Windows 8 and peoples' issue with using a 3rd party start menu


Recommended Posts

ok, so as far as I remember people have liked being able to use 3rd party programs to extend what windows can do. programs suck as objectdock/rocketdock or rainmeter

it's all well and good. it's always been a unspoken philosophy with Windows that if it doesn't do something you want there's probably a program out there for you

now my question is, now that Windows 8 is out why is it that so many people are suddenly complaining that they don't want to use a 3rd party app?

I find that the start screen works just fine (though i'll admit i still have Start8 installed). but why are people making such a big deal about installing a 3rd party app to bring back the start menu (especially when many of the options have little to no effect on system performance)?

It gets very tiring hearing people complain "AH THE START SCREEN SUCKS BLAH BLAH BLAH" but when you suggest install a 3rd party app that brings back the start menu they complain that they shouldn't have to or they just don't want to bother with messing with it.

it gets just as tiring people trying to convince that the start screen is perfect and you should get used to it but that's honestly still not as bad as those who continuously complain about the start screen but are unwilling to compromise in any way

I know these topics are getting old but really, those who continue to complain and have no willingness to compromise ... i just can't understand it

  • Like 1

Simple, people are not happy unless they are bitching and moaning about something. I just ignore them, you can't please everyone and even if you genuinely try to help some of them out, they still find a way to shoot you back down. This is obviously a gross over generalization but is how I generally feel about it. So take with a grain of salt.

  • Like 1

I have no issue with this- do what you want, it's your computer. Can't say I understand it though. The Start Screen works better than the Start Menu ever did (for me).

Many people don't like to have to use extra programs to do what Windows should do out-of-the-box. Since Windows Vista I haven't needed to use third-party skinning applications or UI extensions because Windows worked out of the box and I imagine the same is true for most other users. Personally I don't have a problem with the new Start Screen - it has improved functionality and while it's a bit clunky and inelegant it is better than the old Start Menu.

The biggest issue I have with Windows 8 is the implementation of the hot-corners and the Charm bar, which really are terrible for mouse & keyboard users; I'm constantly triggering UI elements that I don't want during normal usage. I haven't seen any third-party software that offers a viable alternative to the hot-corners and Charm bar without reverting to the traditional Start Menu, which I don't want. It's possible some software does that but I haven't really been bothered enough to search for it.

I know these topics are getting old but really, those who continue to complain and have no willingness to compromise ... i just can't understand it

These topics are getting old because people like you don't understand why people are complaining about Windows 8. I like Windows 8 and use it as my primary operating system but that doesn't mean there aren't substantial design issues and people shouldn't have to find third-party software when they didn't need to with previous versions. Like with Vista, many people have legitimate concerns about the operating system and disagree with the direction that Microsoft is taking Windows - by speaking out against it people are seeking to make sure Microsoft doesn't make the same mistake again.

People need to stop baiting the other side to respond.

there is no issue. the start menu isn't an issue, but it is something they can use to complain about windows 8. if there was a start menu,they would have found something else instead. you gotta understand a lot of this negativity comes from android and iphone users who were constantly bashing windows phone,and vowed never to use it. now that windows 8 is similar,and they've had already chosen their allegiance, they gotta bash windows 8.

Many people don't like to have to use extra programs to do what Windows should do out-of-the-box.

what a bunch of crock. people cite this as the reason they use android,because if they don't like the keyboard or whatever,you can use 3rd party ones.or if they want to change anything,they can. this is just a poor excuse.

there is no issue. the start menu isn't an issue, but it is something they can use to complain about windows 8. if there was a start menu,they would have found something else instead. you gotta understand a lot of this negativity comes from android and iphone users who were constantly bashing windows phone,and vowed never to use it. now that windows 8 is similar,and they've had already chosen their allegiance, they gotta bash windows 8.

I think you are reaching here. I do use Android but I also use Windows 7 and love it. I just don't care for the new start screen in Win 8. It doesn't fit my style.

I genuinely enjoy using third party start menus because you get more features with some of them than you would get if Microsoft offered one. It's fun trying them all.

I don't mind Start8, I think it's better than the Win7 menu and integrates with Modern apps well. Typically, I don't like using 3rd party apps for basic functionality. They also add a layer of troubleshooting when something doesn't work. Many of the GUI enhancers could have compatibility issues in the past. I never really liked many themes more than those in Windows anyway.

I think people use/d them because they were left with no choice. Want to change more than the basic desktop icons, third party app. And so it is with Start menu.

I think the main problem is MS took something or things away people found useful and the Modern UI on top of the Desktop Environment is a kludge and can be annoying/irritating. Modern UI search is terrible in the opinion of many, me included. Lack of context menus is horrendous but really doesn't affect the desktop environment at all. I'm not sure why people feel the need to vehemently defend obvious and blatant shortcomings in many areas of Windows 8. The ecosystem and developers were clearly not ready for RTM.

I think MS is pulling an Xbox RRoD. Release it now for marketing, fix it later. Only problem, there's much more competition (tablets) and devs need money too, they may never come if it doesn't proliferate with "consumers." Yet it is the latest version of Windows and will sell lots by default.

Well, uh...geez, I dunno man. I use classic shell, and I have no issues to speak of. I never ever have to see metro-turd, and that makes me especially happy. So, from where I sit, it's all good.

Back in 2001-2004, With XP ,Customization was was rampant on this site we had dozens of artists who would pour hours of work into themes,programs wallpapers icons etc.

Now this place is filled with fanboy baby asshat trolls who criticize people for wanting something different than the usual vanilla install. Too bad, those were some good times.

  • Like 2

Back in 2001-2004, With XP ,Customization was was rampant on this site we had dozens of artists who would pour hours of work into themes,programs wallpapers icons etc.

Now this place is filled with fanboy baby asshat trolls who criticize people for wanting something different than the usual vanilla install. Too bad, those were some good times.

Watercolor FTW!

The biggest issue I have with Windows 8 is the implementation of the hot-corners and the Charm bar, which really are terrible for mouse & keyboard users; I'm constantly triggering UI elements that I don't want during normal usage. I haven't seen any third-party software that offers a viable alternative to the hot-corners and Charm bar without reverting to the traditional Start Menu, which I don't want. It's possible some software does that but I haven't really been bothered enough to search for it.

I used StopMetro or something for a little bit because I don't like how they exist on every monitor in a multiple monitor setup. It had different options so I left everything unchecked except "Disable Hot Corners". I got tired of running it though.

Back in 2001-2004, With XP ,Customization was was rampant on this site we had dozens of artists who would pour hours of work into themes,programs wallpapers icons etc.

Now this place is filled with fanboy baby asshat trolls who criticize people for wanting something different than the usual vanilla install. Too bad, those were some good times.

Go way back, not too long after I threw away my Timex Sinclair, and you have Norton Desktop. That was better than a Mac. Of course, Microsoft learned how to make a proper desktop and now Norton does, other things and AV, lol.

It's very difficult to take something away from someone that works well, if you're not going to replace it with something that works equally well. Better to have given them nothing at all.

  • Like 3

It's very difficult to take something away from someone that works well, if you're not going to replace it with something that works equally well. Better to have given them nothing at all.

QFT

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
    • Cheers everyone for the replies. It's been very useful. 👍
    • Compared to the 7735HS it is around 25-30% slower in multi-threaded tasks (according to Google search) I did a review of the 7735HS Beelink SER6 Max in 2023, but thinking about it, it's not comparable to the 7730U. For the example you gave about how it will be used, the 7730U is actually an excellent choice for its power and battery efficiency.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      503
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      194
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      67
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!