• 0

Matlab-ish Alternative?


Question

Hi once again,

Im looking for an alternative possibly free, but I doubt it (so paid ones are fine) that enables more capability for modeling vectors, 3d spaces, units, etc...

EDIT: Reasoning: understanding them more and curiosity

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1139852-matlab-ish-alternative/
Share on other sites

10 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

While I had never heard of FreeMat or Scilab before, I have used MATLAB and Octave quite a bit. I'm not really interested in FreeMat, but Scilab looks AWESOME (other than all the Java dependencies apt-get wants to install with it). Thanks for the tip BudMan!

  • 0

Hmm I wish FreeMat had more documentation, so I can see more of behind the works of how they improved the 3d visualization and n-dimension stuff.

With all three not much on documentation on what I want to see. In the end though it comes with trials, ill just try all of em and see if one is past the parameters of Matlab's functions.

Im pretty sure once I install these programs, I can look through the help section to learn more about certain functions.

Scilab does look good, but from just shifting through some documentation, they seem have some limitations as Matlab does.

On a separate note, do you know how these programs do in the signals and systems area? Curious if its improved from what Matlab has, although Matlab has really strong modules and toolboxes.

  • 0

I have primarily used MATLAB for signals and systems computations, but most discrete modeling software would work. While Octave is definitely my second choice, there is a reason that MATLAB is the industry leader: its very powerful and well supported.

Most open-source projects are lacking in documentation because documentation is boring to write. When a developer writes open-source software, he often does it because he likes it. So long as he understands how it works, that is usually deemed good enough. Documentation is secondary. While this is probably not a good approach, as an open-source developer I can definitely understand why most other developers feel this way.

Unfortunately if you want to understand how a poorly documented open-source product is doing something, you will need to fumble through the user interface or scour the source code. On the bright side, I have seen many open-source projects with very good quality source code because the developer is passionate about his work. If you are really interested in learning how the magic happens at the most technical level, the source code is definitely the way to do that. Source availability is a distinct advantage of the open-source alternatives BudMan listed compared to MATLAB.

  • 0

If possible, look into educational discount pricing of Matlab to see if that is more affordable.

I've used Octave and GNUPlot and think they are OK. Octave is great, but GNUPlot I was less impressed with.

R is a completely different language and platform than Matlab is and is oriented towards Statistical analysis but there is a lot of overlap in functionality. R is GPL-2 licensed and is extremely powerful. I think that it is a free alternative to S. I use R quite a bit.

  • 0

According to my professor, Matlab is the de facto industry standard tool used for signals and systems, however most companies develop in-house software for Control Systems implementation tailored to their needs.

Wolfram Alpha is basically the stripped down online version of Wolfram's Mathematica suite. Never used it personally but looks quite feature rich with same user friendliness as Alpha and the interface is not as bland as Matlab. Plus there's tons of documentation available. Might give this a try myself sometime. There's also Mathcad from PTC which I think has a free version available. Although it looks more of a tool for mathematicians than engineers, there's 3d vector plotting.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • "just $100 per TB"? Just? Are we trying to make this seem like the new normal? Kinda weird to make it sound like that is not a ridiculously expensive asking price.
    • The reviews you refer to mean nothing. Where there is no journalism there is no reason to call the gaming media's opinion pieces "reviews". For GP games there is indeed a metric for success - increasing subscriptions. Which turns in revenue. The only circumstance in which subs do not rise when great is being released is a Game Pass system where the company is close to fully saturated with customers in a subscription. However, in that case as the theory goes you spend aplenty in all kind of games - from shady live service cash cows and customer offending agitprop crap in purple colours to robust and entertaining single player games. And keep a solid level of profitability. Ignoring the simply innocuous but mid games MGS has released primarily of the second kind.
    • Report: Microsoft to use AWS to help GitHub deal with a major surge in demand by Pradeep Viswanathan Thanks to the surge of coding AI agents, GitHub's usage has skyrocketed over the past 12 months. To meet this demand, GitHub started with a plan in October 2025 to increase capacity by 10x. However, by early this year, the company realized that it needed 30x scale. This rapid growth has caused severe strain on the platform's reliability, resulting in several small outages over the past few months. In April, GitHub published a long blog post explaining the steps it is taking to resolve these reliability issues. In the post, the company also confirmed that it is working toward a multi-cloud architecture for better resilience. Today, Business Insider reported that GitHub is turning to Amazon Web Services to help deal with a major surge in AI-driven coding activity. It is important to note that GitHub is still in the process of moving completely to the Azure cloud. The current plan is to move the platform fully to Azure by 2027 so that it can scale better as per developer demand. Therefore, the current decision to utilize AWS might be part of a short-term plan to meet immediate demand. A Microsoft spokesperson confirmed that GitHub is using multiple cloud providers with the following statement: For Microsoft, the decision highlights the operational pressure behind the AI boom. GitHub has to stay reliable for developers at a time when rivals such as Codex, Cursor, Claude Code, and other AI coding tools are gaining attention. And the decision to use AWS for computing capacity seems practical given the circumstances.
    • It's growing on me, however, your right, it make better usability sense if the tabs were bellow the address bar.
    • Qwen 3.6 is better value per dollar, and you can run it locally for free.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      vjlex earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Reacting Well
      Dys Topia earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Conversation Starter
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      Console General earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Twozo Technologies earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      517
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      182
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      106
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      88
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!