Recommended Posts

If the budget is under $50 million, it will be a guaranteed garbage. You cannot make a good sci-fi, high quality visual effects movie with that amount of money these days. If they really want to rock our socks they need to do better than that. This ain't the 1990s.

WTF? I am a HUGE fan of the original comic, I have all of the original Eagle comics from the 80s of Judge Dredd and pretty much every spin off (recently thought to myself they may be worth something, worth ****), and it was a dark, moody comic. Almost Sin City esque meets British humor in a weird way. I loved it, as it was especially at the time not much like anything else, and he was just a badass.

judgedredd_tonymoore.jpg

If they followed the tone of the comic, did some of the better storylines from it as there was quite a few, do not see how they could mess this movie up, yet somehow it looks like they are. Visual style is nothing like the original comic. What Lampo posted is how it needs to start being done.

Think this is another flop honestly. Unless the budget is astronomical, I think an all CGI film would serve the source material 1000 times better. A dude walking around in this costume in reality in 2012, just looks a bit cheesy IMO. Hope I am wrong, would love for it to be great.

1995 movie was fantastic. Judges, mega cities, guns, cursed earth cannibals, blood, broken bones, a relic war robot that could kick Titan the Robot's ass, Armand as a complete psychotic. Only bit that sucked ass was Rob Schneider.

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...

Aslong as it isn't the same story as the Stallone one then I couldn't give a hoot they wrote a **** ton of dredd comics so there's plenty of stuff to choose from but if it's just a rehash then forget it I'll most likely just download it instead of paying to see it if it's just a rehash

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Free Software Foundation Europe pushes EU to force Google to allow AI uninstalls on Android by Paul Hill Credit: Pexels Users should be able to fully uninstall AI-based features from Android devices and be able to access interoperability functions, free from Google’s verification requirements, the European Commission has heard as part of an Android interoperability consultation under the Digital Markets Act. These measures were proposed by the Free Software Foundation Europe (FSFE) last week when it submitted its documentation. The FSFE noted that Google had started silently installing AI models without telling users. It noted that the EU’s DMA requires companies like Google to allow users to uninstall pre-loaded software from their devices, but in the case of the AI models Google is installing, they reinstall if you delete them, contravening the DMA. To get Google back under control, the FSFE has told the European Commission that there needs to be improvements within the Android Open Source Project (AOSP). First, it said that users should be able to fully remove pre-loaded AI components from their devices, with companies being prohibited from silently reinstalling or reactivating them. Second, access to Android interoperability features should not be contingent on registration, authorization, or contractual relationships with Google. This pertains to Google’s attempt to force developers to register with Google, even to publish apps to alternative app stores like F-Droid. Discussing its submission, Lucas Lasota, FSFE Legal Programme Manager, said: Google is planning to roll out its Android Developer Certification in September 2026. This will force every Android app developer to register with Google before their software can be installed on certified Android devices, but it should affect those who have removed Google Apps from their device. The program is controversial because it entails the signing of contracts and payment of account fees to Google, as well as the handing over of the identities of developers. It said: The FSFE said that if the Commission’s draft measures remain unchanged, then Google will be allowed to make developers verify their identity. The FSFE believes that asking developers to register is contrary to the text and spirit of the law. In summary, the FSFE has told the Commission that no developer should need a Google account, a Play Store presence, or any agreement with Google to access Android’s interoperability features.
    • You could disable this "functionality/feature/whatever" with 2 registry keys, ages ago.
    • My Photos app is version 2026.11050.1001.0 and it remembers the window size and position. My Snipping Tool is version 11.2602.49.0 and it can capture the taskbar.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      sumytbe earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      B4dM1k3 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      DarkWun earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      519
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      184
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      87
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      81
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!