Welcome Guest! To access all forums & features, please register an account or sign-in. → Why register?



AMD's Vishera 8350 outclasses Intel's Core i7


42 replies to this topic * * * - - 4 votes

#1 humanz.

    Neowinian Wise One

  • 4,635 posts
  • Joined: 04-November 09
  • Location: United States of America
  • OS: Windows 7/Gentoo

Posted 14 January 2013 - 20:43



A lot of paid reviewers favor the Intel chip compared to AMD's latest offering but this dude right here is gonna break down what's what with Piledriver


#2 ahhell

    Neowinian DOMINATING

  • 8,332 posts
  • Joined: 30-June 03
  • Location: Winnipeg - coldest place on Earth - yeah

Posted 14 January 2013 - 20:52

"A lot of paid reviewers favor the Intel chip compared to AMD's latest offering"

:rolleyes:

#3 LaP

    Forget about it

  • 3,207 posts
  • Joined: 10-July 06
  • Location: Quebec City, Canada
  • OS: Windows 8 Pro

Posted 14 January 2013 - 20:56

It's a conspiracy

#4 tim_s

    Default

  • 324 posts
  • Joined: 07-January 13
  • OS: OSX (Macbook Pro i7), Windows 7 (Gaming), Gentoo
  • Phone: Samsung Galaxy SIII, iPhone 4s

Posted 14 January 2013 - 21:00

The wife bought the pile driver - she likes it. Needed to replace the stock cooler but other than that - zero complaints. Games on it quite frequently - I will see if she will bench it against my i7 and see what happens with Crysis 2.

#5 +Asik

  • 6,021 posts
  • Joined: 26-October 05

Posted 15 January 2013 - 02:52

It's not even worth discussing this review. All the independent reviewers including the most knowledgeable (AnandTech, Tech Report, etc) have repeatedly and uniformly demonstrated that Ivy Bridge just trounces Vishera in games, as well as any application where single-threaded performance matters. Heck, Vishera fails to beat the ancient Phenom II in many tests. It's not necessarily a bad value, but trying to claim that it's faster than the i5 3570K in games will take a lot more convincing than that.

#6 +TruckWEB

    Neowinian Wise One

  • 3,983 posts
  • Joined: 27-December 01
  • Location: Quebec, Canada

Posted 15 January 2013 - 02:53

If all those "paid" Website really pushed down AMD to make Intel shine brighter, I think AMD would have done something about it.

So, is AMD being stupid for not doing anything or is it a fact that Intel i5 is (quite) faster, that is the question.... But I think I'm going to keep on reading AnandTech or TomsHardware for my CPU info...

#7 Kamran Mackey

    Apple Fanatic

  • 135 posts
  • Joined: 30-September 12
  • Location: New York, NY
  • OS: Windows 8 Professional x64
  • Phone: Nokia Lumia 920

Posted 15 January 2013 - 02:55

AMD is pretty awesome. But Intel is the best. All processors Intel makes now are fast, and stable. I'm a person who has a Celeron processor in my laptop, yet it should have a i3 at least as my laptop was made in 2011...

#8 Draconian Guppy

    Neowinian DOMINATING

  • 8,850 posts
  • Joined: 22-August 04
  • Location: Neowin

Posted 15 January 2013 - 02:57

View PostDr_Asik, on 15 January 2013 - 02:52, said:

It's not even worth discussing this review. All the independent reviewers including the most knowledgeable (AnandTech, Tech Report, etc) have repeatedly and uniformly demonstrated that Ivy Bridge just trounces Vishera in games, as well as any application where single-threaded performance matters. Heck, Vishera fails to beat the ancient Phenom II in many tests. It's not necessarily a bad value, but trying to claim that it's faster than the i5 3570K in games will take a lot more convincing than that.

View PostTruckWEB, on 15 January 2013 - 02:53, said:

If all those "paid" Website really pushed down AMD to make Intel shine brighter, I think AMD would have done something about it.

So, is AMD being stupid for not doing anything or is it a fact that Intel i5 is (quite) faster, that is the question.... But I think I'm going to keep on reading AnandTech or TomsHardware for my CPU info...

What they said 10X....

#9 DigitalManifestations

    Neowinian Senior

  • 1,528 posts
  • Joined: 16-January 04
  • Location: Oregon
  • OS: Windows 7 64bit
  • Phone: Samsung Galaxy SII

Posted 15 January 2013 - 03:05

That reviewer is paid by AMD to push Intel down

Yep.

#10 Nothing Here

    Neowinian Senior

  • 2,164 posts
  • Joined: 23-February 08
  • Location: California, U.S.A.
  • OS: Windows 8 Pro / Kororaa 17

Posted 15 January 2013 - 03:06

Well, I personally love AMD. If I had the cash, I would build a system with the Vishera and an i7 system and do my own benchmarks. But even though I'm an AMD lover, to this day, I have not seen and AMD out perform an i7 in any benchmarks.

#11 adam7288

    Neowinian

  • 99 posts
  • Joined: 12-March 09

Posted 15 January 2013 - 03:24

I'm pretty sure this guy is only testing the integrated gpu on the respective chips. Any serious gamer would have a discrete card, making this review irrelevant to most people. On the CPU side, the intel solution trounces. No fanboyism, just facts.

#12 +SharpGreen

    Now with built-in BS detector.

  • 1,900 posts
  • Joined: 20-August 04
  • Location: North Carolina
  • OS: Ubuntu 13.04 & 13.10/Windows 8
  • Phone: Galaxy Nexus

Posted 15 January 2013 - 03:40

View Postadam7288, on 15 January 2013 - 03:24, said:

I'm pretty sure this guy is only testing the integrated gpu on the respective chips. Any serious gamer would have a discrete card, making this review irrelevant to most people. On the CPU side, the intel solution trounces. No fanboyism, just facts.
Nope. He says multiple times he's using a Radeon 7870.

Though I think some of these results are a bit weird, as I get slightly higher framerates in metro 2033 with my weaker gtx 660 and first gen i7.

#13 Dushmany

    I cannot Teach Him, the Boy has no Patience!

  • 2,638 posts
  • Joined: 15-October 10
  • Location: United Kingdom
  • OS: Windows 7 X64 Ultimate Edition
  • Phone: Samsung Galaxy S3 i9300 (4.1.2) Stock

Posted 15 January 2013 - 03:50

AMD! AMD! AMD!
THE VERY BEST Processor in the world ever
(If you're cheap like me or cannot afford intel's flagship <again like me>) :p

#14 adam7288

    Neowinian

  • 99 posts
  • Joined: 12-March 09

Posted 15 January 2013 - 03:58

View PostSharpGreen, on 15 January 2013 - 03:40, said:

Nope. He says multiple times he's using a Radeon 7870.

Though I think some of these results are a bit weird, as I get slightly higher framerates in metro 2033 with my weaker gtx 660 and first gen i7.

Doh! You got me..Saw those framerates for the 2.5d sidescroller and couldn't imagine it was from a discrete solution. Guess it was more taxing than it looked.

#15 +Crisp

    To Infinity and Beyond!

  • 3,655 posts
  • Joined: 06-May 10
  • Location: 127.0.0.1

Posted 16 January 2013 - 13:15

What people seem to forget is yes the i7 wipes the floor with it, but the pricing point between them is the distance of another universe.