Recommended Posts

Hi,

I've looked around on Google and have not found much on this exclusive question. If I get 2 hard drives for my new small gaming system I am building, one 128G SSD and one 2TB 7200 Sata III, would my games play a bit better if I used the Hard drive for my system and the SSD for my games or visa-versa?

Thanks so much!

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1146914-best-use-of-ssd/
Share on other sites

I'd install my OS on the SSD (to make Windows run faster (which will help with games)) and game on the HDD.

When you have games you'd like to play, I'd use the mklink command to move them onto your SSD >.< That way you get all the benefits of large HDD storage with the speed benefits of the SSD.

http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc753194(v=ws.10).aspx <- For the tech explanation

http://www.heartlessgamer.com/2011/11/tip-how-to-move-steam-games-to-another.html <- For a real use guide to it. It'll work for everything, not just steam games >.<

Usually the best way is having the SSD for your system, then the Standard HD for your media..

In my opinion games running from the hardrive are already fast enough, without the need to run them from SSD - plus one that small wouldn't fit many games on along with the operating system which is what will benefit the most from an SSD

Thus.. You know.. Mklink >.>

Mklink is your friend..

Ok, I'll remember that, mklink, mklink, mklink, ok! ...... uhhmmm what was that again?

(dev ties a string around his finger)

Ok, does anyone remember what the heck this string is supposed to make me remember?

<g>

Will do, SSD=OS, HDD=Games, Data and uhhhh... uhmmmm.. oh yeah mklink!

Mklink is a symbolic link (kind of like a HTTP Permanent Redirect if you will).

I install Steam on my HDD disk along with my terabyte of games.

I then copy a game onto the SSD, and mklink the folder thusly (HDD and SSD in place of drive letters, and your paths will vary obviously):

mklink HDD:\Steam\Steamapps\Common\Game SSD:\SteamCache\Game /J

Then when I launch the game from steam, it looks on the HDD and gets redirected to the SSD (like an HTML redirect) and loads from there :)

When you want to move the game back, delete the mklink (it appears as a link in the original folder) and copy the game back to the HDD.

At the moment I've linked SimCity from my Origin folder on the HDD onto my SSD and play it by launching it from Origin.

You do indeed >.<

Sorry, easy once you know how it works :p

It's brilliant, I use it all the time now >.<

I used to, but now I have enough SSDs to not bother. And Steam and all the others support installing on other drives for a while now, so I haven't used mklink in a really long time.

While GUI tools, are (arguably) ungodly and blasphemous ways for real admins and pros, I've now found a shell extension that might be of some use regarding junctions:

http://schinagl.priv...nkshellext.html

It does the whole set of "droids you're not looking for" type of links, but there's also an easy to understand help on what each of the things means and does.

Most cost effective use is as a system drive. Games will load a bit faster if you have an SSD but these days most games don't load on the fly anyway so the performance benefit in games won't be that substantial if you have enough ram. I can tell you from my own experience however that having an SSD as a system drive boosts system responsiveness quite substantially.

There's a ton of benefit to running a game from an SSD so long as the game is coded well. If the object loading code is crap, the faster media won't help.

Going from any mechanical HDD to a decent SSD is going to always yield performance benefits, regardless of how the "object loading code" is "coded" :huh:

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • NASA: This asteroid may not kill us but it probably won't be far off either by Sayan Sen Image by Zelch Csaba via Pexels New observations by NASA's James Webb Space Telescope have eliminated the last remaining impact threat posed by asteroid 2024 YR4, ruling out the possibility that the near-Earth object could strike the Moon in December 2032. NASA said observations collected by Webb on February 18 and 26, 2026, enabled scientists to refine the asteroid's orbit enough to "rule out a chance of lunar impact on Dec. 22, 2032." Instead, asteroid 2024 YR4 is now expected to pass the Moon at a distance of about 13,200 miles (21,200 km). The agency stressed that the update "reflects improved precision in our understanding of where the asteroid is expected to be in 2032 rather than a shift in its orbital path." The announcement closes a remarkable chapter in planetary defence that began in late 2024, when the approximately 60-metre-wide asteroid briefly became the most closely watched near-Earth object in the world. Discovered on December 27, 2024, by the ATLAS telescope in Chile, 2024 YR4 initially appeared to have a small chance of colliding with Earth on December 22, 2032. As astronomers gathered more observations, the impact probability briefly climbed to around 3%—the highest ever recorded for an asteroid of its size—before steadily falling as its orbit became better understood. By early 2025, international observations had ruled out any significant risk to Earth. However, astronomers were left with another possibility: a roughly 4% chance that the asteroid could instead strike the Moon. "The probability that asteroid 2024 YR4 will strike the Moon on 22 December 2032 is now approximately 4%," the European Space Agency (ESA) had said last year, noting that "there is a 96% chance that the asteroid will not impact the Moon." ESA said such an impact, while unlikely, would have presented an extraordinary scientific opportunity. "It is a very rare event for an asteroid this large to impact the Moon – and it is rarer still that we know about it in advance. The impact would likely be visible from Earth, and so scientists will be very excited by the prospect of observing and analysing it," said Richard Moissl, Head of ESA's Planetary Defence Office. "It would certainly leave a new crater on the surface. However, we wouldn't be able to accurately predict in advance how much material would be thrown into space, or whether any would reach Earth," he added. The asteroid also exposed an important blind spot in planetary defence. Because 2024 YR4 approached Earth from the direction of the Sun, it remained hidden from ground-based telescopes until after its closest approach. "We looked into how Neomir would have performed in this situation, and the simulations surprised even us," Moissl said. "Neomir would have detected asteroid 2024 YR4 about a month earlier than ground-based telescopes did. This would have given astronomers more time to study the asteroid's trajectory and allowed them to much sooner rule out any chance of Earth impact in 2032." He added, "As an infrared telescope, like Webb, Neomir would have also immediately given us a much better estimate for the asteroid's size, which is very important for assessing the significance of the hazard." The latest NASA observations underscore the value of space-based infrared telescopes in tracking faint asteroids. According to NASA, Webb made "among the faintest ever observations of an asteroid," extending the object's observational record by nearly eight months at a time when it had become too faint for other telescopes. That additional data allowed scientists to eliminate the remaining uncertainty surrounding its 2032 flyby. Although asteroid 2024 YR4 is now confirmed to pose no threat to either Earth or the Moon, scientists say its discovery remains one of the most significant real-world tests of the international planetary defence system, demonstrating how continued observations can rapidly transform an object once considered hazardous into one whose future path is known with high confidence. Source: NASA, ESA This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Yup. Google is just scraping the entire internet for their own ad profits without sharing revenue with the sources. It's obviously stealing, but since these sites depend upon Google's search scraps to survive... As for me, I just stopped using Google for anything except Reddit searches. If Reddit's own search wasn't complete crapola, I'd never use Google search again.
    • I had a feeling this was coming. Picked up my first Mac ever last Saturday. Glad I did.
    • In a major surprise there is actually some good deals for the first time in years. At least for me.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      Admir earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      First Post
    • Apprentice
      daryld went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Contributor
      Carltonbar went up a rank
      Contributor
    • One Month Later
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      419
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      170
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      130
    4. 4
      Xenon
      69
    5. 5
      neufuse
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!