Linux 3.9 Released


Recommended Posts

Linux creator Linus Torvalds last night announced the release of version 3.9 of the kernel. Available for download at kernel.org, Linux 3.9 brings a long list of improvements to storage, networking, file systems, drivers, virtualization, and power management.

H-Online editor Thorsten Leemhuis has an excellent rundown of what's new in Linux 3.9. One new feature, listed as "experimental," allows SSDs to act as caches for other storage devices. "This feature is able to speed up data writes, as it allows the faster SSD to first cache data and then, in a quiet moment, transfer it to the slower hard drive," Leemhuis wrote.

Linux maintainers have also done some driver work that might improve the sometimes questionable support for desktops and laptops. New drivers include support for Intel 802.11ac Wi-Fi components, as well as trackpads used in Samsung's ARM-based Chromebook and the Dell XPS 13 Developer Edition Ultrabook. The Kernel's driver for AMD Radeon graphics chips was updated to support Oland chips in the 8500 and 8600 Series Radeon video cards, in addition to AMD's forthcoming Richland chips. The driver code for HD audio codecs is also now "leaner and more robust."

"With Intel's new Wi-Fi drivers and the AMD graphics driver improvements, the kernel is now better equipped for tomorrow's PCs and notebooks," Leemhuis wrote.

Other improvements include experimental support for RAID 5 and 6 in the Btrfs file system; new "lightweight suspend" and "suspend freeze" modes that "cause the kernel to send all hardware components into their deepest sleep state"; and networking features to improve how workloads are spread across processor cores in Web servers and other systems. Virtualization is getting a boost with KVM support for ARM Cortex A15's virtualization features; Xen support for hotplugging processors and memory components; and integration of drivers to improve support for VMware's virtualization software.

Linux 3.9 comes a little more than two months after Linux 3.8, which has already made its way into Ubuntu and other Linux-based operating systems.

http://arstechnica.c...ort-modern-pcs/

Still on kernel 3.2 here on my CrunchBang box.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1149590-linux-39-released/
Share on other sites

Still on kernel 3.2 here on my CrunchBang box.

If you're really interested in running the latest kernel, you can either wait until Wheezy is released (tentatively slated for May 5) and install the new kernels that show up in wheezy-backports, or you can run the latest mainline kernels from Experimental (don't let the name scare you - at least not for the kernels hosted there). If you don't need any of the new features in the latest kernels I recommend sticking with Linux 3.2; it's very stable and will receive performance and security updates throughout Wheezy's lifecycle (just not new features).

As I understand it 3.7+ have major networking enhancements. I'd hit that.

(If I actually did Linux, anyway.)

From what I understand it's only support for 802.11ac with Intel tech, and a way to allow multiple processes to attach to the same socket (So you spawn 4 single threaded networking apps on a quad core CPU, and each one can read from the same socket, allows better load balancing, etc.)

The last major networking stuff (byte queue limits, codel, etc.) was introduced in 3.3 or so.

From what I understand it's only support for 802.11ac with Intel tech, and a way to allow multiple processes to attach to the same socket (So you spawn 4 single threaded networking apps on a quad core CPU, and each one can read from the same socket, allows better load balancing, etc.)

The last major networking stuff (byte queue limits, codel, etc.) was introduced in 3.3 or so.

This is admittedly my only source. http://www.bufferbloat.net/projects/cerowrt/wiki

I have a linux based router so I'm hoping it gets a kernel upgrade at some point.

Yeah, I've been tracking the CeroWRT guys for a while, most of their improvements were mainlined a while ago.

I think the latest OpenWRT release has codel/BQL/etc., but I'm not entirely sure (I know for a fact that trunk builds do, since I'm running one)

If you're really interested in running the latest kernel, you can either wait until Wheezy is released (tentatively slated for May 5) and install the new kernels that show up in wheezy-backports, or you can run the latest mainline kernels from Experimental (don't let the name scare you - at least not for the kernels hosted there). If you don't need any of the new features in the latest kernels I recommend sticking with Linux 3.2; it's very stable and will receive performance and security updates throughout Wheezy's lifecycle (just not new features).

I'm fine with kernel 3.2 :). On May 5th, will Wheezy be moved to "Stable"? Does this mean Sid will move into "Testing"?

I'm fine with kernel 3.2 :). On May 5th, will Wheezy be moved to "Stable"? Does this mean Sid will move into "Testing"?

Indeed. Although technically it will be forked, not moved. Sid is the permanent code name for Unstable. On May 5th Lenny will lose its designation, Squeeze will become Oldstable, Wheezy will become Stable, Sid will be forked to become Jesse - which will be Testing, and Sid will get many currently blocked packages pushed from Experimental.

Indeed. Although technically it will be forked, not moved. Sid is the permanent code name for Unstable. On May 5th Lenny will lose its designation, Squeeze will become Oldstable, Wheezy will become Stable, Sid will be forked to become Jesse - which will be Testing, and Sid will get many currently blocked packages pushed from Experimental.

Ok I understand now. :) Maybe I'll try out Jesse on a spare hdd when it's released and see if I like it better than Crunchbang.

Ok I understand now. :) Maybe I'll try out Jesse on a spare hdd when it's released and see if I like it better than Crunchbang.

Immediately after a new Stable release, Testing will be fairly close to Stable for about 2 weeks before it starts to see extensive automatic imports from Unstable, and Unstable will get new imports very quick and become much more unstable than normal for a couple months. I recommend that you hold off trying Testing until it goes into release freeze unless you are a developer. During a new release's development cycle the main difference between Testing and Unstable is 2 weeks.

Since Crunchbang is essentially just another repository that can be added to a vanilla Debian install, you could install Crunchbang, edit your /etc/apt/sources.list to point to testing (or unstable) instead of wheezy, and perform a dist-upgrade to try out the new packages without missing Crunchang's customized Openbox experience. Many popular packages are backported from Testing to Stable, so I recommend that you just enable the wheezy-backports repository to get access to a subset of new packages unless you are confident that you can deal with occasional package upgrade problems and broken packages while the new Testing slowly stablizes.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • One of my PC's is Windows 11 Home Edition... and guess what? it supports Hyper-V Disks and Containers, as well as WSL2... which these desktop tools leverage on an as-needed basis. It does not need to be enabled system-wide; it merely needs to exist. Furthermore, I tried something yesterday with Hermes Desktop and their "installer" actually builds everything from source as part of its installer toolchain! The installer (and updater as it were) both go through a roughly 19-step process to prep the system for the tool to be used -- and connectivity to local/remote models, local/remote agent configs, and other steps are not included as part of this process (those are all user config steps post-install). ALSO, the "bug wasn't confirmed to exist" is the weakest argument against a bug. That's literally every flawed product's knee-jerk reaction! Even politicians, lawmakers, murderers, and other violent criminals start with that defense... "I deny everything I'm accused of." The bug is the (shared) experience. Whether it's truly Claude Code's fault, or user error, or some other software package being the ultimate culprit, is not the point. They are experiencing unpleasant side effects and don't like that.
    • Each generaton has its exciting times and I was fortunate enough to be right there at the beginning of the PC industry.   I don't think any of us at that time realized how large it would become I still remember working on a TRS-80 with a green screen monitor that kept overheating and dying.     Also used some TRS-80 PCs with tape cartridge memory.   They worked but boy were they slow with everything being a very slow sequential read or write.  But heh, they worked though it wasn't long before they were repaced by the HDD. 
    • One Drive should be a four letter word. First thing I disable on my computer. If I want to upload something to the cloud, I use a cloud base storage, NOT microsoft. Oh but what about backup. I have done backups since floppy disk eras...it just comes naturally.
    • It does just not OneCloud. 🤷🏻‍♂️
    • Claude Desktop on Linux doesn’t have ram issues. Strange. 🤷🏻‍♂️
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Sopa flores earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • First Post
      StaticMatrix earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      StaticMatrix earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      lamborghiniv10 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Month Later
      pinnclepd earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      515
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      208
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      160
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      96
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      81
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!