Orbis Unmasked: What to expect from next-gen


Recommended Posts

Orbis

- CPU: 8-core Jaguar @ 1.6GHz

- GPU: ~ Radeon 7970M in power, 18 compute units @ 800MHz

- Memory: 4GB GDDR5 @ 192GB/s bandwidth - 512MB reserved for OS -> 3.5GB for games

- Extra: "Compute module"

Durango

- CPU: 8-core Jaguar @ 1.6GHz

- GPU: ~ ? in power (DF says potentially weaker than Orbis), 12 compute units

- Memory: 8GB DDR3 @ 68GB/s bandwidth - 3GB reserved for OS (rumoured it may be down to 1-1.5GB though) -> 5-7GB for games

- Extra: "ESRAM" (small amount of faster RAM, 102GB/s bandwidth), other custom chips

Eurogamer

tumblr_mg6hbmBXhG1s2sgeco1_400.gif

I was going to get PS4 anyway but this has just sealed the deal.

I don't look at specs when buying a video game console all I care about is does it have online so I can play with my friends and does it have fun games.

I even pay gamestop like a year before the WiiU release for the system not knowing anything more then it had a touch screen controller.

all these specs do not really matter , sure more hardware better games but people try to hard to compare them to pc specs.

the WiiU does not have super computer specs and it looks amazing and has some really fun games .

just my 2cents

There isn't much else to talk about at the minute until games get announced and that wont be till E3.

I think the specs do matter as it looks like both consoles are going to be more closely matched than they were this generation. They both have their little strengths and weaknesses but I don't think we'll be seeing any more downrezzed games with choppy framerates like on the PS3.

i just console makers wouldn't skimp on the RAM and add more, yes i know the architecture is different and that effectively the console is streaming the data from disc/hdd however having larger amount of ram would allow more objects to be on screen an any one time, and usually half way into a consoles life a RAM upgrade would be a godsend.

What i mean by objects is say like GTA IV, there was paper fluttering down the street, i wonder how much more could be added if the machines had more RAM.

I would have loved the machines to have at least 8GB available to games with up to 16GB as the environments they could create with that amount would be insane. (i also know about keeping costs down).

I suppose they are my blue skies.

Although my judgement will be on the games they have as to which ill get, ill probably go with the Xbox has i have quite a few 360 games and i like the controller and achievements.

How does that info make you seal the deal on a PS4. so far the xbox seems a better deal to me. more memory makes it a better option alone.

either way we'll see a repeat of last generation, both consoles will be about the same performance, and look the same. well except less texture and object pop on the xbox, but in general. So I'll go with xbox, the company that knows software and has solid online, Sony spent a generation trying to catch up to live as it was at launch, now we're also getting XBL, next generation.

  • Like 3

Last gen had 256-512Mb RAM, this is a huge jump. Just piling more RAM into the console doesn't automatically make it better, all it does is bumps the price up.

Considering the powerful specs these consoles are going to be expensive as it is.

How does that info make you seal the deal on a PS4. so far the xbox seems a better deal to me. more memory makes it a better option alone.

either way we'll see a repeat of last generation, both consoles will be about the same performance, and look the same. well except less texture and object pop on the xbox, but in general. So I'll go with xbox, the company that knows software and has solid online, Sony spent a generation trying to catch up to live as it was at launch, now we're also getting XBL, next generation.

Better GPU, Faster RAM, 'Compute' Unit.

I don't care for being plastered with ads or paying to play online, I mostly play online on my PC, I do play PS3 online every now and again and can't justify ?40 a year for the odd time I fire it up. Next Gen Uncharted is worth the asking price alone for me.

Maybe better GPU, not gonna effect anything in reality. We all know this.

I think we'll have to wait and see about the memory, but in this case, the speed in both is more than fast enough. more is more important here. Far less texture popping.

a comput unit that could mean ANYTHING, and probably mean nothing. just like the "other custom chips".

xbox still comes out better.

Last gen had 256-512Mb RAM, this is a huge jump. Just piling more RAM into the console doesn't automatically make it better, all it does is bumps the price up.

You can buy 6GB of RAM for about $30.

...

I don't think 8 qualifies for bumping the price up.

personally I don't care about the specs, I care about good software. some thign MS has shown they know, and Sony... eh not so much, though they're still somewhat better than nintendo and their slow ass software updates on the WiiU, not to mention the slow loading of... everything.

specs on a console are really not all that important as i the specs on the current gen systems were not all that great and we still have some very impressive looking games that came out later on. I think its just early adopters of new consoles do not know how much they can tax the machine.

You can buy 6GB of RAM for about $30.

...

I don't think 8 qualifies for bumping the price up.

Doesn't work like that, they have to find extra space on the pcb which means rejigging all the components around to make it fit, its too late now to bump the ram up.

personally I don't care about the specs, I care about good software. some thign MS has shown they know, and Sony... eh not so much, though they're still somewhat better than nintendo and their slow ass software updates on the WiiU, not to mention the slow loading of... everything.

Yeah I suppose, specs are all we know of the consoles so far, I haven't seen much chat next gen wise just wanted to start a thread to get people talking about next gen.

Doesn't work like that, they have to find extra space on the pcb which means rejigging all the components around to make it fit, its too late now to bump the ram up.

You seen a laptops innards lately? The insides are so sparse you could fit twice as much in there and still have breathing room. I don't think they'll have any problems whatsoever fitting a RAM chip in.

Components on both sides of the board and traces running through the layers of the PCB, just because there is nothing on the surface doesn't mean there's nothing underneath.

I think the most important thing to take away from this is that 512Mb for the OS on Orbis and 3Gb on the Durango means that the PS4 is geared to be a pure games machine, the Nextbox is more the entertainment hub.

  • Like 1

I think developers want as much ram as they can get though and as far as GPU goes we don't even get any info on it for the Xbox so I can't say. Either way I'll be getting a Xbox yet again to start, I might get a ps4 as well when the price is right.

Components on both sides of the board and traces running through the layers of the PCB, just because there is nothing on the surface doesn't mean there's nothing underneath.

I think the most important thing to take away from this is that 512Mb for the OS on Orbis and 3Gb on the Durango means that the PS4 is geared to be a pure games machine, the Nextbox is more the entertainment hub.

I suspect the OS size will hit between 500-1000 on the nextbox by release.

and it'll be able to play custom music during gameplay :p

I would suspect they'll in fact learn from and use app design from WP and 8, and you'll be able to run apps at the same time as games, in other words. Spotify and similar streaming while gaming.

The rumours are that it'll run on Windows 8 Kernel, I know Microsoft is keen to have consistency between devices. I wouldn't be surprised if it had the ability or functionality of a Windows RT OS geared more for Gaming.

I suspect the OS size will hit between 500-1000 on the nextbox by release.

and it'll be able to play custom music during gameplay :p

I would suspect they'll in fact learn from and use app design from WP and 8, and you'll be able to run apps at the same time as games, in other words. Spotify and similar streaming while gaming.

Also, reservine more for the OS means less likelyhood of the OS dipping into the game's RAM. Just becuase its "reserved" doesn't mean its "exclusive". If they ever decide to up their game with the PS4 OS they may run out of RAM.

Sony is going for a lean OS with just gaming functions, Microsoft reserved more because they want it to be the central media hub.

The Sony XMB OS ran on 50Mb of RAM, with 512Mb I think they have a bit of breathing space.

Most of these specs seem pretty irrelevant right now, the bigger issue is to support large textures you're looking at 30+ Gbs for a game already, and you need a pile of VRAM to load that. That's today, on a PC, not 7 years from now when these consoles finally get replaced.

Sony is going for a lean OS with just gaming functions, Microsoft reserved more because they want it to be the central media hub.

The Sony XMB OS ran on 50Mb of RAM, with 512Mb I think they have a bit of breathing space.

yeah, and with that low memory they had huge issues getting in game functions of the xmb to work smoothly, and some never got implemented.

Also, all indications are that Sony definitely will be aiming for a media hub, that's been their marketing strategy for every device they're doing lately from TV's (and beating the mythical non existent apple tv to the market with the same function) to BD players to phones.

Rumours are $400/?329, obviously this is just a guess on the rumoured specs.

yeah, and with that low memory they had huge issues getting in game functions of the xmb to work smoothly, and some never got implemented.

Yeah, hopefully 512Mb will be enough if they are going the lean, pure gaming OS route.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Removed the blue and underline as you did not post a link. This would also  be considered spamming.
    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
    • Cheers everyone for the replies. It's been very useful. 👍
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      196
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      153
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!