Windows 8 and peoples' issue with using a 3rd party start menu


Recommended Posts

ok, so as far as I remember people have liked being able to use 3rd party programs to extend what windows can do. programs suck as objectdock/rocketdock or rainmeter

it's all well and good. it's always been a unspoken philosophy with Windows that if it doesn't do something you want there's probably a program out there for you

now my question is, now that Windows 8 is out why is it that so many people are suddenly complaining that they don't want to use a 3rd party app?

I find that the start screen works just fine (though i'll admit i still have Start8 installed). but why are people making such a big deal about installing a 3rd party app to bring back the start menu (especially when many of the options have little to no effect on system performance)?

It gets very tiring hearing people complain "AH THE START SCREEN SUCKS BLAH BLAH BLAH" but when you suggest install a 3rd party app that brings back the start menu they complain that they shouldn't have to or they just don't want to bother with messing with it.

it gets just as tiring people trying to convince that the start screen is perfect and you should get used to it but that's honestly still not as bad as those who continuously complain about the start screen but are unwilling to compromise in any way

I know these topics are getting old but really, those who continue to complain and have no willingness to compromise ... i just can't understand it

  • Like 1

Simple, people are not happy unless they are bitching and moaning about something. I just ignore them, you can't please everyone and even if you genuinely try to help some of them out, they still find a way to shoot you back down. This is obviously a gross over generalization but is how I generally feel about it. So take with a grain of salt.

  • Like 1

I have no issue with this- do what you want, it's your computer. Can't say I understand it though. The Start Screen works better than the Start Menu ever did (for me).

Many people don't like to have to use extra programs to do what Windows should do out-of-the-box. Since Windows Vista I haven't needed to use third-party skinning applications or UI extensions because Windows worked out of the box and I imagine the same is true for most other users. Personally I don't have a problem with the new Start Screen - it has improved functionality and while it's a bit clunky and inelegant it is better than the old Start Menu.

The biggest issue I have with Windows 8 is the implementation of the hot-corners and the Charm bar, which really are terrible for mouse & keyboard users; I'm constantly triggering UI elements that I don't want during normal usage. I haven't seen any third-party software that offers a viable alternative to the hot-corners and Charm bar without reverting to the traditional Start Menu, which I don't want. It's possible some software does that but I haven't really been bothered enough to search for it.

I know these topics are getting old but really, those who continue to complain and have no willingness to compromise ... i just can't understand it

These topics are getting old because people like you don't understand why people are complaining about Windows 8. I like Windows 8 and use it as my primary operating system but that doesn't mean there aren't substantial design issues and people shouldn't have to find third-party software when they didn't need to with previous versions. Like with Vista, many people have legitimate concerns about the operating system and disagree with the direction that Microsoft is taking Windows - by speaking out against it people are seeking to make sure Microsoft doesn't make the same mistake again.

People need to stop baiting the other side to respond.

there is no issue. the start menu isn't an issue, but it is something they can use to complain about windows 8. if there was a start menu,they would have found something else instead. you gotta understand a lot of this negativity comes from android and iphone users who were constantly bashing windows phone,and vowed never to use it. now that windows 8 is similar,and they've had already chosen their allegiance, they gotta bash windows 8.

Many people don't like to have to use extra programs to do what Windows should do out-of-the-box.

what a bunch of crock. people cite this as the reason they use android,because if they don't like the keyboard or whatever,you can use 3rd party ones.or if they want to change anything,they can. this is just a poor excuse.

there is no issue. the start menu isn't an issue, but it is something they can use to complain about windows 8. if there was a start menu,they would have found something else instead. you gotta understand a lot of this negativity comes from android and iphone users who were constantly bashing windows phone,and vowed never to use it. now that windows 8 is similar,and they've had already chosen their allegiance, they gotta bash windows 8.

I think you are reaching here. I do use Android but I also use Windows 7 and love it. I just don't care for the new start screen in Win 8. It doesn't fit my style.

I genuinely enjoy using third party start menus because you get more features with some of them than you would get if Microsoft offered one. It's fun trying them all.

I don't mind Start8, I think it's better than the Win7 menu and integrates with Modern apps well. Typically, I don't like using 3rd party apps for basic functionality. They also add a layer of troubleshooting when something doesn't work. Many of the GUI enhancers could have compatibility issues in the past. I never really liked many themes more than those in Windows anyway.

I think people use/d them because they were left with no choice. Want to change more than the basic desktop icons, third party app. And so it is with Start menu.

I think the main problem is MS took something or things away people found useful and the Modern UI on top of the Desktop Environment is a kludge and can be annoying/irritating. Modern UI search is terrible in the opinion of many, me included. Lack of context menus is horrendous but really doesn't affect the desktop environment at all. I'm not sure why people feel the need to vehemently defend obvious and blatant shortcomings in many areas of Windows 8. The ecosystem and developers were clearly not ready for RTM.

I think MS is pulling an Xbox RRoD. Release it now for marketing, fix it later. Only problem, there's much more competition (tablets) and devs need money too, they may never come if it doesn't proliferate with "consumers." Yet it is the latest version of Windows and will sell lots by default.

Well, uh...geez, I dunno man. I use classic shell, and I have no issues to speak of. I never ever have to see metro-turd, and that makes me especially happy. So, from where I sit, it's all good.

Back in 2001-2004, With XP ,Customization was was rampant on this site we had dozens of artists who would pour hours of work into themes,programs wallpapers icons etc.

Now this place is filled with fanboy baby asshat trolls who criticize people for wanting something different than the usual vanilla install. Too bad, those were some good times.

  • Like 2

Back in 2001-2004, With XP ,Customization was was rampant on this site we had dozens of artists who would pour hours of work into themes,programs wallpapers icons etc.

Now this place is filled with fanboy baby asshat trolls who criticize people for wanting something different than the usual vanilla install. Too bad, those were some good times.

Watercolor FTW!

The biggest issue I have with Windows 8 is the implementation of the hot-corners and the Charm bar, which really are terrible for mouse & keyboard users; I'm constantly triggering UI elements that I don't want during normal usage. I haven't seen any third-party software that offers a viable alternative to the hot-corners and Charm bar without reverting to the traditional Start Menu, which I don't want. It's possible some software does that but I haven't really been bothered enough to search for it.

I used StopMetro or something for a little bit because I don't like how they exist on every monitor in a multiple monitor setup. It had different options so I left everything unchecked except "Disable Hot Corners". I got tired of running it though.

Back in 2001-2004, With XP ,Customization was was rampant on this site we had dozens of artists who would pour hours of work into themes,programs wallpapers icons etc.

Now this place is filled with fanboy baby asshat trolls who criticize people for wanting something different than the usual vanilla install. Too bad, those were some good times.

Go way back, not too long after I threw away my Timex Sinclair, and you have Norton Desktop. That was better than a Mac. Of course, Microsoft learned how to make a proper desktop and now Norton does, other things and AV, lol.

It's very difficult to take something away from someone that works well, if you're not going to replace it with something that works equally well. Better to have given them nothing at all.

  • Like 3

It's very difficult to take something away from someone that works well, if you're not going to replace it with something that works equally well. Better to have given them nothing at all.

QFT

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Simple answer is yes, you will still get the Windows updates and as long as browser is up to date, you will be good. Only thing secure boot does is protect you against boot level threats and make it harder to install other OS's. I've been looking into this pretty thoroughly lately myself as wifes computer has secure boot disabled plus my other, older computers that run Linux, don't have secure boot enabled. Have seen all kinds of questions about this on the Linux Mint and MX Linux forums. Just don't suddenly enable secure boot now.
    • How many other companies will follow Ford's lead? Or, have they already gotten lazy and become enslaved to AI--and now can't figure out how to get out of that mess.
    • Why would any self-respecting intelligent person follow any recommendation by Donald's GOP administration? With almost two years of fabrications, deceit, and blatantly illegal behavior, why believe them now? They had best be gone after the November 2026 election, so we'll wait and see.
    • AltSendme 0.4.1 by Razvan Serea AltSendme is a minimal, cross-platform application designed for fast, secure, and private peer-to-peer file transfers. It allows users to send files or entire directories directly between devices without relying on cloud servers, accounts, or any personal information. Everything is encrypted end-to-end using modern protocols like QUIC and TLS 1.3, ensuring both strong security and low-latency performance. Transfers are verified with BLAKE3 for data integrity, and interrupted downloads automatically resume, making the experience reliable even on unstable connections. You can transfer anything—images, videos, documents, and more. Integrity checks are performed on both ends, so your files are automatically verified for correctness during both sending and receiving. AltSendme works seamlessly across local networks or long-distance links, capable of saturating multi-gigabit connections for extremely fast delivery. With built-in NAT traversal and encrypted relay fallback, it connects devices almost anywhere. The app integrates with the Sendme CLI and will soon support mobile and web platforms. Fully free and open-source, AltSendme offers a lightweight, privacy-first alternative to traditional cloud-based services, removing size limits, upload costs, and unnecessary data exposure. AltSendme 0.4.1 changelog: Release Highlights Self-hosted relays: Run your own iroh relay so transfers don't rely on public infrastructure. Includes a full deployment template in deploy/relay/ with Docker Compose for a VPS and configuration examples for production use. Fly.io support: One-click deploy template for Fly.io, including a quick-start config (fly.dev.toml) for testing without a custom domain, plus production setup with Let's Encrypt and your own hostname. Relay settings UI: New Settings → Network panel to choose how AltSendme connects: automatic public relays, custom self-hosted URLs (with optional auth token), or disabled. Test connections, verify latency, and see live relay status in the footer. Disable relays: Turn off relay servers entirely when you only need same-network transfers (e.g. LAN). Direct connections only. No relay hop required when devices can reach each other. Android graduates from beta: Android is now part of the regular release cycle alongside desktop. APKs ship with each version (universal, arm64, and armv7). Other improvements Private relay access control via shared auth token Relay fallback notifications when a custom relay is unreachable Broadcast mode toggle in sharing settings Android release build fixes (split-per-ABI APKs, universal APK preservation) UI polish: mobile safe-area insets, dropzone layout, transfer progress animation Bug fixes for minification-related serialization issues and system tray icon loading What's Changed feat(relay): add relay status functionality and settings UI (a120cdf) feat(relay): implement custom relay server configuration and verification (51276c7) feat(relay): add configuration for private relay access and enhance observability features (48fbabf) feat(relay): enhance relay URL validation, display connection status (d4fffa0) feat(relay): add RelayChangeGuard component and enhance relay-related translations (16ba514) feat(broadcast): add toggle setting for broadcast mode in sharing UI (ca6d977) fix(relay): correct QUIC discovery port, pin image, templatize fly.dev (52a2ba5) fix: More broken serialization due to minification (67491a9) fix(android): preserve true universal APK across per-ABI builds (e9f256f) fix(ui): conditional safe-area insets padding on mobile (1182f0e) refactor(transfer): CircularRing component animation fix (944572b) chore(android): drop x86 and x86_64 release APKs, keep universal+arm64+armv7 (34ada0b) Download: AltSendme 0.4.1 | ARM64 | ~9.0 MB (Open Source) Download: AltSendme for MacOS | Android Links: AltSendme Home Page | GitHub | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • You are mostly right about the ephemeral nature of it. As I mention in the article, if you dont add a second device or take a backup of your account before uninstalling it, then yes you will lose access to your account. That said, in terms of actual user experience when you sync multiple devices your message history carries across and there's also a Saved Messages chat like there is on Telegram to send messages and attachments between your installs. But yh, what you point out are correct and its not trying to emulate Messenger or Telegram.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      495
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      225
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      150
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!