Animation Direction from Up, Left, or Off. Added configurable animation direction (Up, Left, Off) for improved accessibility Added TTL caching to the system info backend Refactored tweak application flow to await NvidiaProfileInspector Improved IPC listener cleanup to correctly remove specific listeners Fixed online status not updating after successful network requests Updated system info tests to support backend caching Removed electron-toolkit utils dependency in favor of internal is.dev helper Fixed unwanted files and folders being included in application bundles Download: Sparkle 2.20.1 | Portable | ~100.0 MB (Open Source) Links: Sparkle Website | Github | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Never used the G7 Pro, but I've never had a good experience with that style of d-pad and fighting games.
    • And I just bought a seat cushion for my mesh chair. The chair feels nice but the first time I sat in it with boxers, I realized I don't like the feel of mesh on my legs. 😂
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      JKR earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Dedicated
      Asgardi earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      496
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      247
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      154
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      86
    5. 5
      macoman
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!