Do you believe they should be law?  

189 members have voted

  1. 1. Do you believe they should be law?

    • Yes
      93
    • No
      96


Recommended Posts

I'm on the fence with this one.

I mean, if you cannot see the other car while driving, what makes one think you can see their lights?

Maybe the headlights, at a distance, are more visible since they are shining straight at you, but....

I guess i just answered my own argument. :D

That wouldn't work since headlights are supposed to aim low. The only reason you'd ever see them shining in your face is if they're improperly aimed.

haha...

umm, okay.

We'll just pretend that there isn't some light scattered parallel to the road surface... more light than what was there to begin with... and aimed right at an oncoming driver.

Try it some time- park a car a mile down the road from you and have them turn the lights off and on.

Let me know what you see.

That wouldn't work since headlights are supposed to aim low. The only reason you'd ever see them shining in your face is if they're improperly aimed.

Mine are half-beam high-beams, so they are aimed higher than normal headlights.

My 02 volvo s60 has them, and I don't care for them

Do they bother you when you drive? ;)

Nope. Even though it may be super minute they will use gas and at the prices these days.....

I think the math would work out to about $10 a year (if that) and why worry when the radio, AC, power windows and brakes and steering are all using the same power source we're suddenly worried about for DRL? There are many safety features we pay for in the price of the car, so why are so many resistant to this one? :blink:

I say we just slow people down. If you're not considerate enough to put your lights on in dark conditions, or to take (really) enough time to look for other cars/people... how is seeing a dim light going to help?

It's law over here for a motorbike rider to have their lights on while driving, but they're small compared to a car. So you wouldn't notice them too well.

Uh...don't all new (last 10 years) cars have that feature already?

Here in Manitoba running lights are mandatory. I don't see the big deal.

And what's with the "just another law being force down our throats" attitude?

Not in the US, among other countries.

I doubt the cars are that much more visible. The lights are dim and aren't attention grabbing.

Then why do some states make you turn on your lights in the rain on highways?

Then why do some states make you turn on your lights in the rain on highways?

Usually when it rains it's looks more like dusk. I think lights should always be on while it's raining (and it is a law in my state of Alabama).

I have DRLs, but I don't think it should be a law of any kind. It just costs car manufactures more money for something that's useless. I can't say I remember a time where someone else DRL helped me see them better or helped avoid any sort of accident. They do help those people who can't remember to turn their lights on in the rain though ... but that's the only time I can say it's ever "helped". It's useless.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Now 8GB of ram looks even worse in the Neo. I'm so happy I purchased 128GB of DDR 4 when I did.... paid $174. Upgraded my parents laptop to 32GB around the same time for $48. Luckily I have a TON of spare laptops. So i'm good on laptops for a while. I also have a lot of desktops too that I could use if i had to. Lets just hope nothing happens to my main 4 monitor couch workstation.
    • I will keep my current devices for several years... no planning in upgrading until these devices stop working. Too pricey.
    • Apple raises MacBook and iPad prices as memory costs surge by Karthik Mudaliar Apple has raised the U.S. prices of several MacBook and iPad models, including the MacBook Neo, which it launched for $599 less than four months ago. The company’s cheapest laptop now starts at $699, while some MacBook Pro configurations have increased by $300. The changes affect the MacBook Neo, MacBook Air, MacBook Pro, iPad Air, and iPad Pro. Apple has not changed the hardware or storage included with these models, so customers are simply paying more for the same configurations. Here is how the new US pricing compares with the previous starting prices: Product Previous price New price Increase MacBook Neo $599 $699 $100 13-inch MacBook Air, 512GB $1,099 $1,299 $200 14-inch MacBook Pro, 1TB $1,699 $1,999 $300 16-inch MacBook Pro $2,699 $2,999 $300 11-inch iPad Air, 128GB $599 $749 $150 13-inch iPad Air, 128GB $799 $949 $150 11-inch iPad Pro, 256GB $999 $1,199 $200 13-inch iPad Pro, 256GB $1,299 $1,499 $200 The updated prices are already appearing on Apple’s U.S. online store. The MacBook Neo increase will probably attract the most attention. Apple introduced the laptop in March for $599, pitching it as a more affordable Mac for students and buyers considering Windows laptops or Chromebooks. It uses an A18 Pro processor and originally undercut Dell’s new $699 XPS 13 by $100. Following the increase, the two laptops now have the same starting price. The M5 MacBook Air has also lost the price Apple promoted when it launched in March. The 13-inch model arrived with 512GB of storage for $1,099, while Apple’s store now lists the MacBook Air range as starting at $1,299. The 14-inch MacBook Pro with an M5 chip and 1TB of storage has gone from $1,699 to $1,999. Apple has made similar changes to its iPads. The recently released M4 iPad Air, which launched at the same $599 starting price as its predecessor, now starts at $749 for the 11-inch version. The 13-inch version has risen from $799 to $949. The iPad Pro increases are larger in dollar terms. Apple’s 11-inch M5 iPad Pro now starts at $1,199, up from $999, while the 13-inch version has moved from $1,299 to $1,499. Both base models still include 256GB of storage. Apple blamed the increases on the rapidly rising cost of DRAM and NAND flash, which provide system memory and device storage. The company told Reuters that it had tried to shield customers from the increases but could no longer absorb them. “We have never seen a component price increase this much, this quickly,” Apple said. Tim Cook had already warned that price increases were coming. Cook said Apple’s existing component inventory had softened the immediate impact, but that higher memory costs would increasingly affect the company after the June quarter. Much of the pressure comes from the construction of AI data centers. Memory manufacturers are directing more production toward high-margin server products, leaving PC, tablet, and smartphone makers competing for the remaining supply. Apple has not said whether the new prices are temporary or whether further increases are planned. For now, the changes show that even Apple’s purchasing power has not been enough to keep the AI-driven memory shortage away from consumer devices.
    • Ventoy 1.1.16 is out.
    • This is a none story - these low volume Chinese models will always get new experimental features first because Apple and Samsung can't produce them in huge volume to meet demand.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      kinowa earned a badge
      First Post
    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      462
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      171
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      135
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      77
    5. 5
      Xenon
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!