Welcome Guest! To access all forums & features, please register an account or sign-in. → Why register?



Ridley Scotts "Prometheus" (2012)


591 replies to this topic * * * * - 6 votes

#586 +TruckWEB

    Neowinian Senior

  • 3,979 posts
  • Joined: 27-December 01
  • Location: Quebec, Canada

Posted 15 October 2012 - 22:44

View PostSOOPRcow, on 15 October 2012 - 00:39, said:

Dude, it doesn't even take place on the same planet as Alien...

Yeah yeah, sorry Dude...

- Alien was LV-426 and this one was LV-223... Hey, it's called "LV" in both movies...
- Same corporation in both movies, Weyland...
- The ship found in "Alien" is the same, with the Engineer, in suit, dead in his "command post"...
- We see the same ship again in "Aliens" when the terraformer are asked to go look in that sector...

The only thing not pressent in this movie, are the facehuggers and chestbursters aliens. They look more like squids

But, no, it's not a prequel, it's not the same thing AT ALL.... No relation, completely new movie.


#587 moloko

    Neowinian Senior

  • 2,488 posts
  • Joined: 28-December 02

Posted 16 October 2012 - 06:14

View PostTruckWEB, on 15 October 2012 - 22:44, said:

Yeah yeah, sorry Dude...

- Alien was LV-426 and this one was LV-223... Hey, it's called "LV" in both movies...
- Same corporation in both movies, Weyland...
- The ship found in "Alien" is the same, with the Engineer, in suit, dead in his "command post"...
- We see the same ship again in "Aliens" when the terraformer are asked to go look in that sector...

The only thing not pressent in this movie, are the facehuggers and chestbursters aliens. They look more like squids

But, no, it's not a prequel, it's not the same thing AT ALL.... No relation, completely new movie.


I saw a quote on I09 the other day...... Ridley Scott took 33 years to come back to the universe of Alien, with the don't-call-it-a-prequel movie Prometheus

#588 TheLegendOfMart

    Neowinian DOMINATING

  • 8,632 posts
  • Joined: 01-October 01
  • Location: England

Posted 16 October 2012 - 06:23

View PostTruckWEB, on 15 October 2012 - 22:44, said:

Yeah yeah, sorry Dude...

- Alien was LV-426 and this one was LV-223... Hey, it's called "LV" in both movies...
- Same corporation in both movies, Weyland...
- The ship found in "Alien" is the same, with the Engineer, in suit, dead in his "command post"...
- We see the same ship again in "Aliens" when the terraformer are asked to go look in that sector...

The only thing not pressent in this movie, are the facehuggers and chestbursters aliens. They look more like squids

But, no, it's not a prequel, it's not the same thing AT ALL.... No relation, completely new movie.
Seriously?

- The LV means nothing, it is just a tag added as a way to catalogue planets and galaxies, much like our galaxy has odd names such as Sxx, NGC, CW xx. LV-426 isnt LV-223.
- I don't have a rebuttal to the Weyland corporation tie in.
- Of course the ship found in Alien is the same, just like our space shuttles look the same, that doesnt mean its the same ship
- The only reason you see the same ship again in Aliens is because the Weyland Yutani Corp went back there after finding the ship Ripley was in, they want the Xenomorph to use as a biological weapon.

It's not a prequel to Alien, its a prequel to the fiction behind the movies, how the Xenomorph came to be.

#589 vetRadishTM

    Resident know-it-all

  • 25,097 posts
  • Joined: 28-November 01

Posted 16 October 2012 - 06:47

Watched it last night, a good film not great.

Felt like the actors apart from Fassbender (who played "David" really well) came across as reading from a script with no emotion.

#590 Syanide

    From here to infirmary.

  • 3,730 posts
  • Joined: 05-February 03
  • Location: /home

Posted 16 October 2012 - 08:55

View PostTheLegendOfMart, on 13 October 2012 - 10:37, said:

there are no plot holes because this film has NOTHING to do with Alien, Aliens, Alien 3 or Alien Resurrection.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHA

View PostTheLegendOfMart, on 13 October 2012 - 06:50, said:

Xenomorphs are not a mutation of the engineers. Humans are a mutation of the engineers, humans infected with the mutagen turn into rampaging zombies, human intercourse resulted in the mutagen creating what would ultimately evolve into a facehugger, facehugger implanting into an engineer created the Xenomorph.

Wrong, as we've already seen an Engineer with his chest ripped open, (which happened 2000 years before the nonsensical David-can-see-the-future implantation of the virus via intercourse) which makes the logic of the movie fall apart. But it's no biggie, as there's not much logic to begin with, and the only point of this movie is to try and beat its own record of the times it was contradicting itself.

This movie is a POS and Damon Lindelof should be banned from writing.

#591 moloko

    Neowinian Senior

  • 2,488 posts
  • Joined: 28-December 02

Posted 16 October 2012 - 10:05

View PostSyanide, on 16 October 2012 - 08:55, said:

the only point of this movie is to try and beat its own record of the times it was contradicting itself.

This movie is a POS and Damon Lindelof should be banned from writing.

I agree. He let down the current and future fans. It is a cop out. I just rewatched all the Alien movies here in the last 2 days at work and I cannot let this go. It is difficult to make a prequel of a popular movie (see star wars). Everyone was expecting a prequel. Even Ridley scott started to say this was a prequel...then later retracted and said this has nothing to do with the alien universe, then said something else..blah blah blah. He started to figure out he was gonna get flack for what DL wrote. See the last 40 pages of this forum postings.

#592 OP Rappy

    Mudblood

  • 98,253 posts
  • Joined: 20-July 02
  • Location: England
  • OS: Windows 7 Enterprise
  • Phone: Blackberry Bold 9900

Posted 16 October 2012 - 17:26

I will say what I said earlier, for what it was it was enjoyable