Posted 15 January 2013 - 02:52
Posted 15 January 2013 - 02:53
Posted 15 January 2013 - 02:57
It's not even worth discussing this review. All the independent reviewers including the most knowledgeable (AnandTech, Tech Report, etc) have repeatedly and uniformly demonstrated that Ivy Bridge just trounces Vishera in games, as well as any application where single-threaded performance matters. Heck, Vishera fails to beat the ancient Phenom II in many tests. It's not necessarily a bad value, but trying to claim that it's faster than the i5 3570K in games will take a lot more convincing than that.
If all those "paid" Website really pushed down AMD to make Intel shine brighter, I think AMD would have done something about it.
So, is AMD being stupid for not doing anything or is it a fact that Intel i5 is (quite) faster, that is the question.... But I think I'm going to keep on reading AnandTech or TomsHardware for my CPU info...
Posted 15 January 2013 - 03:40
Nope. He says multiple times he's using a Radeon 7870.I'm pretty sure this guy is only testing the integrated gpu on the respective chips. Any serious gamer would have a discrete card, making this review irrelevant to most people. On the CPU side, the intel solution trounces. No fanboyism, just facts.
Posted 15 January 2013 - 03:58
Nope. He says multiple times he's using a Radeon 7870.
Though I think some of these results are a bit weird, as I get slightly higher framerates in metro 2033 with my weaker gtx 660 and first gen i7.