Server Hardware Issue - No Post / No Beeps


Recommended Posts

Hello and thank you in advance for your help.

I am putting together some server hardware and I am having a strange issue.

The Issue: When both processors are installed system will power on, the fans will spin up, but system will not post, there is no video signal, and there are no audible warnings. On my SUPERMICRO 833T-650B Chassis there is a front pannel which illuminates a solid temperature warning light when this occurs. The motherboard manual says an audible warning should accompany a thermal event, but there are no beeps.

The System:

Motherboard: SUPERMICRO X8DTL-iF-O Dual LGA 1366

Chassis: SUPERMICRO 833T-650B w/ included PSU (4-to-8 pin EPS power adapter used to supply second EPS plug)

CPUs: 2 x Xeon E5620 Westmere 2.4GHz 80W w/ XIGMATEK Durin D982 Ultra Low Profile Cooler

RAM: 2 x Patriot Signature 12GB (3 x 4GB) DDR3 1333 ECC Registered Server Memory

RAID: Areca ARC-1220 w/ ARC-6120 Battery

System drives are not connected so I will leave out that information.

What I Have Tried:

Remove all add-on cards - No Post (same error)

Remove all but one DIMM - No Post (same error)

Remove all DIMMS - No Post (audible warning for no memory)

Reseat CPUs - No Post (same error)

Remove CPU2 - Post

My Notes:

I got the system to post without error using a single CPU in the CPU1 socket and one DIMM.

I added the RAID card and a second DIMM and it again posted.

I added a third DIMM and it again posted, but only the capacity of two DIMMs was recognised.

I set the BIOS to full boot instead of quick and had the same results with the memory.

The memory gets downclocked to 1066 as expected with the Xeon E5620 CPU.

Any ideas? Need any more information?

Thank you again.

So it posts with 1 CPU but not 2, and 2 DIMMs but not 3?

Sounds like you may have a bad motherboard.....I don't have much experience with multi-CPU systems, but if it has 2 installed and one isn't working, I don't think it would POST properly.

Try putting the other CPU into the first slot (take out the one thats installed right now and put CPU2 into CPU1 socket), that will help rule out a bad processor.

Also, try each stick of memory in the first memory slot one by one, to rule out a bad stick of ram that isn't being recognized.

Thank you.

I am going to try the other CPU in the CPU1 slot when I get a chance today. That should rule out a bad CPU.

The system does post with all three DIMMs for CPU1 populated, but the BIOS states 8GB of memory instead of 12GB. Rearranging the three DIMMs yields same 8GB reading, trying them one-by-one posts and reads 4GB. I even tried the second set of memory the same way, the system behaves in exactly the same manner.

Yes it could be a bad motherboard, but I need to be sure because otherwise the replacement could act in the same exact manner and I'll be out additional time and money.

The system does post with all three DIMMs for CPU1 populated, but the BIOS states 8GB of memory instead of 12GB. Rearranging the three DIMMs yields same 8GB reading, trying them one-by-one posts and reads 4GB. I even tried the second set of memory the same way, the system behaves in exactly the same manner.
Hmmm, server motherboards should support more than that, but are you positive it supports that much ram in that few slots? Some motherboards can be pretty picky with ram. Have you tried using different ram slots? Might not work if you use different ram slots though because it might require certain slots to contain ram before other slots check for ram......really an odd issue, it sounds like it's not supporting that much ram, but server motherboards are generally designed to support much more ram than desktop motherboards so that shouldn't be the issue.
Yes it could be a bad motherboard, but I need to be sure because otherwise the replacement could act in the same exact manner and I'll be out additional time and money.

I fully agree with that, I spent a week troubleshooting and trying things before setting up an RMA for a motherboard so I didn't spend that week waiting for a new motherboard that might not have worked anyway. Just saying a bad motherboard is the most likely at this point in time.

The motherboard has six RAM slots supporting up to 8GB ECC Registered per DIMM in each slot.

I agree, it does seem to me to be a bad motherboard. I have a this thought in the back of my mind that it could be the memory though. The board supports DDR3 1333, but the Xeon CPU does not. Though the board downsamples the RAM I have a this feeling it could be causing some issue. Though that doesn't explain why it boots with one CPU and not two. I would also assume I would get a bad memory audible warning at post instead of nothing but fans.

Am I right in the idea that pre-post issues are usually due to CPU problems, whether it's the motherboards problem with the CPU or the CPU itself?

I am going to try the CPU swap, and if that doesn't work I'll start the RMA unless anyone has another suggestion.

Am I right in the idea that pre-post issues are usually due to CPU problems, whether it's the motherboards problem with the CPU or the CPU itself?

I am going to try the CPU swap, and if that doesn't work I'll start the RMA unless anyone has another suggestion.

Usually, yes, you could also go buy a PCI Diagnostic card before RMAing it, thats what I did. Only cost about $10 but essentially I can plug it into a PCI or Parallel slot (so I can use it on laptops with parallel ports) and it will give me a readout of the last process the motherboard went through before it stopped working. On the one I suspected was bad, it came straight out and told me no-cpu, knowing that the CPU was good (worked in another motherboard and I tried a known good CPU in the bad motherboard with the same results) it quickly reduced it down to me knowing the CPU socket on the motherboard was faulty (or something of the sort, at least).

In general, if it's not getting to POST and not beeping or anything, its either power or CPU related. Power is easy enough to test with a voltmeter or proper equipment, CPU issues are a bit trickier but can still be tested for. In your case it makes it easy that you have 2 processors and you know one works, so if the other one works in the first socket, try it with keeping that one in the first socket and putting the other one you removed in the second socket. If it still doesn't work then its definitely motherboard issues since you know both processors work on their own in the first socket.

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 3 weeks later...

So I received the new motherboard, and I rebuilt the system. Same exact issue when both CPUs are installed. That rules out the motherboard.

This leaves the PSU, RAM, or CPUs as the possible faulting components then.

I talked with an engineer from supermicro, and he assures me the RAM is compatible and the PSU is sufficient even though I had to convert a PCI-E connector into an EPS12v connector. I have also tried every combination of the RAM sticks so unless they are all faulty then the RAM is good.

The supermicro engineer thinks that something could be shorting out the board or a QPI link on one the processors might be faulty. I'll take the motherboard out and try and assemble it on top of an anti-static pad to make sure nothing from the case is shorting it.

Any thoughts or insight into how I should proceed?

Thank you.

As I began reading this I thought 'I bet something is shorting' as I've had this issue myself where the case was touching the board and causing a short. The result was no beeps but fans spinning, no video on display no post. It seems the SuperMicro engineer you are speaking with is having the same thought.

If it continues to not post even outside of the case I recommend you try increasing the voltage on the CPU and Memory with only one CPU in the system, then shutdown and stick the 2nd CPU in and see if it posts. The memory controllers in these latest Intel processors are incredibly finicky.

Thanks Vice. I will give this a try later. It's a big help when someone can confirm a feeling or suspicion, as it instills some confidence in taking the actions required to troubleshoot these haunted pc problems. So thanks again.

I'll let neowin know what happenned after I try it.

Powzah! Right on.

I took the board out and set it up on an anti-static surface. The board worked like a dream.

Having now experienced this type of problem I can better troubleshoot it later, but I tell you broskis, this has been a total jabroni of a build. I hate losing sleep, hair, and arterial wall integrity over this kind of stuff.

I hope this thread can help someone else experiencing the same thing.

Thank you all for helping me digest and work through this problem.

  • 1 year later...

I had the same Issue with a Supermicro X8DTL, no post no beep. The IPMI came up though. This ATX form factor motherboard is missing one of the standard mounting holes, and my case was shorting out because It still had the metal stud in that position.

Thanks for the excellent pointer. I've built many many systems but this was a new problem for me.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Microsoft confirms Windows 11 26H2, urges IT admins to prepare for release by Usama Jawad Windows 11 typically follows an annual update cycle, but Microsoft recently broke that tradition a bit by releasing a "26H1" version in the first half of this year as a "scoped" build for select new silicon PCs only. This version was not available for customers using 24H2 and 25H2 builds, as Microsoft is busy preparing version 26H2 for them, confirmed officially for the first time. In a Windows IT Pro blog, Microsoft has urged IT admins to prepare for the upcoming release of Windows 11 version 26H2. The company has confirmed that this will be a small enablement package (eKB) that will simply light up certain disabled features that are already present in the operating system's code base. This means that the "refined" Windows update and deployment experience will be simpler and quicker, with minimal disruptions, as the feature update will simply toggle a few flags rather than performing a complete replacement. Microsoft has explained that this is all possible because the standard Windows 11 releases share the same servicing branch and hence, the same source code. However, this also means that Windows 11 26H1 users won't be able to upgrade to 26H2 as that is a different branch, but this is something we have known for a while now. Similar to previous annual feature updates, Windows 11 26H2 will offer the following support cycles: 24 months of support for Home, Pro, Pro EDU, and Pro for Workstations editions 36 months of support for Enterprise, Education, IoT Enterprise, and Enterprise Multi-session editions Microsoft has not confirmed a concrete release date for Windows 11 26H2, but noted that it is "coming soon". If we go by the ongoing release cadence, we can expect it to begin rolling out in early October 2026. As such, IT admins have been encouraged to begin validating Windows Insider releases in the Experimental Channel, plan rollout rings, and strategize the utilization of their existing deployment tools.
    • Windows 11 gets new audio improvements in the latest builds by Taras Buria Today's Experimental builds (26H1 and Future Platforms, formerly Canary) pack several audio-related improvements. If your device is enrolled in the Experimental Channel (26H1), you can download build 28120.2315, while those in the Future Platforms version have build 29613.1000 to try. Here is what is new in build 29613.1000: [Audio] Following up on our previous improvements, we’re making some more adjustments to Settings > System > Sounds based on your feedback. Namely, we’ve updated the “All sound devices” page so: You now have the ability to change default devices from this page. Each of the devices displayed on this page now has a little volume meter next to it to show if there is audio actively playing. We’ve adjusted the page design slightly so now you can filter whether you’re viewing input or output devices. We’ve added toggles so you can choose if you want to hide or show disabled, disconnected, and unplugged devices on this page. We’ve also updated the input and output audio properties page for devices in Settings to now include jack information for those that need it. And here is the changelog for build 28120.2315: This update includes a small number of minor bug fixes and improvements. [Accessibility] This update improves caption style responsiveness by redrawing captions immediately for caption style changes. If no current caption is visible, a sample caption string is displayed. [Audio] This update improves the reliability of the inbox HD Audio driver. You can find the official release notes for build 28120.2315 here and for build 29613.1000 here.
    • I agree with what I think you are saying, just not in the way you are saying it. Like any tool, the amount it represents your work is perorational to the effort you put into it. It is similar to why 2nd grade math students learning to add and subtract are not allowed to use calculators, but a high-school calculous student is. For the 2nd grader, that tool would completely replace the work they are doing, for the calculous student the same tool allows them to work far more effectively while in no way replacing their effort or knowable. If you spend 30 seconds writing a prompt, then the image that comes out is no more "yours" than if you found the same image with a Google Image search. However, many of these generative tools also support highly iterative processes that allow back and forth, and merging generated images with photos or human created images. I am sure you would agree that a human spending hours of time working on a project, even if AI was involved in the process, still reflects that human's work.
    • Windows 11 version 26H2 is now available for testing in the latest preview build by Taras Buria Friday Windows 11 preview builds are here. Insiders in the Experimental (formerly Dev) and Beta Channel can download builds 26300.8697 and 26220.8690. There are no new features, but Microsoft is officially moving the Experimental Channel to version 26H2. In addition, Microsoft is improving the copy dialog in File Explorer, the Start menu reliability, and fixing virtualization issues. Here is the changelog: [General] With today’s build, Windows Insiders in the Experimental channel will see the versioning updated under Settings > System > About (and winver) to version 26H2. For more information, see the Windows Insiders blog. [File Explorer] We’ve improved the visual consistency and reliability of the Copy dialog in Dark mode, including its launch experience and the expanded progress view. [Start menu] - Also available in Beta Improved reliability of Start menu reflecting newly installed or removed apps without requiring sign-out or restart. [Taskbar] Fixed an issue for Insiders using the new smaller taskbar option, where the system tray might get cut off or pushed off screen. [Settings] - Also available in Beta Improved reliability of Settings > Apps > Startup. [Virtualization] - Also available in Beta This update addresses an issue that could result in bugchecks citing HYPERVISOR_ERROR (0x20001) and KMODE_EXCEPTION_NOT_HANDLED (0x1E) errors after installing the latest flights on some devices during system restarts, virtual machine operations, or while running some gaming applications. You can find the official changelog for the Experimental build here and for the Beta build here.
    • I've always preferred this possibility. There is something that feels good about the idea that all matter in the universe will eventually come back together and maybe even result in another big bang. The idea that the universe would fizzle out over the eons and forever drift apart is a little depressing. I realize it is not logical to let a basic human desire for life to have a grand everlasting meaning change the way I feel about a scientific theory, but I am human, so that is how I feel :-).
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      574
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      188
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      77
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      76
    5. 5
      neufuse
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!