• 0

Looking for a good Chat solution for a non-profit website. Suggestions?


Question

Hello.

I know of a non-profit ministry organization that is wanting to add a good chat solution to their website, ideally a solution that is flexible and powerful, but that is reasonably simple to implement into their website. Currently, the chat solution would need to very reliably handle at least 200-300 chat participants at one time, but it would need to be able to handle possibly even a couple thousand chat participants in the next year or two.

The chat solution needs to be more along the lines of IRC, where everyone is seeing the messages that are posted by default. It would be nice if one also has the option of sending private, direct messages to the moderators or other key people behind the scenes if there is a message that you do not want everyone to see. I am not sure of the importance of whether "guests" are allowed and/or a log-in of some type is required. The chat solution will be used for live, real-time conversations during live broadcasted events which are currently using Livestream for the broadcasts. Livestream has its own chat solution, but the non-profit ministry organization is looking for a better chat solution to integrate into their website for use during their live broadcasted events.

This could be a service offered by a company that could be integrated into their website or simply chat software installed onto their server to run on the website.

As far as cost, a free or low-cost solution would be nice, but it would be worth for them to pay a bit of money if there was a particularly good solution or two that was better than the free/low-cost options.

Thank you in advance for any suggestions or feedback.

-JayZJay

9 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

Are you looking for chat rooms like IRC, or one-on-one chat like any instant messenger? What would the chat service be used for (i.e. what features are required)?

  • 0

Why not just use one of the already running IRC networks such as freenode etc and put a java based webchat on the site that connects to that room?

  • 0

Light IRC is a flash based chat application that can be integrated into the website and would allow those with higher tech knowledge to break out into a desktop application. IRC is not the easiest chat system in the world but it can easily accomplish what you are trying to achieve - although I think 1000 - 2000 different people offering their opinions at the same time would just drown the experience altogether.

You might be able to find a more modern / superior system in terms of usability but it would be hard to find a more "battle" tested chat system.

  • 0

@tim_s, thanks for the feedback. Light IRC might be a good solution to consider. That said, being Flash based isn't ideal from the stand-point of Flash crashing, but I'll pass on the suggestion for further consideration. Again, thanks.

  • 0

@tim_s, thanks for the feedback. Light IRC might be a good solution to consider. That said, being Flash based isn't ideal from the stand-point of Flash crashing, but I'll pass on the suggestion for further consideration. Again, thanks.

You have to remember that Flash is not doing anything other then sending text to the IRC server and displaying text received from the IRC server. Flash is more than able and I have not experienced any major Flash issues - that would be down to the user to insure their personal computer is functioning, which would be true of any client side programming language.

To understand possibilities that exist outside of the above solution we would need to know,

1: What level of Tech competence do you expect from your users / looking to support?

2: Does it have to be integrated into the website?

I imagine on some level you would rather a 3rd party support this and thus creating an official IRC channel and linking to a 3rd party provider maybe the solution.

  • 0

@tim_s, to answer your questions...

1) There is no way to know the tech level of people that would be joining the chat. There are literally people from the UK, Pakistan, Philippines, and countless other countries popping in and out all the time. Anybody from any location around the world could join in and benefit if they can understand spoken and/or written English. That said, in my experience, there are a few that are more technical like you and I, but the majority are not very technical or are very average, technically speaking. As a result, whatever chat solution is implemented needs to be reasonably simple for any visitor to the site.

2) Yes, I believe that there is definitely a desire to have the chat solution integrated into the website. That is the way it has been over the last couple of years and despite increasing growth and site improvements, I believe they want chat to continue to be integrated, probably for simplicity for the participants/visitors/users as much as anything (rather than have a separate window of some sort). When one visits the live stream/broadcast page on the site, there is the video "window" in/on the page and the integrated chat functionality right there on the page next to the video "window".

  • 0

2) Yes, I believe that there is definitely a desire to have the chat solution integrated into the website. That is the way it has been over the last couple of years and despite increasing growth and site improvements, I believe they want chat to continue to be integrated, probably for simplicity for the participants/visitors/users as much as anything (rather than have a separate window of some sort).

Well you are left with 2 choices,

1: Hosting software to handle the chat I.e. ran on your web server and support is handled on your side. Limitations being the hardware / technical experience / quality of software and cost.

2: Which might be another argument for IRC: Integrate an IRC Client (example: Light IRC which is Flash based) but the "heavy" lifting is done on a 3rd party IRC server.

The benefits of IRC is that is it a standard and very popular and thus you can switch to different providers while maintaining the core service look and feel. Keeps the whole thing cheap and simple, of-course you may want to investigate more commercial software alternatives.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • How many other companies will follow Ford's lead? Or, have they already gotten lazy and become enslaved to AI--and now can't figure out how to get out of that mess.
    • Why would any self-respecting intelligent person follow any recommendation by Donald's GOP administration? With almost two years of fabrications, deceit, and blatantly illegal behavior, why believe them now? They had best be gone after the November 2026 election, so we'll wait and see.
    • AltSendme 0.4.1 by Razvan Serea AltSendme is a minimal, cross-platform application designed for fast, secure, and private peer-to-peer file transfers. It allows users to send files or entire directories directly between devices without relying on cloud servers, accounts, or any personal information. Everything is encrypted end-to-end using modern protocols like QUIC and TLS 1.3, ensuring both strong security and low-latency performance. Transfers are verified with BLAKE3 for data integrity, and interrupted downloads automatically resume, making the experience reliable even on unstable connections. You can transfer anything—images, videos, documents, and more. Integrity checks are performed on both ends, so your files are automatically verified for correctness during both sending and receiving. AltSendme works seamlessly across local networks or long-distance links, capable of saturating multi-gigabit connections for extremely fast delivery. With built-in NAT traversal and encrypted relay fallback, it connects devices almost anywhere. The app integrates with the Sendme CLI and will soon support mobile and web platforms. Fully free and open-source, AltSendme offers a lightweight, privacy-first alternative to traditional cloud-based services, removing size limits, upload costs, and unnecessary data exposure. AltSendme 0.4.1 changelog: Release Highlights Self-hosted relays: Run your own iroh relay so transfers don't rely on public infrastructure. Includes a full deployment template in deploy/relay/ with Docker Compose for a VPS and configuration examples for production use. Fly.io support: One-click deploy template for Fly.io, including a quick-start config (fly.dev.toml) for testing without a custom domain, plus production setup with Let's Encrypt and your own hostname. Relay settings UI: New Settings → Network panel to choose how AltSendme connects: automatic public relays, custom self-hosted URLs (with optional auth token), or disabled. Test connections, verify latency, and see live relay status in the footer. Disable relays: Turn off relay servers entirely when you only need same-network transfers (e.g. LAN). Direct connections only. No relay hop required when devices can reach each other. Android graduates from beta: Android is now part of the regular release cycle alongside desktop. APKs ship with each version (universal, arm64, and armv7). Other improvements Private relay access control via shared auth token Relay fallback notifications when a custom relay is unreachable Broadcast mode toggle in sharing settings Android release build fixes (split-per-ABI APKs, universal APK preservation) UI polish: mobile safe-area insets, dropzone layout, transfer progress animation Bug fixes for minification-related serialization issues and system tray icon loading What's Changed feat(relay): add relay status functionality and settings UI (a120cdf) feat(relay): implement custom relay server configuration and verification (51276c7) feat(relay): add configuration for private relay access and enhance observability features (48fbabf) feat(relay): enhance relay URL validation, display connection status (d4fffa0) feat(relay): add RelayChangeGuard component and enhance relay-related translations (16ba514) feat(broadcast): add toggle setting for broadcast mode in sharing UI (ca6d977) fix(relay): correct QUIC discovery port, pin image, templatize fly.dev (52a2ba5) fix: More broken serialization due to minification (67491a9) fix(android): preserve true universal APK across per-ABI builds (e9f256f) fix(ui): conditional safe-area insets padding on mobile (1182f0e) refactor(transfer): CircularRing component animation fix (944572b) chore(android): drop x86 and x86_64 release APKs, keep universal+arm64+armv7 (34ada0b) Download: AltSendme 0.4.1 | ARM64 | ~9.0 MB (Open Source) Download: AltSendme for MacOS | Android Links: AltSendme Home Page | GitHub | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • You are mostly right about the ephemeral nature of it. As I mention in the article, if you dont add a second device or take a backup of your account before uninstalling it, then yes you will lose access to your account. That said, in terms of actual user experience when you sync multiple devices your message history carries across and there's also a Saved Messages chat like there is on Telegram to send messages and attachments between your installs. But yh, what you point out are correct and its not trying to emulate Messenger or Telegram.
    • OK so SearXNG is a meta search engine that you can install locally or use via a public instance. It scrapes other search engines which you choose and then sorts the results. Not as complicated as multiple relays
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      495
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      225
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      150
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!