Rumor: Next Xbox will be $499, or $299 with a sub


Recommended Posts

The latest Next Xbox rumblings have been put forth by tech blogger Paul Thurrott, who claims the new console will be based on the "Core" version of Windows 8, priced at $499 or $299 with a two-year Xbox Live Gold subscription at $10 per month, and must be connected to the internet to use.

"This is source of the 'always on'/'always online' rumors and isn't as Draconian as many seem to believe," he wrote. If accurate, I can't wait to hear Microsoft's precisely-worded pitch. Thurrott also has reason to believe the Xbox will launch in November and that Microsoft will at some point put out another, cheaper model of the Xbox 360 (codenamed "Stingray"), which seems like a safe bet.

Whatever the case may be, we'll hear more about the console on the morning of May 21, 2013 as well as additional information at E3. Thank eff for that.

Here Comes the Next Xbox [Windows IT Pro]

http://www.destructo...m_source=feedly

So $499 with no subscription, but $539 with 2 year subscription. '

$5 per month for XBOX, so $120 for two years.

$539 - $120 = $419 <--- Good deal assuming you will be getting 2 years of XBOX Live anyway.

Otherwise, it's $499 + $120 for two years.

Can't you get yearly subs much cheaper than $10 a month?! That's $120 a year.

Yep, so you'd pay $240 over 2 years. Take off $200 that you save on the console and you've paid $40 for two years of xbl gold. As long as there aren't any nasty stipulations, it sounds like it'd be a good deal for those who subscribe already.

I guess! Think I'm just used to the cut throat UK market, aka never pay RRP.

Just like with phones, the stores will probably decide the final retail price of the subsidized version as well, the RRP is pretty much just the upper limit.

I wonder how they'll do this in Norway and countries with similar rules like us, since we don't allow more than 12 month contracts for consumers, and max 24 for business. i they'll just ditch the subscription model or do a 12 month version and if so what it'll cost.

PT has corrected himself saying the sub will be 2 years at $15, not $10.

Ouch. $15/month for 2 years is $360 (or $180/year). It's only worth it if you want to subscribe for more than 10.66666666666667 months (or 324.66 days).

$299 + 2 years at $15/month = $659

$499 + 2 years at $15/month = $859

$499 + 1 year at $15/month = $679

$499 + 10 months at $15/month = $649

$499 + 10.66666666666667 months at $15/month = $659.0000000000001

I'd buy the $499 because I don't want to spend $360 for 2 years. The most I've ever used with my old Xbox 360 (as well as the replacement given to me as a gift) was 6 months. And even then, I barely made use of half of it. My friends bought 1-year subscriptions and only one of them made good use of it.

Ouch. $15/month for 2 years is $360 (or $180/year). It's only worth it if you want to subscribe for more than 10.66666666666667 months (or 324.66 days).

$299 + 2 years at $15/month = $659

$499 + 2 years at $15/month = $859

$499 + 1 year at $15/month = $679

$499 + 10 months at $15/month = $649

$499 + 10.66666666666667 months at $15/month = $659.0000000000001

I'd buy the $499 because I don't want to spend $360 for 2 years. The most I've ever used with my old Xbox 360 (as well as the replacement given to me as a gift) was 6 months. And even then, I barely made use of half of it. My friends bought 1-year subscriptions and only one of them made good use of it.

Your math is flawed because a normal sub if you buy the $500 console isn't $15. It's $8 if you're actually paying monthly, but you can get yearly subs for $40. So if you're going for most bang for your buck, you save a lot no matter what by just buying the $500, but if you can't afford that in one payment you'll only end up paying about $80 more spread out over two years than someone who bought the $500 box and paid $40/year so I guess its still not too bad.

Ouch. $15/month for 2 years is $360 (or $180/year). It's only worth it if you want to subscribe for more than 10.66666666666667 months (or 324.66 days).

$299 + 2 years at $15/month = $659

$499 + 2 years at $15/month = $859

$499 + 1 year at $15/month = $679

$499 + 10 months at $15/month = $649

$499 + 10.66666666666667 months at $15/month = $659.0000000000001

I'd buy the $499 because I don't want to spend $360 for 2 years. The most I've ever used with my old Xbox 360 (as well as the replacement given to me as a gift) was 6 months. And even then, I barely made use of half of it. My friends bought 1-year subscriptions and only one of them made good use of it.

So you're saying as long as you already subscribe to gold, it's worth it...

Your math is flawed because a normal sub if you buy the $500 console isn't $15. It's $8 if you're actually paying monthly, but you can get yearly subs for $40. So if you're going for most bang for your buck, you save a lot no matter what by just buying the $500, but if you can't afford that in one payment you'll only end up paying about $80 more spread out over two years than someone who bought the $500 box and paid $40/year so I guess its still not too bad.

I assumed $15/month would be the new price. I didn't account for any deals on yearly memberships. Going by the $8/month price, then it would definitely be cheaper to pay more upfront.

So you're saying as long as you already subscribe to gold, it's worth it...

Yes, but only if you want to subscribe for more than 324.66 days. Otherwise it's cheaper to go for the $499 console but only by mere dollars when it's 12 months or less. If you subscribe for more than 12 months, you'll be losing more than $20 (difference of cost between $299 + 2 years and $499 + 1.083333333333333 years [or more]).

I think most people will go for the subscription because it's hard to imagine how much you can save by paying more upfront. You and I may not have that problem because we'd likely do the math and figure out which option is best. As for the average though, they'd only consider the initial price.

no way in hell $500 for a xbox then $60 for a game when every single game is going to have a season pass so the game is stipped of content and sold to you twice look at bioshock inf for example.

this Gen is going to SUCK the MONEY from your pockets

the avg game is going to cost players over $100USD each with the all season pass / DLC crap

time for me to jump ship and just stay with nintendo they know what games are for

Yes, but only if you want to subscribe for more than 324.66 days. Otherwise it's cheaper to go for the $499 console but only by mere dollars when it's 12 months or less. If you subscribe for more than 12 months, you'll be losing more than $20 (difference of cost between $299 + 2 years and $499 + 1.083333333333333 years [or more]).

I think most people will go for the subscription because it's hard to imagine how much you can save by paying more upfront. You and I may not have that problem because we'd likely do the math and figure out which option is best. As for the average though, they'd only consider the initial price.

the wast majority of subscribers subscribe 365 days a year.... so I'm not seeing the issue. if you don't, then buy the regular version.

Personally though, I'd probably end up buying the full priced version simply because I don't want any more monthly expenses, unless economy is tight :)

But chances are the subscription won't be available here anyway, we have max 12 month contract subscriptions for consumers over here. so either it would be more expensive or they'll just drop it. that's if the 24 month thing is true.

no way in hell $500 for a xbox then $60 for a game when every single game is going to have a season pass so the game is stipped of content and sold to you twice look at bioshock inf for example.

this Gen is going to SUCK the MONEY from your pockets

the avg game is going to cost players over $100USD each with the all season pass / DLC crap

time for me to jump ship and just stay with nintendo they know what games are for

uh what....

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Google's new hand-wave reCAPTCHA can be bypassed with a stock photo by Ivan Jenic Image: Screenshot Google is testing a new reCAPTCHA method that asks you to wave at your camera to prove you're human. So, besides solving puzzles and reading distorted text, you can now use your computer’s camera to pass the verification test. When the hand gesture verification is triggered, your browser asks for camera access and prompts you to perform a simple gesture, like a wave or an open palm. Google says it records a short video of the movement and uses AI to extract 21 hand-knuckle coordinates to complete the verification process. The video is then immediately deleted, and Google swears it doesn't keep it. The process alone can be uncomfortable for people who wouldn’t want their biometric data, which hand scans technically qualify as, recorded. But it gets even more nuanced, as early testers discovered that the new hand-waving reCAPTCHA can be passed with a simple stock image. A user on X tested the new challenge using a stock image of a hand fed through OBS Virtual Camera, and it passed. I wanted to verify it, so I tried the same thing. It took me a few tries and a few stock images, but in the end, I was also able to pass the test. I simply had to readjust the stock image of a generic person waving inside OBS, and Google’s mechanism registered it as a legitimate hand gesture. Once again, it didn’t even have to be a video or an AI-generated hand animation. Given the simplicity of the process, the entire action can be automated in minutes. All it takes is a simple Python script to render the new reCAPTCHA method obsolete. And it doesn’t even have to be an AI bot, which is usually used for solving puzzles and other verification methods. The new reCAPTCHA method is still in its early phase, and Google will, hopefully, update its AI to at least reject still images. However, this incident, combined with users’ initial skepticism about Google’s practices regarding user data, likely won’t make too many people wave at the camera anytime soon.
    • 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 "to fund healthcare and tuition" 🤣🤣🤣🤣 Who do you think you are talking about, some COMMUNIST? We are better than them, doG bless Murica!!! p.s. I'm from a country where government does exactly that, i.e. not form US.
    • Apparently not. I know it is on Edge for business at the moment, but how long will it be before it become on the home version of Edge?
    • Microsoft details new Edge for Business security features, including AI-powered scareware detection So Edge is adding a "scarecrow." Will it be animated?
    • I have this one and it's great, also paired with a Mac. I like the white back aesthetics of it and ability to have all your wireless usb peripherals under a clean lid. 4K @ 120 Hz and 65W usb-c charging is not bad even at its typical price point. The U series is probably better for commercial photo work though; IIRC one reason this one is priced in a different bracket is because it's not calibrated and verified for optimal color accuracy. Not something I think of in daily use, coding, and light gaming though.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Apprentice
      Asgardi went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • One Month Later
      sunrisea2milk earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      sunrisea2milk earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Snow Day Calculator Alert earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Conversation Starter
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      495
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      251
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      154
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      86
    5. 5
      macoman
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!