Multiple accounts, one Windows installation; how to?


Recommended Posts

My parents do use their computers (they have 2 seperate notebooks) on a not-so-regular basis. One notebook cannot be upgraded to Windows 11.

So, there's basically two options:
1. Get a new laptop with Windows 11, use the older one which has W11 installed
2. Have one notebook, with to accounts (one for my mum, the other for my dad) - plus is saves licensing costs

My questions are on the second option:

- If one harddrive is partitioned, can user A have partition 1 as default storage option, and user B partition 2 [and not see each other partitions]
- Cana a "super-admin" account be created (for e.g. me) if something goes wrong, get accidently deleted or whatever to restore and login in for both accounts/troubleshooting?

Or is 2 laptops the easier way on tackling and handling this

Or do you guys recommend a different setup on this situation?

Yes it can be done the way you're saying. The question is why would you do that. Windows separates it's users documents in folders. If you're worried about privacy then create one admin account for yourself, and two standard accounts for your parents. They won't be able to access yours or the other account without your admin password 

On 04/02/2025 at 19:41, Som said:

Yes it can be done the way you're saying. The question is why would you do that. Windows separates it's users documents in folders. If you're worried about privacy then create one admin account for yourself, and two standard accounts for your parents. They won't be able to access yours or the other account without your admin password 

I'm not worried about privacy. Just ease of use. And possible saving 'mistakes' onto another partition.

So, can I have one partition 'hidden' (not being displayed) to avoid saving errors on one user?

From what I understood is that on the C:/ ("Windows") partition a 'folder' is being created for users. Which is good, but given HDD size on the Windows installation, I would like to have an additional HDD for just documents and stuff. And that 'docs'-HDD in two partitions (one accessable for my mum for her user, and another partition for my dad on his Windows accouns)

If you have pro version of windows you may be able to alter group policies  to hide partitions

https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/troubleshoot/windows-client/group-policy/using-group-policy-objects-hide-specified-drives

You can also 1. Use group policies to move the user folder, 2. Do it through the registry, 3. Move them manually via folder properties, 4. Use windows settings to do it 5. Use third part software , I can't remember any off hand 

Guide below 

https://www.thewindowsclub.com/change-default-save-location-windows-10

As someone who has elderly parents and also has being fixing computers for (sigh two decades now) , my advice is to go the simplest route. Windows is easy to fix and also even easier to reinstall.

 

On 04/02/2025 at 13:58, kiddingguy said:

I'm not worried about privacy. Just ease of use. And possible saving 'mistakes' onto another partition.

So, can I have one partition 'hidden' (not being displayed) to avoid saving errors on one user?

From what I understood is that on the C:/ ("Windows") partition a 'folder' is being created for users. Which is good, but given HDD size on the Windows installation, I would like to have an additional HDD for just documents and stuff. And that 'docs'-HDD in two partitions (one accessable for my mum for her user, and another partition for my dad on his Windows accouns)

What your wanting to do doesn't actually make sense, however you can repoint the users subfolders (eg. Documents, Pictures, etc...) to new locations (this is supported by default in Windows 11 via the folder properties dialog), however if you do anything through the registry (i've done it in the past to move the entire C:\Users\ folder to another drive) you risk being unable to install updates, and considering windows at least once a year does a complete OS upgrade install that will break things.

The way I do things is now a days is point C:\Users\Username\Documents to D:\Username\Documents and just set correct ACL permissions on the folders, only admin level access can do anything with the folders, the users are limited to their own locations,

This sounds like massively overengineering a situation to turn a problem into a maintenance disaster.

Just use two separate user accounts and relocate the folders as Matthew S suggested.  Or use OneDrive.

Thanks for all the advice.

I'm not looking to overcomplicate things, privacy is not an option.

Still they can remain admin (an admin-user and not standard from within Windows) on their own machine in case they need to install software or whatever. And with repointing the users subfolders with already available options (like indeed folder properties dialog) [thx @Matthew S.for the tip], I think it should be done this way,

The relocation can still remain to other partitions like E:\Documents (for mum) and so on, and F:\Documents etc. (for my dad).

Is it wise to have an (admin) account for me as well on that machine, or wil these two account suffice?
Maybe a password/pincode to enter their user-account might be an option, though not really necessary I guess.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • But the reality is it will work for people's needs, and they don't care about the technology that makes it. Clearly not everyone's needs, but that low end space where personal laptops were only used to type emails, watch content and browse websites, but they didn't want to do that on a small screen device. Heck, writing that out I can now see the connection and reason it'll do so well. Apple is about experience. If the experience is bad, they don't release it. Low end Windows laptop manufacturers up until this point have not taken that into consideration ever before, so slow laggy usage with brittle slimey plastic shells were common. I hope that the low end space at least creates better physical products that last a bit longer, and if Microsoft get their act together, they could also have a solid OS on such low end hardware that would actually make the experience work for what the hardware was intended for. The fact that the CPU is a "cellphone", sorry mobile phone processor is irrelevant. It's about the experience, and so far, that sounds quite solid.
    • Hello, Bonjour is Apple's implementation of a multicast-DNS service, which allows devices running Apple's software and/or hardware to find each other on your local network.  I believe the Windows version was last updated around 2010. If you do not need it, you can stop and disable the Bonjour service in the Services Control Manager (filename: SERVICES.MSC).  Once you have done that, the operating system will no longer attempt to load the service. Regards, Aryeh Goretsky  
    • This AMD RX 9070 16GB GPU that performs close to Nvidia 5070 is under $600 by Sayan Sen With the memory shortage that's prevalent nowadays, discounts are super-hard to get. As such we post good deals whenever they pop up. Recently, we covered a few great discounts on SSDs wherein you can get a 4TB TeamGroup NVMe PCIe Gen4 drive for just $400 thanks to a special coupon. If you want a faster product but don't need all that capacity, you can also opt for Samsung's 990 PRO 2TB that is on sale for its lowest price in over three months. Let's say though that you are on the hunt for a 1440p gaming card. In that case AMD's RX 9070 non-XT can help, and with its 16GB VRAM, you can also run AI models locally without worrying about bottlenecking (check out our recent 9070 GRE reviews for gaming and productivity to get an idea). The PowerColor Reaper variant of the RX 9070 is currently on sale for just $580 which is a very good price in the current state of affairs (purchase link under the specs table down below). The Reaper cooler on this 9070 uses a triple‑fan design with ring‑blade fans, paired with premium dual ball bearings to extend lifespan and reduce friction. "Intelligent" fan control allows the fans to remain idle at lower temperatures, only spinning up when the GPU is under load. A nickel‑plated copper base makes direct contact with both the GPU and memory modules, helping to spread heat evenly. PowerColor also applies Honeywell PTM7950 phase‑change thermal interface material (TIM), which fills microscopic gaps between the die and heatsink for more efficient thermal transfer. The fan shroud is shorter in height as the firm has made it such that it can be used in certain SFF (small form factor) cases. The technical specifications of the Reaper RX 9070 are given in the table below: Specification Value Stream Processors 3584 Units Video Memory 16GB GDDR6 Memory Speed 20.0 Gbps Memory Interface 256-bit Engine Clock Game Clock: up to 2070 MHz Boost Clock: up to 2520 MHz Bus Standard PCI Express 5.0 x16 Display Connectors 1 x HDMI 2.1b, 3 x DisplayPort 2.1a Maximum Resolution DisplayPort: 7680 × 4320 HDMI: 7680 × 4320 Board Dimensions 289mm × 111mm × 41mm 304mm × 127mm × 42mm (with bracket) Slot 2 Minimum System Power Requirement 600W Power Connectors Two 8-pin PCI Express Get the PowerColor Reaper RX 9070 at the links below (you get only a 90-day warranty on Woot): PowerColor Reaper Radeon RX 9070 16GB Graphics Card (RX9070 16G-A): $579.99 (Sold and Shipped by Amazon US) (Was: $700) PowerColor Reaper Radeon RX 9070 16GB Graphics Card (RX9070 16G-A): $559.99 (Sold and Shipped by Woot US) Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Are they marketed as an entry into astronomy or astrophotography? I do astrophotography. With big rigs, lots of computers, cables and headaches. I love it. And by learning this ridiculously complex hobby, I’ve learned about the objects I’m shooting. Astronomy followed from photography.
    • Microsoft confirms Recycle Bin bug across all versions of Windows by Usama Jawad A couple of days ago, we reported that the latest Patch Tuesday update has seemingly resulted in a lot of issues for many users, including OneDrive and Dropbox access problems, BitLocker recovery lockouts, and BSODs. Although Microsoft is yet to acknowledge these bugs, it has confirmed another, relatively smaller issue across all supported versions of Windows. In an update on its Windows Release Health Dashboard, Microsoft has confirmed that after installing June's Patch Tuesday update (KB5094126), you'll experience unexpected behavior when leveraging Recycle Bin. Basically, when you attempt to delete an item from the Recycle Bin, the confirm dialog will show you the internal file name of that content rather than the actual name. For example, the file may be named abc.png, but the confirm dialog will ask if you're sure that you want to permanently delete $Rxxxxx.png from the Recycle Bin. This is pretty much it for the scope of the bug itself; it just displays the wrong name in the confirm dialog. The correct name will be shown in the list view of the Recycle Bin and if you restore the file, it will return with the correct name as well. This issue affects pretty much all supported versions of Windows client and server, including: Client: Windows 11, version 26H1; Windows 11, version 25H2; Windows 11, version 24H2; Windows 11, version 23H2; Windows 10, version 22H2; Windows 10 Enterprise LTSC 2021; Windows 10 Enterprise LTSC 2019; Windows 10 Enterprise LTSB 2016 Server: Windows Server 2025; Windows Server 2022; Windows Server 2019; Windows Server 2016; Windows Server 2012 R2; Windows Server 2012 As things currently stand, Microsoft is working on a concrete solution that will be released in a "future" Windows update. It remains to be seen if the firm will wait till the next Patch Tuesday or roll out an out-of-band (OOB) fix. The good news is that commercial customers can deploy a workaround right now, but they will have to reach out to Microsoft Support for Business for additional details.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Jordan Smith earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      579
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      184
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      75
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      72
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!