Jump to content

Question

Posted

[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=23YR9miIg08[/media]

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

15 answers to this question

  • 0

Posted

can't watch the video where I am, but there is no "best for gaming" really, it comes down to preference anyway you look at it... most tasks now in high end games depend on the GPU more then the CPU, most CPU's can easily handle the logic now days, it's usually the GPU that is taxed

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

Posted

[quote name='neufuse' timestamp='1360181511' post='595505796']
can't watch the video where I am, but there is no "best for gaming" really, it comes down to preference anyway you look at it... most tasks now in high end games depend on the GPU more then the CPU, most CPU's can easily handle the logic now days, it's usually the GPU that is taxed
[/quote]

+1 what he said!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

Posted

[quote name='neufuse' timestamp='1360181511' post='595505796']
can't watch the video where I am, but there is no "best for gaming" really, it comes down to preference anyway you look at it... most tasks now in high end games depend on the GPU more then the CPU, most CPU's can easily handle the logic now days, it's usually the GPU that is taxed
[/quote]

Then basically he does make sense. But he also states that for gaming you don't need a CPU that is rated the best in hyper threading. Also states that 2 out of 10 most resource taxing games an AMD will do better then an Intel. As long as you have a decent GPU. So I am a little confused. Benchmarks say otherwise when you do a search.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

Posted

[quote name='Just Sal' timestamp='1360181775' post='595505802']
Then basically he does make sense. But he also states that for gaming you don't need a CPU that is rated the best in hyper threading. Also states that 2 out of 10 most resource taxing games an AMD will do better then an Intel. As long as you have a decent GPU. So I am a little confused. Benchmarks say otherwise when you do a search.
[/quote]

benchmarks usually throw in CPU performance as part of their equation, I know 3DMark use to do CPU computation's as part of it, doesn't mean a game will be slower or faster, you could have an ultrafast CPU but a slow GPU or a ultrafast GPU and a slow CPU and get similar benchmark scores if their algorithm doesn't put the GPU as the majority of the scores weighting...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

Posted

the dude could have summed up that video in about 2 mins. i had to stop watching it. anyway, there's a lot of variables that go into what's "best for gaming" so the CPU is only part of it.
1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

Posted

I agree that he could have summed it up into a 2min vid. I got bored listening to him. Anways, I was thinking of upgrading my CPU before seeing this. Wanted to get the FX-6200, my current CPU is a Phenom II 970 BE, but after listening to that guy, I think I will be upgrading my nVidia GTX 550 TI.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

Posted

[quote name='Just Sal' timestamp='1360181775' post='595505802']
Then basically he does make sense. But he also states that for gaming you don't need a CPU that is rated the best in hyper threading. Also states that 2 out of 10 most resource taxing games an AMD will do better then an Intel. As long as you have a decent GPU. So I am a little confused. Benchmarks say otherwise when you do a search.
[/quote]

It's hard to find sites that test all given CPUs at a price point with all GPUs at a price point. They usually just pick one (usually a high end one) and go from there.

The long and short of it is that for the right price, yes, AMD makes decent processors. But, given their current architecture, the X4s and X6s are basically dead in the water. The X8 competes fine with some i5s, but doesn't really match the i7.

Hyperthreading is basically non-issue here, except for i3. Everything above that is already at 4 physical cores.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

Posted

The guy rambles too much, and even though his heart is in the right place he doesn't express his points properly and lacks knowledge about certain aspects. Also, he's referring to youtube videos mostly. If you want to make an informed decision about something look for written reviews on reputable websites.

As somebody who aims for price/performance, I tend to buy/recommend CPUs that are between half and two thirds of the GPU price.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

Posted

[quote name='Luc2k' timestamp='1360188156' post='595506036']
As somebody who aims for price/performance, I tend to buy/recommend CPUs that are between half and two thirds of the GPU price.
[/quote]

Once upon a time. I think the street value of my CPU and GPU are the same now, although what I paid was around the 2/3rds ratio. A generation ago it was easy to get a CPU at 50% the cost of the GPU that was in the same class.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

Posted

point is a X6 is fast enough for all game now and for the next several years, the GPU is what decides the performance there.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

Posted

[quote name='HawkMan' timestamp='1360188976' post='595506066']
point is a X6 is fast enough for all game now and for the next several years, the GPU is what decides the performance there.
[/quote]
That's true. A lot of modern game engines are GPU-limited. That means your performance is limited by the power of your GPU. It doesn't make sense to buy an expensive CPU and an inexpensive GPU (assuming you have a limited budget).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

Posted

[quote name='threetonesun' timestamp='1360188863' post='595506058']
Once upon a time. I think the street value of my CPU and GPU are the same now, although what I paid was around the 2/3rds ratio. A generation ago it was easy to get a CPU at 50% the cost of the GPU that was in the same class.
[/quote]

Not if your focus is gaming they're not. You get more gaming performance out of a 150$ CPU and a 250$ GPU than from a 200$ CPU + 200$ GPU.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

Posted

Unless, your after playing Minecraft and i suspect SIm City 2013 which are more cpu based.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

Posted

not by far enough to tax an x6

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

Posted

No of course, But i had a AMD x2 3800+ and 7800gt before, which did tax even on Minecraft, but the same system ran CS Source on highest and most games up to then amicable ( Gta Iv played ok for me ), . It depends on what you want from a system and some points he says are right, If your dream is to run BF3 at 1080p on three monitors on Ultra, then your going to be spending the pennies. If your happy at 720 High Detail with the odd fps drop below 30 then you can get a reasonably priced system.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.