Recommended Posts

So, either it doesn't exist or I am missing something. After installing the Google Chrome GPO into my Central Store and creating a policy to apply to users in the domain, everything is working fine. However I don't see any way to prevent the usage of "Clear all browsing data..." under history.

Anyone else have any experience with this, am I missing it or did they leave this option out for some reason. And if they did, any other ways to prevent it's usage?

I *think* the workaround is to click "clear history" and then untick all the boxes, then click OK, so that nothing is actually ticked to delete and the button effectively does nothing. AFAIK it saves that setting.

Not sure how to disable it altogether.

I *think* the workaround is to click "clear history" and then untick all the boxes, then click OK, so that nothing is actually ticked to delete and the button effectively does nothing. AFAIK it saves that setting.

Not sure how to disable it altogether.

Right but in the group policy, none of those options exist, I need to deploy it across our network to all clients. That's the main issue.

don't allow people to use chrome

use a webfilter so that they can pretend to delete their history all day long (they cant delete webfilter history, tying their history to their username regardless of where they sign on to)

I would strongly opt for #2. There are other things that you can do that will capture history that arent free and can't be deleted by the individual even if they choose to nuke their computer.

don't allow people to use chrome

use a webfilter so that they can pretend to delete their history all day long (they cant delete webfilter history, tying their history to their username regardless of where they sign on to)

I would strongly opt for #2. There are other things that you can do that will capture history that arent free and can't be deleted by the individual even if they choose to nuke their computer.

Yeah I have considered blocking chrome domain wide, problem is over half of our systems are running XP with IE8, and that brings into play some issues with HTML5 sites not rendering correctly.

Any suggestions on a a web-filter/logger that either works locally as a client app with a central management console, or something that runs through like a proxy server. Network is all Windows Domain/OS based.

proxy

squid proxy with squid guard (free)

pfsense with squid guard (free)

websense

barracuda webfilter

bluecoat webfilter

forefront threat management gateway

safesquid

gfi webmonitor

sonicwall with the webfilter addon

software

k9 (free for personal use)

spector

I have used websense, k9, sonicwall, and the barracuda. There are many more out there. The 2 appliances (sonicwall and the barracuda) and the software websense, can be set up as a pass through that integrate with active directory. They log who what where and when, they can be setup to just monitor or setup to block certain things like viruses, porn, gaming, as well as specific applications like skype and yahoo instant messenger. You can leave it as relaxed (no other options other than monitoring) or tighten your grip either on a specific user or group of users limiting them to 1 website during the times of 12:00 and 1:00 and denying them complete access to the internet at all other times and all they would be able to go to is basketweaving.com during those times or maybe hampsterdance.com. How you choose to implement is up to you.

All of these mentioned will integrate with active directory.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • NASA: This asteroid may not kill us but it probably won't be far off either by Sayan Sen Image by Zelch Csaba via Pexels New observations by NASA's James Webb Space Telescope have eliminated the last remaining impact threat posed by asteroid 2024 YR4, ruling out the possibility that the near-Earth object could strike the Moon in December 2032. NASA said observations collected by Webb on February 18 and 26, 2026, enabled scientists to refine the asteroid's orbit enough to "rule out a chance of lunar impact on Dec. 22, 2032." Instead, asteroid 2024 YR4 is now expected to pass the Moon at a distance of about 13,200 miles (21,200 km). The agency stressed that the update "reflects improved precision in our understanding of where the asteroid is expected to be in 2032 rather than a shift in its orbital path." The announcement closes a remarkable chapter in planetary defence that began in late 2024, when the approximately 60-metre-wide asteroid briefly became the most closely watched near-Earth object in the world. Discovered on December 27, 2024, by the ATLAS telescope in Chile, 2024 YR4 initially appeared to have a small chance of colliding with Earth on December 22, 2032. As astronomers gathered more observations, the impact probability briefly climbed to around 3%—the highest ever recorded for an asteroid of its size—before steadily falling as its orbit became better understood. By early 2025, international observations had ruled out any significant risk to Earth. However, astronomers were left with another possibility: a roughly 4% chance that the asteroid could instead strike the Moon. "The probability that asteroid 2024 YR4 will strike the Moon on 22 December 2032 is now approximately 4%," the European Space Agency (ESA) had said last year, noting that "there is a 96% chance that the asteroid will not impact the Moon." ESA said such an impact, while unlikely, would have presented an extraordinary scientific opportunity. "It is a very rare event for an asteroid this large to impact the Moon – and it is rarer still that we know about it in advance. The impact would likely be visible from Earth, and so scientists will be very excited by the prospect of observing and analysing it," said Richard Moissl, Head of ESA's Planetary Defence Office. "It would certainly leave a new crater on the surface. However, we wouldn't be able to accurately predict in advance how much material would be thrown into space, or whether any would reach Earth," he added. The asteroid also exposed an important blind spot in planetary defence. Because 2024 YR4 approached Earth from the direction of the Sun, it remained hidden from ground-based telescopes until after its closest approach. "We looked into how Neomir would have performed in this situation, and the simulations surprised even us," Moissl said. "Neomir would have detected asteroid 2024 YR4 about a month earlier than ground-based telescopes did. This would have given astronomers more time to study the asteroid's trajectory and allowed them to much sooner rule out any chance of Earth impact in 2032." He added, "As an infrared telescope, like Webb, Neomir would have also immediately given us a much better estimate for the asteroid's size, which is very important for assessing the significance of the hazard." The latest NASA observations underscore the value of space-based infrared telescopes in tracking faint asteroids. According to NASA, Webb made "among the faintest ever observations of an asteroid," extending the object's observational record by nearly eight months at a time when it had become too faint for other telescopes. That additional data allowed scientists to eliminate the remaining uncertainty surrounding its 2032 flyby. Although asteroid 2024 YR4 is now confirmed to pose no threat to either Earth or the Moon, scientists say its discovery remains one of the most significant real-world tests of the international planetary defence system, demonstrating how continued observations can rapidly transform an object once considered hazardous into one whose future path is known with high confidence. Source: NASA, ESA This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Yup. Google is just scraping the entire internet for their own ad profits without sharing revenue with the sources. It's obviously stealing, but since these sites depend upon Google's search scraps to survive... As for me, I just stopped using Google for anything except Reddit searches. If Reddit's own search wasn't complete crapola, I'd never use Google search again.
    • I had a feeling this was coming. Picked up my first Mac ever last Saturday. Glad I did.
    • In a major surprise there is actually some good deals for the first time in years. At least for me.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      Admir earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      First Post
    • Apprentice
      daryld went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Contributor
      Carltonbar went up a rank
      Contributor
    • One Month Later
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      419
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      170
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      130
    4. 4
      Xenon
      69
    5. 5
      neufuse
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!