Do you believe they should be law?  

189 members have voted

  1. 1. Do you believe they should be law?

    • Yes
      93
    • No
      96


Recommended Posts

I'm on the fence with this one.

I mean, if you cannot see the other car while driving, what makes one think you can see their lights?

Maybe the headlights, at a distance, are more visible since they are shining straight at you, but....

I guess i just answered my own argument. :D

That wouldn't work since headlights are supposed to aim low. The only reason you'd ever see them shining in your face is if they're improperly aimed.

haha...

umm, okay.

We'll just pretend that there isn't some light scattered parallel to the road surface... more light than what was there to begin with... and aimed right at an oncoming driver.

Try it some time- park a car a mile down the road from you and have them turn the lights off and on.

Let me know what you see.

That wouldn't work since headlights are supposed to aim low. The only reason you'd ever see them shining in your face is if they're improperly aimed.

Mine are half-beam high-beams, so they are aimed higher than normal headlights.

My 02 volvo s60 has them, and I don't care for them

Do they bother you when you drive? ;)

Nope. Even though it may be super minute they will use gas and at the prices these days.....

I think the math would work out to about $10 a year (if that) and why worry when the radio, AC, power windows and brakes and steering are all using the same power source we're suddenly worried about for DRL? There are many safety features we pay for in the price of the car, so why are so many resistant to this one? :blink:

I say we just slow people down. If you're not considerate enough to put your lights on in dark conditions, or to take (really) enough time to look for other cars/people... how is seeing a dim light going to help?

It's law over here for a motorbike rider to have their lights on while driving, but they're small compared to a car. So you wouldn't notice them too well.

Uh...don't all new (last 10 years) cars have that feature already?

Here in Manitoba running lights are mandatory. I don't see the big deal.

And what's with the "just another law being force down our throats" attitude?

Not in the US, among other countries.

I doubt the cars are that much more visible. The lights are dim and aren't attention grabbing.

Then why do some states make you turn on your lights in the rain on highways?

Then why do some states make you turn on your lights in the rain on highways?

Usually when it rains it's looks more like dusk. I think lights should always be on while it's raining (and it is a law in my state of Alabama).

I have DRLs, but I don't think it should be a law of any kind. It just costs car manufactures more money for something that's useless. I can't say I remember a time where someone else DRL helped me see them better or helped avoid any sort of accident. They do help those people who can't remember to turn their lights on in the rain though ... but that's the only time I can say it's ever "helped". It's useless.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I and many others did not vote to get out of the E.u because of Putin or Farage, we did so for our own reasons. You don't have to tel me what my own did or did not do when it comes to the E.U. The EEC is or was the European Economic Community, a different beast to what the E.U is now.The EEC was a mainly about trading, the E.U have gone far beyond that and as I have said before, is now more of a United States of Europe. The U.K did not vote to join a United States of Europe. Anyway, they did not want us in there in the first place, Charles de Gaulle stopped us joining as he claimed we didn’t agree with the core ideas of integration. He was not wrong and that is why we voted out of the E.U when the time came. I was not old enough to vote the first time. My only regret is that we did not have the referendum years ago and got out years ago. If we rejoined, we would have to agree to join the Euro and no doubt Schengen, agree with freedom of movement, we have enough problem with people coming over here as it is. i have no problem with people coming over here if they work and don't try to push their way of life onto us. The E.U has a currency, freedom of movement, an anthem a flag, a parliament, well they are there, not sure if they do anything. Don't sound like something that is just for trading. Oh yeah, also wanted a euro Army. How many stupid rules have the E.U made that we had to follow? I doubt I will see the Uk rejoin the E.U, which suits me. Oh yeah, my partner is Polish, she came over here before Poland joined the E.U and she got fed up of people just coming over here with ease, while she had to struggle. She is now a British citizen and have been for a fair few years
    • Hello, Paul. Thanks for the editorial. It was interesting. I'm going research more into the app and its concept. Of course, if you know me at all, you know that I'd say your articles needs some editing! I a;ways do, don't I? For instance, the article occasionally mentions a concept before defining it, e.g., relays.
    • Screamer is 50% off on Steam, making it £24.99 here in the UK: https://store.steampowered.com/app/2814990/Screamer/ You might remember the series from the mid 90s / early 2000s, this new game is also by Milestone who created the older games.
    • U.S. partially reverses Anthropic AI ban for Mythos but keeps Fable 5 off the market by Karthik Mudaliar Anthropic says that the U.S. government has finally allowed it to restore Claude Mythos 5. But of course, there's a catch. The rollout is again for a limited set of U.S. organizations that operate and defend critical infrastructure. The company announced this in a post on X (formerly Twitter). This does not mean that Anthropic's latest frontier models are back to normal availability. Fable 5, which was a tuned version of Mythos 5 for public release, remains unavailable. Anthropic said that it is still working with the government to expand Mythos 5 access and make Fable 5 available again, but there's no timeline. Reports from Bloomberg and Reuters say that this decision actually came through a letter from the U.S. Commerce Department. According to Reuters, this would allow more than 100 companies and institutions access to Mythos 5. Reuters also reported that Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick’s letter removes the need for export licenses for approved companies’ non-US citizen employees, as well as Anthropic’s own non-US citizen employees, while restrictions remain for organizations outside the approved list. Anthropic isn't alone with this kind of controlled rollout. OpenAI's newest model family, GPT 5.6, was announced just yesterday, but isn't available for everyone yet. In its announcement, OpenAI also said that access to these models is initially limited to a select group of trusted partners and organizations, with broader access planned later this year. Both of these cases show that frontier AI launches are no longer just ordinary product releases and more like slow and vetted deployments shaped heavily by the U.S. government.
    • Sol, Terra, Luna - aren't those the names of failed crypto coins? 🤣🤣🤣
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      495
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      226
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      154
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!