iPhone 4 Poll - Black or White


Are you getting the Black or White iPhone 4?  

138 members have voted

  1. 1. Are you getting the Black or White iPhone 4?

    • Black
      99
    • White
      39
  2. 2. What about the bumper?

    • Leave as is
      65
    • Black
      23
    • White
      10
    • Pink
      2
    • Blue
      4
    • Green
      1
    • Orange
      1


Recommended Posts

What it is. No 3rd option for people not getting the phone (no need to ask). Just curious what the results will look like.

I'm going with white this time around. I currently have a black 3GS so figured I would try something different (but not Android different, obviously) :shifty: . Still, I think the black has a more "pro" look to it.

What are you getting?

Edit: Added "Apple branded" bumper colors to poll selections.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/910446-iphone-4-poll-black-or-white/
Share on other sites

Black, hands down.

White suits the iPod but not the iPhone, it looks cheap to me :unsure:

The black looks slick & alot nicer, but thats just my thoughts, everyone is allowed to their own opinion, so if anyone loves the White and disagrees then thats cool :cool:

I have a white 3GS now and I love it - but I'm not a big fan of the "all white" 4.0 phone, although I haven't seen it in real life yet.

I kinda wish I could hold both of them before pre-ordering. I'm too impatient though. IDK though...so conflicted. Almost ALL other smartphones out there are black. At least all the smartphones people have at work are black. But the Black does look better in the photos and I do agree that the White looks cheap, Scazza.

Uhhgg... must. make. up. mind. tonight.

Is anyone else going with white or black based on what they currently own?

As stupid as it sounds, the only reason I wouldn't get the white model is because I don't like those "slits" near the top for the sensors. It just looks odd and out of place. Of course, I already thought the black model looked far better, anyway. Just look at the iOS interface... It's dark, clearly designed around a black casing.

Will probably try to pick up a black Bumper, too.

As stupid as it sounds, the only reason I wouldn't get the white model is because I don't like those "slits" near the top for the sensors. It just looks odd and out of place. Of course, I already thought the black model looked far better, anyway. Just look at the iOS interface... It's dark, clearly designed around a black casing.

Will probably try to pick up a black Bumper, too.

I agree 100%. At first I wanted a white one, because like others here, I have the black 3Gs and wanted something different, but after seeing the white one with the sensors showing like its a freakin Verizon handset, I decided to just get the black, and get some colored case if I want something different.

As stupid as it sounds, the only reason I wouldn't get the white model is because I don't like those "slits" near the top for the sensors. It just looks odd and out of place. Of course, I already thought the black model looked far better, anyway. Just look at the iOS interface... It's dark, clearly designed around a black casing.

Will probably try to pick up a black Bumper, too.

I think you've changed my mind about going white with that post :pinch:

The bumper colors look like they're aimed at teenage girls...black would look really nice with a red one.

Exactly. I would LOVE to get a black iphone with a blood red bumper. A buddy of mine said he thinks the bumpers are stupid looking and is going for a full case enclosure. While I agree to the extent that I am scared I would shatter the back glass now, I actually really like the bumpers, because they have the silver looking buttons on it just like the phone does, unlike all your normal phone cases which just use attached rubber.

Engadget has a post up saying that the White iPhone 4 will not be available at launch :(

The popular rumor going around right now at the eleventh hour is that AT&T will only be offering the black iPhone 4 models for pre-order tomorrow and at launch, with their white counterparts coming "later this Summer."

If the rumor turns out to be true, guess I will be definitely going with Black and not White.

Ha...this just made me laugh. Pro what? Pro phone?

None the less black because it will appear to stay cleaner longer....

Pro as in Professional. You know, kinda like how a Thinkpad looks more professional than an Alienware gamers laptop. Or a laptop bag/brief case looks more professional than a backpack. Yes it is completely subjective and a matter of opinion. I think tat the black iPhone 4 has a more professional look to it than the white one does. Not sure why that was so funny for you. But I'm glad I made you laugh.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • The quantum search for Time's origin had an equally mind-boggling conclusion by Sayan Sen Image by Steve Johnson via Pexels A theoretical study from researchers at the University of Surrey suggested that the direction of time may not be fundamentally fixed in certain quantum systems. The work, published in Scientific Reports, examined how the “arrow of time” could emerge from microscopic physics and found that time-reversal symmetry can remain intact even in models used to describe processes such as energy loss and thermalisation. The arrow of time refers to the observed one-way direction from past to future in everyday life. In macroscopic processes, this is easy to see. Spilled milk spreads across a table and does not gather back into a glass, and heat flows from hotter objects to colder ones. These processes shape the common sense idea that time moves in a single direction. However, at the level of fundamental physics, many equations do not prefer a direction of time. Time-reversal symmetry means that the same physical laws can describe a system whether time moves forward or backward. This has made it difficult to explain why irreversible behaviour appears in the large-scale world even when the underlying rules do not require it. Dr Andrea Rocco, Associate Professor in Physics and Mathematical Biology at the University of Surrey, described this contrast: "One way to explain this is when you look at a process like spilt milk spreading across a table, it's clear that time is moving forward. But if you were to play that in reverse, like a movie, you'd immediately know something was wrong – it would be hard to believe milk could just gather back into a glass. However, there are processes, such as the motion of a pendulum, that look just as believable in reverse. The puzzle is that, at the most fundamental level, the laws of physics resemble the pendulum; they do not account for irreversible processes. Our findings suggest that while our common experience tells us that time only moves one way, we are just unaware that the opposite direction would have been equally possible." The study focused on open quantum systems, which are quantum systems that interact with a surrounding environment. This environment, often described as a heat bath, can exchange energy and information with the system. The researchers used this framework to study how a direction of time might appear even when the underlying physics does not enforce one. A key part of the analysis involved the Markov approximation. This is a simplification used in many models where the system is assumed not to retain memory of its past states. The idea is that changes depend only on the current state, not on earlier history. This is commonly used when studying thermalisation, which is the process where a system settles into equilibrium with its environment. The study also used concepts such as master equations, including the Lindblad and Pauli equations, which describe how probabilities of different quantum states change over time. Another related model discussed was quantum Brownian motion, which describes the random-like movement of a quantum particle interacting continuously with its environment. In these descriptions, a “memory kernel” can appear, which is a mathematical term that accounts for how past states influence current behaviour. The researchers found that applying the Markov approximation did not break time-reversal symmetry. Even when the system interacted with an effectively infinite heat bath, the resulting equations of motion remained symmetric in time. This meant that the same mathematical description could, in principle, run forward or backward in time without contradiction. The study further showed that standard frameworks used in open quantum systems, including quantum Brownian motion and master equations like the Lindblad and Pauli forms, could be written in a time-symmetric way. These equations are typically used to describe processes that look irreversible, such as dissipation and thermalisation, but the results suggested they can also be interpreted as allowing evolution in both time directions. Thomas Guff, Research Fellow in Quantum Thermodynamics, said: "The surprising part of this project was that even after making the standard simplifying assumption to our equations describing open quantum systems, the equations still behaved the same way whether the system was moving forwards or backwards in time. When we carefully worked through the maths, we found that this behaviour had to be the case because a key part of the equation, the "memory kernel," is symmetrical in time. We also found a small but important detail which is usually overlooked – a time discontinuous factor emerged that kept the time-symmetry property intact. It’s unusual to see such a mathematical mechanism in a physics equation because it's not continuous, and it was very surprising to see it appear so naturally." The researchers also noted that deriving a one-way arrow of time from time-reversal symmetric microscopic dynamics remains an open problem across fields such as thermodynamics, statistical mechanics, particle physics, and cosmology. Their results suggested that some standard descriptions of irreversible behaviour in open quantum systems may be better understood using a time-symmetric formulation of Markovianity. According to the study, processes such as thermalisation, which are usually treated as irreversible, could in theory be described in a way that allows evolution in either time direction under the same rules. This does not imply that time reversal occurs in everyday life, but rather that the underlying equations do not strictly enforce a single direction. Overall, the findings suggested that the perceived direction of time may emerge from how physical systems are modelled and approximated, rather than from a fundamental asymmetry in the laws themselves. The researchers noted that this perspective could have implications for ongoing work in quantum mechanics, thermodynamics, and cosmology on the origin of time’s arrow. Source: University of Surrey, Nature This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing
    • A bit premature... 100% Marketing. Bizarre.
    • A $300 price hike is insane! No one is going to want to pay that much!
    • Since the 1st one flopped, there is really no reason to make another one. It's just losing money left and right.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      581
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      182
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      75
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      73
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!