Battlefield 3 on 3 screens; Eyefinity. Is it worth it?


Recommended Posts

Does anyone here have any positive experiences with a 3 screen eyefinity set up?

http://www.amd.com/us/products/technologies/amd-eyefinity-technology/Pages/eyefinity.aspx

I'm not worried about the power/performance aspect. I'm more wondering if the investment in another 2 identical screens would pay off in a memorable way or is it more of a gimmick?

I'm using a 24" monitor, too big?

About as useful as using three screens for gaming. Personally it is just a way to say "look i have money to burn". :laugh:

Unless it allows you to customize each screen then i don't see the point to multi-monitor gaming. Supreme Commander if i remember correctly, that allowed you to use a big map for the second monitor.

i'd say you'd be wasting your money. BF3 looks great, but isnt a very memorable game. i might not even play it again even though i enjoyed my run-through. That being said, you're better off getting a card that can max out the settings in the game. That's where the game really shines.

BF3 looks great, but isnt a very memorable game.

you're better off getting a card that can max out the settings in the game.

I've had some very memorable moments but I play with a group of RL friends on TS. Maxing the settings isn't an issue.

The bezels

Then where is the 3x extra wide monitor with 48:9 resolution?

Is it possible to make a, say 46", display a 48:9 res with black bars?

According to AMD's website; the center screen, in an eyefinity setup, is the same display as playing on a single screen. The right and left monitors add that much more to the peripheral viewing, which I find to be a great advantage.

i'd say you'd be wasting your money. BF3 looks great, but isnt a very memorable game. i might not even play it again even though i enjoyed my run-through. That being said, you're better off getting a card that can max out the settings in the game. That's where the game really shines.

Erm. You must be talking about single player. BF3 is one of the most memorable games out. Why anyone would ever play even half the campaign is beyond me. Load it back up and jump into multiplayer. Youll invest over 100 hours easy.

Erm. You must be talking about single player. BF3 is one of the most memorable games out. Why anyone would ever play even half the campaign is beyond me. Load it back up and jump into multiplayer. Youll invest over 100 hours easy.

i liked the single player. it's just not something i'm clamoring to play over and over. i dont do multiplayer. too much time and you never beat it!

But how can the bezels be that much of an issue if the center screen remains identical whether or not it's solo or with 2 others...?

Your focus would not change.

The left and right screens act as peripheral enhancements allowing you to spot important items/enemies sooner.

It seems to me, unless I am missing something, that a 3 screen set-up is a obvious and big advantage.

i liked the single player. it's just not something i'm clamoring to play over and over. i dont do multiplayer. too much time and you never beat it!

I beat opposing teams every night in BF3? You could also level up fully and unlock all weapons, mods and assignments - this I suppose could count as "beating" the game although I'm not too familiar with the term I play for fun - even singleplayer games I will usually play 50% of them and then move on because I get bored.

Those screens look great, I would try it out but I only have 2 montiors :laugh: You can imagine how bad that would be for a fps.....

As someone with 3 screens, I can tell you that after about 30 secs you never notice the bezels. For an overview of what bf3 looks like have a look here.

http://www.wsgf.org/dr/battlefield-3

Thank you. This is a helpful link.

I think I'm going to have to give it a try.

  • 1 month later...

i liked the single player. it's just not something i'm clamoring to play over and over. i dont do multiplayer. too much time and you never beat it!

The single-player was the most slapped together part. BATTLEFIELD is multiplayer, that's what it originally started out as, without any single player; iirc.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • With the current hardware prices Microsoft should lift the restriction. Then if you have the correct TPM then allow you to use X feature, if you don't have the correct TPM then don't but still actually let you run windows. 11. With a disclaimer during install that X features would be unavailable.
    • It's good for recycling of course. But commence inflation of a second hand RAM bubble and price gouging on DDR 4 inventory in 3... 2... 1...
    • Bypassed Windows 11 shows surprising stability on ancient, completely unsupported hardware by Sayan Sen When Windows 11 was first released, one of the most complained-about issues with the new desktop Microsoft OS was its higher system requirements, which pushed many relatively modern and powerful processors and devices onto the officially unsupported list. Thankfully, they have not been updated again for the base OS, though systems require four times the memory and storage if they want to run AI-powered apps and features. As such, Windows 11 technically runs on 4GB of memory, and there is no imposed restriction on the generation of memory it supports. Speaking of memory, prices are extremely high nowadays for hardware, especially DDR5 and DDR4 kits due to the current silicon shortage, and there are also reports of it affecting DDR2 as well, and it might only be a matter of time before even DDR1 gets affected. Before that could happen, an enthusiast took an ancient DDR1-based system and decided to try out Windows 11 on it to see how well the modern OS would fare on such hardware. The system runs an outdated graphics card interface standard based on AGP, or Advanced Graphics Port, called AGP 3.0 or AGP8x. AGP was essentially succeeded by the modern PCI Express (PCIe) bus standard. The user behind the experiment is retro hardware enthusiast Omores, who built the system around an ASRock ConRoe865PE motherboard based on Intel's i865PE chipset from way back in 2003, around the time when AGP was still in fashion. What made this board special back in the day was its unusual support for newer Core 2 Duo and even Core 2 Quad processors while still retaining older DDR1 memory support and an AGP8X graphics slot, making it an ideal bridge or link between two vastly different generations. Powering the machine was Intel's Core 2 Quad Q6600 alongside 3GB of DDR1 RAM and an ATI Radeon HD 4650 AGP graphics card, one of the final and most capable GPUs released for the aging AGP interface. While installing Windows 11 itself was relatively easy by bypassing Microsoft's hardware checks, getting the graphics card fully functional proved to be some challenge. Microsoft had quietly dropped native AGP support after the earliest releases of Windows 10, meaning newer versions of Windows no longer include the necessary Graphics Address Remapping Table (GART) drivers required for proper AGP acceleration. Without them, AGP graphics cards typically boot up, though with limited functionality, and can often throw a Code 43 error in Device Manager. To work around the limitation, Omores extracted Intel's legacy AGP440 SYS driver from an early Windows 10 release and paired it with a modified INF file so Windows 11 would correctly recognize the chipset. Following this and combined with AMD's final 64-bit Catalyst AGP drivers from 2012, the Radeon HD 4650 was able to operate with full AGP 8X acceleration intact. The result was said to be surprisingly usable for hardware that is over two decades old. Hardware-accelerated H.264 video playback worked correctly and benefited apps like Firefox, while legacy applications and games ran without major graphical issues. The system also successfully completed the 3DMark 2001 benchmark, although performance naturally lagged behind what the same hardware achieves under Windows 7, which is significantly lighter than Windows 11. There was, however, one unavoidable limitation as Microsoft's Windows 11 version 24H2 introduces a mandatory SSE4.2 CPU instruction requirement that cannot be bypassed through installer modifications or registry tweaks. Since no AGP-era processor supports SSE4.2, Windows 11 version 23H2 effectively becomes the final release capable of running on such systems. Regardless, it is still a very cool feat and quite fascinating to see just how stable Windows 11 turned out to be on such unfamiliar hardware. Source: Omores (Patreon) via O_MORES (Reddit)
    • That will only really help other players that are also responsible for creating the problem.
    • Well, it's good to know that they have found a workaround to a problem that they helped create, I guess...
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      538
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      266
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      98
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!