• 0

Definitive Best Firewall 2011

Asked by Yusuf M.,

 Share

Definitive Best Firewall 2011  

181 members have voted

  1. 1. Your Choice?

    • BitDefender
      0
    • BlackIce
      3
    • Comodo Firewall
      50
    • Eset Smart Security
      9
    • Hardware Firewall / NAT Router
      14
    • Jetico
      0
    • Kaspersky Internet Security
      9
    • Lavasoft
      0
    • Linux Based Firewall Software
      2
    • Look 'n' Stop
      0
    • McAfee
      1
    • Microsoft ISA
      4
    • Norton Internet Security
      11
    • Outpost
      4
    • Sunbelt Kerio Personal Firewall
      1
    • Tiny
      1
    • Windows Built-In Firewall
      49
    • Windows One-Care
      1
    • Zone Alarm
      10
    • Other (please specify)
      12

Question

22 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
Grand Master

PGHammer

Posted
Posted

If its a stand-alone box that can be used, I like Endian Firewall.

If its on a PC, not actually sure, I'd probably go with ESET.

While ESET is good, like most "fee" firewalls, they have had to "bulk up" to compete with free products (which are no longer jokes simply by being free, especially with Microsoft in the mix).

I've no experience with ESET (therefore, I have only the opinions of others). CheckPoint *has* fixed the problems that had been plaguing ZoneAlarm (which, like ESET and Kapersky, has bulked up).

However, my recommendation for best definitive firewall remains the *only* free firewall that I recommend and use personally - Microsoft Security Essentials/Microsoft Forefront Endpoint Security.

While light in code, it remains as impervious as any of the "fee" firewalls (including ESET) at the default settings; unlike ESET (in fact, unlike most "fee" firewalls) it doesn't take an advanced degree to configure, either.

  • 0
Grand Master

cork1958

Posted
Posted

PrivateFirewall, http://www.privacyware.com/personal_firewall.html, is what I've been using, although seeing one of these older "definitive" polls, I came across Windows7FirewallControl, which is what I'm using on this computer at the moment.

Using the free version which doesn't allow you to control system connections and using it WITHOUT enabling windows built in firewall.

Otherwise, just plain ol' NAT router is enough for me also.

  • 0
Contributor

divinechild

Posted
Posted

For years, I've been happy with Kerio firewall, but it's a shame they didn't evolved toward windows vista/seven... :-(

So for Seven, I use Comodo's one...

To those who claim NAT is enough, I'm sorry to tell them they're wrong !

Internet has become nasty and dangerous, many protections are never enough xD

  • 0
Mentor

Jen Smith

Posted
Posted

For me anyway, most of my Windows boxes just use the built in Windows 7 firewall. The *Nix boxes mostly run IPTables or IPFilter depending on what OS it is. I keep a close eye on what's installed, and I really don't need a popup confirming every little thing that's going on. Stuff coming in is blocked by default, and I can block specific stuff from going out, good for my needs. My virtual machine "junk box" that runs unknowns or just temporary things however has Comodo running in "ultra anal" mode, and it does a good job monitoring everything and anything that's going on. Granted, it takes about 20 dialog boxes to get a new program going, but that's why it's there. Pretty light on the resources as well too. If I was the type that blindly ran programs first and wondered if that was a mistake later, I'd feel pretty comfortable with it.

  • 0
Grand Master

TEX4S

Posted
Posted

software-based firewalls = laughable.

hardware based firewalls = the way to go.

I'm a big fan of Sonicwall of course, always like Cisco's stuff (except for my crappy E4200) :angry:

I never messed with Watchguard and there is 1 other I cant think of that is real popular.

As mentioned/argued in the previous 2010 firewall thread - software-based firewalls' only reason for existence is keeping bad stuff from getting out.

But as most people have a router - having an add-on SW firewall makes about as much sense as ... well doesnt really make any sense.

I'd appreciate someone in IT Security to tell me why SW-based firewalls still exist - or is it another "prying on the people who dont know any better" ?

For that matter - when it comes to SW firewalls, why is anything necessary more than windows' ?

EDIT:

I just thought of something which kinda answers my own question.

Hardware-based FW dont protect against SPAM, and phishing and stuff, right ? So - they pretty much justifies a need ? meh :(

  • 0
Grand Master

fr33k

Posted
Posted

Switched my vote from ZoneAlarm to Comodo. I liked the previous versions of ZoneAlarm which has great application filtering, but they never changed the vsmon so it wouldn't use so much cpu when you have a lot of connections and or using a lot of bandwidth, so I tried a few other firewalls with application filtering, and at this point Comodo wins. It has good applications filtering if you set it up right.

If you aren't paranoid, and don't care what programs connect, or when they connect to the Internet then The OS based firewall is fine.

  • 0
Collaborator

Innuendo

Posted
Posted

Agnitum's Outpost Security Suite Pro for me. It's one of the few firewalls that can brag 100% leaktest protection. Bought it years ago when Agnitum was running a lifetime license sale.

Simply indispensable...especially when you're curious about what programs you are using that are trying to phone home on the sly.

  • 0
Mentor

cropcircles

Posted
Posted

Norton Internet Security runs very smooth and quiet and doesn't interfere with my computer. Unlike Norton from several years ago that was bulky and a resource hog the last couple years versions are streamlined and IMO the top rated security suite out there and I've tried almost all the ones listed in this survey and almost all of them were annoying in some way or slowed down my system.

http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2369749,00.asp

320570-2012-security-suites.jpg?thumb=y

This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to question listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Posts

    • New PowerToys update fixes memory leaks and other issues

      By Dutchie64 · Posted

      Yup, that's a doozy right there 😄
    • New PowerToys update fixes memory leaks and other issues

      By Dutchie64 · Posted

      It's a bundle of tools created by a variety of people, so things can go wrong sometimes. It's a great addition to Windows, and I use a lot of the tools on a daily basis. Also, it's still a 0.**** release so quick updates are to be expected 😉
    • Why Delta Chat is the best decentralized messenger you have probably never tried

      By Nas · Posted

      Oh, I did. And it's even worse than I was hoping! Besides a lot of techno-babble jargon (yes I understand 100% of it but it's still all just techno-babble) there's 2 key points that make me super-weary about even considering testing this out. -- By default, after installation, a relay is automatically set up, so you do not need to care about that. * Non-chatmail apps use email servers as a long-term message archive while chatmail clients use email servers for ephemeral instant message relay. * Supporting the full variety of classic email setups would require considerable development and maintenance efforts, and complicate making chatmail-based messaging more resilient, reliable and fast. -- Basically, the end-user device is the 'server' (relay) so there is NO ARCHIVING whatsoever because every message is necessarily ephemeral. Great for techno-paranoia (and for illicit activities preferring no tracks to cover) but terrible for everybody else. It's also ironically contradictory to engineering principles of redundancies besides the transport layers due to the explicit absence of any persistent storage. Instead of 'classic email address' retaining multi-GB messaging archives on its server, now every device must retain 100% of those storage demands. (Email messages were originally meant to be short correspondences, not the multi-MB attachments boondoggle that now exists with unlimited spam engines flooding every potential recipient.) Any device swap or reset (or loss) makes the entire message history go bye-bye forever... lest there's an off-device auto-archival "relay" mechanism that's really a separate server that holds onto all transported messages (an email server) that utilizes 'chatmail email address' identities (like an email server) and its own persistent storage archive (like an email server). But... this solution is hoping to exist alongside real-world email address identities (based on the email server relay pathway) but simply render messages in chat thread format in an ephemeral manner (with contents being encrypted, and messages auto-expiring) ... In the end, it's a chat app/experience for the Web3/P2P-at-all-costs zealots. (I have accts on all sorts of federated web3 services so I understand the technical and non-technical alike.) For any practical users, however, it's just another service to download/install, register, cross-share id cards/qr codes, but know that there's no history/archive whatsoever (by design) so no account/message recovery whatsoever... update the device, install a bummed update patch, or dare upgrade your device... all history, poof, gone. Ya gotta start everything over again like they're a brand new person.
    • You've tried DuckDuckGo and Brave Search, now get serious with SearXNG

      By zikalify · Posted

      You've tried DuckDuckGo and Brave Search, now get serious with SearXNG by Paul Hill Over the last decade, it has become quite trendy to dump Google Search in favor of privacy-preserving alternatives such as DuckDuckGo, Startpage, and Brave Search. These search engines have done a very good job at highlighting dodgy practices by Google, such as adjusting search results based on what it thinks you’ll like (filter bubble) and stalking you around the web to advertise to you. While these search engines are good starting points when compared to non-private services like Google, there are still quite a few issues with them. For example, both DuckDuckGo and Brave Search require running non-free JavaScript in your web browser, which is comparable to running proprietary software on your computer, meaning you can be sure about what it’s actually doing in the background. Another issue is that these search engines are hosted on the respective companies’ servers, and you are using a service that you don’t control. Finally, DuckDuckGo, while offering privacy features, relies heavily on Microsoft’s infrastructure for its results and, in the past, has permitted Microsoft tracking scripts. If you are looking for a more private search solution than DuckDuckGo, Brave Search, and Startpage, then I recommend taking a look at SearXNG. It is a privacy-respecting metasearch engine that can be used via different public instances, which is useful for mobile users, or you can install it on your computer or server and run it locally with maximum control. Unlike Google, Bing, or Brave Search, which crawl the web and have their own search indexes, SearXNG is a metasearch engine, meaning it taps other search engines, stripping your identifying data, such as IP address, user agent, and cookies, in the process. Your search query is sent to the other search engines you enable before aggregating the results. SearXNG has deployment flexibility. If you are a casual user or a mobile user and don’t want to run SearXNG locally, you can use a public instance that is hosted by someone else. The main problem with this is that you are putting trust in the maintainer of the instance regarding stuff like logs that they may keep; good hosts should have a privacy policy explaining their policies. If you are trying to use SearXNG, you can also install the software on your device and then head to 127.0.0.1:8080 in your browser and search from there. While you don’t have to worry about a third-party admin like the public instances, search engines could ultimately block your IP address if they frown on you pulling in their search results locally. If you want to run it locally, it’s a good idea to use proxies or VPNs to hide your actual IP. You don’t have to worry about this with a public instance, as search engines never see your IP address. The main privacy benefit of using SearXNG is that it isolates your identity from the underlying engines that it’s capable of searching, such as Google and Bing. These search engines will only see requests coming from a generic server, so they can’t profile you and create a bubble filter that influences what results you see. This also ensures that your search engine doesn’t turn into an echo chamber that prevents you from reading alternative points of view. As a free software project, you are allowed to inspect SearXNG to make sure there are no negative features bundled inside. This sets it apart from the privacy search engines mentioned earlier because you can’t check their source code. As a meta search engine, you are not restricted to getting results from one source. Due to the fact that it scrapes content from other websites, your SearXNG instance will periodically get blocked from different providers, so it’s good to select a range of sources as a backup. While enabling all of the services will give you great results, this can make searching slower. I am personally happy with slower searches for the best results, but you can always check which providers are slowing down your search from the search results page and disable them to speed things up. If you want decent results quickly, enable the main search providers such as Google, Brave, DuckDuckGo, Qwant, Bing, and Yahoo. This way, you get wide coverage without the latency. On the Engines tab in Preferences, do note that there are different tabs, such as General, Images, and Videos, with their own providers that can be toggled and are not covered by "Enable all" while on the General tab, so be sure to dig into each. Just a note, if you want to enable everything, press "Enable all" in one tab, then hit save at the bottom of the page, then do the next tab, and so on. If you press "Enable all", then do that in each tab, and then save, nothing will stick. When I had just some of the search engines enabled, I searched “define nefarious” and results came back with the definition of “define” - obviously that was a sucky result. However, when I had everything enabled, it found dictionary pages for the word “nefarious” and even had an inline definition on the sidebar, which is quite nice too - that was delivered by WolframAlpha for anyone wondering! Probably the worst thing about this meta search engine is that the engines you select are saved with a cookie, so you must enable them on every new device you use SearXNG on, including if you decide to go into incognito mode with your web browser. Honestly, I would say this is the most annoying aspect, and perhaps if your browser lets you choose a separate private browsing search engine, then it would be best to use DuckDuckGo for this portion of your browsing. Another weakness of SearXNG is the random blocking of it by search providers. When you are on the results page, expand the “Response time” box, and it will show things like “Suspended: too many requests” or “access denied”. This is why it is good to enable several providers so that there is always a fallback to get results from. I won’t pretend SearXNG will be for everyone, however, if you enable all of the providers and put up with the slower response time, the results can be really amazing. Even if you don’t want to use it as your daily driver, keeping a bookmark handy that links to it is a good idea if you ever feel like doing a deep dive into a niche topic where other search engines are just failing to bring up any good result, due to the amount of sources it looks on. If you’re interested in radical user control over the software you use, installing SearXNG locally can also be a good idea, but be prepared to be temporarily blocked from sites if you trigger bot sensors without a VPN. Personally, I’ve opted to use a public instance, rather than install it myself. If you want to use it via a public instance, head over to searx.space to find a provider. Let us know in the comments if you have used SearXNG or its predecessor, Searx. What do you think about the quality of the results?
    • Windows 11 is getting redesigned taskbar settings in new build

      By Captain_Eric · Posted

      Dear Neowin, If it is not too much trouble, can you start using the new-ish designations for Insider Preview? "Experimental" is different than "former Dev" as it can apply to different models, eg 26H1 or 26H2 etc, right? No need to seed confusion IMHO. And, please "finally" update your graphics. OK?

  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done

  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      503
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      226
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      158
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
    Show More

  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!