Webserver Backup to other server


Recommended Posts

Ok, I'm a complete noob when it comes to doing anything in terminal, or known what terms to use. So, if someone can help me understand what and how, that would be awesome.

I have two servers.

US1 = CentOS with cPanel

US2 = CentOS with Kloxxo

I have an account on US1 which is a vBulletin board. I'd like to be able to automatically backup that account daily to US2. I need the entire account.

Is there a way to do this easily, on the daily, automatically across the two servers?

Both servers are on the same network, and have an internal IP address.

192.168.1.101 / 102 for the servers.

I appreciate any help greatly.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1154260-webserver-backup-to-other-server/
Share on other sites

That is definitely possible. In fact, CPanel has a backup option built in if I remember correctly. You could probably setup automatic backup through CPanel, then setup a cron job on that server to mount the backup directory on the other server using rsync over ssh. I can provide specific commands if you want, but you should have no problem piecing together the procedure I described from guides elsewhere online.

Alright, so here/s what I'm trying to do, and the problems I'm having.

Using this command:


rsync -P XXXX -avz -e ssh /home/site [email protected]: /home/name/site
[/CODE]

I get the following error:

[CODE]
Unexpected remote arg: [email protected]:
rsync error: syntax or usage error (code 1) at main.c(1213) [sender=3.0.6]
[/CODE]

What am I doing wrong here?

The rsync command should look something like this:


rsync -aPvz -e "sshpass -p 'mySSHPasswordHere' ssh -p 22" /home/site [email protected]:/home/name/site
[/CODE]

In the command above I interpreted what I think you meant to do. According to the rsync man page '-P' is equivalent to '--partial --progress', but it looks like you were trying to use it to specify your SSH password. The OpenSSH client does not allow you to specify your password on the command line for security reasons, but if you really need to you can use the sshpass utility, which is what I did in the above command. However it would be much better if you used key-based SSH login instead, in which case you could remove the "sshpass -p 'mySSHPasswordHere'" from the command and just have "ssh -p 22" instead. Read this wiki page on key-based SSH login to learn how to set that up. When done correctly you will be able to SSH into the remote host without being prompted for a password.

Thanks for that.

I am just playing around with getting the keys to work. In the meantime though.


rsync -aPvz -e ssh -p 22" /home/site [email protected]:/home/name/site
[/CODE]

Am I correct to assume the -p 22 is the port?

That is correct; "-p 22" specifies the port. 22 is the default port for SSH, so you could technically leave that off and still have no problems. You can find the manual page for rsync here and the one for the OpenSSH client here.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Glad these prices are starting to come down, but that is still crazy. I bought the 2TB 9100 Pro (slightly more expensive version with PCIe 5.0) last year for $240.
    • The 2TB Samsung 990 PRO NVMe SSD hits lowest price in over three months by Sayan Sen Yesterday, we covered a really good deal wherein you can get a 4TB TeamGroup T-FORCE G50 NVMe PCIe Gen4 SSD for a low price of just $400 with a special discount coupon. That's just $100 per TB, making it a very good offer during these hard times. The deal is still live, so you can check it out in its dedicated article here if you do not want to miss out. Meanwhile, if you don't have that kind of budget but still wish to buy an SSD for a good price, the 2TB variant of the TeamGroup SSD at $280 its lowest price in over three months. Meanwhile, those seeking 2TB but faster performance can check out Samsung's 990 PRO, which has hit the lowest price also in the last quarter or so, as it's on sale for $370 (purchase links under the specs table down below). Thus, you want a faster drive, get the 990 Pro, or you want more capacity, grab the TeamGroup 4TB linked in the first para. The 990 PRO is a PCIe Gen4 NVMe SSD and still one of the fastest drives available today for under $500. Speaking of fast, sequential reads and writes are rated at 7450 MB/s and 6900 MB/s, respectively. The random throughputs for reads and writes are 1400K IOPS and 1550K IOPS, respectively. The 990 PRO is based on Samsung's 7th Gen V-NAND flash, and it too is TLC. It packs 2 gigs of LPDDR4 DRAM cache, which helps the random performance. The endurance rating for this is 1200 TBW (terabytes written), which should be sufficient for most users. The Samsung 990 PRO is compatible with the PlayStation 5, but if you are going to use the 990 PRO on a PC, check out the Samsung Magician app that lets you track your drive's health, update its firmware, customize various settings, and more. The tech specs are given below: Specification TeamGroup T-FORCE G50 2TB Samsung 990 PRO 2TB Interface PCIe 4.0 x4, NVMe 1.4 PCIe Gen 4.0 x4, NVMe 2.0 Form Factor M.2 2280 M.2 2280 Controller InnoGrit Controller Samsung In-house Controller NAND Flash 3D TLC 3D TLC DRAM Cache None (HMB supported) 2GB LPDDR4 Sequential Read (Max) 5,000 MB/s 7,450 MB/s Sequential Write (Max) 4,500 MB/s 6,900 MB/s Random Read (4K) Up to 600,000 IOPS Up to 1,400,000 IOPS Random Write (4K) Up to 700,000 IOPS Up to 1,550,000 IOPS TBW (Endurance) 1,300 TBW 1,200 TBW MTBF 3,000,000 hours 1,500,000 hours Operating Temperature 0°C to 70°C 0°C to 70°C Storage Temperature -40°C to 85°C -40°C to 85°C Shock Resistance 1,500G / 0.5ms 1,500G / 0.5ms Heatsink Patented Graphene Heat Spreader No Get them at the links below: Samsung 990 PRO SSD 2TB (MZ-V9P2T0B/AM): $369.99 (Sold and Shipped by Amazon US) TEAMGROUP T-Force G50 2TB SSD (TM8FFE002T0C129): $279.99 (Sold by TeamGroup, Shipped by Amazon US) Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • If you can't spell a simple word that 2nd graders learn, your entire argument is suspect.
    • And here goes the "Won't someone think of the children" brigade. Get stuffed mate. This has NOTHING to do with making the internet safe. It's about tracking adults, spying on your online activity, and sending the boys around when they don't like something you post. Also, again, parliament have voted TWICE against this, and Starmer is going ahead anyway. THAT is anti-democratic bullsh**. They will use this law to track you, they will use this law to control you, and they will use this law to punish you if they don't like what you do, even if it's legal. And your data? Say bye bye to that. It'll be on the darkweb in weeks. I'm not some rando online. I've been an IT professional for 40 years, many of it in security. I know exactly what this means and what will happen to your data. I do not consent and I will not comply.
    • "...but it may not be Microsoft's fault" seems like a reasonable way to tease what is going on without leaving the user with a false impression that an update is the problem. A title isn't a summery, it is meant to entice the user to read the article. It should not contain a misleading premise; which this title does not. You could maybe complain that the first paragraph should have included that detail. The writing style popularized over 100 years ago in newspapers will cover the most important information as soon as possible with details and nuance added later; the idea being that with each new paragraph you have less of the reader's focus.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      Jocimo earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      suprememobiles48 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      Prasann earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Prasann earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      520
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      174
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      91
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      81
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!