Splinter Cell: Conviction PC delayed


Recommended Posts

Ubisoft just slipped the PC version of Splinter Cell: Conviction from April 16 to April 30.

The 360 version remains unaffected at April 16.

The news comes after another turbulent day for Ubi?s PC games, with Assassin?s Creed II and Silent Hunter V being removed from Steam in the UK as the result of a ?business discussion? between the publisher and Valve.

Source

Hope that they not making their draconian drm more restrictive.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/884982-splinter-cell-conviction-pc-delayed/
Share on other sites

Somehow this does not surprise me......

Hope they are delaying it to remove the crappy internet connection required DRM, but I highly doubt that is the case.

If they remove it, great, I will likely buy the game, otherwise, too bad for them, they are simply losing sales because of it.

^ Don't count on it. If AC 2 gets properly cracked then expect the same process to be applied to SC down the road, that is if they keep the same DRM bs.

I know, but one can hope, and its certainly the only way I will buy any single-player game. The point of single player games is to be able to entertain yourself without an internet connection. Requiring one to play the game sort of defeats the purpose IMO.

O I agree. This is just one more way to kill PC gaming IMO. Imagine publishers insisting on an constant online connection while plying the 360 or PS3. People would revolt! (maybe)

The more that I read about this form of DRM the more I believe console is the only fair way to play now :(

If Ubisoft removes their unnecessary DRM then maybe, just maybe... I'll consider buying it on the PC.

This. Planning on playing this on 360, but if the delay is to remove the horrid DRM, I'll go out of my way to support the decision. Let's not forget that UBI has tried in the past to listen to gamers. They released PoP (2008?) totally free of DRM and at $30 MSRP, because everyone swears if you release a game with no DRM at a fair price no one will pirate it. Instead the game was instantly on the torrents and downloaded like crazy. So while I don't like their new DRM, I also see where they feel like they are out of options.

It does not look like they are Doing Premature Death of the DRM.

They are polishing it like adding more triggers and etc.

for pop 2008's fail -> actually it was mediocre game so it's sales were obviously low

I thought it was a great game myself. Got it for Christmas or something, and I'd intended to get the PC version but didn't, so I flat out couldn't believe it when they wouldn't release the DLC for the PC version. That was a major WTF moment.

If they pull that with Conviction (hell, or anything else,) I'll say to hell with Ubi and never support them again.

It does not look like they are Doing Premature Death of the DRM.

They are polishing it like adding more triggers and etc.

for pop 2008's fail -> actually it was mediocre game so it's sales were obviously low

That was not my point, yes, it was a meh game. My point was that Ubi did play by the ruels gamers always say they will follow, and everyone stole the game anyway.

  • 2 weeks later...
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I've not seen any controlled testing and, judging by Microsoft's mentality, within a year, they'll have added so much more bloat, it'll undo any perceptible latency benefit and we'll have boosted the CPU clocks for nothing.
    • It depends: heat soak is a thing. Initially on cold boot-up, the heatsinks & heatpipes are at ambient temp. After heatsinks & heatpipes warm up (through normal usage), they don't immediately cool to ambient temp when the load goes away. So their baseline is higher and the trigger point for fans is much less stress. Add a few more CPU spikes → it's too hot to stay at the same fan RPM → fans get triggered to start up up much sooner / get triggered to ramp much more quickly.
    • Can LibreOffice just shut up and worry about themselves and stop comparing themselves? Do we see Microsoft complaining about euro office?
    • Why should simply opening the Action Center ... require any significant amount of CPU cycles? Too many are ignoring the elephant in the room: today's CPUs may have similar clock frequencies to CPUs from a decade ago (~4 to 5 GHz), but they run with far higher performance per clock, even on the smallest E-cores. The Action Center is a static, minor desktop element. It ought to open instantly on any CPU made in the past 2.5 decades at even low clocks. Opening a program? Boost away. Unzipping a file? Boost to your heart's content. Right-clicking the notification area? This should be an ultra-efficient, low-impact event that opens instantly. Compare today's UI elements to Windows 7 UI elements. Today's UI elements hardly do anything more substantial or important or critical, yet now require modern-day processors to jump half a GHz to reduce their latency.
    • This is not an option lmao: it is part of the KB5094126 update, pushed to all users. There is no GUI to configure it. Reading the article should be required for commenting.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      slackerzz earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      highriskpaym earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      highriskpaym earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      highriskpaym earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      FBSPL earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      501
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      198
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      156
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      84
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!