Recommended Posts

I am trying to get my VM to connect to the network with its own IP address ... but I am having a bit of trouble getting that done..

I have done it before a few months ago but I have forgotten what I did... I firstly a problem was with the OS its self (linux in this case ubuntu server) the eth0 was not activated ... so I activated it (sudo ifconfig eth0 up) ... it has now been connected... I really dont know what to do my VM is on the correct NIC... here are some snap shots which should be better at explaining then me...(attached)

any suggestions on what i need to do?

Edited by Brian M
Removed attachments at op's request.
Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1138894-need-help-with-esxi/
Share on other sites

Does your machine have more than one physical port? It's usually best practice to separate the Machine Port Group and the VMkernel Port.

I do have more the one port yes, surely that would not be an issue?

Which NIC adapter did you pick for your VM? As in E1000, VMXNET3, etc.

e1000 i think :p

If you used e1000 the native driver in ubuntu should work, if you used the vmxnet3 driver then you would have to install the tools, which you don't have installed.

As to multiple nics in the host.. What jdawg was stating was its BAD security practice to run your management network over the same physical network as your guests network. Its best to isolate these, even if on the same IPspace - its best to use the other physical nic from a bandwidth perspective, etc.

If you used e1000 the native driver in ubuntu should work, if you used the vmxnet3 driver then you would have to install the tools, which you don't have installed.

As to multiple nics in the host.. What jdawg was stating was its BAD security practice to run your management network over the same physical network as your guests network. Its best to isolate these, even if on the same IPspace - its best to use the other physical nic from a bandwidth perspective, etc.

its deffo E1000 ... but I cannot see why its being like this... it must be something with the dhcp ??

il set up your suggestion once i get it working at all lol

And what is your dhcp server? Something on your physical network connected via your vmnic2 that you have connected to your vswitch?

So your located at The University of snipped? I wouldn't suggest you post your IP like that, That is a public IP -- I sure hope its not open to the public net for your vmhost management?

And what is your dhcp server? Something on your physical network connected via your vmnic2 that you have connected to your vswitch?

So your located at? I wouldn't suggest you post your IP like that, That is a public IP -- I sure hope its not open to the public net for your vmhost management?

crap... I thought I removed everything to do with the IP ? what did I leave in ? can you please edit your post to remove the name of my uni I have reported my own post to get images taken down

edit ... damn i see it FML ..

Its in your vswitch image. I edit my post to take out the name. Figured that was vague enough to not be an issue, but sure can understand your concern so I snipped it.

So your VMs would be getting an IP on that same range? Do you control the dhcp server? Possible they have some sort of NAC or NAP in place, for example here on our network if your device (mac) is not listed your never going to get an IP, even if you plug into a port that is active.

But I would not put your vmhost management on a connection that allows unknowns to connect to it. I would assume its behind a firewall even if public so I wouldn't be able to connect for example. But what about others on that network that might be outside your control.

I would put the management on the private side of your setup, and use the other nic in your host for connectivity that gives you wider network access/internet access. You could then use a VM to route the traffic for you.

This is how I am setup, I run pfsense as my internet gateway as vm. And then other vms are just connected to the vswitch that is connected to the private side only. My physical boxes (all under my control) share the same IP space. And I don't have 3rd physical nic to breakout the VMKernel port group (managment) to its own physical nic - or I would.

Maybe you trust all the devices on that network -- but unless this is meant to be wide open to the network, I would isolate it.

Its in your vswitch image. I edit my post to take out the name. Figured that was vague enough to not be an issue, but sure can understand your concern so I snipped it.

So your VMs would be getting an IP on that same range? Do you control the dhcp server? Possible they have some sort of NAC or NAP in place, for example here on our network if your device (mac) is not listed your never going to get an IP, even if you plug into a port that is active.

But I would not put your vmhost management on a connection that allows unknowns to connect to it. I would assume its behind a firewall even if public so I wouldn't be able to connect for example. But what about others on that network that might be outside your control.

I would put the management on the private side of your setup, and use the other nic in your host for connectivity that gives you wider network access/internet access. You could then use a VM to route the traffic for you.

This is how I am setup, I run pfsense as my internet gateway as vm. And then other vms are just connected to the vswitch that is connected to the private side only. My physical boxes (all under my control) share the same IP space. And I don't have 3rd physical nic to breakout the VMKernel port group (managment) to its own physical nic - or I would.

Maybe you trust all the devices on that network -- but unless this is meant to be wide open to the network, I would isolate it.

the DHCP is supplied its on their network ... I am going to create my own network to run the system on next week when I have another few hours in the lab to see if its just a DHCP issue, I will obviously set up my own DHCP.. but first I am going to give it its own hardware which should work like a charm I hope, I just need the internet and I dont know why its being a douche ... if all else fails I will set up my own network with its own dedicated IP for the WAN which should then work... I am really stumped though no one can see the problem :/

their is no kind of access list here, and it worked before previously some months ago so I am lost to the problem ... security will be an issue somewhat later but at the moment its just to work their is nothing important on their at the moment ...

Well do a simple sniff then - you should see your dhcp discover go out, do you get back an offer? Then you should send out request and then get back an ack.

Dhcp is fairly easy to troubleshoot. In your screenshot there I see 6000 some rx packets, what is odd is that 377 dropped, are you running a firewall on the linux box that could be blocking dhcp?

If you want to verify the nic is working - give it static on that network, and then see if you can connect. I would make sure you pick and IP that is not in use ;)

edit: btw your IP is still listed there in your vswitch image. You might want to remove that image, that can be done in neowin cp under image management.

edit2: Other things I notice which has nothing to do with your problem, but are you running esxi 5.1, if so your using old vm8 vs the newer vm9 versions. Also I would suggest you install the vmware tools on all your guests.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Ford execs say they made a mistake when they replaced human engineers with AI by David Uzondu Ford recently announced that over the last three years, it's had to rehire about 350 "gray beard" engineers to mentor younger staff and reprogram diagnostic systems and AI tools that were failing to meet up to quality expectations. The company's VP of vehicle hardware engineering, Charles **** said that leaders overlooked the deep experience of veterans who survived many product cycles. **** admitted that simply replacing them with AI was a huge mistake, and that while AI is "a fantastic tool," it remains "only as good as the information you use to train it." The rehired engineers now run mandatory meetings to troubleshoot vehicles and reprogram automated engineering software and AI tools to prevent glitches before production. These technical specialists hunt for failure points before parts ever reach the plant floor, helping prevent the massive recalls and defects that previously cost the company billions as it aims to cut one billion dollars in expenses this year. In last year's JD Power Quality Survey, an annual study that measures the quality of a car during the first three months of ownership, Ford finished 10th among mainstream brands and scored below the industry average. But this year, JD Power ranked the automaker as the top mainstream brand, placing it above the likes of Toyota Motor Corp. and Honda Motor Co. Ford attributed this massive improvement directly to the expertise of these returned engineers. Ford's realization that AI cannot magically design and test quality vehicles without senior human oversight is just the tip of the iceberg. When Careerminds looked at companies that conducted AI-driven layoffs, researchers found out that 35.6% of those companies had to rehire more than half of the employees they previously fired. Another 32.7% had to rehire between 25% and 50% of them. In 2024, Sebastian Siemiatkowski, CEO of Klarna, proudly announced that its new chatbot was doing the work of 700 full-time customer service agents. As a result, the fintech company froze hiring and cut hundreds of positions. But by mid 2025, and into 2026, Klarna was scrambling to recruit human agents again because customer satisfaction had plummeted. It turns out, while AI is very good at answering basic questions like how to check an account balance, when faced with complex customer issues that require nuance, the thing usually resorts to the unhelpful, robotic corporate jargon we all know and love.
    • Free AI in IDEs is shifting to paid models Or you know, you could just learn to actually design and code apps, use frameworks to handle the repetitive parts and not use AI at all - and voila... free for life!
    • In a sane world US antitrust laws wouldn't even allow these companies to be in the position to be subjected to EU directives. As you say, better than oligarch nothing.
    • Apple reportedly has a second-generation iPhone Fold planned for 2027 Good grief, Apple hasn't even released a first folding phone and the Apple faithful is already obsessing over the sequel? Seriously people, go out and touch grass... because this level of obsession is borderline stalkery/neurotic.
    • I checked on the IPs associated with every login and they're all mine... And whenever I get a new prompt, there is no activity to show for it. 
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      xvvxcvv earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      xvvxcvv earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Enthusiast
      Xonos went up a rank
      Enthusiast
    • Conversation Starter
      Admir earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      405
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      169
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      129
    4. 4
      neufuse
      69
    5. 5
      Xenon
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!