msvcrt.dll XP problem


Recommended Posts

I uninstalled Silverlight, since I did not need it for the photo sharing site anymore.

Since then, every single program I launch gives this error "entry point was not found" msvcrt.dll

I started in safe mode, fixed the Premissions settings. I copied the original DLL from the windows cd, I cannot fix this problem.

I reinstalled Silverlight, problem still here, then installed Visual Basic.

I cannot figure out how to fix this. Its been 4 weeks, I am going nuts.

errrror.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/972032-msvcrtdll-xp-problem/
Share on other sites

You're going to want to nuke your machine ASAP. Pay attention to your credit cards if you have ordered anything offline recently. Then follow through with at least the last two steps below.

Install Windows 7 :shiftyninja:

Install MSE

Install Firefox w/ Noscript & Adblock

Think back to what you have recently done. Anything shady, avoid doing in the future. If it was just casual browsing, then it is time to follow through with steps 2 and 3 above if anything else.

You're going to want to nuke your machine ASAP. Pay attention to your credit cards if you have ordered anything offline recently. Then follow through with at least the last two steps below.

Install Windows 7 :shiftyninja:

Install MSE

Install Firefox w/ Noscript & Adblock

Think back to what you have recently done. Anything shady, avoid doing in the future. If it was just casual browsing, then it is time to follow through with steps 2 and 3 above if anything else.

Even Firefox isn't a sure thing; no matter which browser you use there will be some vulnerability with the largest being layer 8 (aka the end user). When ever I've fixed up computers in the past, 9/10 you find that what the person has been infected with is the result of social engineering rather than brut force cracking a system.

Maxmem is a switch in Windows XP and some viruses can disguise themselves as this process! If a program accessing the Msvcrt.dll is unable to find the procedure entry point in the file, you may receive error messages! What actually happens on boot, anything at all or nothing..

What happens when you restart your PC, have you checked for viruses and malware? What Antivirus program do you have installed on your PC? What service pack? SP3 with all the latest updates I hope!

I see it looks like you have tried this already:

Boot your system using the Windows XP installation CD.

On the Welcome to Setup screen, press R to access the Recovery Console.

In case you have more than one operating system installed on your PC, then you will have to select the number key that corresponds to the operating system you wish to repair.

Logon to the system as an administrator.

In the Recovery Console screen, type the commands listed below. Press Enter after each command to execute them.

cd system32

ren msvcrt.dll msvcrt.bak

X:

cd \i386

expand msvcrt.dl_ Y:\windows\system32

exit

Note: X here represents the drive letter of your CD-ROM or DVD-ROM drive and Y stands for the drive in which Windows is installed.

Even Firefox isn't a sure thing; no matter which browser you use there will be some vulnerability with the largest being layer 8 (aka the end user). When ever I've fixed up computers in the past, 9/10 you find that what the person has been infected with is the result of social engineering rather than brut force cracking a system.

True, but Adblock blocks anything that could come through hijacked ads, and NoScript prevents any kind of script from running unless it's a white listed page. It pretty much eliminates all chances except user error.

I downloaded maxmem from the AnalogX website. Been using maxmem for many years now.

I run F Secure antivirus and Peerblock.

My hosts file will block most known malware networks along with Open DNS.

Anti spyware programs: SuperANTISPYWARE and Malaware Malwarebytes and GMER. I have not seen a virus and spyware warning in 3 months.

You could use a BartPE CD with your choice of anti-malware loaded to clean your drive from outside the installed OS.

You could also use any of a number of Linux distros that have LiveCDs to do the same thing. There's Linux versions of Avast and a couple other Windows anti-virus programs complete with GUIs. Just make sure you've got plenty of RAM as it may take a bit to run the LiveCD and install an anti-virus with updates using only your RAM.

"I copied the original DLL from the windows cd, I cannot fix this problem."

And was your CD on the same SP level as your install?

The file is not really on the CD you would have to have done an

expand msvcrt.dl_

And booting into safe mode is not going to cut it to replace a system DLL, you going to have to boot from recovery console, etc.

  • 2 years later...

since this is bumped I wanted to ask, why are they saying "msvcrt.dl_"

whats the .dl_ all about?

On older versions of Windows NT (pre-Vista) Microsoft used per-file compression to keep the size of the install disk as small as possible. (This is in contrast to the way Microsoft has done compression since Vista - compressing the entire install image as one file.) Their naming convention for compressed files was to replace the last letter of the file extension with an underscore. Therefore msvcrt.dll compressed to msvcrt.dl_. Any of the compressed files on the installation disc may be expanded back to their original, uncompressed state using the expand utility built into Windows.

Therefore the One Post Wonder who necroed this thread is suggesting replacing the damaged copy of msvcrt.dll with the original one from the Windows XP installation disc. However, he is making the assumption that the i386 directory has been copied from the installation disc to the root of the C drive. While that was once common practice for many OEMs, it is far from standard. If C:\i386 doesn't exist on your machine, you could substitute the path for your CD drive (i.e. D:\i386 or E:\i386) once you have inserted your original Windows XP installation disc.

In general in a situation where you need to replace a corrupt file installed on your system with a good copy from the Windows installation disc, it is probably better to run an SFC scan than to expand the file manually. System File Checker will check to make sure that each Windows system file is valid and replace it automatically if not. (It does still require your Windows installation disc, however.) As an additional advantage, while you cannot replace individual system files in Windows Vista and later the same way you could in earlier versions of Windows due to Vista's more modern installation method, SFC is supported by Microsoft and has been included with every version of Windows since Windows 2000. Enter the following command at an administrator command prompt to initiate an SFC scan:


sfc /scannow
[/CODE]

On older versions of Windows NT (pre-Vista) Microsoft used per-file compression to keep the size of the install disk as small as possible. (This is in contrast to the way Microsoft has done compression since Vista - compressing the entire install image as one file.) Their naming convention for compressed files was to replace the last letter of the file extension with an underscore. Therefore msvcrt.dll compressed to msvcrt.dl_. Any of the compressed files on the installation disc may be expanded back to their original, uncompressed state using the expand utility built into Windows.


sfc /scannow
[/CODE]

It's still done now, check AMD driver folder

Capture.PNG

thanks for the reply guys.

I knew about sfc but I didnt know that the .dl_ meant it was compressed.

I see what you are saying but why? why rename it? whats wrong with a compressed msvcrt.dll? Is it just so that its easy to tell whats compressed and what isn't?

It's still done now, check AMD driver folder

I was not trying to claim that no one compresses files that way anymore. It is absolutely still done. When Microsoft depreciates a technology they will still support it 20 years (give or take a decade). They are very good about maintaining legacy support. My claim is that the aforementioned method of compression is no longer used on Windows installation discs (since Vista). Driver manufacturers are free to package their code however they see fit. In fact, full image compression (similar to what Microsoft uses on modern Windows installation discs) wouldn't make much sense for installation or backup files which are rarely accessed but may need to be decompressed individually.

Is it just so that its easy to tell whats compressed and what isn't?

That's it exactly. File extensions are just a way to assoicate files with programs that can manipulate them. They have no more significance than that.

Whenever I find a missing DLL on an old system, I am always able to find it by doing a Google search and downloading hte file.

That sounds like an exceptionally terrible approach, especially if the library in question shipped with Windows. It is very easy to end up with much bigger system problems by downloading an incompatible version of the library. Not to mention that fact that I'm not sure I trust the vast majority of the "DLL DOWNLOAD!" sites on the Internet; they just look shady. Unfortunately those websites exist because many people do exactly that: Google the DLL and download a copy from the first website in the search results.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Why does a PDF software need an audio player inside it. What is this bloat.
    • Sadly, that is the state of things. It's basically considered acceptable for any random app running on your computer to use 1+ GB of RAM, and install space, lol, no one even seems to consider that.
    • EU Commission explains why Siri AI isn't launching in the EU, and Apple is to blame by Hamid Ganji Image via Apple This week at Apple’s 2026 developers conference, the iPhone maker unveiled the upgraded Siri after more than a year of delays. The new Siri is now called Siri AI, and it's powered by Google Gemini models. While Siri AI is preparing to roll out to Apple users worldwide, the company’s EU customers might need to wait much longer before getting their hands on the new assistant. Shortly after announcing iOS 27, Apple said in a blog post that Siri AI is not coming to the EU anytime soon due to hurdles posed by the Digital Markets Act (DMA) and other regulatory requirements. To comply with the DMA in the EU, Apple apparently needs to open Siri AI to rival assistants on iOS 27 and iPadOS 27. Apple has refused to do so, which has resulted in Siri AI being delayed for its EU users. The company argues that such a move would put users’ privacy at risk. In a statement to Neowin, a European Commission spokesperson provided more details about why Siri AI will not be rolled out to Apple customers in the region. The statement first noted that the DMA does not prohibit Apple from launching its services in the EU and that the company is simply required to comply with the law. The European Commission spokesperson added that, since Apple is considered a gatekeeper under the DMA, it is “obliged to give third parties access to equivalent features as they give to its own products. Because the DMA is precisely about giving users the choice to use the product they find best suits their needs.” Moreover, the spokesperson said the Commission has been in contact with Apple, though the company “did not develop proposals for DMA compliant interoperability solutions.” The statement also clarified that companies designated as gatekeepers cannot leverage their status and products, such as operating systems, to favor their own AI services. The first public beta of iOS 27 will roll out next month, while the stable version is expected to launch this fall following the release of the iPhone 18 series. It remains unclear when Apple will be able to resolve its DMA-related compliance issues with the European Commission and bring Siri AI to its European customers.
    • i wish i could uninstall Chrome from Anrdoid...  
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      pinnclepd earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • First Post
      X-No-file earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      johnjacobb40 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Primer1st earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Experienced
      JayZJay went up a rank
      Experienced
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      510
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      214
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      145
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      88
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      83
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!