Samsung Galaxy S


Recommended Posts

I bought this phone because it has the power of an iPhone but uses the Android OS, which i have been a fan (not a fan boy) of since its release.

The boxing and phone itself are almost the same as an iPhone (3g or 3gs). Only there is a slight lip at the back of the phone and it is far lighter.

The Android OS is really smooth on this device and is compairable to the speed and smoothness of the iPhone. There is sometimes lag when many apps are open and\ir if you install some application that is a bit buggy, but otherwise it is a smooth ride!

In comparison to the iPhone, i would say this is equal in MANY ways and has the added bonus of being OpenSource, so you have far more control over the device than you would an iPhone.

The drawback of the phone, which for me is quite a big thing:

The music players are a little rubbishy. There is no program other than possibly DoubleTwist, which will create true playlists on the device and import iTunes playlists (as i had created loads over the years!).

The only player that seems to truely see the playlists is "MixZing". This is a great app and the pay for version adds support for lock screen controls similar to the iPhone\iPod. It allows you to keep the app in memory after closing for more speed when starting the application in future.

I upgraded to the latest beta firmware today which uses Froyo 2.2 and there is SOME improvement on the gapless playback for MP3 format, although there is still a large gap which would be annoying to those who have seperate MP3s within their albums. Apparently though this will be completely fixed in future Android updates because of the implimentation of OpenCore 2.06, which is used for the sound board etc.

Any questions on other aspects, please let me know!

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/939566-samsung-galaxy-s/
Share on other sites

Both phones have pluses and minuses: Samsung has a bigger screen but lower ppi resolution, Open Source OS but not as refined as the iOS, removable battery but with a lower life than iPhone 4's. Overall a descent phone...

Here is one pretty descent review comparing both phones.

Galaxy S & iPhone 4 Review

Cheers

Both phones have pluses and minuses: Samsung has a bigger screen but lower ppi resolution, Open Source OS but not as refined as the iOS, removable battery but with a lower life than iPhone 4's. Overall a descent phone...

Here is one pretty descent review comparing both phones.

Galaxy S & iPhone 4 Review

Cheers

Actually, it has a bigger screen AND a more clearer/colourful screen. As for the battery life, since when did iPhones last two and half days?

EDIT: And I didn't really expect an Apple lover like you to post a decent review, and after reading it, I was right.

Actually, it has a bigger screen AND a more clearer/colourful screen. As for the battery life, since when did iPhones last two and half days?

EDIT: And I didn't really expect an Apple lover like you to post a decent review, and after reading it, I was right.

But then we don't expect a Apple hater like you to post anything decent either.

how is does the galaxy s mimic the iphone os at all?

there are virtually zero similaritys.

Actually there are quite a few.

Samsung-Galaxy-S.jpg

The chrome border around the phone (like the 3g and 3gs) and the launcher is made up of square icons, with 4 at the bottom in a dock, which pages that scroll side to side.

Actually there are quite a few.

Samsung-Galaxy-S.jpg

The chrome border around the phone (like the 3g and 3gs) and the launcher is made up of square icons, with 4 at the bottom in a dock, which pages that scroll side to side.

Samsung mimics the iphone because they lay their icons out in a grid?!

are you joking me?!

And that picture you linked is the 'app drawer' not the home screen.

and I own an iphone...

I've been using my iPhone 3G for about 1 1/2 years now and I am so sick and tired of it's bull****. I've been using Android phones since the G1 first came out, got it on an upgrade and now on Oct 25 my contract ends and I can not wait until I get the Samsung Vibrant a member of the Galaxy S family for T-Mobile.

I really like the iPhone 4 but I had enough with iOS and want to go back to Android. Much better mods, firmwares, etc. And the ability to overclock/underclock? Makes me want to buy a second hand G1 or MyTouch right now...

It has more power than the iPhone 4. Look up the GPU specs of this and the iPhone.

As for Froyo, I would stay away from all current firmwares, JP2, JP3, JPC, JPH, etc. They are still a little buggy and may cause problems down the line.

They are both compairable in overall spec. I wouldnt say either outdoes the other in total, but certain aspects of the iphone are better and other aspects of the Samsung are better, so they are both COMPAIRABLE.

Take it from someone who is not a fanboy on either side! :)

I have upgraded to the latest (and likely to be final) release of 2.2 on the phone and see lots of small improvements, especially when it comes to the gapless playback!

Both phones have pluses and minuses: Samsung has a bigger screen but lower ppi resolution, Open Source OS but not as refined as the iOS, removable battery but with a lower life than iPhone 4's. Overall a descent phone...

Here is one pretty descent review comparing both phones.

Galaxy S & iPhone 4 Review

Cheers

Not read your review, but i agree, they are both compairable overall.

Actually there are quite a few.

Samsung-Galaxy-S.jpg

The chrome border around the phone (like the 3g and 3gs) and the launcher is made up of square icons, with 4 at the bottom in a dock, which pages that scroll side to side.

The hardware side of the phone does indeed look like a 3G\s, however the software, when you really get to play with it, is nothing at all like the iPhone. It in fact is far more powerful than the iPhone, because you can change the whole style, look and feel to be how ever you want! How else can they present the OS though really? Are you going to say they are copying iOS because they have square icons and the screen is black when switched off? :p

Came close to getting it but went with HTC Desire instead. It does look very nice and is more powerful then desire, but from what I read it had too many problems.

The mentioned laggyness and GPS apparently is rubbish. Not sure on how are fixes coming along, but I must say that at times I regret not getting it :D

Came close to getting it but went with HTC Desire instead. It does look very nice and is more powerful then desire, but from what I read it had too many problems.

The mentioned laggyness and GPS apparently is rubbish. Not sure on how are fixes coming along, but I must say that at times I regret not getting it :D

I think the laggyness was in the earlier builds. The phone ran fine straight out of the box for me and just as well on Froyo. I have tried GPS and to be honest have seen no more issues than the iPhone :s

Bah, I disabled Touchwiz immediately in favor of LauncherPro. Running Froyo JPH and it runs nicely. Beats the Desire and any other Android device hands-down, particularly when you compare the screens.

I love the Touchwiz, however have not tried LauncherPro... Is it similar or as good etc?

Came close to getting it but went with HTC Desire instead. It does look very nice and is more powerful then desire, but from what I read it had too many problems.

The mentioned laggyness and GPS apparently is rubbish. Not sure on how are fixes coming along, but I must say that at times I regret not getting it :D

I've not had a problem with the GPS the couple of times I've used it, it was pretty damn accurate to be perfectly honest.

I wanted a desire but it was easier and quicker to get a Galaxy and I'm glad I did, so I'm kind of in the opposite set to you :D

How are you guys getting Froyo on your phones? the official samsung update isn't out for a couple more days yet I think, so are you all using pre-release/custom jobs?

I love the Touchwiz, however have not tried LauncherPro... Is it similar or as good etc?

Looks and feels better than Touchwiz but that's my opinion. It is comparable to Sense. It is also quite customizable. I do recommend the Pro version as it does have more features but you can easily get it free off the market. It won't remove Touchwiz, merely give an option and is easily uninstallable if you don't like it.

How are you guys getting Froyo on your phones? the official samsung update isn't out for a couple more days yet I think, so are you all using pre-release/custom jobs?

You can get it through Kies if you enable the "Test" mode and set the sources. JPH most likely the final version. Check xda for more information. http://forum.xda-developers.com/forumdisplay.php?f=656

I've not had a problem with the GPS the couple of times I've used it, it was pretty damn accurate to be perfectly honest.

I wanted a desire but it was easier and quicker to get a Galaxy and I'm glad I did, so I'm kind of in the opposite set to you :D

How are you guys getting Froyo on your phones? the official samsung update isn't out for a couple more days yet I think, so are you all using pre-release/custom jobs?

Just add this to the end of your Hosts file:

174.123.5.146 fus.samsungmobile.com

Then fire up Kies, connect your device and you will instantly be told an update is available... Just make sure you backup your apps and settinsg first, as you MIGHT need to wipe them out during or after the upgrade!

  • 2 weeks later...

Personally I tend to favour HTC phones simply for the reason that I find SenseUI to provide the most polished Android user experience, but Android as a platform is excellent on any phone. Personally i'd root the Galaxy S and install a stock Froyo ROM on it, you'd probably get better performance

  • 1 month later...

I agree, I have had my iPhone 3G for 1 year and got my Galaxy S a few weeks back and the Galaxy S is far Superior to iPhone.

I loved my iPhone, as I came from a crappy Symbian Nokia past and the iPhone was a revelation, it completely revolutionized phones. But once you go Android you never go back. The iPhone is just soooo crippled it is useless. With Android you have flexibility to do things you want like copy an mp3 over as if your phone is a USB device and then select that mp3 as your ring tone. Try doing that on an iPhone....

But the are some bugs with Galaxy S

#1 it is poorly supported by Samsung. As of Nov 5 2010 there is still no Froyo 2.2 for it.

#2 WiFi is buggy as hell. I have 2 AP's in my house, with my iPhone it remembers the IP's it should use for each and it seamlessly connects to the right AP as I move about the house. On the Galaxy you have only 1 setting for static IP and you need to change it for each AP. Also, the galaxy will not connect automatically to the strongest signal AP, I have to force it. Also, with the iPhone you can put in authenticated proxy details for work/school networks, on Android you can't.

#3 The apps are generally comparable to iPhone but I do miss some of the iPhone apps, all the weather apps are crap on the Android for example.

But the are some bugs with Galaxy S

#1 it is poorly supported by Samsung. As of Nov 5 2010 there is still no Froyo 2.2 for it. Wrong.

#2 WiFi is buggy as hell. I have 2 AP's in my house, with my iPhone it remembers the IP's it should use for each and it seamlessly connects to the right AP as I move about the house. On the Galaxy you have only 1 setting for static IP and you need to change it for each AP. Also, the galaxy will not connect automatically to the strongest signal AP, I have to force it. Also, with the iPhone you can put in authenticated proxy details for work/school networks, on Android you can't. Wrong. This has been corrected in 2.2 and I think in the later 2.1 builds. The Galaxy S will automatically remember each WiFi access point and connect to the strongest one.

#3 The apps are generally comparable to iPhone but I do miss some of the iPhone apps, all the weather apps are crap on the Android for example. The weather apps are okay but most of the good ones aren't free.

Since day one, I've replace TouchWiz with Launcher Pro paid. It's comparable to Sense. Fancy Widget gives the HTC Sense Clock which is nice. At the moment, there are a group of developers dedicated to porting the Desire HD rom over to the Galaxy S. Samsung is dedicated to giving users Froyo and it has been released in several countries (mostly in Europe). Samsung can't be expected to provide every user 2.2 as they rely on the phone carriers to release them over Kies. You can however download the base Samsung Froyo rom and flash through Odin or make changes in your registry plus host file and get it directly through Samsung. However, you'll need to add your carriers information such as access points etc yourself.

Since day one, I've replace ...

I must have a faulty 2.2 then as it rarely if ever will connect to the strogest signal, I have to fight with it. I will repeatedly force it to go to the strongest AP, the 1 I am standing next to, but it will auto revert back to the other distant AP that is 1 bar weak signal. By fight I mean I try to force connect it upto 10 times and still no go. The best chance I have is to turn off wi-fi then back on again and 50% of the time it will then correctly connect to the AP I am physically standing next to.

Also, 2.2 will not remember multiple static IP's. You have only 1 option. Turn on static IP or off, and in that option you have to write in the IP.

For the iPhone you can select the wi-fi profile, go into and edit the settings and manually put static IP's for each AP and the iPhone will remember.

I'll look into the HTC port as I like the look of their UI

  • 1 month later...

I agree, I have had my iPhone 3G for 1 year and got my Galaxy S a few weeks back and the Galaxy S is far Superior to iPhone.

I loved my iPhone, as I came from a crappy Symbian Nokia past and the iPhone was a revelation, it completely revolutionized phones. But once you go Android you never go back. The iPhone is just soooo crippled it is useless. With Android you have flexibility to do things you want like copy an mp3 over as if your phone is a USB device and then select that mp3 as your ring tone. Try doing that on an iPhone....

But the are some bugs with Galaxy S

#1 it is poorly supported by Samsung. As of Nov 5 2010 there is still no Froyo 2.2 for it.

#2 WiFi is buggy as hell. I have 2 AP's in my house, with my iPhone it remembers the IP's it should use for each and it seamlessly connects to the right AP as I move about the house. On the Galaxy you have only 1 setting for static IP and you need to change it for each AP. Also, the galaxy will not connect automatically to the strongest signal AP, I have to force it. Also, with the iPhone you can put in authenticated proxy details for work/school networks, on Android you can't.

#3 The apps are generally comparable to iPhone but I do miss some of the iPhone apps, all the weather apps are crap on the Android for example.

Great reply, I have to totally agree with you.

I had the iPhone 3G for a coupe years and it was a great phone but after using the Samsung Galaxy S Captivate, there's no going back to iOS after you've been on Android. I've actually had some problems with my Samsung unit, I believe it's a lemon and a new one is being sent to me as I write this, but I've had to go back to my iPhone again and it feels like I have handcuffs on when using the thing!

When you've actually used both OS's you MUST see that Apple has you by the throat and will only let by what they want in their little "Ecosystem" or whatever you/they want to call it.

I waited for the Captivate to come out on Rogers because of the form factor. The Captivate looks a lot better than the other Galaxy S versions imo, but they all have pretty much the same hardware, although some versions have a front facing camera, which to me I wouldn't see myself using that much.

Anyways, if there is anybody on the fence about buying a Samsung Galaxy S (any version)... My vote is... get one!!

  • 3 months later...
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • And the fact that the majority of people from Poland are white European Christians while the people you are complaining about in post after post are not is just a coincidence... Every sentence in your post I am replying to is racist nonsense. None of it is actually based on any facts whatsoever. All immigrants are seeking a better life too. It's literally the only reason they would risk everything and leave their homes, families, and homeland. They are working and contributing to the economy too, as you even admit. They get the same benefits your partner did AND that YOU are eligible for as well. That is one of the key things of the EU and a mark of a civilization. That is the definition of a society where everyone is given a chance, treated equally and fairly, and is judged by the content of their character, not their different skin color or which version of ignorant superstitious nonsense their parents lied about as children. Racists around the world said the same things about the Irish and Jews and Poles (like your partner) and...every other immigrant movement over the centuries. What's your family's heritage, by the way? Were your ancestors lied about with racist fearmongering crapola by self-entitled locals the same way as you are now? If someone like that said the same things about all people from Poland, like your partner, would they be right? Or would you want them to judge your partner based on who they actually were, not where they just happened to come from?
    • Again, this is an irrelevant attempt to attack the messenger. The truth does not require any justification.
    • Removed the blue and underline as you did not post a link. This would also  be considered spamming.
    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      196
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      153
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!