Scheduled PSN downtime tomorrow in Back Page News

Faster computer? but 3dmark06 not better?


13 replies to this topic - - - - -

#1 jmarling

    Neowinian

  • 4 posts
  • Joined: 04-June 07

Posted 04 June 2007 - 14:28

Hello. Perhaps you can help me understand a lack of performance improvement. I have 2 computers. The first has Win2000 and Athlon XP 2500 with ATI Radeon x700 AGP video and 1 meg ram. I got a 3dmark06 score of 1350. I then buildt what I thought should be a faster computer with WinXP, ATI dual core 4200 CPU, ATI x1300 PCI-e video and 1 meg ram. But the 3dmark06 score was essentially the same at 1390. What gives?


#2 DKAngel

    That i cannot own ....I shall destroy

  • 1,618 posts
  • Joined: 20-July 03
  • Location: Perth, Australia

Posted 04 June 2007 - 14:32

try installing the latest ati drivers, also install the dualcore hotfix for windows xp from microsoft, and make sure uve got service pack 2 installed

#3 lunamonkey

    You're a member's title.

  • 8,642 posts
  • Joined: 28-May 03
  • Location: Swindon, England

Posted 04 June 2007 - 14:33

The graphics card might be better in your old PC. version7 is better than version3 (even if it was a higher generation)

#4 jmarling

    Neowinian

  • 4 posts
  • Joined: 04-June 07

Posted 04 June 2007 - 14:41

View PostDKAngel, on Jun 4 2007, 14:32, said:

try installing the latest ati drivers, also install the dualcore hotfix for windows xp from microsoft, and make sure uve got service pack 2 installed
Yes I installed the dual core optimizer and latest ati video drivers, but 3dmarko6 was unchanged. SP2 was not yet installed.
P.S. I also tried overclocking 10% but 3dmark06 only increased 1% to 1405.

#5 lunamonkey

    You're a member's title.

  • 8,642 posts
  • Joined: 28-May 03
  • Location: Swindon, England

Posted 04 June 2007 - 14:46

The card _is_ worse in your new pc. Lower memory clock, and less pipes and less transfer speed.

http://www.hardwares...com/article/131

#6 jmarling

    Neowinian

  • 4 posts
  • Joined: 04-June 07

Posted 04 June 2007 - 15:00

View Postlunamonkey, on Jun 4 2007, 14:46, said:

The card _is_ worse in your new pc. Lower memory clock, and less pipes and less transfer speed.

http://www.hardwares...com/article/131


View Postlunamonkey, on Jun 4 2007, 14:46, said:

The card _is_ worse in your new pc. Lower memory clock, and less pipes and less transfer speed.

http://www.hardwares...com/article/131

Ah, so basically the faster computer only compensated for a slower video card?

#7 vetneufuse

    Neowinian ULTRAKILL

  • 12,572 posts
  • Joined: 16-February 04
  • Location: Pennsylvania

Posted 04 June 2007 - 15:01

ugh i hate ATI's number scheme... they make you think the higher the number the better/newer... kinda like nvidia's 7300 isnt as goot as a 6800 stuff...

#8 jmarling

    Neowinian

  • 4 posts
  • Joined: 04-June 07

Posted 04 June 2007 - 15:11

View Postneufuse, on Jun 4 2007, 15:01, said:

ugh i hate ATI's number scheme... they make you think the higher the number the better/newer... kinda like nvidia's 7300 isnt as goot as a 6800 stuff...
Since the ATI x1300 card apparentluy isn't so good, can you recommend a good video card under $100? Thanks in advance

#9 Darksoft

    Resident Elite

  • 1,473 posts
  • Joined: 02-January 06
  • Location: Miami Beach, FL, USA

Posted 04 June 2007 - 15:20

swap cards and install sp2?

#10 NienorGT

    Nee-Heh-Nor GeeTee

  • 12,546 posts
  • Joined: 10-August 04
  • Location: Quebec / Canada
  • OS: Windows 7

Posted 04 June 2007 - 15:24

The video card is something like >85% of the score.
The x700 don't have Shader Model 3.0 so it don't pass all the tests

A card under $100? A 8500GT maybe.
Still, it won't super perform. But I think you will get 2000.

#11 Fulcrum

    LeLoooEr

  • 1,432 posts
  • Joined: 27-April 02
  • Location: new XKR

Posted 04 June 2007 - 15:48

a 7900GT might be had for $100, or a 7900GS, I get about 5600-5800 3D Marks with a very similar processor (2.5ghz), but I also have 2GB memory.

found one a GS for 106 after rebate including shipping. http://shop4.outpost...product/4970851

Dont Hate kuz I post rebate deals, they're hot if they're hot and meet or exceed your needs :)

#12 -Frylock

    Neowinian²

  • 134 posts
  • Joined: 18-July 06
  • Location: CT

Posted 04 June 2007 - 21:53

It could be that 1 meg ram :p

View Postjmarling, on Jun 4 2007, 10:28, said:

ATI x1300 PCI-e video and 1 meg ram.


#13 +chconline

    I review, not promote.

  • 12,977 posts
  • Joined: 20-August 04
  • Location: Calgary, AB, Canada

Posted 04 June 2007 - 22:05

Yeah and his "ATI dual core 4200" processor. Like obviously ATI bought AMD back in July right? :p

#14 sundayx

  • 11,912 posts
  • Joined: 27-October 04
  • Location: Hong Kong

Posted 04 June 2007 - 22:13

Another fooled by video card numbering schemes.