Hello. Perhaps you can help me understand a lack of performance improvement. I have 2 computers. The first has Win2000 and Athlon XP 2500 with ATI Radeon x700 AGP video and 1 meg ram. I got a 3dmark06 score of 1350. I then buildt what I thought should be a faster computer with WinXP, ATI dual core 4200 CPU, ATI x1300 PCI-e video and 1 meg ram. But the 3dmark06 score was essentially the same at 1390. What gives?
Page 1 of 1
Posted 04 June 2007 - 14:32
try installing the latest ati drivers, also install the dualcore hotfix for windows xp from microsoft, and make sure uve got service pack 2 installed
Posted 04 June 2007 - 14:33
The graphics card might be better in your old PC. version7 is better than version3 (even if it was a higher generation)
Posted 04 June 2007 - 14:41
DKAngel, on Jun 4 2007, 14:32, said:
try installing the latest ati drivers, also install the dualcore hotfix for windows xp from microsoft, and make sure uve got service pack 2 installed
Yes I installed the dual core optimizer and latest ati video drivers, but 3dmarko6 was unchanged. SP2 was not yet installed.
P.S. I also tried overclocking 10% but 3dmark06 only increased 1% to 1405.
Posted 04 June 2007 - 14:46
The card _is_ worse in your new pc. Lower memory clock, and less pipes and less transfer speed.
http://www.hardwares...com/article/131
http://www.hardwares...com/article/131
Posted 04 June 2007 - 15:00
lunamonkey, on Jun 4 2007, 14:46, said:
The card _is_ worse in your new pc. Lower memory clock, and less pipes and less transfer speed.
http://www.hardwares...com/article/131
http://www.hardwares...com/article/131
lunamonkey, on Jun 4 2007, 14:46, said:
The card _is_ worse in your new pc. Lower memory clock, and less pipes and less transfer speed.
http://www.hardwares...com/article/131
http://www.hardwares...com/article/131
Ah, so basically the faster computer only compensated for a slower video card?
Posted 04 June 2007 - 15:01
ugh i hate ATI's number scheme... they make you think the higher the number the better/newer... kinda like nvidia's 7300 isnt as goot as a 6800 stuff...
Posted 04 June 2007 - 15:11
neufuse, on Jun 4 2007, 15:01, said:
ugh i hate ATI's number scheme... they make you think the higher the number the better/newer... kinda like nvidia's 7300 isnt as goot as a 6800 stuff...
Since the ATI x1300 card apparentluy isn't so good, can you recommend a good video card under $100? Thanks in advance
Posted 04 June 2007 - 15:24
The video card is something like >85% of the score.
The x700 don't have Shader Model 3.0 so it don't pass all the tests
A card under $100? A 8500GT maybe.
Still, it won't super perform. But I think you will get 2000.
The x700 don't have Shader Model 3.0 so it don't pass all the tests
A card under $100? A 8500GT maybe.
Still, it won't super perform. But I think you will get 2000.
Posted 04 June 2007 - 15:48
a 7900GT might be had for $100, or a 7900GS, I get about 5600-5800 3D Marks with a very similar processor (2.5ghz), but I also have 2GB memory.
found one a GS for 106 after rebate including shipping. http://shop4.outpost...product/4970851
Dont Hate kuz I post rebate deals, they're hot if they're hot and meet or exceed your needs
found one a GS for 106 after rebate including shipping. http://shop4.outpost...product/4970851
Dont Hate kuz I post rebate deals, they're hot if they're hot and meet or exceed your needs
Posted 04 June 2007 - 22:05
Yeah and his "ATI dual core 4200" processor. Like obviously ATI bought AMD back in July right?
Page 1 of 1


Share 


MultiQuote


neufuse





