• 0

C++ as a base language....!


Question

10 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

How C++ can play an important role as a base language in order to understand the modern programming languages such as C#, Java, J# etc?

I actually learned C# without knowing anything at all about C++. Didn't even know what cout or cin was lol. I only knew a little bit of C but no OOP at all.

  • 0

I'm fairly sure that this is a homework question for a CS class you are taking, so I'm not going to give you a direct answer. Regardless, if you Google the question you can find answers here and here. I recommend that you consider C++'s explicit memory management and object-oriented design in your answer. Thinking through the pros and cons of each language is likely to help as well.

  • Like 1
  • 0

I'm fairly sure that this is a homework question for a CS class you are taking, so I'm not going to give you a direct answer. Regardless, if you Google the question you can find answers here and here. I recommend that you consider C++'s explicit memory management and object-oriented design in your answer.

Hey budy you are right. But, I am looking answer for one of my friend. She can't do it because of some problem so I am asking for help. I will be very thankful to you if you provide me the answer..

  • 0

You don't need to know anything about C++ to be able to learn C# or Java. If anything C# and Java might help in learning C++ because of the similarities in syntax.

nope. I recommend C++ first. I did C# then I did C++ afterwards and I felt a huge leap backwards. Like every shortcut I was taught in C# I was being shown the long way in C++.

  • 0

You don't need to know anything about C++ to be able to learn C# or Java. If anything C# and Java might help in learning C++ because of the similarities in syntax.

I don't think the question is suggesting that its necessary to learn C++ first; its merely asking what some potential advantages of learning it before other languages may be. For the serious programmer, its probably best to understand the basics before moving on to something more abstract. Abstraction is great - the bread-and-butter of modern programming - but there is no substitute for understanding how things work underneath. Even with a greater level of abstraction (and therefore ease-of-use) provided by many other modern programming languages, a programmer who understands the cost of each instruction will (hopefully) write more efficient code.

Its somewhat similar to having working knowledge of the architecture of your machine (usually in the context of assembly) when doing embedded device programming. For example, using a int in C on an 8-bit microcontroller has much higher overhead than using an unsigned char because an int is both 16-bits wide (so it can't fit in a single register) and signed (so the sign bit must be explicitly manipulated), translating into more assembly instructions. Most loops could be just as easily be written using an unsigned char to keep track of the number of iterations as an int. On modern 64-bit Intel processors this particular restriction has no bearing, but the concept is still the same: know thy architecture.

  • 0

It's an example of terrible language design and makes you realize how lucky you are if you can program in anything else than C++ (except perhaps PHP). It's a good language to start learning programming because at that point you don't know any better and can't realize how miserable and unproductive you are because of its flaws; it also makes it a joy to discover other things that aren't complete **** such as C# or Python. It's always better to start neck-deep in the **** hole and climb out than the other way around, so learning C++ first can be a good way to go about it. Also, the more time goes the more people realize they don't actually need for C++ for much of anything, and there's still a whole bunch of software written in it, so if you have forever renounced to all pleasures of life, writing C++ is something that pays very well today.

  • Like 3
  • 0

People use C++ because it can be high performance (depending on how good the programmers who wrote the code were). That's why the video game industry uses it almost exclusively: they need all the performance they can get. Like Dr_Asik said, its nowhere near as easy to use as Python, but there is a huge industrial code base written in it.

  • 0
That's why the video game industry uses it almost exclusively: they need all the performance they can get.
State-of-the-art multiplatform engines are written in C++, mainly for portability to consoles but also in good part for performance, indeed. However, these engines usually allow writing much of the actual game logic in some other language - UnrealScript, Lua, C#, Boo, etc. Civilization IV was largely written in Python, for instance.
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I grew up a Star Trek fan and never watched Star Wars movies. To this days I've not watched most Star Wras movies. As a result I rarely get these references, I have no idea what this post means. Given the popular reactions these get I have to accept I missed out.  
    • Spotify really have turned in to a butthole of a company. Assuming this isn't a bug then this is a low act for Premium users. Honestly, YT Premium which includes YT Music is a genuine alternative. In any event, the internet enshitification continues unabated...next up, the banning of VPN's.
    • This is why science is the only path to truth. It isn't rigid in its beliefs, rather it changes its views based on scientific discoveries.
    • A 13 billion year old secret about our Universe's origin was revealed by Sayan Sen Image by Pascal Küffer via Pexels Researchers at the Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik (MPIK) in Heidelberg had recreated a key chemical reaction from the early universe, producing results that could change scientists' understanding of how the first stars formed. The study focused on the helium hydride ion (HeH⁺), which is widely regarded as the first molecule to form in the universe. Scientists believe HeH⁺ appeared around 380,000 years after the Big Bang, when the universe had cooled enough for electrons and atomic nuclei to combine into neutral atoms in a period known as recombination. This marked the beginning of chemistry in the cosmos. Immediately after the Big Bang about 13.8 billion years ago, the universe was extremely hot and dense. As it expanded and cooled, hydrogen and helium became the dominant elements. Once neutral helium atoms formed, they could react with ionised hydrogen nuclei, or protons, to create helium hydride ions. Although simple in structure, HeH⁺ played an important role in the young universe. It was the first step in a chain of reactions that eventually produced molecular hydrogen (H₂), a molecule made up of two hydrogen atoms and now the most abundant molecule in the universe. Molecular hydrogen later became a key ingredient in the formation of the first stars. At the time, the universe had entered a phase often called the cosmological "dark age." Matter had become transparent to light following recombination, but there were still no stars or galaxies producing visible light. Several hundred million years would pass before the first stars appeared. For those first stars to form, large clouds of gas had to collapse under their own gravity. To do that, the gas needed to cool by releasing energy. While hydrogen atoms can help with this process at high temperatures, they become less effective below about 10,000 degrees Celsius. Molecules can continue the cooling process by releasing energy through rotational and vibrational motions. Scientists have long considered HeH⁺ a potentially important coolant because of its comparatively large dipole moment, a property that describes how electric charge is distributed within a molecule and allows it to release energy efficiently. The amount of helium hydride present in the early universe may therefore have influenced how easily the first stars could form. At the same time, HeH⁺ was constantly being destroyed. Under primordial conditions, its main destruction mechanisms were recombination with free electrons and chemical reactions with hydrogen atoms. These reactions ultimately helped produce molecular hydrogen, linking the formation and destruction of HeH⁺ to the chemistry that shaped the early universe. For many years, theoretical studies suggested that reactions between HeH⁺ and hydrogen atoms would become much slower at low temperatures. Scientists believed there was an energy barrier along the reaction pathway that reduced the chances of the reaction taking place in the cold conditions of the early universe. The new study suggests otherwise. To investigate the process, researchers recreated a closely related reaction using deuterium, a naturally occurring isotope of hydrogen that contains one proton and one neutron in its nucleus. When HeH⁺ collides with deuterium, it forms an HD⁺ ion and a neutral helium atom. This allows scientists to study the reaction in a controlled way while closely mimicking the behaviour of the original reaction involving hydrogen. The experiments were carried out at the Cryogenic Storage Ring (CSR) at MPIK, a specialised facility designed to recreate conditions similar to those found in space. Researchers stored HeH⁺ ions in the 35-metre storage ring for up to 60 seconds at temperatures just a few kelvins above absolute zero and merged them with a beam of neutral deuterium atoms. By adjusting the speeds of the two particle beams, the team measured how the reaction rate changed with collision energy, which is directly related to temperature. The researchers found that the reaction rate remains almost constant as temperatures decrease. In other words, the reaction does not slow down at low temperatures as earlier models predicted. “Previous theories predicted a significant decrease in the reaction probability at low temperatures, but we were unable to verify this in either the experiment or new theoretical calculations by our colleagues,” explained Dr Holger Kreckel of MPIK. “The reactions of HeH⁺ with neutral hydrogen and deuterium therefore appear to have been far more important for chemistry in the early universe than previously assumed,” he continued. According to the researchers, the reaction appears to be barrierless, meaning there is no energy obstacle preventing it from taking place efficiently even at very low temperatures. The findings support recent theoretical work led by physicist Yohann Scribano, whose group identified an error in a widely used potential energy surface, a mathematical model used to describe how the energy of a system changes during a chemical reaction. The error appears to have caused previous studies to significantly underestimate reaction rates under primordial conditions. The new calculations closely match the experimental results. Together, they suggest that helium chemistry in the early universe may need to be re-evaluated. Because molecules such as HeH⁺ and molecular hydrogen played an important role in cooling primordial gas clouds, the findings could help scientists build more accurate models of how the first stars formed. By showing that helium hydride was likely destroyed more efficiently than previously thought, the study offers new insight into the chemical processes that shaped the universe during its earliest stages and helped set the conditions for the emergence of the first stars. Source: Max-Planck Institute, EDP Sciences This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      DrWankel earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      DrWankel earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      163
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      92
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      76
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!