• 0

Tabs in Microsoft Word?


Question

Hi, is it just me, or does not having tabs in most Microsoft Office products, including Word and PowerPoint etc a bit primitive?

I know you can have tabs in Excel, kind of, but it would be nice if MS stole the idea of tabs, like they did with IE from Firefox and built this into all of their office software.

I'm a college student and I frequently have several documents open at the same time, it's frustrating to not just quickly flip between them like I can with my browser. I know there's Flip 3D and probably a keyboard shortcut. But the same argument could be made for not introducing tabs in Web Browsers. Why do it? Because it makes life a little bit simpler is why!

Please MS steal this idea! If anyone has any influence with them and wants to steal it instead, please feel free!

There is a 3rd party add on that enables this feature I believe, but it seems to be quite buggy and unstable. So other people have clearly at least thought about it!

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1152948-tabs-in-microsoft-word/
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0
Hi, is it just me, or does not having tabs in most Microsoft Office products, including Word and PowerPoint etc a bit primitive?

Just my own preference of course, but personally haven't missed them. Can already quickly flip between them now with either a keystroke or a single click on the taskbar, complete with previews, there's also window list on the ribbon too. For me it doesn't matter if I'm clicking above the document or underneath it, it's still one click or one keypress, personally don't see adding another place to click really boosting my productivity. You mentioned addons, there's a couple that do that, don't use them myself, my neighbor does though, don't recall the one he uses giving him problems. "Office Tabs?" Not positive, didn't pay much attention to it, seems happy with it with Office 2010 anyway.

I'm not 100% positive, but reasonably sure Firefox wasn't the first one with a tabbed browser... could of swore it was IE via a third party shell for IE called NetCaptor, late '90s, then Opera a couple years later. Could be wrong, old age, bad memory, too lazy to search and all that.

  • 0

arachnoid, are you using Office/Word 97? O_o

Kingsoft Office (which in its basic version looks like MS Office 2003) provide a tabbed document interface

Cant see you image but I was using it as an example.of how Word has changed over the years i.e. In word 2K3 it makes separate pages in the taskbar the same as in 2K13

78358eb5babd8ae2d859750a9c84ad7a.png

  • 0

Hi, is it just me, or does not having tabs in most Microsoft Office products, including Word and PowerPoint etc a bit primitive?

I know you can have tabs in Excel, kind of, but it would be nice if MS stole the idea of tabs, like they did with IE from Firefox and built this into all of their office software.

I'm a college student and I frequently have several documents open at the same time, it's frustrating to not just quickly flip between them like I can with my browser. I know there's Flip 3D and probably a keyboard shortcut. But the same argument could be made for not introducing tabs in Web Browsers. Why do it? Because it makes life a little bit simpler is why!

Please MS steal this idea! If anyone has any influence with them and wants to steal it instead, please feel free!

There is a 3rd party add on that enables this feature I believe, but it seems to be quite buggy and unstable. So other people have clearly at least thought about it!

Personally I'd like to have seen a UI that i could tab word, outlook 2010 into tabs as I often copy and paste for my research.

  • 0

Yeah, like I said, all the arguments presented by the naysayers (of which there are always a majority on Neowin) could have been made for any browser too, pre-Firefox. Ask them to give up their properly integrated and elegantly executed tabbed browsing interface now however and go back to the old taskbar only way of doing things and I'm sure you would hear them all sing a different tune.

My experience when I have 20 or 30 word, or powerpoint documents open is that the travel time to the taskbar is often longer than if I could use tabs. bizarrely I can use Tabs with MS's online version of Office, but not with the desktop version. You may think WTF is a few inches of extra movement to get to the taskbar to open a document? But the difference is a that few inches adds up to miles worth of difference through the years and those miles worth of unneeded repetitive movements can lead to serious cases of RSI. (Which I have had the misfortune to experience several times in my life.)

It always just seemed like a natural desire to me, when I had a lot of documents open, to just flip between easily identifiable tabs. Of course you could use keyboard shortcuts and flip 3D etc to achieve a similar goal, but I always find that people who say 'just use the keyboard short cuts' are really a little primitive. Why have a GUI at all in that case? This is the same kind of argument Linux die-hards of old used to make. It is a very old fashioned and out of date paradigm in my view. Keyboard advocates will of course almost certainly object to this perspective.

  • 0

I agree with the OP. Tabs have proven to be indispensable for web browsing, yet remain conspicuously absent from Explorer and Office. Switching between multiple instances of Explorer or Word has been incredibly tedious since Microsoft introduced the superbar in Windows 7. If you have several windows open then when you click on the taskbar icon it brings up Aero Peek rather than displaying the active window and the window preview is utterly useless given that most Explorer windows look the same and can't be easily discerned at a quick glance.

Microsoft was late to the game with a tabbed web browser and doesn't seem to care about multi-tasking on the desktop. In fact Windows 8's Metro interface demonstrates that Microsoft is actually moving away from multi-tasking, which is quite concerning. The success of tabs in web browsers clearly demonstrates that users understand and benefit from tabbed interfaces, so why is the company so reluctant to bring tabs to Explorer or Office?

  • 0

Yeah, like I said, all the arguments presented by the naysayers (of which there are always a majority on Neowin) could have been made for any browser too, pre-Firefox. Ask them to give up their properly integrated and elegantly executed tabbed browsing interface now however and go back to the old taskbar only way of doing things and I'm sure you would hear them all sing a different tune.

I don't think you can really compare a content creation application like Word with a content consumption application like a browser because people use them differently. Tabs might be useful in Word sometimes but there are other times where they would be a real pain. For instance, I often have multiple documents open side by side so I can easily cut and paste from one document to another using ALT+TAB to switch back and forth between documents. This would be difficult to do without using your mouse if all documents opened as tabs in a single instance of Word. Excel behaves in this way (without tabs - it acts as a sort of MDI interface) and it always annoys me.

  • 0

Per the Seventies "That's a Big 10-4 on the tags."

Will try that Tag app that "MayHem" posted about on Office 2013 and get back later.

Back: Tried to use the app mentioned by Mayhem, albeit it will not load, however, it will direct you to a home page where you can download a "Free version" that will work (and does) for Office 2013.

Tested it out and at present show no problems.

There is also an Enterprise Version for a price.

Good Luck. . . :D

  • 0

Mayhem's link has worked well for me with Office 2003 and 2007. I haven't used it with 2010 or 2013 but if it works, it's one of the better options. I can recommend it for that purpose. If you go through the settings you can get the tabs along the bottom like in Excel. (Y)

  • 0

I agree with the OP. Tabs have proven to be indispensable for web browsing, yet remain conspicuously absent from Explorer and Office. Switching between multiple instances of Explorer or Word has been incredibly tedious since Microsoft introduced the superbar in Windows 7. If you have several windows open then when you click on the taskbar icon it brings up Aero Peek rather than displaying the active window and the window preview is utterly useless given that most Explorer windows look the same and can't be easily discerned at a quick glance.

Microsoft was late to the game with a tabbed web browser and doesn't seem to care about multi-tasking on the desktop. In fact Windows 8's Metro interface demonstrates that Microsoft is actually moving away from multi-tasking, which is quite concerning. The success of tabs in web browsers clearly demonstrates that users understand and benefit from tabbed interfaces, so why is the company so reluctant to bring tabs to Explorer or Office?

If you hate the task bar so much you can change it to not group the items....

  • 0

I don't think you can really compare a content creation application like Word with a content consumption application like a browser because people use them differently. Tabs might be useful in Word sometimes but there are other times where they would be a real pain. For instance, I often have multiple documents open side by side so I can easily cut and paste from one document to another using ALT+TAB to switch back and forth between documents. This would be difficult to do without using your mouse if all documents opened as tabs in a single instance of Word. Excel behaves in this way (without tabs - it acts as a sort of MDI interface) and it always annoys me.

Yes, like I said, I heard all of the same arguments for browsers back in the day. Heck it even took me a while to get used to tab web browsing. But now I can't imagine life without it. The take home message I think is if it's done properly, tabbed interfaces can work in a number of scenarios. I wouldn't want MS to take the approach that they did recently with Windows 8 and make it so that a somewhat different way of working was forced on those who didn't care for it. (I.e. the "do it my way, or the highway" approach to interface design.) Users should still have a choice, just as they do with tabbed web browsers, where in theory if you don't like tabs no one forces you to use them. However most people would agree that it would barely make any sense not to use tabs for this purpose now.

You are correct to some extent however. It depends on the usage scenario and on user preference. My frustration is born of the need to frequently have several tens of Word documents open, or PowerPoint slide shows, or indeed as someone else mentioned Explorer windows. My usage pattern under these conditions is often very browser like, with the need to frequently switch between different windows and documents.

The take home message is I think that if done right (and the 'done right' part should not be underplayed I think) that a tabbed user interlace could have many uses. Not so long ago people would have thought it was crazy to have a tabbed email client. However Thunderbird (although I rarely use it as my main client), appears to have implemented this rather well.

As another poster commented however, MS has seemed to 'lose the plot' a little with Windows 8, and have almost abandoned the paradigm of multitasking entirely, particularly with their new touch screen interface and lack of focus on providing a great desktop experience. It is not a helpful direction, particularly with those who may often be presented with the need to perform several complex tasks at the same time.

PS

Just a closing note too. It might be worth thinking that added travel time to the taskbar may only equate to a couple of seconds at a time. But add those seconds up over a lifetime and they will probably equate to hours. Hours that you probably could spend doing something else far more enjoyable!

  • 0

I've not found myself wanting tabs in Office but I agree with some of the sentiment here that it's something that should be Windows-wide rather than specific to Office.

I use Switcher (http://insentient.net/) to search for windows by window title text but it can become quite a hog when you've got 50+ windows open.

Ideally I guess I'd like open windows to appear as results in Windows search.

  • 0

You don't need tabs. The OS manages switching between instances of documents just fine with the aero popups.

Also the tabs in Excel are not to separate documents, but sheets within one document. The mapping is not valid.

Fair enough. Oh BTW welcome ... I hope you're enjoying life in the 1990's. ;)

Someone should at least give this tabbed interface thing a crack. Those who feel they would not like to use such an interface should certainly retain the means not to do so, or wear bags on their heads. Which ever they prefer, lol.

To be fair someone else would probably have to give it a go first prove to the doubting masses if it could work or not and then wait for MS to steal the idea. After 25 years working in the IT sector, this does rather seem to be the way things tend to get done.

  • 0

What the hell are you on about 1990s? This is an OS addition since Win 7 as I recall!

The implementation of multiple documents within one MDI container has been available for a long long time.

Win7 allows a group of instances of one application (such as Word) to be available from one taskbar entry, which when hovered, allows access to any, with live previews.

A tabbed interface is much more old-hat than this!

  • 0

What the hell are you on about 1990s? This is an OS addition since Win 7 as I recall!

The implementation of multiple documents within one MDI container has been available for a long long time.

Win7 allows a group of instances of one application (such as Word) to be available from one taskbar entry, which when hovered, allows access to any, with live previews.

A tabbed interface is much more old-hat than this!

Yes indeed. So much old hat that it doesn't even exist, yet. However I would wager if it ever did happen - and particularly if it was implemented well, that within a few years, after some possible initial resistance, you would probably find yourself quite happily using it and wondering indeed how you ever managed without it, just as many did (including myself) when tabbed web browsing was introduced. I think the game changer for people like you might be how well it was implemented and how well it really worked however.

In any case I can give you one immediate advantage (in addition to reduced travel time for your mouse), which is that right now I have aproximately 19 separate web pages open in tabs in my immediate view. This is a rather low number for me and is because I am working at present with a small screen. However as I sit here I can glance at each of the tabs without moving my mouse at all. This enables me to move straight to a document of interest with exactly zero investment in time or effort whatsoever. A single glance is sufficient, with no eye scanning or mouse travel at all. I would argue that this is quicker and more efficient than the peek functionality of the task bar. Live previews in any case have only ever seemed like a gimmick and a probable memory hog to me. If I can monitor a dozen or more documents at no net investment in time and additional effort, I would take this option first every time.

It is of course as I said, a matter of preference and it would depend how well it was implemented, but done right and under the circumstances I often find myself in, I'm certain a lot of people would find it extremely useful, even if you did not. Tabbed browser interfaces tend to be more memory efficient than their separate window counterparts also.

PS

It is all rather academic anyway. As I said MS don't have a great track record for innovation, so unless someone tries to implement it and does a really good job of it, I doubt MS would be interested in stealing it.

  • 0

The usage of a web browser and a word processor are vastly different from the physical interaction through to the use case. Comparing apples and oranges doesn't help anyone.

I'm not against the use of tabs for those who would rather interact that way, but any argument that "One office app has it why don't they all" (which is what the OP wrongfully asserted is what I'm picking up on here.

Moreover, the Windows interface is obviously aware of multiple instances of one application, so whether tabs or any other mechanism, this should be a Windows feature and not an app-specific feature.

  • 0
You don't need tabs. The OS manages switching between instances of documents just fine with the aero popups.

Nonsense. Browsing websites would be horrible if you had to rely on the superbar to change between webpages and that's the experience people have to put up with for Explorer and Office. There really is no decent reason not to have tabs in Explorer or Office - people wouldn't have to use them but it would greatly benefit those who do. The superbar is very poor when it comes to multitasking.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Glad these prices are starting to come down, but that is still crazy. I bought the 2TB 9100 Pro (slightly more expensive version with PCIe 5.0) last year for $240.
    • The 2TB Samsung 990 PRO NVMe SSD hits lowest price in over three months by Sayan Sen Yesterday, we covered a really good deal wherein you can get a 4TB TeamGroup T-FORCE G50 NVMe PCIe Gen4 SSD for a low price of just $400 with a special discount coupon. That's just $100 per TB, making it a very good offer during these hard times. The deal is still live, so you can check it out in its dedicated article here if you do not want to miss out. Meanwhile, if you don't have that kind of budget but still wish to buy an SSD for a good price, the 2TB variant of the TeamGroup SSD at $280 its lowest price in over three months. Meanwhile, those seeking 2TB but faster performance can check out Samsung's 990 PRO, which has hit the lowest price also in the last quarter or so, as it's on sale for $370 (purchase links under the specs table down below). Thus, you want a faster drive, get the 990 Pro, or you want more capacity, grab the TeamGroup 4TB linked in the first para. The 990 PRO is a PCIe Gen4 NVMe SSD and still one of the fastest drives available today for under $500. Speaking of fast, sequential reads and writes are rated at 7450 MB/s and 6900 MB/s, respectively. The random throughputs for reads and writes are 1400K IOPS and 1550K IOPS, respectively. The 990 PRO is based on Samsung's 7th Gen V-NAND flash, and it too is TLC. It packs 2 gigs of LPDDR4 DRAM cache, which helps the random performance. The endurance rating for this is 1200 TBW (terabytes written), which should be sufficient for most users. The Samsung 990 PRO is compatible with the PlayStation 5, but if you are going to use the 990 PRO on a PC, check out the Samsung Magician app that lets you track your drive's health, update its firmware, customize various settings, and more. The tech specs are given below: Specification TeamGroup T-FORCE G50 2TB Samsung 990 PRO 2TB Interface PCIe 4.0 x4, NVMe 1.4 PCIe Gen 4.0 x4, NVMe 2.0 Form Factor M.2 2280 M.2 2280 Controller InnoGrit Controller Samsung In-house Controller NAND Flash 3D TLC 3D TLC DRAM Cache None (HMB supported) 2GB LPDDR4 Sequential Read (Max) 5,000 MB/s 7,450 MB/s Sequential Write (Max) 4,500 MB/s 6,900 MB/s Random Read (4K) Up to 600,000 IOPS Up to 1,400,000 IOPS Random Write (4K) Up to 700,000 IOPS Up to 1,550,000 IOPS TBW (Endurance) 1,300 TBW 1,200 TBW MTBF 3,000,000 hours 1,500,000 hours Operating Temperature 0°C to 70°C 0°C to 70°C Storage Temperature -40°C to 85°C -40°C to 85°C Shock Resistance 1,500G / 0.5ms 1,500G / 0.5ms Heatsink Patented Graphene Heat Spreader No Get them at the links below: Samsung 990 PRO SSD 2TB (MZ-V9P2T0B/AM): $369.99 (Sold and Shipped by Amazon US) TEAMGROUP T-Force G50 2TB SSD (TM8FFE002T0C129): $279.99 (Sold by TeamGroup, Shipped by Amazon US) Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • If you can't spell a simple word that 2nd graders learn, your entire argument is suspect.
    • And here goes the "Won't someone think of the children" brigade. Get stuffed mate. This has NOTHING to do with making the internet safe. It's about tracking adults, spying on your online activity, and sending the boys around when they don't like something you post. Also, again, parliament have voted TWICE against this, and Starmer is going ahead anyway. THAT is anti-democratic bullsh**. They will use this law to track you, they will use this law to control you, and they will use this law to punish you if they don't like what you do, even if it's legal. And your data? Say bye bye to that. It'll be on the darkweb in weeks. I'm not some rando online. I've been an IT professional for 40 years, many of it in security. I know exactly what this means and what will happen to your data. I do not consent and I will not comply.
    • "...but it may not be Microsoft's fault" seems like a reasonable way to tease what is going on without leaving the user with a false impression that an update is the problem. A title isn't a summery, it is meant to entice the user to read the article. It should not contain a misleading premise; which this title does not. You could maybe complain that the first paragraph should have included that detail. The writing style popularized over 100 years ago in newspapers will cover the most important information as soon as possible with details and nuance added later; the idea being that with each new paragraph you have less of the reader's focus.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      Jocimo earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      suprememobiles48 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      Prasann earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Prasann earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      520
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      174
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      91
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      81
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!