Recommended Posts

Hey guys, I am thinking of getting an SSD drive to speed up my PC as the hardware in it is getting a little old now and I don't currently have the money to build a new one (which is my main goal) so I want to get an SSD just now to give a boost and when I do build a new machine, it will also be used in that.

The thing is, I just checked and my Program Files (x86) folder is 360GB and my Program Files folder is 15GB.

The SSD i am looking at is only 120GB so how do you go about that? Do you prioritise which programs are installed on the SSD. Can you even install programs to another drive from the main windows drive? I'd love a bigger one but they are just too expensive for me at the moment. 120 is about the biggest I can afford. I'm looking for under ?100 on eBuyer, unless anyone else knows of anything bigger for that price.

edit - I have found a 256GB for ?130 which I may be able to stretch to. Still won't hold all my programs though so still wondering all points asked here.

I currently run two 1TB drives (which are both 80% full) but I've only ever installed windows and all the programs on one, I thought installing programs on another drive would cause problems?

Also, my Mobo has Sata2 but my PSU only has 2 sata power connectors, it was built during the crossover time. My current HDD's both have 4 pin molex and sata power connectors but both use sata data cables.

Does the SSD need a mini sata (don't know the name, I'm new to SSD's so im just guessing here) connector as it says 7 pin and I thought sata was 15. If it does then can I get molex to mini sata and keep my two current HDD's as-is or do I get Sata to mini-Sata and use a molex in one of my current drives.

Also want to ask, can I migrate my current windows install to another HDD, is that easy or should I just start fresh? My current install is only 4 months old and I have ALOT of installed software and games, I'd hate to have to install everything again. If I could migrate, can I migrate only some software. This may be an issue but all my programs wouldn't fit lol.

Lastly my mobo has SATA2 3.0 Gb/s connectors, but the SSD I am looking at says "1 x Serial ATA-300 - 7 pin Serial ATA" and "SATA Revision 2.6" is that compatible? Is Sata-III backward compatible? If so, would I be better getting that so when I come to build my new pc, my SSD is of the newer standard and my new mobo will be able to benefit from the higher speed.

Sorry if this post is confusing, tried to fit a lot of questions in :)

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1133030-ssd-storage-program-files/
Share on other sites

Installing programs onto a non system drive is fine. I have done it in the past to keep my SSD free if its a program I don't use much / am not bothered about the speed of it.

The data cable is 7 pin, the power connector is 15 pin. So no, its a normal SATA connector. Don't really understand the last bit of that question but if your PSU has a SATA power connector and molex, you can either use the proper SATA power connector or use one of the molex connectors with a converter (drives / mobos often bundle these with them).

I wouldn't try to migrate to another drive. You would be best to reinstall onto your SSD when you get it.

Yes, SATA3 is backward compatible so yes I would get SATA3 now if you are intending on upgrading in the future.

Installing programs onto a non system drive is fine. I have done it in the past to keep my SSD free if its a program I don't use much / am not bothered about the speed of it.

The data cable is 7 pin, the power connector is 15 pin. So no, its a normal SATA connector. Don't really understand the last bit of that question but if your PSU has a SATA power connector and molex, you can either use the proper SATA power connector or use one of the molex connectors with a converter (drives / mobos often bundle these with them).

I wouldn't try to migrate to another drive. You would be best to reinstall onto your SSD when you get it.

Yes, SATA3 is backward compatible so yes I would get SATA3 now if you are intending on upgrading in the future.

the bit you didn't get was because I thought the SSD used mini sata, my PSU has only 2 sata power connectors, both are being used.

But I can use one for my SSD and then use a molex to power my other HDD since it has a molex plug too. :)

Thanks, answered all my questions :)

how did you amass 375 gigs of programs?!?!?

yeah I have like 50 games :laugh:

pic related and thats not them all, I started doing them with oblytile but got bored so haven't finished them all yet. Plus i wanted them to be a square and not have unfinished columns

post-147642-0-87326200-1359296139.jpg

I have a 120GB SSD for my system drive and I've never had a problem with size (though obviously I've love to have a bigger drive). Obviously if you can stretch for a 256GB drive - like the OCZ Vertex 4 - then go for it

You just have to be sensible. I install all my regular programs on the SSD but keep anything that is storage intensive on HDDs - for instance, my Steam folder is over 1.6TB (1,600GB) and I have over 300GB in sampled instruments. Even if I wanted to keep them those folders on SSD there isn't any drive big enough on the market and it would cost ?1,600 to setup a four-drive SSD RAID array. You should keep all your documents and media files on regular HDDs, which is good practise anyway given the risk of boot-drive failure or corruption. Basically, use your SSD for installing regular programs (Office, Adobe Creative Suite, Cubase, iTunes, etc) - that way you get all the performance, without the huge expense.

I have a 120GB SSD for my system drive and I've never had a problem with size (though obviously I've love to have a bigger drive). Obviously if you can stretch for a 256GB drive - like the OCZ Vertex 4 - then go for it

You just have to be sensible. I install all my regular programs on the SSD but keep anything that is storage intensive on HDDs - for instance, my Steam folder is over 1.6TB (1,600GB) and I have over 300GB in sampled instruments. Even if I wanted to keep them those folders on SSD there isn't any drive big enough on the market and it would cost ?1,600 to setup a four-drive SSD RAID array. You should keep all your documents and media files on regular HDDs, which is good practise anyway given the risk of boot-drive failure or corruption. Basically, use your SSD for installing regular programs (Office, Adobe Creative Suite, Cubase, iTunes, etc) - that way you get all the performance, without the huge expense.

thanks for the tips, holy crap I thought my game files were large! haha

So its not worth putting games on an SSD? Even if you could? Like just say a certain game you really liked, would it improve performance of the game at all?

thanks for the tips, holy crap I thought my game files were large! haha

So its not worth putting games on an SSD? Even if you could? Like just say a certain game you really liked, would it improve performance of the game at all?

The games you put on the SSD will load a lot faster, so put your most played ones on there. Any music or videos won't get a performance boost on a SSD, so keep those on your other HDDs.

And if you need another SATA power connector, there are lots of adapters out there to choose from:

035462e496f1a1c50f4d9304f875f2f910318.jpg

I keep all of my data... Games, music, video files, ETC on my data drives. I have a 60GB SSD and all that I install onto it is Windows, Office, web browsers, and other basic apps like CD burning and my system utilities.

[snip]

And if you need another SATA power connector, there are lots of adapters out there to choose from:

[snip pic]http://www.xpcompute...75f2f910318.jpg

Thanks yeah those were the connectors I was talking about. Guessing they are just as good as a normal connector?

By that I mean that the power throughput is the same and is sufficient enough?

If so, why do they always change adapters, if it does the same thing whats the point? other than being slightly smaller

thanks for the tips, holy crap I thought my game files were large! haha

So its not worth putting games on an SSD? Even if you could? Like just say a certain game you really liked, would it improve performance of the game at all?

Now that Steam has the option to install individual games to different locations it's possible to do that, though it's too much hassle for me. But yes, it would improve loading times significantly - it might also reduce framerate dips but generally it won't have much?if any?impact upon your framerate.

If so, why do they always change adapters, if it does the same thing whats the point? other than being slightly smaller

To make them smaller and easier to use - it's progress. All modern PSUs have had plenty of SATA power connectors for years and it's easy to get adaptors if you need them.

Thanks yeah those were the connectors I was talking about. Guessing they are just as good as a normal connector?

By that I mean that the power throughput is the same and is sufficient enough?

If so, why do they always change adapters, if it does the same thing whats the point? other than being slightly smaller

Yeah those molex connectors are harder to connect and the pins tend to fall out when they get used enough. I was never a fan of them.

The power throughput is the same. It's just a different form factor.

The downside, however, is that a lot of SATA cables still don't have clips on them which makes them annoyingly easy to knock loose.

Yeah I was thinking exactly that, my Molex connectors feel better when they are plugged in and don't come out nearly so easy. Its why I asked the reason for SATA ones if they do the same job then apart from being bigger the molex one seems better to me.

If I just more the sata one ever so slightly it will fall out of my HDD. I actually used a cable tie to make sure it won't come out if my computer gets a knock

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
    • I think he means you haven't reviewed previous UFC games. Of course it doesn't matter... Every time you just report on something that involves the President even if just simply what happened you guys usually get accused of being anti-Trump. We live in fun times.
    • So how did you solve the problem? Disabling Secure Boot isn’t a solution.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      agatameier earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!