Question about speed if a router and 1GB switch is connected


Recommended Posts

I have a DSL router provided by my ISP and here is the spec http://www.wikidevi.com/wiki/Alice_IAD_WLAN_4421

I bought a NAS and I wanted to buy a 1GB switch to enable faster data access within my network

I am wondering if I connect the 1GB switch to my router (10/100) & NAS to the swtich would I still get high speed of the swtich

Anything connected via ethernet to the switch would be able to communicate with the NAS at 1Gbps, but if your router is also a wireless router than 100Mbps is the maximum speed any wireless device would be able to communicate with the NAS. The slowest link along the path between the two devices will dictate the maximum speed.

If the interconnect is through the switch, then yes, you will get the Gigabit connection. If not, then you will get 100Mbps. For example, if both your computer and your NAS is on the switch, then that's full speed. If your computer is on the switch, and the switch is connected to your router, and the NAS is also on the router, then it will be 100Mbps.

If the Machine & NAS are wired to the switch, then Gigabit if machine has Gigabit LAN otherwise will run at slowest interface speed

If you have to go through the router, then 100mbps, unless wifi, then however fast your wifi is, 54/65/150/300mbps

kind of hard to be 150/300mbps if the lan ports are 100 ;)

I don't understand the point of trying to say your wireless is 300 when it only has ports that are 100 -- your getting 300 to what? Sure and the hell is not going to be another wireless client because that is /2 automatically..

If you going to be connecting via wireless, what point is the gig switch? Might as well just connect it to your 10/100 ports on your router.

  • Like 2

kind of hard to be 150/300mbps if the lan ports are 100 ;)

I don't understand the point of trying to say your wireless is 300 when it only has ports that are 100 -- your getting 300 to what? Sure and the hell is not going to be another wireless client because that is /2 automatically..

If you going to be connecting via wireless, what point is the gig switch? Might as well just connect it to your 10/100 ports on your router.

The point is that I wanted to enable fast data transfer over the network & I was thinking connecting the NAS to a 1GB Switch and then the switch on to my existing router (which is 10/100)

My laptop is & will be using the WLAN from router but I plan to connect the NAS to switch

If you want to maximize the speed over WiFi then you will need a new wireless router with gigabit ethernet ports.

The maximum speed any communication between the router (10/100) and the switch (10/100/1000) will be 100mbps.

The point is that I wanted to enable fast data transfer over the network & I was thinking connecting the NAS to a 1GB Switch and then the switch on to my existing router (which is 10/100)

The point is, no matter what setup you create, your data transfer will be only as fast as the slowest port/interface it has to travel through

My attempt explaining in paint

Capture.PNG

So that GIGABIT PC has two NIC's (pic above)? You could just connect the PC to the 1Gb switch seeing that it connects to the 100Mb router?

The picture was showing (in a visual form) the types of speeds you'd get if either connection was used.

When a WIRED router says it is 100mbps, you'll reliably get roughly 10MB/sec. When a WIRELESS router says 300mpbs, you won't get anywhere near 30MB/sec. As an example, on wireless 300N connecting to my laptop sitting next to my router, i get a whopping 3-4MB/sec (admittedly, that is quite bad...). And no, there aren't 50 other people sharing the wireless, nor clogging the frequency. (see various sources about wireless 'overheads')

The point of all this? Do not feel like your wireless is being "wasted" by only having a 100mbps wired connected to a 300mbps wireless. Your wired likely still as a lot more "application layer" throughput.

"When a WIRELESS router says 300mpbs, you won't get anywhere near 30MB/sec."

Completely and utterly agree with you!! Then they shouldn't report it as such! Just like when they say 54mbit for G, at best you get about 23mbit or about 3MBps

Its pure marketing nonsense how they report wireless RAW total bandwidth, while in wireless there is a **** load of overhead! So if you head over to smallnetbuilders wireless benchmarks N at 40mhz your looking at like 60mbps tops which ok your 100mbit wire can handle.

My point is they are putting 300Mbps on the box -- when clearly that can not be the case if the wire connections are only 100 ;) Who are they thinking they are fooling?

Also to the OP, unless your going to be connecting something else to the gig switch that can do gig, there is NO point to getting it for your nas if then connecting that to a 100mbit switch on your router and your using wireless anyway.

I would wait to get the switch until you have have other devices connecting at gig. Or you move to a wireless speed that is over 100mbit, ac is out there for example. Some of the 3 stream N can get over 100. But then your going to need another wireless router.. Which will prob have gig lan ports.

To be a bit clearer Detections drawing should of shown a gig connected pc and a 100mbit connected pc vs just the one with both connected and wireless client.

Think of it as a road connecting the devices - if at any point there is a lower speedlimit, then that is the fastest you can go on that path even if part of the path is faster. Example you have a 10/1 mbit internet connection 10 down and 1 up.. Does not matter if your computer was connected to router at 10Gb fastest your going to download is 10mbit

  • 2 weeks later...

Yeah pretty much all of the new ones, unless you buy the cheapest available.

Keep in mind at report 300Mbps speeds of your N, 100 is more than enough. Now if your going to go with say a AC vs N wireless or 3 stream N you might be pushing the 100mbit limit.

But currently the only reason to change out your router for one with gig ports would be to not have to use a gig switch for your gig connected devices. But unless I missed something - if your going to be using wireless to access your NAS then your nas has no use of gig either. The only point of connecting your nas at gig is if you were also going to connect something you wanted to move files back and forth with at gig speeds as well.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Personally, I’ve found that it’s usually worth investing in the infrastructure you don’t want to replace later, especially cabling. Running Cat6A (or better, depending on your needs) during an upgrade is relatively inexpensive compared to having to re-cable a few years down the road. For switches I try to balance current specs with realistic growth. If my budget allows it Ill choose switches with higher uplink speeds which leaves room for expanding later on, but I don’t necessarily overspend on access ports if the endpoints won’t benefit from them anytime soon. One lesson I’ve learned is that planning for scalability pays off. It’s much easier to add devices, VLANs, or higher-bandwidth workloads when your network infrastructure already supports it than to replace hardware later.  What is your budget like?
    • I hate the term, "future-proof." We saw it back in the 90's / 2000's, if not before. You cannot future-proof anything, since there is no definition of how far into the future you plan on prepping for. Best idea is to tell us what you currently have and what its use is at the moment, and we can then offer ideas about some areas that might need an upgrade and other areas that can be left alone.
    • I can agree that it is being used in a small capacity. I worked for a company where their engineers still used XP, and when asked why it was because their sensor software wasn't compatible with newer operating systems and the software was discontinued so they couldn't upgrade the software. Given that the sensors were still in use by companies, they had to continue using XP to support the sensor, otherwise the price to the company would have gone into the millions or billions. Our response was simple: Ok, you can keep the XP machine. But we're removing it from the network. "But then it can't access the Internet or folder shares!" Yup, kinda the point. If someone wants to continue using an unsecure OS they can do, I have no problem with that. But it should be isolated. Simple. I had a fight with a guy in the engineering department for weeks before he finally relented. But we digress.   What do I plan on doing to commemorate the anniversary? Nothing. I have fond memories of the OS, but at the end of the day it's just an OS. If I had some time I might see if I could install it on my Raspberry Pi for a laugh. But my reflex memory with today's OS ideas would probably get me frustrated and I'd uninstall it after 5 mins.
    • Shutter Encoder 20.2 by Razvan Serea Shutter Encoder is one of the best video converter software and image, audio available today. It has been designed by video editors in order to be as accessible and efficient as possible. It is one of the few free professional tools. Based on FFmpeg, it has the largest codec library available. You can thus convert your files into many different formats. Complete settings for the most advanced Shutter Encoder has a panel containing a large number of settings, in order to define your own choices based on your files and perfect your video or audio output. Well-thought-out settings, with parameters predefined to create files quickly and easily. List of functions Without conversion: Cut without re-encoding, Replace audio, Rewrap, Conform, Merge, Extract, Subtitling, Video inserts Sound conversions: WAV, AIFF, FLAC, MP3, AAC, AC3, OPUS, OGG Editing codecs: DNxHD, DNxHR, Apple ProRes, QT Animation, GoPro CineForm, Uncompressed YUV Output codecs: H.264, H.265, VP9, AV1, OGV Broadcast codecs XDCAM HD422, AVC-Intra 100, XAVC, HAP....and much more. Shutter Encoder 20.2 changelog: Added "Intel Quick Sync" hardware acceleration for Linux Added 'Identify speakers' option for "Audio transcription" function Improved installer package Improved video player performance Improved timecode display with drop-frame videos Improved naming convention for surround audio files Fixed splash screen freeze Fixed bug with file hanging Fixed bugs with presets loading Fixed bugs with video player's buffer Fixed bug with 'Total length of file' option Fixed bugs with 'Record screen/device' option Fixed bug with "XAVC" & "XAVC Long GOP" functions Rollback to XPDF tool for PDF conversion Removed unused binary architecture for Mac Various corrections Various improvements Download: Shutter Encoder 20.2 | 166.0 MB (Open Source) Download: Shutter Encoder Portable | 185.0 MB Links: Shutter Encoder Home Page | FAQ / Tips | macOS | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • did you give it permission to do so? its probably on the ToS. After that South Park episode I'm paying attention to them lol
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      534
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      265
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      152
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      99
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!