• 0

Transmit an array of strings in a POST operation using Jquery/AJAX


Question

Hello! I would like to submit an array of strings from a web form to my web service and need a little bit of hand holding. My web service I've written seems fine with having an array of strings as input but I'm not exactly sure how to encode this in javascript from my html form elements before I ship the data to my web service to be processed. The array of strings will be pretty small (on the order of 20x3 strings).

I suspect that there is a clever way to do this by coding the form correctly and just running a jquery .serialize() operation on the form and submitting it.

My first thought was to define a number of textbox inputs and give them incremental ID#'s such as "array0_0", "array0_1", "array0_2", "array1_0", "array1_1", "array_1_2", "array_2_1" etc.

Then as a first step before submitting the post, collect all the values in the textboxs and compile an array using 2 nested for loops. Something like that would probably work, but I was wondering if there was some magic that I could do in my form so that jquery recognizes an array of strings in my form so that the .serialize() function just does its magic.

Thanks!

-Shad

21 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

Maybe use JSON to convert it back and forth as needed? That's how we do search suggestions on our website. A service serializes JSON, the ajax (jquery, really) javascript picks it up and parses it and displays the results.

  • 0

To be more specific... we have a series of services on one server... including a search service. When you type in a search box a javascript function sends off queries to the server (the web app action written to deal with this) which then queries the service. The service hands back the JSON response, all the action does is reads it as an input buffer and println's it out to the client. Once the javascript gets the response back it parses it and displays the result.

UI (javascript) --> Action (java) --> SERVICE (java) --> Action (java) --> UI (javascript)

  • 0


var arrayToStore = new Array();
var $strings = $('form input');
$strings.each(function(){
arrayToStore.push(this.val());
})
[/CODE]

Also, if you want to store them with a specific key, give them all a data-something attribute rather than abusing the ID property.

  • 0


var arrayToStore = new Array();
var $strings = $('form input');
$strings.each(function(){
arrayToStore.push(this.val());
})
[/CODE]

Also, if you want to store them with a specific key, give them all a data-something attribute rather than abusing the ID property.

I thought that it was only considered "abuse" if you don't use unique IDs.

Your solution is a good start but I need to make a 2d string array in the end so I'll need to tweak it.

  • 0

I have some ideas to play around with. Haha, its funny how much time is spent just communicating between applications and services. This particular application started as a standalone windows program, but my boss wants tighter control so now I'm extending it with a web front end. I think I've spent more time trying to figure out jquery and javascript than I did with the whole write up of my application. I guess whatever you are use to is easy, its when you are up against a learning curve that makes things hard.

Still, I'm amazed at how powerful this jquery and AJAX stuff is and how far the tools have come in the past 10 years. When I was doing full time web development I did everything in server side PHP scripting with auxiliary basic javascript stuff. Using AJAX has the huge advantage of not having to redraw the whole page for every little thing. Now it seems like it is better to offload as much work on the client side as you can and just write auxiliary server side scripting.

  • 0

I thought that it was only considered "abuse" if you don't use unique IDs.

Your solution is a good start but I need to make a 2d string array in the end so I'll need to tweak it.

It's not abuse, per se, but if you can use the data- attribute, it makes much more sense to use it in a case like this. If you gave them all some data-location1 and data-location2 attribute (or however named), as you iterate through with each you can grab those attributes using .attr(), and then store the final string in your 2d array.

  • 0

It's not abuse, per se, but if you can use the data- attribute, it makes much more sense to use it in a case like this. If you gave them all some data-location1 and data-location2 attribute (or however named), as you iterate through with each you can grab those attributes using .attr(), and then store the final string in your 2d array.

Word. Thanks.

  • 0


(function store(){
var arrayToStore = [['',''],['','']];
var $strings = $('form input');
$strings.each(function(){
var x = $(this).attr('data-loc1');
var y = $(this).attr('data-loc2');
arrayToStore[x][y] = $(this).val();
});
console.log(arrayToStore);
})();
[/CODE]

A better example...

  • 0

I keep getting an error when I try to use multidimensional arrays.

Here is my form:

<form>
	<table>
		<tr>
			<th> </th>
			<th>Independent</th>
			<th>Pass</th>
			<th>Fail</th>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<th>Data Labels</th>
			<td><input type="textbox" data-row="0" data-col="0" /></td>
			<td><input type="textbox" data-row="0" data-col="1" /></td>
			<td><input type="textbox" data-row="0" data-col="2" /></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<th>Data Row 1</th>
			<td><input type="textbox" data-row="1" data-col="0" /></td>
			<td><input type="textbox" data-row="1" data-col="1" /></td>
			<td><input type="textbox" data-row="1" data-col="2" /></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<th>Data Row 2</th>
			<td><input type="textbox" data-row="2" data-col="0" /></td>
			<td><input type="textbox" data-row="2" data-col="1" /></td>
			<td><input type="textbox" data-row="2" data-col="2" /></td>
		</tr>

		</table>
	</form>
	<p><input type="button" value="Run Regression" onClick="ProcessButtonClick()"/></p>

Here is my javascript:

   	 function ProcessButtonClick() {
			var arrayToStore = [['',''],['','']];
			var $strings = $('form input');
			$strings.each(function(){
				var x = parseInt($(this).attr('data-row'));
				var y = parseInt($(this).attr('data-col'));
				arrayToStore[x][y] = $(this).val();
			});
			console.log(arrayToStore);
}

I get this error in the console from Firebug:

TypeError: can't convert undefined to object

arrayToStore[x][y] = $(this).val();

If I'm only addressing 1 index, it works (i.e., arrayToStore[x] = $(this).val(); does not give me an error but doesn't give me the right output obviously).

Thank you for your input and time.

  • 0

Its an array initialization problem... once I sized it correctly when dimensioning the array variable it worked fine:

var arrayToStore = [['','',''],['','',''],['','','']]

I did not think that Javascript arrays had to be strictly dimensioned... Is there a short hand for this? I would think new Array(3,3) or something would look better...

  • 0

#

# CORRECT WAY TO INSTANTIATE AN ARRAY WITHOUT DIMENSION

#

var arrayToStore = [];

#

# PROBLEM

#

var arrayToStore = [['',''],['','']];

#

# REASON

#

IF you instantiate the array with only the above "problem" dimensions and do not correct the length beyond this, they will be truncated.

  • 0

Its an array initialization problem... once I sized it correctly when dimensioning the array variable it worked fine:

var arrayToStore = [['','',''],['','',''],['','','']]

I did not think that Javascript arrays had to be strictly dimensioned... Is there a short hand for this? I would think new Array(3,3) or something would look better...

I had worked that code up in a fiddle and was getting the same error, hence why I posted it with ['','']. The general consensus seems to be to create a helper fuction that, given a number x, can push x number of blank objects into the array which you can then fill.

Or... just use an object. It's certainly the preferred way in JS unless you really need an array of arrays.

#

# CORRECT WAY TO INSTANTIATE AN ARRAY WITHOUT DIMENSION

#

var arrayToStore = [];

#

# PROBLEM

#

var arrayToStore = [['',''],['','']];

#

# REASON

#

IF you instantiate the array with only the above "problem" dimensions and do not correct the length beyond this, they will be truncated.

If you do arrayToStore = [] and then try to set arrayToStore[0][0] = something, you'll get the same error.

  • 0

If you gave me an example of how you would like the content it might make it easier but off the top of my mind - how does this work?


var arrayData = [];

function ProcessButtonClick() {

var $strings = $('form input');

$strings.each(function(){

var arrayParent = [];
var arrayChild = [];

var x = parseInt($(this).attr('data-row'));
var y = parseInt($(this).attr('data-col'));

arrayChild[x] = $(this).val();
arrayParent[y].push(arrayChild);
arrayData.push(arrayParent)

});



}
[/CODE]

  • 0

tim_s - I get this error:

TypeError: arrayParent[y] is undefined

arrayParent[y].push(arrayChild);

Seems like the only way for me to get it to work is to declare the full size of the array... in just about every language you can initialize the size of an array directly but for some reason this doesn't seem possible in Javascript unless I'm missing something.

In the end, the size of my table is fixed so dimensioning out the variable before hand is fine.

  • 0

Seems like the only way for me to get it to work is to declare the full size of the array... in just about every language you can initialize the size of an array directly but for some reason this doesn't seem possible in Javascript unless I'm missing something.

In the end, the size of my table is fixed so dimensioning out the variable before hand is fine.

You're not, as I mentioned, it's not a preferred way of doing things in JS. If you must, this will work:


<script>
var multidArray = function(y){
var array = [];
for(i=0;i<y;i++){
array.push(['example', 'array']);
}
return array;
}
var newArray = multidArray(6);
newArray[1][0] = ['now', 1,1];
newArray[1][1] = 'modified';
console.log(newArray);
</script>
[/CODE]

However, in JS, this is preferable:

[CODE]
var better = {};
better[0] = {1: 'this', 2 : 'will', 3: 'work', 4: 'much', 5: 'better'};
console.log(better[0][1]); // will log 'this'
[/CODE]

  • 0

Well..its all moot because I can't get the input array into my web service.... apparently arrays of strings are a supported output (in JSON format) but not a supported input. I'll have to turn my table into CSV and then program my web service accordingly.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Wow, imagine you dump hundreds of hours into completing things and unlocking stuff and you lose it all. Back in the day when cheats were built into games, you could at least unlock things again that way without spending hundreds of hours again. But those days are long gone for some reason as no one builds cheats into games anymore. So it's even more painful that studio that's on its 6th installment **** it up so badly.
    • Spotify finally removes the disco ball app icon in the latest update by Ivan Jenic Image: Spotify Spotify has just released an update that removes its now infamous disco ball icon. The update reverts the app icon to the familiar flat green logo after weeks of mixed reactions online. The icon arrived on May 13 as part of the company's 20th anniversary celebration and was always intended to be temporary, though Spotify only confirmed that after the backlash started. The disco ball took the internet by storm, as the reception was split. A vocal group of users called it ugly and disorienting, with some iOS users noting that the 3D glowing effect made the app look like it was stuck mid-update. On the other end, the icon picked up a following of its own. Its retro, three-dimensional look immediately stood out against the flat, minimalist aesthetic that has dominated app design for years. It even started a small movement, spawning what people started calling "discomorphism," a mashup of disco and skeuomorphism. Other brands started posting disco ball versions of their own logos, probably in an effort to ride the wave of memes that flooded the internet during late May. Spotify has had a turbulent relationship with its user base lately. Besides the disco ball icon, which certainly wasn't appreciated by everyone, the company has also received backlash for its willingness to include AI-generated music on its platform. On May 17, Spotify promised the old icon would return “in a few weeks.” And now it looks like that time has finally arrived. So, whether you liked the disco ball or it made you uncomfortable, it’s now gone for good. The next time you update the Spotify app on your phone, the old, flat-design icon will return.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      slackerzz earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      highriskpaym earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      highriskpaym earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      highriskpaym earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      FBSPL earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      520
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      197
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      157
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      84
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      75
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!