• 0

I think I'm fighting the Same Origin Policy


Question

Hi!

About 10 years ago I basically LIVED in this forum. Now I'm returning to web development for a small project of porting my application that I've written in LabVIEW to be used over the web. The fact that I am using LabVIEW isn't really important. What is important is that my LabVIEW application is running a REST service on my port 8080, and I'm trying to consume that service using some Jquery in an html page running on IIS on port 80.

The service I'm using to get things going is a simple adding service that takes the form:

http://localhost:808...:input1/:input2

Where the output is the summation of the two inputs. So for example if I were to do a GET request for http://localhost:8080/add/1/2 the return would look like:

<Response>
<Terminal>
<Name>Output</Name>
<Value>3.000000</Value>
</Terminal>
</Response>

I can't even get this basic checkout to work:

	   	 $.ajax({
				type: "GET",
				url: "http://localhost:8080/add/1/2",
				success: function(data){		
					alert(data);
				}
			});

Doing some searching reveals that I'm up against the old "Same Origin Policy" because my script is being accessed through port 80 (where IIS lives) and is trying to place a call to port 8080 (where my web service lives).

So many friggen solutions out there! But I'm having trouble getting any of them to work. It would be great if my alert box would popup and give me the correct response. I think that some kind of reverse proxy might be a good solution, but the manner of setting that up in IIS 7 on Windows 7 Pro isn't sitting well (I'm thinking of switching to Apache just because it does this more gracefully I think).

Ultimately I do not think a reverse proxy will work on the production server because I am not the admin. And what I give them as a web service installation will be running on a different port (and possibly a different domain) than the front end javascript client.

Thanks for your time.

11 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

Hi,

Do you have a public facing IP?

I.e. how can I see your results to debug?

--

When you refer to the origin policy I am assuming you mean that you are sending the request from http://localhost(:80)/ to http://localhost:8080/?

  • 0

Hi,

Do you have a public facing IP?

I.e. how can I see your results to debug?

--

When you refer to the origin policy I am assuming you mean that you are sending the request from http://localhost(:80)/ to http://localhost:8080/?

Sorry, I do not have a public facing IP right now (and do not have the authority to enable that).

Yeah, sending the request from http://localhost:80/ to http://localhost:8080/

I'm reading about CORS as a possible solution. But there is a requirement to echo back the origin in the HTTP header which I do not think is possible with a LabVIEW web service....

-Shad

  • 0

Sorry, I do not have a public facing IP right now (and do not have the authority to enable that).

Yeah, sending the request from http://localhost:80/ to http://localhost:8080/

I'm reading about CORS as a possible solution. But there is a requirement to echo back the origin in the HTTP header which I do not think is possible with a LabVIEW web service....

-Shad

This could be done in a 100 different ways depending on your level of access. How many calls a second would you be looking to instantiate? I.e. would an extra step provide an efficiency issue?

  • 0

This could be done in a 100 different ways depending on your level of access. How many calls a second would you be looking to instantiate? I.e. would an extra step provide an efficiency issue?

I don't see any extra steps providing efficiency issues...

the number of calls is pretty low...as in a user would really only be expected to issue 1 call.

My end product (not this trivial addition one) will have the following work flow

Present user with web form -> User fills out web form and hits submit -> Contents of web form are compiled to a POST response and pushed to my REST service on port 8080 via javascript -> REST Service returns an image URL -> Javascript updates an image tag on the page with the URL returned from the REST Service.

The REST Service takes the data, does some calculations, produces a plot, saves the plot as a PNG image somewhere, and returns a URL for the image file.

In addition the end product will be behind a username/password and access will be limited to a small number of people.

  • 0

You could use the PHP fsockopen functions http://www.php.net/manual/en/function.fsockopen.php , but sockets extension needs to be enabled in the php.ini file. You could have your php script call the socket directly and pass parameters to it and have the application return results back to the php script, then the script can return data to the end user as the rest response.

If your port 8080 application is running its own webserver or can be loaded from a browser than use CURL within php as it is easier than using fsockopen.

  • 0

Thanks guys. I have one PHP proxy worked out, but am not happy with the lag...lol (at least not on my development machine).

I found a way to incorporate my static HTML/Javascript/Image/CSS files inside the web service executable (it's compiled) so that my static files are served on port 8080. Doing this alleviated the same origin policy issues and everything is snappy.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • And the fact that the majority of people from Poland are white European Christians while the people you are complaining about in post after post are not is just a coincidence... Every sentence in your post I am replying to is racist nonsense. None of it is actually based on any facts whatsoever. All immigrants are seeking a better life too. It's literally the only reason they would risk everything and leave their homes, families, and homeland. They are working and contributing to the economy too, as you even admit. They get the same benefits your partner did AND that YOU are eligible for as well. That is one of the key things of the EU and a mark of a civilization. That is the definition of a society where everyone is given a chance, treated equally and fairly, and is judged by the content of their character, not their different skin color or which version of ignorant superstitious nonsense their parents lied about as children. Racists around the world said the same things about the Irish and Jews and Poles (like your partner) and...every other immigrant movement over the centuries. What's your family's heritage, by the way? Were your ancestors lied about with racist fearmongering crapola by self-entitled locals the same way as you are now? If someone like that said the same things about all people from Poland, like your partner, would they be right? Or would you want them to judge your partner based on who they actually were, not where they just happened to come from?
    • Again, this is an irrelevant attempt to attack the messenger. The truth does not require any justification.
    • Removed the blue and underline as you did not post a link. This would also  be considered spamming.
    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      196
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      153
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!