Recommended Posts

Why does Microsoft earn money from Android handset manufacturers ? Accoring to this article

http://bgr.com/2013/05/01/microsofts-android-licensing-agreements-earnings/

" Google unlawfully used technology from Oracle, Microsoft and others when creating its Android and Chrome operating systems "

Why handset makers have to pay ? Should Google pay to Microsoft ?

handset makers pay because they are given the OS freely and somehow that absolves Google. Handset makers have to pay for all the patents in Android I think - MPEG, H264, WiFi, etc

When you license a Microsoft product you are automatically protected by them, an umbrella I think is the term, from anyone suing you because you are using a Microsoft product that potentially infringes a patent.

Google would never pay, and/or MS feels that if they forced google to pay google would try to invalidate their patents or sue them for other things that would cost them even more money

Google doesn't make any money directly (except for motorola) from Android while handset makers do make money. That is why microsoft/apple chose to go after the handset makers.

Why does Microsoft earn money from Android handset manufacturers ? Accoring to this article

http://bgr.com/2013/...ments-earnings/

" Google unlawfully used technology from Oracle, Microsoft and others when creating its Android and Chrome operating systems "

Why handset makers have to pay ? Should Google pay to Microsoft ?

because these handset manufacturers are profiting off stolen intellectual property.google is profiting,but its harder to prove damages,because they make their money from advertising. it isn't a question of whether Microsoft can nail google through litigation, they can,theres do doubt about it, google doesn't have any valuable patents to defend themselves ,its just that they can make more money going after handset manufacturers because profit numbers are clear cut and much more than they would be able to squeeze out of google.

Why does Microsoft earn money from Android handset manufacturers ? Accoring to this article

http://bgr.com/2013/...ments-earnings/

" Google unlawfully used technology from Oracle, Microsoft and others when creating its Android and Chrome operating systems "

Why handset makers have to pay ? Should Google pay to Microsoft ?

Though Android may be developed by Google, the handset manufacturers customize and develop the platform for their phones themselves as well. As a result, in addition to Android itself violating patents, the changes the OEM's make can also violate patents that will need to be licensed.

Additionally, as Google develops Android "As Is", they do not provide patent protection of any kind to the OEM's that use it. So, really, if you want to look at it that way, this really comes down to Google not standing behind their own product and protecting their OEM's...

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Microsoft's fast coding model MAI-Code-1-Flash comes to Copilot Business and Enterprise by Karthik Mudaliar Microsoft’s recently announced MAI-Code-1-Flash model is now generally available to GitHub Copilot Business and Copilot Enterprise customers. With this support, organizations can have more centralized policy controls and billing while finally being able to use Microsoft’s lightweight, first-party coding model. According to GitHub’s announcement, Business and Enterprise plan administrators must enable the MAI-Code-1-Flash policy in Copilot settings before developers can access the model. Microsoft says that MAI-Code-1-Flash is for fast, iterative coding work rather than the most demanding architectural or debugging tasks. GitHub’s official model comparison page says that the model is great for "general-purpose coding and writing," while it excels at fast, accurate code completions and explanations Microsoft introduced MAI-Code-1-Flash on June 2 as part of a broader collection of internally developed MAI models. GitHub subsequently expanded support to Copilot CLI, the Copilot cloud agent, GitHub.com chat, GitHub Mobile, Visual Studio, JetBrains IDEs, Eclipse, and Xcode, but said support for managed Business and Enterprise customers was still on the way. In Microsoft’s own benchmark testing, MAI-Code-1-Flash scored 51.2% on SWE-Bench Pro, compared with 35.2% for Anthropic’s Claude Haiku 4.5. Microsoft also claimed that the model used up to 60% fewer tokens on SWE-Bench Verified. Do note that these are vendor-run results rather than independent measurements. The model is billed at provider list pricing under GitHub’s usage-based system. GitHub currently lists MAI-Code-1-Flash at $0.75 per million input tokens, $0.075 per million cached input tokens, and $4.50 per million output tokens. For organizations, the main incentive to use MAI-Code-1-Flash is likely to be efficiency rather than maximum capability. A smaller model that responds quickly and limits unnecessary output is quite useful for repetitive agent tasks at scale, especially after GitHub Copilot’s move toward usage-based billing. The "Flash" model is recommended for fast work and not necessarily for huge repositories with loads of context. It's better if teams compare their output with other larger models, especially if they're working on security-sensitive changes and complex, multi-file work.
    • yes AND no the "original" or plain/normal Optiplex 7010 won't be getting any more new firmware updates BUT the Optiplex SFF/SFF Plus {small form factor}, Micro/Micro Plus & Tower/Tower Plus 7010 editions DO get new updates such as this new one   and here are similar guides from the Dell web site for Dell systems: https://www.dell.com/support/kbdoc/en-us/000390990/secure-boot-transition-faq https://www.dell.com/support/kbdoc/en-us/000347876/microsoft-2011-secure-boot-certificate-expiration
    • AT&T has been spying on US citizens with the NSA for decades.. they just know how to keep it more under wraps.. the evil level is still there.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      tuben earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      459
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      212
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      157
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      71
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!