Successfully Managed to Remove RAID0


Recommended Posts

Hi Guys,

I've experienced a problem on my PC recently.

I have a Dell XPS420 and towards the end of last summer the PC started to crash, screen would go black, and one of the fans sped up inside really quickly, until i rebooted, and the fan would come on slowly again, and then eventually the same thing would reoccur.

I removed the side panel, blew out the inside with compressed air, downloaded the latest driver for my Geforce 8600GT video card and as soon as i downloaded the driver the fan speed sped up without it crashing, i reformatted the hard drive, reinstalled Windows, and all was fine until two days ago.

The same thing happened again two days ago, first the operating system locked up, and the Windows bar at the bottom of the desk top screen changed colour (went white) then the screen started locking up, then it went blank, the fan sped up, i tried downloading the driver for the graphics card again, but didn't work this time.

I therefore purchased a new video card yesterday, the Geforce 630 with a massive fan ontop of it, installed that last night, but the operating system was playing up big time, i couldn't install the drivers for the video card, tried the enclosed CD Rom, even online, everything i tried to do on the Pc wouldn't work, even right clicking on the desk top and choosing 'personalise' came up with errors, Google Chrome wouldn't open, i couldn't even right click 'my computer' to try and get into Device Manager, as it told me that Windows Explorer could not open or something to that effect!

The whole thing was running slow, even though i'm running Vista on a Quad Core Intel with 4GB Ram (i know Vista can only use 3GB).

It was even doing a religious CHKDSK on every reboot!

So, i went for a fresh install of Windows, using the installation CD, all sorted i thought, until it loaded for the first time and told me straight away on the login screen it came up with some error box telling me that the user account control file or something is corrupt! This was a fresh install!

So, i'm now thinking hard drive problems, so thought about replacing the hard drives and removing the dreaded RAID 0 whlist i was at it, thought i would experiment with the old drives whilst removing the RAID0 and then if i can do it, then buy 2 x new hard drives once done.

Managed to remove the RAID0 volume from within the RAID BIOS screen (CTRL & I) and then set the hard drives to ATA in BIOS, then reformatted both hard drives using the Vista installation CD, and all reinstalled fine and i now have 2 x 300GB separate hard drives showing in Windows Explorer (happy days !)

The hard drives and the PC all seem to be working brilliantly now, but do you reckon i could still have bad hard drives?

I'm running a CHKDSK now but it seems to be taking a lot longer now they are no longer RAID0.....

Also, its been so long since i've not had RAID0 set up, how would you use the 2 seperate hard drives?

I was thinking having 1 of the drives just for the operating system and program files, and the other hard drive for my media, i have about 180GB of media consisting of photos, videos etc., and if i wanted to replace that hard drive for media with a 1TB drive would that be easy enough to do if i keep it seperate to the program and operating system drive?

"The hard drives and the PC all seem to be working brilliantly now, but do you reckon i could still have bad hard drives?"

Yes. If something is going wrong with your RAID then either you have crappy drives or crappy controlling hardware/software. If you remove the RAID and still get problems either one or both of the hard drives are bad and need to be RMA'd. Run the manufacturer's utility to check the condition of the drives.

Guess What? Just as well i havent loaded anything onto these drives yet, as Windows is starting to mess up again.

I started to load MS Office 2007 from a CD, it was taking forever to open one of the files on the CD, the progress bar at the top of the screen kept creeping along slowly, and then it froze, i tried a Ctrl Al Del and it said its not responding....

Then it came up with something about System Login Security failed........

Do you reckon its the drives? Have i done anything wrong do you think?

They are Western Digital Drives, just about to see if i can download there diagnostics checker.

Edit: Would welcome as much input and assistance as i can get, as can't really afford another PC, and this was a great PC for a good few years.

Check the SMART on those drives, that should be the first thing you should do. Also see if the event viewer has any disk error / warnings on it. Also RAID 0? really?

Hi Mate, i'm not all that clued up, what does that mean?

Yes they were def RAID 0.

I've just tried to download the Western Digital disk checker here

http://support.wdc.com/product/download.asp?groupid=606&sid=3

Extract, run, and it comes up with 'unable to execute file' 'Create process failed code 740, the requested operation requires elevation?

Just managed to run Western Digital Data Lifeguard Diagnostics - DLGDIAG for Windows and run a quick test on both drives and it came back as a Pass.

Ran a quick Smart test on each drive and it placed a green tick in each drive saying 'Smart Status' Pass.

Any other ideas what could be wrong?

Hi Mate, i'm not all that clued up, what does that mean?

Yes they were def RAID 0.

I've just tried to download the Western Digital disk checker here

http://support.wdc.c...oupid=606&sid=3

Extract, run, and it comes up with 'unable to execute file' 'Create process failed code 740, the requested operation requires elevation?

run as administrator that app (right click on the exe and chose "run as administrator"); also try HD Tune http://www.hdtune.com/download.html to view the SMART table on the disks; S.M.A.R.T. or Self-Monitoring, Analysis and Reporting Technology, is a technology that every modern HDD has; it holds lots of info about the HDD, like temperature, spin time, reallocated sectors count and more; you can see lots of attributes here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S.M.A.R.T.#Known_ATA_S.M.A.R.T._attributes. Also there are lots of programs that check the SMART table and report in a easy way if the HDD is good or is damaged.

Ok so ive now peeformed Extended tests on both drives and they said they completed succesfully using the Western Digital diag tool that I posted above and the SMART has passed.

So they cant be damaged then?

Anything else can be slowing it down and causing hangs and error messages after a reformat?

Shall I start another thread?

Take the drive(s) out, try them in radically different hardware and see if the same problem occurs.

If no problem -> your motherboard or drive controller (if not on the motherboard) or RAM or PSU is dodgy.

If same problem -> your drives are failing.

... also try HD Tune http://www.hdtune.com/download.html to view the SMART table on the disks; S.M.A.R.T. or Self-Monitoring, Analysis and Reporting Technology,

I'd second this over running the SMART app from Western Digital. I had a 2TB WD disk causing issues in windows. Windows logs indicated it had issues writing to the drive (a lot or retries). Running the WD app showed the SMART as a pass. Running HDtune showed a fail. I returned the drive to WD for RMA.

Thanks N k And Jason, ill try that Hd Tune on the drives.

Also, re swapping out the drives into another pc is it as simple as disconnecting from my faulty pc and installing into another? I have an old Packard Bell running XP, if I swap the drive out to the XP machine will that XP Machine boot straight into Vista (which is on the troublesome pc) ?

HI Guys,

Might have had a breakthrough, although a confusing one at that....

As mentioned above, i performed a quick test via Western Digital dianostic test and each drive returned fine.

Then last night before going to bed, i did a longer 'extended' test and Drive 1 (operating system) (think the operating systems on that one as don't know if WD number them differently) and when i got up this morning it past, then when i went out to work this morning i started the 'extended' test on Drive 2, and just got in from work and it said 'stopped - too many bad sectors'!!!

But its on Drive No.2 and i'm almost sure its Drive 1 that the operating system is installed on...

I'm just about to download HDTune and run that as suggested,

Bad sectors on any drive can cause crashes, especially if they send bad data to the disk controller. If you open event viewer and look under system you'll probably see some error messages indicated that there were paging errors and / or delayed write failures.

Downloaded HDTune and could only test 1 drive as was only showing 1 in the drop down box, run the test on that drive and it found something cant now remember what as I was confused as wanted to know why it wouldnt show the other drive so went into explorer and the other drive isnt even showing now!!

To summarise, both drives were showing in explorer as I remember saving a notepad file to the d drive (drive 2) once I removed the raid 0 to make sure it worked.

So I then restarted the pc to see if it would show and the pc wont even boot now!

Came up with an error in the flash/dos screen that no boot device can be found or something.

Could that WD diagnostic test have killed the drive completely?

Edit said 'drive 1 not found serial ata sata1 Alert! Failed to detect one or more drives during post strike f1 key to continue f2 to run the setup utlity press f5 to run onboard diagnostics.

So well and truly knackered them drives!

Can those diagnostic tools finish off a poorly drive?

Yes they can but only really if the drive is inheritly bad anyway, i.e. running a diagnostic isn't going to make a drive that fine have mostly bad sectors.

Either RMA the drives if they're within warranty or sell the spares if not or whatnot.

And don't listen to people moaning about RAID0, it does what it's meant to. If you store all your mega important files on a RAID0 then yes, you're an idiot, but if you use RAID0 for what it's meant for (a boot OS drive only with applications/games) then that's fine.

And don't listen to people moaning about RAID0, it does what it's meant to. If you store all your mega important files on a RAID0 then yes, you're an idiot, but if you use RAID0 for what it's meant for (a boot OS drive only with applications/games) then that's fine.

it's not moaning, RAID 0 is fine for what is meant for (performance); the problem is i never saw a RAID 0 configuration purposely made with the perception of the disadvantages in mind, ever; all the RAID 0 configs is saw was in the aftermath of a single HDD failure (meaning the array was gone), with important data going bye bye; much safer is RAID 10.

lol it's not moaning :rofl:

RAID 10 needs 4 drives and you might as well RAID 5/6 them instead, plus this is all being done using your system CPU, so it'll run much slower than a software RAID 0.

I've got a RAID 0 setup for my arch box, it's not my main device and if the drive/array failed then yeah I'd lose some things but nothing of importance.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Segra 1.6.2 by Razvan Serea Segra is a free, open-source OBS-powered game recorder offering fast gameplay capture, instant clips, AI highlights, deep game integration, and seamless uploads—perfect for gamers, streamers, and content creators. Lightweight, fast, zero bloat. Segra key features: Automatic Game Recording: Begin capturing gameplay the moment your game launches, with zero manual setup. Instant Clipping: Save important moments instantly using a customizable hotkey—perfect for highlights, montages, or quick shares. Segra AI Highlights: Let Segra automatically detect kills, assists, deaths, and key events to generate polished highlight reels without manual editing. Gameplay Uploads: Upload recordings and clips directly to Segra.tv for fast sharing and cloud access. Deep Game Integration: Enjoy advanced game-data tracking across hundreds of supported titles, enabling smart highlight generation and stat-informed clipping. High-Performance Capture: Record up to 4K at 144 FPS using OBS-powered technology with minimal performance impact, supporting NVENC, AMD VCE, and custom quality controls. Segra Editor: Edit recordings easily with timeline controls, segment management, and event-based navigation to build the perfect clip. Customization Options: Adjust hotkeys, output formats, storage paths, codecs, capture quality, and performance settings for a tailored recording experience. Segra 1.6.2 changelog: UI: Improved the transition from the loading skeleton to the real content card. Security: Added Segra.dll code signing and automatic VirusTotal upload. Settings: Fixed the settings header to highlight Account when scrolled to the top. Recording: Updated OBSKit.NET to 1.4.1. Download: Segra 1.6.2 | 74.5 MB (Open Source) View: Segra Homepage | Github | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Hey Google, these are the Gemini features I want in 2026 by Aditya Tiwari Google Gemini has been around for over three years. The AI chatbot started its journey back in 2023 (as Bard) when ChatGPT was already a talk of the town. However, it quickly attracted criticism after misrepresenting facts about the James Webb Space Telescope. The search giant spent a year fine-tuning Bard before rebranding the chatbot and its underlying generative AI model to Gemini, drawing inspiration from NASA's first human spaceflight program. Note that Bard was initially powered by LaMDA and PaLM 2; Google has since added several new features and integrations to Gemini. That said, there is scope for improvement and a gap for new features. I have been using Gemini for a while now and have realized that the chatbot lacks several features, making it harder for me to research across topics. These are mostly function-over-form updates that can improve the overall experience. Delete individual messages from a conversation Image via DepositPhotos.com One good thing about Gemini is that it can maintain context throughout the conversation. But things might get chaotic when you want to ask a related question, but don't want it to be part of your conversation in the long run. You can't ask that related question in a fresh chat because Gemini will lose the active conversation context of what you're trying to research. If Google allowed you to delete individual question/answer pairs, you could simply ask about a sub-topic and remove it from the conversation to create a smooth flow of important stuff. Offline mode Image via DepositPhotos.com A big pain of using Gemini daily is that everything loads from the cloud. It takes time for your chats to appear, and you can't view your conversation history while offline. To get a better idea, you can open the Gemini app and see how it looks without an internet connection. While Gemini models run in the cloud, it wouldn't hurt if Google could store chats (at least the text part) on the device so we can refer to them when offline. Google can also offer a lightweight version of its AI model to help with basic drafting, summarization, and other tasks. It has the Gemini Nano model, which can perform on-device processing on Google Pixel, Samsung, and some other Android brands, but it's a system feature and not related to the cloud-based Gemini app. Make temporary chats permanent I can't thank Google enough for taking the time and effort to add incognito mode or temporary chat mode to the Gemini app. It lets you have conversations without worrying that the topics will end up in your chat history or used for model training (at least on paper). Google claims that it doesn't use your temporary chats to "personalize your Gemini experience or train Google’s AI models." However, the data is stored "up to 72 hours to respond to you and to process any feedback you choose to provide." That said, I often start researching something in a temporary chat, only to realize the chatbot's answer is good enough to refer to later. Sadly, Gemini doesn't have an option to make such temporary chats permanent. In other words, I won't be able to follow up on it if I close the temporary chat. I'm left with alternatives like copying the answers into notes or another app. My digital life will get a lot better if Gemini gets a button to make temporary chats permanent. Collapse answers for a cleaner view You're heavily invested in your research game and suddenly feel the need to go up in the chat to recall something. This is when the conversation thread starts to feel like an overwhelming, unending wall of questions and answers. What if Google added a way to collapse Q&A pairs in the Gemini chat thread? It would look quite clean and easy to navigate. You'll quickly get an overview of everything you have discussed with the chatbot. Add buttons to jump between messages Suggested mockup of the feature. This reminds me of a small but useful Gemini feature that Google could add to its chatbot: the ability to hop between prompts in a conversation. Just add simple up- and down-arrow buttons, similar to YouTube Shorts, so people can quickly scroll through the messages. A table of contents or Chat Overview It's hard to get a bird's-eye view of everything you have discussed with the chatbot during a lengthy conversation. This is where a table of contents, or Chat Overview, displayed at the top of the screen, possibly in a drop-down button, might come in handy. You'll be able to get an overview of the chat and jump between messages, serving as an alternative to the up/down arrow buttons. Temporary mode for Gemini Live Image: Google You can use Gemini Live to have real-time conversations with the chatbot, which feels like you're talking to someone in the same room. However, a downside is that Gemini Live doesn't work in Temporary Chat mode, so all your conversations end up in the chat history. Google should consider expanding the temporary chat mode to include Gemini Live. Default to a specific chat One thing that feels somewhat annoying to me is that Gemini always opens in a new chat, whether on web or mobile. Sometimes, you want to return to your last chat. Google can take cues from web browsers, which let you choose whether you want to go to a new tab or a specific web page(s). Gemini can also have options to default to a specific chat when reopened. That said, generative AI chatbots have endless possibilities given the vagueness of their work. You can mold them the way you want by attaching different connectors, adding custom instructions, and including source files. It remains to be seen what Google has in store for future updates and whether anything from this wishlist gets the green light. The search giant released a stream of new Gemini updates in recent months, including Gemini 3.5 Flash and Gemini Omni Spark, adding that it now has 13 products with more than a billion users each. What do you want to see in the Gemini app? Tell us in the comments.
    • Thank you for the post. Just a FYI that links to an outside site or promoting specific software is considered spamming here. Asking general questions is fine.
    • I have been thinking about AI detector tools as a software workflow rather than a single "AI score" widget. When someone pastes text or uploads a document, the UI can return a report with a probability-style score, sentence highlights, reliability notes, and limitations. The useful part is that it can point a reviewer toward passages worth reading again. The risky part is that a polished score can look more certain than it really is. For people who build or review web apps, what should happen before the user copies or exports that kind of report? The minimum I would expect is: A clear input boundary for pasted text versus document files. Limits shown near the workflow, including minimum text length and maximum file size. A report label that says the result is a signal, not proof of who wrote the text. Sentence highlights and evidence notes alongside the global score. Reliability notes when the sample is too short or lacks enough sentence variety. False-positive and false-negative caveats that remain visible in copied/exported summaries. I am trying to avoid the pattern where a clean report card becomes the whole product story. For AI detection, "review this evidence in context" seems more honest than "trust this score." Would you keep the warning text visible on every report, or make it collapsible so the main result stays easier to scan? Disclosure: I work on a small AI detector/reporting workflow, but I am intentionally not linking it here. I am asking about software and report design, not promoting a site.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      sumytbe earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      B4dM1k3 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      DarkWun earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      507
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      181
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      86
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!