GameStop commits to Xbox One despite pre-owned issues


Recommended Posts

New-XBOX-ONE-016.jpg

GameStop has committed to a continued partnership with Microsoft for its Xbox One.

The US retailing giant has said that concerns regarding the company's new policy of instituting a paywall for pre-owned games will not affect their relationship.

-Microsoft And Game Publishers Will Reportedly Take A Cut Of Xbox One Used Game Sales

-Gamestop only gets 10% of the cut

digitalspy

forbes

Maybe there's more to this than what we all know and GameStop has more info under NDA? If it's all doom and gloom for used games like some make it sound then wouldn't GameStop be tossing a fit about this? I haven't seen them do so, nothing like how some individuals are. Makes you wonder what's really going on.

Maybe there's more to this than what we all know and GameStop has more info under NDA? If it's all doom and gloom for used games like some make it sound then wouldn't GameStop be tossing a fit about this? I haven't seen them do so, nothing like how some individuals are. Makes you wonder what's really going on.

Wouldn't surprise me if MS payed Gamestop the amount to buy Europe twice over.

Wouldn't surprise me if MS payed Gamestop the amount to buy Europe twice over.

For what? You can't just pay huge sums of money to another company and not have it show. It's not only GameStop either, what about the other guys out there that do the same stuff? What about any retail shop that handles returns of games? That's kinda the same idea to. I don't hear anyone from retail making a issue out of this. I believe it's telling how GameStop, Best Buy and others who sell games aren't saying anything.

So, if they didn't "commit to it" then what, they wouldn't be selling Xbox hardware and games anymore?

Yeah, I bet that would work out really well for them.

They'd sell hardware and new games but Gamestop makes the majority of it's money from used games. That's a fact, they say it themselves. If something cuts into the huge profits they pull in from used games that would hurt their business in a big way, why wouldn't that be making a large media issue out of it then? If you were gamestop and they told you you have to do this and this and that your cut from used games will be tiny now, when before they'd get the whole thing from the resale, you wouldn't go online and say anything?

Gamestop will not have a future if they fight against MS on this. This box will unfortunately sell in the masses and there's nothing anyone can do to stop it, not even Sony.

This is a clear violation of the first sale doctrine:

"The first sale doctrine, codified at 17 U.S.C. ? 109, provides that an

individual who knowingly purchases a copy of a copyrighted work from the

copyright holder receives the right to sell, display or otherwise

dispose of that particular copy, notwithstanding the interests of the

copyright owner. The right to distribute ends however, once the owner

has sold that particular copy."

They'll also get money from beyond the 1st sale.

Why should they be allowed to? I don't see the same with cars, movies, books, why are games as a product should have special needs?

Gamestop is cancer but this move will also affect people who never used Gamestop for anything ever, only because Microsoft wants to get money they shouldn't be entitled to.

-Microsoft And Game Publishers Will Reportedly Take A Cut Of Xbox One Used Game Sales

-Gamestop only gets 10% of the cut

digitalspy

forbes

Wheres the ratio info from? Is it your guess? And the Forbes link leads to their home page.

since by MS standard that Gamer are not buying the game, but rather the license to play the game,

the xbox-1 need to came up with Licenses Manager?, to allow gamers (licensee) to managed theirs.

Common cases:

  1. To transfer licenses directly to another account (used games as gift or used games direct selling),
  2. To lend license to another, but retain right to revoke 'em back (lending used games),
  3. Deactivate licenses, so another activation would immediately transfer to whomever account that activate'em. (used games sales/gift, without asking for buyer account info)

This way second hand sales will still there, 1st Hand Sales doctrine are honored, and Publisher get money according to License sold.

The problem with this 'Licenses Manager' is its not profitable to microsoft & the publishers ....

How much will "pre-owned" cost? Do we know this yet? The last I read, "used" prices would be close to paying full price or something like that?

That was not the case it seems. Any cut MS/publishers get as far as the newest set of rumors go is small. There was a $35 price floating and initially people said that was the "fee" or the cut MS/Publishers would get but last I heard that's the full used game price and any cut back to MS/publishers is a few dollars which is already part of that price. I think the deal with retailers is that they pay, say, $2-$5 back and keep the rest. Just my guess at this point.

"Making a fraction of the money we once did is still beneficial due to the PR. It will pull people into our retail locations, especially when 'making a game used', so they can see our inventory and hopefully buy some of this useless crap nobody wants anymore...."

How much will "pre-owned" cost? Do we know this yet? The last I read, "used" prices would be close to paying full price or something like that?

As much or little as MS and the developer wants it to. They will be setting the 'make it used' fee, which the store has to pay them to be able to resell it... They could also use big data to adjust prices for maximum gouging across regions, depending if the system is setup pre or post customer resell. If the cost of activation, and thus the game cost is determined at purchase something along the lines of, "Hmm, seems we had 4 copies of halo 5 activated on 4 consoles all in the south region today, Those 4 accounts have more friends located in the south region so lets put their used copy prices up by $8 in that region for a bit which will put them on-par with a DLC copy" Of course the system would have the intelligence to make these changes on a daily or even hourly basis.

If they will do it pre, meaning its value is determined and set on the day of trade-in/exchange, meaning they can gouge the customer trading in rather than buying depending on what the local market looks like for that particular title that day. Either way its setup to maximize cash flow to both developers and MS itself which should result in more developers making more money and making better games. hopefully. Theres a reason MS is jumping from 15k servers to over 300k.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Limited time Prime Day deal cuts price of this Hisense 65" 4K smart TV in half by Ivan Jenic It’s Amazon Prime Day, and brands are offering great deals to consumers. One of the best deals of the day is definitely this Hisense 65" U7, which is currently $799.99 on Amazon, down from $1,499.99. That's nearly 50% off and $700 saved on this feature-packed 4K TV (purchase link down below). The U7 uses Mini-LED backlighting with up to 3,000 local dimming zones and up to 3,000 nits of peak brightness. That means blacks are truly deep and highlights are punchy enough to hold up even in bright rooms. The screen is covered with a dual-layer anti-reflection coating, which prevents the afternoon overhead lights from washing the picture. For gaming, the native 165Hz refresh rate and VRR 330 support make this one a great TV option for PS5 and Xbox Series X. The TV even features a native game mode, which should help minimize the input lag for a better gaming experience. Audio is handled by a 2.1.2 channel system tuned by Devialet, which is a notable partnership for a TV at this price. Additionally, Dolby Vision IQ, Dolby Atmos, and IMAX Enhanced are all supported. It runs Fire TV with Alexa+ built in. So, if you’re looking for a sharp, large screen to watch the World Cup on, the U7 at this price is definitely an attractive option. Speaking of which, Hisense is the official sponsor of the World Cup, which should mean absolutely nothing to you, and isn’t the reason why you should by this TV. The reason why you should buy it is that it’s “la bella televisione, HDTV-compatible, beautiful,” and available at half the price. Hisense 65" U7 Mini-LED 4K Smart Fire TV - $799.99 | 47% off on Amazon Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • eM Client 10.4.5600.0 by Razvan Serea eM Client is a full featured e-mail client with a modern and easy to use interface. eM Client also offers calendar, tasks, contacts and chat. eM Client supports all major services including Gmail, Exchange, iCloud, and Outlook.com. You can easily import your data from most of the other e-mail clients. This includes Microsoft Outlook, Outlook Express, Windows Mail, Windows Live Mail, Thunderbird, The Bat and more. eM Client fully supports touch devices like touch-enabled laptops, tablets and hybrid devices. Use your email client easily in a modern way. eM Client PRO vs. Free version While the Free license allows you to set up the maximum of two accounts in the application, it is possible to add an unlimited number of accounts with the PRO license. The PRO license also enables you to use eM Client for commercial purposes. Commercial use is any activity that helps you make profit, the Free license therefore cannot be used in company settings or on personal computers for business correspondence. PRO users also gain access to the dedicated support system and to the licensing manager. eM Client has been fully optimized to run smoothly on Windows Vista, 7, 8, 10 and 11. eM Client 10.4.5600.0 changelog: Improved memory management Improved MS Teams support A lot of other fixes Download: eM Client 10.4.5600 | 128.0 MB (Free, paid upgrade available) View: eM Client Website | eM Client Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Re: Capitalism. It's just 1 of dozens of economic models currently-adopted worldwide; most national models separate money from politics thereby limiting the influence wealth carries over the economy (due to limited tentacles wealth politics has over the broader economy). The "American model" of unfettered financial influence should NOT be the variant of pure capitalism adopted worldwide. More regulations formulated within this variant is effectively useless due to the misalignment between regulatory objectives and fundamental influence wealth politics carry over the market. Re: enough money. Without constraining the breadth/depth/scope/scale that any measure of money/wealth can have within a market, there will always inherently be those who have "enough money" and those who do not. Those without "enough money" will always lose -- regardless if a bedroom DJ, indie developer, or million-dollar corporation going against a billion-dollar mega-corporation. The evil is the absence of guardrails against the influence of wealth; not the mere existence of wealth. Re: dragged through the courts. The liberalist nature of litigation does not exclude anyone, anywhere, for any reason for getting dragged through the courts. Rather than formalize remediation pathways for various perceived ills, everything is left up to flawed interpretations... and this is where a litigation-averse community fails to thrive (thus a losing proposition when dragged to courts). Everyone should have more protections and clear remediation strategies! Going to an alternate remediation arbitration is OK so long as the case review and remediation processes are clear and transparent. For corporations, hit them where it hurts: automatic financial penalties. (PS: This is where corporate risk management strategies would do well to behave more ethically.) Overall, failure to truly shake-up the incentive core and regulatory extremities of the economic market will necessarily mean that all other actions are simply applying lipstick on a pig. Change begins from the inside. Is the root cause of the problem that a majority of consumers within a market goes for Option Brand-name versus Option Indie? Or that brand-name is spending foreign money to control domestic markets? Or that money is the objective measure for success across all walks of life? Or that deep pockets dictate the moral and ethical rights/wrongs of entire societies? Regardless of the answer (and there's nothing inherently wrong with being a socialist or communist or whatever label your surroundings deem 'cool' or 'uncool') there's a common thread: If a market truly wants to nurture domestic innovation, then performative finger-wagging will do nothing to that end.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      Admir earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      First Post
    • Apprentice
      daryld went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Contributor
      Carltonbar went up a rank
      Contributor
    • One Month Later
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      407
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      167
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      130
    4. 4
      Xenon
      71
    5. 5
      neufuse
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!