Jump to content
|Topic||Stats||Last action by|
|Malaysia Airlines 'loses contact with plane'||
|Do you guys have days that start bad, keep getting worst and you know wont stop getting worst?||
|This Is Why Your Parents Shouldn’t Be On Facebook||
|Panasonic's 4K-ready Lumix GH4 priced at $1,700, ships in late April||
|Sony and Panasonic announce the Archival Disc||
Posted 13 June 2013 - 16:16
Posted 13 June 2013 - 16:30
Posted 13 June 2013 - 16:32
I'd go with Mint. Cinnamon == teh best. I run Debian Wheezy with Cinnamon as the DE with nice dark GTK Themes, and Faenza icons. Would never know it was Debian by looking at it.
Posted 13 June 2013 - 19:36
i could not get cinnamon to look decent
Posted 13 June 2013 - 19:45
Posted 13 June 2013 - 19:45
Posted 13 June 2013 - 21:48
Current Debian Desktop
Posted 13 June 2013 - 22:24
Are you running Wheezy or Sid? I noticed that Cinnamon is not in Wheezy, but it is in Sid. The system information in your screenshot also says that you are running Linux 3.9, which hasn't been backported to Wheezy yet. If you are running Wheezy, I would be interested to know how you got it running. Did you use a repository, compile everything from source, or backport the packages yourself?
Posted 13 June 2013 - 23:26
It's Wheezy. Had to add the linux mint repository which has cinnamon and all its dependencies. As for the 3.9 kernel I downloaded the source from git and built it. Then recompiled the required modules, setup grub to include the 3.9 kernel and removed the 3.2 entries, then ran a cleanup to remove all the 3.2 references/modules/headers.
I'm not that skilled at linux to be back-porting. But having run arch for a long time I am pretty used to building from source.
# Install the basic Debian development packages sudo apt-get install build-essential devscripts # Find the package you wish to backport. # If this is an official backport you must follow the official guidelines at: http://backports.debian.org/Contribute/ # # 1. Navigate to http://www.debian.org/distrib/packages in your web browser # 2. Under "Search package directories" # a. Type the name of the package you wish to backport in the "Keyword" field # b. Select "Testing" or "Unstable" from the "Distribution" dropdown box # c. Click the "Search" button # 3. Select the package # 4. Under "Download Source Package" on the right-hand side of the page, copy the link location for the package ".dsc" file # Download and extract the package source. Replace the package name in this example as necessary. dget http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/pool/main/c/cinnamon/cinnamon_1.7.4-2.dsc dpkg-source -x cinnamon_1.7.4-2.dsc cd cinnamon-1.7.4 # Create a unique revision by add "~yourusername1" to the package name. # This is another example of something that would be slightly different with an official backport. # Example: cinnamon_1.7.4-2~firey1 debchange -R # Install any missing build dependencies. # The command below will print any missing dependencies, which you can then (hopefully) "sudo apt-get install". dpkg-checkbuilddeps # Build the package. dpkg-buildpackage -us -uc cd .. # Install the package. sudo dpkg -i *.deb
Posted 14 June 2013 - 00:01
Posted 14 June 2013 - 00:07
Seems pretty easy, basically let the OS do it all for me. For the 3.9 I just followed this guide:
http://verahill.blog...ml<br /><br />Which is really just downloading source and compiling.
For cinnamon I just added the repo, and an apt-get install update/upgrade then apt-get install cinnamon. To get 1.8 I had to do a dist-upgrade.
Posted 14 June 2013 - 00:09
Posted 14 June 2013 - 01:18
That kernel compile guide looks about right. I'm sure the LMDE repository works well for Cinnamon as well; I'm just a little hesitant to use anything packaged by Linux Mint anymore. So long as there are no conflicts (despite the dist-upgrade) it's probably alright.
Posted 14 June 2013 - 06:56
Like others have mentioned, the best thing to do is to try several different distros before you decide which to install. Since you are new to Linux, sticking with an Ubuntu base is probably the best choice. Ubuntu is polished, easy to use, and very well supported. While I don't mind Ubuntu's Unity desktop environment in its current form, I agree with Max Norris that I don't really like where it is headed. I encourage you to download the latest Kubuntu and Xubuntu discs to try the KDE and XFCE desktop environments before you make your final decision. Both distributions are as highly polished as Ubuntu, and they exclusively use software that is in the Ubuntu repository - essentially they are Ubuntu, not derivatives.
While it is true that Linux Mint is based on Ubuntu and compatible with Ubuntu repositories, I would never recommend it to anyone because of the high level of technical debt the project has incurred. While many people agree that Linux Mint looks very nice, the Linux Mint developers have taken on a huge number of internal development projects - far beyond their resources. They consistently make poor technical decisions, which includes flagrantly ignoring recommended Debian packaging policy as if they know better than the APT developers. While things mostly work in each release of Linux Mint, their technical debt is becoming more visible with each release as more bugs are found in internally developed software (such as Cinnamon and MDM), the release cycle gets longer, the support window get shorter, and there continues to be a complete lack of an officially supported upgrade path between releases.
Posted 21 June 2013 - 11:59