Recommended Posts

WIRED EQUIVALENT PRIVACY (WEP) a wireless security measure

hi, I need to try and find more information on WEP I am doing a project (1 of many ) and i need to learn everything I can about WEP ... in extreme detail .. I need to see how and why it is so easily exploited with detailed explanations (I dont need to know how to hack it...just making that clear)

any help will be great..

once again to be clear (just so admins know) I am not asking how to hack a WEP I am asking about the wifi encryption standard and details on the know exploits .. for example, when a key is being obtained handshakes and arps are exchanged ... why? how? what is then done with the information? etc

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1139420-i-need-information-on-wep/
Share on other sites

Join a college/university that subscribes and you'll get it free.

I will get it from my uni then they should have it

You don't learn (and actually understand) that stuff in "extreme" detail in a short amount of time. It's like saying you want to know physical chemistry but don't want to get bogged down with all those orbital shapes and baryons and stuff. To get a solid understanding is going to take some real work so maybe you want to scale back a bit.

I Know I say in my post I need to know everything ... its more... I need access to everything but I know specifically what I am looking for :p its just to long to google search it and I was just coming here for sources or someone with an expert knowledge... I have read your post and will take your points on .... I am going to start ... there is a couple of issues with wep that I will be directly addressing for a program I am writing ... simple OPN WEP to start with then eventually moving on untill my program has all aspects of WEP security down..

Have a listen. This is from Security Now #89

Even More Badly Broken WEP

Leo and I review the operation of wireless network security and discuss in detail the operation of the latest attack on the increasingly insecure WEP encryption system. This new technique allows any WEP-protected WiFi network's secret cryptographic key to be discovered in less than 60 seconds.

http://www.grc.com/sn/past/2007.htm

http://media.grc.com/sn/sn-089.mp3

Kinda the opposite of RTFM: the FM tells you how it's supposed to work and how to build an implementation. It doesn't tell you why an implementation is weak (if it did, we'd never have used it). I went for more of a "read the bug reports and patch notes" recommendation.

[/color]

It sounds more like you don't really care about how or why WEP is weak - that's going to be a discussion for math or comp-sci nerds who like to use lots of letters and symbols when they talk about things. You sound like you're more interested in the steps necessary to exploit a vulnerability.

Consider two imaginary descriptions of a weakness in some piece of cryptographic software:

  • Algorithm X has a bias in byte 3 that makes it 1/2^384 % more likely to return 0 than any other a-bit sequence. You can use that to discover 1 bit of key information in time 2^56 with 95% probability. (1.5 assloads of math and stats follow here. Lots of brackets and letters)
  • Capture 300,000 packets, then compute byte 5 + byte 9 xor byte 3 for each packet. Count how many times you get 1, 2,3,4,5,? as a result of that calculation and store the the number of times for each value. If a value occurs twice as often as any other number then there is a 95% chance that bit 4 of that value is bit #7 in the key. if you get { 1= 953, 2=888, 3=1,965, 3=1,001, 4=920? } then there's a good chance that the 7th bit in the key is 0 (because 3 occurs most often, 3dec = 0b0000011, so bit #4 is 0, so bit #7 of the key is probably 0). You can use this new information about the key + new packets + different calculations to determine the value of more bits in the key.

The first answer is what you'll get out of comp-sci text books and papers. It's the "real understanding" of why WEP is weak. You will see bits of the second in research papers but its typically a mathematical description rather than an algorithm. If you're not a huge math nerd it's going to be somewhat difficult to convert that into a useful algorithm. On the plus side, you know why those algorithms work.

If you prefer the second kind of answer then you're probably best off just reading the source code for a tool like aircrack-ng or metasploit. It won't give you an understanding about why the code works, but you will understand how to use it. The second is saying "you can perform a statistical attack" but it hand-waves passed the details about why particular data is used or exactly how it reveals particular bits of key information (why byte 5+9 and not 7+6? why do we get the bit in the key at postion 7 instead of 3? why do we need 300k packets and not 3m or 300?). If you don't really care why it works then reading the source code is the quickest way to enlightenment.

you are half right :p while I am looking as to how its exploited (i am not looking to exploit it with a program like aircrack and aireplay I want to know what these programs do to exploit it) but I feel I should have an understanding of the math as well but not to a massive indepth level to the point that I can write a book my self :p

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • There are so many of these apps now that do this, what do people recommend?
    • Just the price of doing business. The scamble to pull as much from the web as possible is happening, and it's happening before a case like this changes how or what is legal do to with AI in terms of data harvesting. But even then as we've seen with the likes of Google who ignore cookie requests and just accept the fact they'll get fined, it's built into their business price model now. AI is here, its not going away. Their reward if any from the court case would be best suited to trying to incorprate AI or licence their end points as authentic human verified content. The problem is, as we've seen these same news papers are using AI themselves.
    • Which finger's fingernail are we talking about? I can see how not having this info can lead to massive differences in interpretation.
    • This Chinese company is reportedly developing a feature Apple and Samsung can only dream of by Hamid Ganji While companies like Apple and Samsung have been relatively conservative with their devices’ battery capacities in recent years, Chinese manufacturers have taken the competition to the next level by introducing significantly larger batteries. However, the latest report from China suggests that a local company may already be developing a smartphone with a whopping 14,000mAh battery. Chinese leaker Digital Chat Station claimed on Weibo that a smartphone maker is developing a device with a 14,000mAh battery. If true, it would be the largest battery ever used in a smartphone and could, in theory, provide up to a week of battery life on a single charge. The leaker did not reveal the name of the company behind the device, but there are some clues. This week, HONOR unveiled the X80 Pro Max in China with an 11,000mAh battery and 90W wired charging support. The company also launched the Honor Win in January, which packs a 10,000mAh battery. HONOR, a former subsidiary of Huawei, has a proven track record of developing smartphones with unusually large batteries. However, other Chinese brands, including Xiaomi, have also launched devices such as the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max with 7,500mAh batteries. Though Chinese users on Weibo also believe the company behind the new battery is HONOR. Interestingly, Digital Chat Station said the device with the 14,000mAh battery weighs around 220 grams, making it lighter than the Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max (233 grams) and slightly heavier than the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra (214 grams). The iPhone 17 Pro Max currently packs a 5,088mAh battery in eSIM-only versions, while the Galaxy S26 Ultra features a 5,000mAh battery. Neither device is expected to see a dramatic increase in battery capacity in its next-generation successor. So when it comes to battery comparison, Chinese brands are unbeaten. HONOR smartphones are currently available in the EU, but the Chinese brand has no official presence in the United States due to restrictions imposed by the U.S. government.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      kinowa earned a badge
      First Post
    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      461
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      172
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      136
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Xenon
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!