Command & Conquer Copies Ubisoft's Awful DRM


Recommended Posts

Command & Conquer Copies Ubisoft's Awful DRM

500x_cc4screen.jpg

Well, here's something that slipped through the cracks. While we were all busy condemning Ubisoft for its restrictive, must-be-online PC digital rights management, EA has crept in and done the exact same thing.

In a post over on Command & Conquer 4's forums, EA community manager Apoc writes "First thing to be clear about, Command & Conquer 4 has NO DRM. Zip, zero, zilch, none."

Sounds great! Until, a few lines later, he says this. "To play Command & Conquer 4, the computer needs to be connected to the internet."

Uh. Apoc. If the publisher is imposing limitations on when and how a game can be played, it's DRM. While it's unclear how often you'd need to be connected - whether it's just at startup, or whether it requires a constant connection - what is clear is you'd still need a connection at some stage. So laptop gaming is out. As is playing when your internet connection is down.

It's sad to have to highlight this only a day after giving EA a pat on the back for removingsome DRM from Battlefield Bad Company 2, but hey, I guess different arms of EA do things in different ways.

Source: Kotaku

Who cares, that's what the cracks and patches are for, fix that "Non-DRM" right up. Again before the flamers get on me, I don't condone piracy, but if I'm going to spend the money ($40-60) on the game I will play the game and edit any part of it I want without the restrictions!

Who cares, that's what the cracks and patches are for, fix that "Non-DRM" right up. Again before the flamers get on me, I don't condone piracy, but if I'm going to spend the money ($40-60) on the game I will play the game and edit any part of it I want without the restrictions!

It's what I do. All the games I have that I actually play online, I don't touch. Games that I like for the single player aspect and couldn't care less about the online portion, I get a patch for them.

Arrrrrrgh! 3 times within 10 minutes I've gotten the stupid "You've been randomly disconnected from the Internet, your progress will not be saved blah blah blah" message (when my web access is actually perfectly fine) so I've not got past the first 3 minutes of gameplay yet as I refuse to lose what I've done. Why oh why EA?! Stupid ****ing move :angry: Never have I regretted a purchase so quickly :(

EDIT: Oh and it gets even better - the commandandconquer.com website is now down so I can't even go and rant at the official support forums.

Arrrrrrgh! 3 times within 10 minutes I've gotten the stupid "You've been randomly disconnected from the Internet, your progress will not be saved blah blah blah" message (when my web access is actually perfectly fine) so I've not got past the first 3 minutes of gameplay yet as I refuse to lose what I've done. Why oh why EA?! Stupid ****ing move :angry: Never have I regretted a purchase so quickly :(

EDIT: Oh and it gets even better - the commandandconquer.com website is now down so I can't even go and rant at the official support forums.

:no: what an incredible clusterf**k this has become. It's such a shame to see a beloved brand get so totally wiped out by not only a change in format, but DRM also.

:no: what an incredible clusterf**k this has become. It's such a shame to see a beloved brand get so totally wiped out by not only a change in format, but DRM also.

they are probably getting ****ing hammered/owned by a DDOS right now...

Got it today. Haven't had any problems with the connection, plays really fine.

When I first read about it I was convinced this game was lost, got even more convinced when I played the first version of the beta (Although I only played with myself).

Then when the beta was about to end I tried again (against other players this time), and boy was I in for surprise! I loved it. And I still do.

I welcome the change that there is no more base building, no more the same downtime at every C&C beginning where you build: Power plant > Barracks > Refinery > Power > Refinery > War factory etc etc. Now you just go right into the action. As a plus: You don't lose if you build in the wrong order.

The always Internet Connection is a double edged sword, it works great with the leveling stuff, but I am afraid of what happens when EA pulls the plug on the servers... :s

You all may say what you will, but I enjoy this game. :)

Wow. It's sad to see so many things go wrong to what used to be a great franchise. It's hard to imagine EA screwing up this release anymore.

IMO, C&C died when Westwood was bought by EA, which is why I won't purchase this. The no base building would be another reason.

Who cares, that's what the cracks and patches are for, fix that "Non-DRM" right up. Again before the flamers get on me, I don't condone piracy, but if I'm going to spend the money ($40-60) on the game I will play the game and edit any part of it I want without the restrictions!

Agreed.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
    • I think he means you haven't reviewed previous UFC games. Of course it doesn't matter... Every time you just report on something that involves the President even if just simply what happened you guys usually get accused of being anti-Trump. We live in fun times.
    • So how did you solve the problem? Disabling Secure Boot isn’t a solution.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      agatameier earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!