[FAQ] How is Linux Layered?


Recommended Posts

"I don't understand how the kernel, OS and GUI are layered in Linux..."

This FAQ is a quick run-down that I have written to briefly introduce GNU/Linux (often referred to as just "Linux") to someone completely unfamiliar with how a typical Linux system is structured. The target audience for this is quite likely someone who is considering installing Linux for the first time, or who has installed it recently, but is having difficulty dealing with the variety of choices.

A Linux system usually consists of several layers, many of which have numerous alternatives available for selection. I will start at the base level, and then build up.

The Linux Kernel: The Engine

www.kernel.org

The heart of a Linux system is the Linux kernel. It is the very low-level software that deals directly with the computer's hardware. On its own, a kernel doesn't do anything. It just sits there waiting to be told what is needed.

The Linux kernel has a production branch that uses an even number as the first number after the decimal point (2.2, 2.4, 2.6, etc.). Any development work that is being worked on for the next major revision of the kernel will use an odd number after the first decimal point (2.5, 2.7) Note, that at the time I am writing this, there is no 2.7 version, as all new features are being quickly incorporated into the production 2.6 series.

The GNU OS: What Really is Running

www.gnu.org

A kernel, by itself, doesn't get work done. This is where the GNU Project (part of the Free Software Foundation, or FSF) comes in. they provide the 'tools' needed to accomplish work. Think of these as the basic set of commands to perform operations.

GNU can be used by other kernels, as well. The FSF's own Hurd kernel (under development) uses it, and there are projects to get GNU on BSD (which typically is a self-contained kernel/OS). The nice thing about this is that the higher levels are independent of the kernel, meaning that you can run the same sets of apps (including Window Managers - more on that later) regardless what kernel you choose to run in the future. (and indeed, BSDs can even run the same apps in their BSD kernel)

The X Window System: Graphics!

www.xfree86.org

www.x.org

The "X Window System", often called "X", is really just a system of handling graphics. There are two popular applications that handle the X protocol: XFree86 and X.org. X.org is a fork from the XFree86 code, just before XFree86 changed their licensing terms in 2004.

It is in X11 that your video driver is used. Also your other input and output devices (such as keyboard, mouse and screen) are declared here.

It is important to note that X does not provide for any sort of advanced windowing functions other than the display of them. User manipulation of the windows (and the decorations, such as titlebars, borders and widgets) is handled by the Window Manager, which we will cover next.

The Window Manager: So many choices...

The realm of managing windows in X is populated with a large variety of Window Managers. This is perhaps the most daunting and confusing thing for Microsoft Windows users to understand about the world of Linux.

In Linux, the user may choose a Window Manger that uses very little system resources, or they may choose ones with more features. This level will provide a fully functional GUI for your Linux box. Some examples include Fluxbox, Sawfish, FVWM, Enlightenment, Metacity and IceWM.

Compiz (or, more properly, Compiz Fusion) with its Emerald window decorator is another Window Manager with special appeal to many. It uses graphics card hardware to run visual effects of warping, zooming, shadows and more. Compiz is closely associated with Gnome, and replaces Metacity in a "3D" Gnome setup. If a user decides to switch back away from this Window Manager into a traditional (no GPU) Window Manager, they must replace it, not just remove Compiz.

The Desktop Environment: The Big Two (plus one)

www.kde.org

www.gnome.org

www.xfce.org

Where can you go beyond a Window Manager? Why, a full-blown Desktop Environment, of course! It continues where a Window Manager leaves off by incorporating things such as a "control panel" like item that lets you adjust your settings for a great deal of peripherals (scanners, printers, keyboards, mice, and anything else you can connect).

A Desktop Environment matches what most Microsoft Windows users expect in an operating system. All of these extra features come at the cost of extra resources being consumed. And, in fact, many people get a current Linux system running on an old box by not using the heavier KDE or Gnome, and getting more life out of the PC. The PC can still be updated with the latest kernel and apps (such as GIMP, OpenOffice.org and Firefox) and be a very capable desktop machine.

While KDE and Gnome have all the extra bells and whistles, if you want to slim down your resource usage, but don't want to sacrifice the convenience of having the added features of a Desktop Environment, XFCE may fit the bill. A self-described "lightweight desktop environment for various *NIX systems", screenshots of these desktops are often featured in our "Desktop" threads.

In Summary

How many layers, and which modular options you choose is up to you. The choices are daunting for someone first looking at them, but these choices make Open Source so exciting and you will have all the tools needed to make your PC work the way you want it to.

I hope this brief summary helps some of those who want to understand what makes up a Linux PC, and takes some of the confusion away. The forums here have many knowledgeable members, many of them are IT professionals (which I am not) and with the experience needed to help you out with guidance to get yourself out of a bind.

Those of you who are reading this and notice an error in what I have said, please let me know so that it can be corrected.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/259962-faq-how-is-linux-layered/
Share on other sites

One spelling mistake :p

Edit : Otherwise Well Done (Y). Nice Article.

585135935[/snapback]

:pinch:

I went back and fixed two spelling errors, and three typos where my fingers had a mind of their own. :blush:

Some examples include Fluxbox, XFCE, Enlightenment, Metacity and IceWM.

Last time I checked XFCE is a lightweight desktop environment and not a window manager.

From www.xfce.org:

"Xfce is a lightweight desktop environment for various *NIX systems.

Designed for productivity, it loads and executes applications fast, while conserving system resources."

Last time I checked XFCE is a lightweight desktop environment and not a window manager.

585137503[/snapback]

Their site was very informative.

XFCE uses XFWM4 as the Window Manager.

I will update the first post. (Y)

Edit: Updated the DE section (and edited the listing of WMs at the end of the WM section).

Edit 2: Thank you, everyone for your improvements and compliments. :D

Edited by markjensen
  • 2 weeks later...
Very good article, just one thing, BSD is both an OS and a Kernel, it does not in fact include GNU.  (this becomes very apparent when you use a BSD system :p)

585277068[/snapback]

Very correct!

http://www.gnu.org/gnu/linux-and-gnu.html

I will make the appropriate edit. Google shows GNU/BSD as a sourceforge project, and other links with the reference (but some of those may be mis-identified, as I did above).

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • The quantum search for Time's origin had an equally mind-boggling conclusion by Sayan Sen Image by Steve Johnson via Pexels A theoretical study from researchers at the University of Surrey suggested that the direction of time may not be fundamentally fixed in certain quantum systems. The work, published in Scientific Reports, examined how the “arrow of time” could emerge from microscopic physics and found that time-reversal symmetry can remain intact even in models used to describe processes such as energy loss and thermalisation. The arrow of time refers to the observed one-way direction from past to future in everyday life. In macroscopic processes, this is easy to see. Spilled milk spreads across a table and does not gather back into a glass, and heat flows from hotter objects to colder ones. These processes shape the common sense idea that time moves in a single direction. However, at the level of fundamental physics, many equations do not prefer a direction of time. Time-reversal symmetry means that the same physical laws can describe a system whether time moves forward or backward. This has made it difficult to explain why irreversible behaviour appears in the large-scale world even when the underlying rules do not require it. Dr Andrea Rocco, Associate Professor in Physics and Mathematical Biology at the University of Surrey, described this contrast: "One way to explain this is when you look at a process like spilt milk spreading across a table, it's clear that time is moving forward. But if you were to play that in reverse, like a movie, you'd immediately know something was wrong – it would be hard to believe milk could just gather back into a glass. However, there are processes, such as the motion of a pendulum, that look just as believable in reverse. The puzzle is that, at the most fundamental level, the laws of physics resemble the pendulum; they do not account for irreversible processes. Our findings suggest that while our common experience tells us that time only moves one way, we are just unaware that the opposite direction would have been equally possible." The study focused on open quantum systems, which are quantum systems that interact with a surrounding environment. This environment, often described as a heat bath, can exchange energy and information with the system. The researchers used this framework to study how a direction of time might appear even when the underlying physics does not enforce one. A key part of the analysis involved the Markov approximation. This is a simplification used in many models where the system is assumed not to retain memory of its past states. The idea is that changes depend only on the current state, not on earlier history. This is commonly used when studying thermalisation, which is the process where a system settles into equilibrium with its environment. The study also used concepts such as master equations, including the Lindblad and Pauli equations, which describe how probabilities of different quantum states change over time. Another related model discussed was quantum Brownian motion, which describes the random-like movement of a quantum particle interacting continuously with its environment. In these descriptions, a “memory kernel” can appear, which is a mathematical term that accounts for how past states influence current behaviour. The researchers found that applying the Markov approximation did not break time-reversal symmetry. Even when the system interacted with an effectively infinite heat bath, the resulting equations of motion remained symmetric in time. This meant that the same mathematical description could, in principle, run forward or backward in time without contradiction. The study further showed that standard frameworks used in open quantum systems, including quantum Brownian motion and master equations like the Lindblad and Pauli forms, could be written in a time-symmetric way. These equations are typically used to describe processes that look irreversible, such as dissipation and thermalisation, but the results suggested they can also be interpreted as allowing evolution in both time directions. Thomas Guff, Research Fellow in Quantum Thermodynamics, said: "The surprising part of this project was that even after making the standard simplifying assumption to our equations describing open quantum systems, the equations still behaved the same way whether the system was moving forwards or backwards in time. When we carefully worked through the maths, we found that this behaviour had to be the case because a key part of the equation, the "memory kernel," is symmetrical in time. We also found a small but important detail which is usually overlooked – a time discontinuous factor emerged that kept the time-symmetry property intact. It’s unusual to see such a mathematical mechanism in a physics equation because it's not continuous, and it was very surprising to see it appear so naturally." The researchers also noted that deriving a one-way arrow of time from time-reversal symmetric microscopic dynamics remains an open problem across fields such as thermodynamics, statistical mechanics, particle physics, and cosmology. Their results suggested that some standard descriptions of irreversible behaviour in open quantum systems may be better understood using a time-symmetric formulation of Markovianity. According to the study, processes such as thermalisation, which are usually treated as irreversible, could in theory be described in a way that allows evolution in either time direction under the same rules. This does not imply that time reversal occurs in everyday life, but rather that the underlying equations do not strictly enforce a single direction. Overall, the findings suggested that the perceived direction of time may emerge from how physical systems are modelled and approximated, rather than from a fundamental asymmetry in the laws themselves. The researchers noted that this perspective could have implications for ongoing work in quantum mechanics, thermodynamics, and cosmology on the origin of time’s arrow. Source: University of Surrey, Nature This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing
    • A bit premature... 100% Marketing. Bizarre.
    • A $300 price hike is insane! No one is going to want to pay that much!
    • Since the 1st one flopped, there is really no reason to make another one. It's just losing money left and right.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      580
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      182
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      75
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      71
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!