Setting local DNS server? Ubuntu 12.04


Recommended Posts

Hii guys...

I need to create a local DNS server in my office.

Here is the scenario:

- There is a development and staging website that is hosted on a remote server.

- We need to add the host file entries in everyone's system who needs to access that site.

What we need to accomplish is

- Skip to edit the host file entries on every system and instead just use the DNS server IP that will resolve the website that has a public IP and can be accessed only from our office

.

- Should I configure caching only DNS server OR primary and slave DNS server?

I tried configuring primary DNS server but unable to setup proper zone files. The name server is not registered anywhere. I am using dnsindia as the nameserver.

Can someone help me configuring the SOA


dnsindia.com. IN SOA dnsindia.com. root.dnsindia.com. (
[/CODE]

Can we use any name above or is there any process / restrictions?

when I use dig, the answer section returns NONE.

Even if I create a forward zone file with one of the system in my local network, the host name is not resolved.

Can someone help me with the walk through / guide that will help me configure the DNS server with bind?

So if i am reading this right you have some server you need to access, so this server is not available via the public dns? There is no name I could resolve on the internet that would point to this IP of the server.

So your creating entries in your host file to access this server?

What is this entry?

So your clients that your putting the host entry in use what for dns now? Are you going to point them at this new BIND server you want to bring up, so that you can resolve say google.com and neowin.net?

Where did this ddnsindia.com come from?? You do understand that domain is already registered on the internet and currently points here for the owning nameservers

Nameservers

NS1.DOMAINRECOVER.COM

NS2.DOMAINRECOVER.COM

Now can not see who its registered to because its whois info is listing DomainProtect, do you own this domain?

Be more than happy to walk you through how to setup bind, but not really clear on what your wanting to do.. So here is an example, lets say your server IP address you create host entries for is 192.168.1.100, and you call it www.myserver.tld

so you have a host entry like this

192.168.1.100 www.myserver.tld

Is myserver this dnsindia domain? Or something else. Lets say you point to googledns now or your isp for dns currently. Just because you bring up a BIND that is setup to own the myserver.tld zone. Your clients are not going to ask him for dns -- they are going to ask googledns or your isp, etc.

So you need to point all your computers to your bind box, then you need to setup bind resolve the zone you want myserver.tld - and also forward other queries to googledns or your isp, etc.

So No if you want to resolve www.myserver.tld it can not be a caching only server, it would have to have authoritative zones, one being the myserver.tld zone - and then either query root servers for internet domains, or forward to some other dns so you can resolve say www.neowin.net, etc.

There is nothing that wrong with that SOA statement from how you presented it - your saying the SOA for dnsindia.com is a record called root.dnsindia.com -- but that is not really true.

The current SOA for that domain is

;; QUESTION SECTION:

;dnsindia.com. IN SOA

;; ANSWER SECTION:

dnsindia.com. 86400 IN SOA ns1.domainrecover.com. dnsmaster.domainrecover.com. 2011111400 28800 7200 604800 86400

So do you own that dnsindia.com domain or not - you shouldn't just grab some random name that you don't own and try and use it. If you want to use FQDN on your local network, then use domains that are not publicly feasible, ie make up the TLD, use .lan or .local, etc. For example you could use dnsindia.lan as you domain.

  • Like 2

So if i am reading this right you have some server you need to access, so this server is not available via the public dns? There is no name I could resolve on the internet that would point to this IP of the server.

So your creating entries in your host file to access this server?

What is this entry?

So your clients that your putting the host entry in use what for dns now? Are you going to point them at this new BIND server you want to bring up, so that you can resolve say google.com and neowin.net?

Where did this ddnsindia.com come from?? You do understand that domain is already registered on the internet and currently points here for the owning nameservers

Nameservers

NS1.DOMAINRECOVER.COM

NS2.DOMAINRECOVER.COM

Now can not see who its registered to because its whois info is listing DomainProtect, do you own this domain?

Be more than happy to walk you through how to setup bind, but not really clear on what your wanting to do.. So here is an example, lets say your server IP address you create host entries for is 192.168.1.100, and you call it www.myserver.tld

so you have a host entry like this

192.168.1.100 www.myserver.tld

Is myserver this dnsindia domain? Or something else. Lets say you point to googledns now or your isp for dns currently. Just because you bring up a BIND that is setup to own the myserver.tld zone. Your clients are not going to ask him for dns -- they are going to ask googledns or your isp, etc.

So you need to point all your computers to your bind box, then you need to setup bind resolve the zone you want myserver.tld - and also forward other queries to googledns or your isp, etc.

So No if you want to resolve www.myserver.tld it can not be a caching only server, it would have to have authoritative zones, one being the myserver.tld zone - and then either query root servers for internet domains, or forward to some other dns so you can resolve say www.neowin.net, etc.

There is nothing that wrong with that SOA statement from how you presented it - your saying the SOA for dnsindia.com is a record called root.dnsindia.com -- but that is not really true.

The current SOA for that domain is

;; QUESTION SECTION:

;dnsindia.com. IN SOA

;; ANSWER SECTION:

dnsindia.com. 86400 IN SOA ns1.domainrecover.com. dnsmaster.domainrecover.com. 2011111400 28800 7200 604800 86400

So do you own that dnsindia.com domain or not - you shouldn't just grab some random name that you don't own and try and use it. If you want to use FQDN on your local network, then use domains that are not publicly feasible, ie make up the TLD, use .lan or .local, etc. For example you could use dnsindia.lan as you domain.

I am very much grateful for your answers.... Thanks !!.

Entries in the host files:


66.xx.xx.84 www.myserver.tld
[/CODE]

So now, I changed the name from dnsindia.com to dnsindia.inc

I was able to setup zone file for my internal network. i.e I am able to dig / ping the internal hostnames just fine.(local IPs)

There is a website at remote location that has public IP (66.xx.xx.84)

Now when I point www.myserver.tld to public IP in zone file, it does not gets resolved.

Zone file entries as :

[CODE]
...
...
@ IN NS ns1.myserver.tld
www.myserver.tld IN A 66.xx.xx.84

[/CODE]

Do we need to include views for accessing Public IPs through local DNS?

The zone file looks fine for myserver.tld. checkzone command indicates the zone file as OK.

Please shed some light here sir

If you zone is myserver.tld

then your A record for www.myserver.tld would just be

www IN A 66.xx.xx.84

Your record is for

www.myserver.tld.myserver.tld

Why would you need to hide dnsindia.inc ?? with myserver.tld

Is that the zone your using? If you not using public domains, then there is no reason use made up stuff as examples or hide stuff.

Here are details for both the zone files::


root@dnsindia:/etc/bind# cat dnsindia.inc.db
; BIND db file for dnsindia.inc
$TTL 86400
@ IN SOA ns1.dnsindia.inc. admin.dnsindia.inc. (
2013030301 ; serial number YYMMDDNN
28800 ; Refresh
7200 ; Retry
864000 ; Expire
86400 ; Min TTL
)
NS ns1.dnsindia.inc.
MX 10 mail.dnsindia.inc.

$ORIGIN dnsindia.inc.
@ IN NS ns1.dnsindia.inc.
mail IN A 192.168.1.103
ns1 IN A 192.168.1.103
rahul IN A 192.168.1.111
[/CODE]

[CODE]
root@dnsindia:/etc/bind# cat db.mvelopes-dev.com
; Start of Authority (SOA) record
;TTL needs to be specified here too
$TTL 86400
mvelopes-dev.com. IN SOA dns.mvelopes-dev.com. root.mvelopes-dev.com. (
2013030301 ; serial # (date format)
10800 ; refresh (3 hours)
3600 ; retry (1 hour)
604800 ; expire (1 week)
86400) ; TTL (1 day)
; Mail Exchange (MX) records.
NS ns1.in2m.com.
; Address (A) records. (real-names of machines)
dns.mvelopes-dev.com. IN A 127.0.0.1
mvelopes-dev.com. IN A 66.xx.xx.84
www IN CNAME mvelopes-dev.com.
my IN CNAME mvelopes-dev.com.

apps.mvelopes-dev.com. IN A 66.xx.xx.85

[/CODE]

And what is not working?

you can't point to 127.0.0.1 - that is loopback, anyone that looks that is up is going to just point to themselves.

What are you trying to do with that NS record to ns1.in2m.com. whois domain is owned by.

Domain servers in listed order:

NS3.SINGLEEDGE.COM 63.171.8.252

NS4.SINGLEEDGE.COM 63.171.8.253

And what is not working?

you can't point to 127.0.0.1 - that is loopback, anyone that looks that is up is going to just point to themselves.

What are you trying to do with that NS record to ns1.in2m.com. whois domain is owned by.

Domain servers in listed order:

NS3.SINGLEEDGE.COM 63.171.8.252

NS4.SINGLEEDGE.COM 63.171.8.253

Thanks !! I got this working and was able to access the remote sites using my DNS server. There were some issues with the zone files which I checked with checkzone command. Zone files seems to be OK now.

in2m.com is a domain owned by our company. But can I exclude it? I don't want to use anything that is public. Everything should be private only for our company users.

I used dns.mvelopes-dev.com as loop back because any requests made to dns.mvelopes should be resolved by DNS server itself because that domain does not exists. (correct if I am wrong)

At last any suggestions or guide that you would prefer for the zone files OR DNS configuration that can enhance the performance of my DNS server.

Thanks in advance..

"I used dns.mvelopes-dev.com as loop back because any requests made to dns.mvelopes should be resolved by DNS server itself because that domain does not exists. (correct if I am wrong)"

You would point that to the IP of the dns server resolving it then, not loopback - if a client got told that the NS for mvelopes-dev.com was dns.mvelopes-dev.com and its ip address was 127.0.0.1 the client would query its OWN loopback, which would fail.

There is really no reason to include in2m.com, unless you want to have a zone for it on your own servers. Those domain servers are public already.

As to guides - none I would suggest, what I would suggest if your interested in BIND is http://shop.oreilly.com/product/9780596100575.do

Great book on BIND and dns in general.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Apple reportedly has a second-generation iPhone Fold planned for 2027 by Hamid Ganji The iPhone Fold is one of the most anticipated tech products expected to debut this fall. It will be Apple’s first foldable iPhone, ushering in a new product category for the company. While the first generation has yet to hit the shelves, a new leak suggests Apple has already begun work on its successor. Chinese leaker Digital Chat Station claims that the second-generation iPhone Fold has already been confirmed, meaning Apple could launch a successor in fall 2027. The foldable iPhone is also reportedly referred to as the “iPhone Ultra,” though it remains unclear whether Apple will ultimately choose that branding, especially as Samsung is rumored to rename the Galaxy Z Fold 8 as the Galaxy Z Fold Ultra this year. The leaker also claims that the second-generation foldable will feature a wider folding display while reusing the same screen found in the first generation. Apple’s first foldable iPhone is expected to feature a 7.8-inch inner display and a 5.3-inch outer screen in a passport-style form factor. It has already been reported that Apple plans to change its iPhone release cycle in 2026 to spread launches throughout the year. Under this strategy, the iPhone Fold is expected to debut this fall alongside the iPhone 18 Pro and iPhone 18 Pro Max. The standard iPhone 18 and iPhone Air 2 are expected to arrive later in 2026 or in early 2027. Speaking of the iPhone Air, Digital Chat Station says Apple remains undecided about a third-generation model. The company is reportedly waiting to see how the iPhone Air 2 performs in the market, and if sales disappoint, a successor may never materialize. As we reported this week, the iPhone Air has not been scrapped from Apple’s plans. The second-generation model is reportedly scheduled for spring 2027 and could introduce upgrades such as an additional rear camera for ultrawide photography and improved battery life.
    • ahh yes the good old your opinion differs from mine so you are therefore insane lol destiny 1 had no agenda pushing and was a massive success of a game, if you clearly look online the team for some reason thought they had too many men on the team and went on a woman and dei recruitment drive and we all know how destiny 2 performed from then on in
    • The limited imaginations and business acumen of non-dominant players is simply that: the abject lack of creative business acumen. Businesses often want to operate in a financially-rewarding marketplace (free market economics) and/or exit/cash-out at maximal financial recompense. Money is their incentive; regulations are both their obstacles and their tools; politics is their means of influencing the marketplace. Google, in this story's example, is crying that AWS and Azure are "too dominant" -- cuz Google Cloud is not printing as much money as Alphabet wants (although it is still dramatically more than they actually need). The EU DMA should truly follow-the-money and treat the EU as its own sovereign nation in order to protect European market players: Domestic entities are exempt from market-influence regulations until absolute monopoly is achieved; Foreign (non-EU/non-Euro) entities are all regulated via stricter DMA measures whereby regulated partnership with independent domestic entity becomes the only way for foreign entities to 'tip the scale' for favorable financial remunerations. Basically create a dual-track aligning with China's foreign investment models. In my eyes, this is the only way to properly protect the European marketplace beyond the current dot-com/ai-bubble/social-media crazes.
    • I have a fire n ice theme w my bedroom laptops. one is a red lenovo gaming laptop (fire) and the precision is ice
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      Vistor earned a badge
      One Year In
    • First Post
      kinowa earned a badge
      First Post
    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      406
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      172
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      131
    4. 4
      Xenon
      72
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!