Recommended Posts

Why do I see people keep bringing up IE's release cycle? IE9 from the start has been on a 8 week dev process, look at the release dates for the PPs, (beta = PP5 which you could get right now as well if you just want to see the rendering engine and not the whole browser). It's logical then to expect beta 2 in another 8 weeks, so Nov. Then we'll take it from there, dunno if they'll do a beta 3 or go to RC1 like with IE8 so only time will tell.

you don't, you see people mentioning the development cycle, which isn't the same thing.

e.g. IE9 will go final, the dev team will then move onto IE10. we will see nothing for 2 yrs. only patches to IE9.

If you are a company with 1000+ employees, rolling out a major upgrade to a browser is a big task (especially with IE as each version mangles things other browsers can render perfectly), so you have to keep planning these rollouts, then executing them. This means many workplaces are stuck on IE6 at the moment as IE6 was such a disaster that moving away from it requires a LOT of testing/rework.

If you are a developer, IE is evil. If you are a developer and don't agree with this, you should maybe look for alternative employment :rofl:

you don't, you see people mentioning the development cycle, which isn't the same thing.

e.g. IE9 will go final, the dev team will then move onto IE10. we will see nothing for 2 yrs. only patches to IE9.

If you are a company with 1000+ employees, rolling out a major upgrade to a browser is a big task (especially with IE as each version mangles things other browsers can render perfectly), so you have to keep planning these rollouts, then executing them. This means many workplaces are stuck on IE6 at the moment as IE6 was such a disaster that moving away from it requires a LOT of testing/rework.

If you are a developer, IE is evil. If you are a developer and don't agree with this, you should maybe look for alternative employment :rofl:

It is the same thing, I don't get why you think it's different. IE is on a 1 year release cycle, rtm, it's also not tied into the system as much as IE6 is. The longer cycle you talk about for business is actually something they like, they like schedules that don't force them to rush things, 2 years is their sweet spot, it's also more or less always been Windows release cycle (and IE was tied to windows till IE8). Workplaces are stuck with IE6 because they have inhouse apps built for that that they don't want to change, that's they're own problem and MS has XP Mode that lets you run IE6 in a VM just for those apps which lets you upgrade the host browser whenever you want, no problems at all.

As for the web dev, if you know what you seem to try to indicate you know, then every browser renders some newer things a bit different, Chrome/FF/Opera, they never always match 100%. That aside, with IE9 that's not going to be an issue since MS is pushing ahead with standards.

In the end IE9's 8 week schedule is fast, Chrome was slower till Google decided to play the one up game and move to a 6 week schedule. Really the end user isn't always updating to the newest nightly build of browser X either, that's more for devs to see what changes in the engine have been made. To that extent the IE9 PPs are for devs and thus don't come with any UI to them.

Getting a new beta or RC for IE9 basically every 2 months till RTM sounds good to me.

It is the same thing, I don't get why you think it's different. IE is on a 1 year release cycle, rtm, it's also not tied into the system as much as IE6 is. The longer cycle you talk about for business is actually something they like, they like schedules that don't force them to rush things, 2 years is their sweet spot, it's also more or less always been Windows release cycle (and IE was tied to windows till IE8). Workplaces are stuck with IE6 because they have inhouse apps built for that that they don't want to change, that's they're own problem and MS has XP Mode that lets you run IE6 in a VM just for those apps which lets you upgrade the host browser whenever you want, no problems at all.

As for the web dev, if you know what you seem to try to indicate you know, then every browser renders some newer things a bit different, Chrome/FF/Opera, they never always match 100%. That aside, with IE9 that's not going to be an issue since MS is pushing ahead with standards.

In the end IE9's 8 week schedule is fast, Chrome was slower till Google decided to play the one up game and move to a 6 week schedule. Really the end user isn't always updating to the newest nightly build of browser X either, that's more for devs to see what changes in the engine have been made. To that extent the IE9 PPs are for devs and thus don't come with any UI to them.

Getting a new beta or RC for IE9 basically every 2 months till RTM sounds good to me.

I still don't understand how you don't see the issue.

We are also running chrome/firefox in the same corporate environment. Both of these update themselves and are always up to date. There is no need to plan anything. IE doesn't do this and always involves a lengthy problematic removal/installation as it spreads it's tentacles all over the OS.

I still don't understand how you don't see the issue.

We are also running chrome/firefox in the same corporate environment. Both of these update themselves and are always up to date. There is no need to plan anything. IE doesn't do this and always involves a lengthy problematic removal/installation as it spreads it's tentacles all over the OS.

Maybe because your issue isn't a issue? We're not talking IE6 here. What long tentacles is it spreading exactly? And IE updates through WU along with the OS, so it is also "up to date" if you install the updates that is. Aside from needing a restart there is no "issue".

There are two easy ways to do this: 1) Hit Ctrl-E for search and type it in, or 2) Type "?" before your search query. for example "? blueberries" will search for blueberries using your default provider instead of showing your history.

Thank you!!! I would have never worked that out :)

where is the option to import/export the html files? before it was located under files, but i do not see it there any more.

nevermind, i found the option, in case anyone else is looking for it, click the star icon (favorites) then click on the little arrow next to the "add to favorites"

I wish I could customize the shown buttons.. I want the Developer Tools button there because it's what I'm generally in IE for..

Also it would be nice if you could pin the favorites to any side of the window you wanted too, and if the pane also supported Aero transparency ..

Aside from that I am very happy with the new IE.

MOUSE GESTURES! =@

Granted I can probably never see Microsoft adding them seeing as htey'd consider them too "confusing" for some users. But I feel disabled without them these days =/

http://www.ysgyfarnog.co.uk/utilities/mousegestures/ works great for mouse gestures and still works in the IE9 beta :)

Re: Adblocking

HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Internet Explorer\Safety\PrivacIE\

DWORD 32 FilteringMode = 0 for Disabled, = 1 for Automatic, = 2 for Choose (ie. use Filterlist only, don't automatically block other stuff).

Then import the latest list from here: http://forums.overclockers.co.uk/showthread.php?p=16784084#post16784084 (built from the Fanboy adblock list! :) )

Also I guess Simple Adblock works for IE8 is based on Adblock lists and actually collapses the empty space as well (nice!) but hasn't been updated for IE9 yet (boourns.) But hopefully soon?

So maybe it's not something I wish IE 9 had, but:

I have a new Vaio x64 with Windows 7...I downloaded and ran IE 9 just fine. The only problem is that it places a white border around my gadgets...kinda annoying.

Secondly, when I click "show desktop" on the bottom right corner, everything, included my gadgets disappear; showing just the desktop and the icons. I deleted IE 9 and my problems are gone, but I really wanted to use it as maybe my main browser.

Any way to fix the problems with the gadget/desktop?

I found something else in IE9 I miss from the other browsers, while viewing the website source code, links are not clickable. So if you want to check if the entered path for some css or js file is correct, in other browsers you can just view source, click the link in <script src="link"...> and it opens the javascript file. Is there a way around?

There are a few things that are missing that even IE8 has, like where's the option to save my tabs?

All closed tabs are automatically saved. If you are referring to adding tabs to 'Favorites', click on the Favorites button (star) and the options are available in the drop down list 'Add to favorites ...'.

Or to restart my last tab session?

Open a 'new tab' and the option to "Reopen last session" is very much there along with an option for a drop down list of "Reopen closed tabs".

Also the back/forward buttons are missing their dropdown history list as well.

Right click on the back/forward buttons for the dropdown history list.

The option to move tabs below or above the address bar as well would be good.

+ 1

This is something I also wish for. By moving the 'tabs' up higher, it means moving the mouse a greater distance to switch between tabs. I prefer that the 'tabs' bar be the last bar before the actual page.

Also, I hate that they have combined the 'search bar' with the 'address bar'. I used to like being able to type something in the 'search bar' and then search using different search providers, without having to retype anything. Now one has to retype to do the same search with a ifferent search provider.

I just want a save session when you close the browser (like in FireFox) NOT restore, spell check, tabs on the bottom, and an extension like "unPlug" where I can download flv files from youtube.

Other than that I love the new IE.

Yep, I need it. lol

I'm paralysed and type side hand so mistype a lot.

if you need spellcheck then run a non ie based browser and they got it, ms will never implement a spell check as they are too lazy to add one.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Rufus alternative Ventoy now supports Windows 11's mandatory update, fixes major boot bug by Sayan Sen While Microsoft has its own official Media Creation Tool used for making bootable USB media, there are some popular third-party utilities as well which offer additional options like bypassing system requirements, Microsoft Account creation, and more. One of these is Ventoy, and the software has received its latest update today. In fact, the app actually got a slew of updates over the last couple of days, three version releases in total, to be specific. The first release, version 1.1.13, was pulled as there was some unspecified error in the update, and as such, the corrected version 1.1.14 was pushed out. Following that on very short notice, 1.1.15 was published as well. For those unfamiliar, Ventoy is an open-source utility that lets users create a bootable USB drive once and then simply copy ISO, WIM, IMG, VHD, or EFI files onto it without repeatedly formatting the drive. It supports both legacy BIOS and UEFI boot modes, Secure Boot, and a wide range of operating systems, making it one of the most versatile tools in the category. The biggest change in version 1.1.14 is an updated Secure Boot shim file aimed at resolving the UEFI CA 2023 issue, which is basically a compatibility problem that has affected Secure Boot environments on some systems. If you recall, we reported about severe boot issues on HP devices following the release of updated Secure Boot 2023 keys. For anyone who may not be aware, back in early 2024, Microsoft announced that it was updating Secure Boot keys as they were going to become 15 years old in 2026, which is also when they are set to expire. As such, the new 2023 certificates have been rolling out with the newest Windows 11 updates. Updated boot manager and Secure Boot certificates are crucial for protection against malware like bootkits. These are mandatory updates. Alongside that, the VentoyPlugson graphical plugin configurator was updated in sync with the release. The update also introduces a new VTOY_SECURE_BOOT_POLICY option within the Global Control plugin, giving users more flexibility in managing Secure Boot behavior. Ventoy has also received a fix for a startup issue when Secure Boot was disabled. Microsoft does officially allow users to boot systems without Secure Boot as long as the PC is Secure Boot capable. The full changelog is given below: Update secure boot shim file to solve the UEFI CA 2023 issue. The new release use a new CA, so you need to enroll the new key for the first boot time. VentoyPlugson update synchronously. Global control plugin add a VTOY_SECURE_BOOT_POLICY option. Fix the boot issue when Secure Boot is disabled in the UEFI firmware. You can download the latest version of the app here on Ventoy's official GitHub repo or from Neowin software stories.
    • Windows 11 is fine, no issues on any of the machines I've run it on since release. The stricter security requirements are a good thing, sometimes the baseline needs to change and people will winge, but it is what it is. Happened with the move from 9x to NT - broke compatability Happened with XP SP2 when security started to become a serious consideration Certainly happend with Vista that brought in UAC, the concept of not running as admin (something that has been the norm in Linux/Unix from pretty much the start) and a completely new driver stack. Windows 11 will probably get looked back at as the point where even consumer and SMB IT was dragged kicking and screaming into a somewhat secure by default configuration.
    • Bluestacks has been emulating Android on Windows for fifteen years. It's janky and riddled with ads though, so WSA looked like it was going to be a huge improvement over the emulator experience. Too bad Microsoft dropped the ball on that.
    • Classic. China would be nothing without Western, Japanese, and South Korean technology.
    • The world is larger then your small viewpoint. Plenty of scientists care about this, especially those involved in space.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      441
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      172
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      134
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Xenon
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!