• 0

Definitive Best Backup Software 2011


Definitive Best Backup Software 2011  

105 members have voted

  1. 1. For Home?

    • Acronis TrueImage
      50
    • EMC Retrospect
      2
    • Nero BackItUp
      0
    • Norton Ghost
      6
    • Norton Save and Restore
      1
    • Windows Backup
      25
    • NTI Backup Now
      0
    • Other (Please specify below)
      21
  2. 2. For Work?

    • Acronis TrueImage
      51
    • EMC Retrospect
      4
    • Symantec / Veritas
      16
    • Windows Backup
      11
    • Other (Please specify below)
      23


Question

An updated "Best Backup Software" poll for 2011. Please use this as a reference when researching backup utilities. As time goes on, the poll can be updated to add further options.

Please choose one app or N/A per category when voting.

Happy Voting!

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/972816-definitive-best-backup-software-2011/
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0

People always mention Acronis when asked about best app for file backup. Acronis is more of an imaging/disaster and recovery product in my opinion. Very expensive and bloated just for backup purposes. I think of apps like Super Flexible File Synchronizer and SyncBack for personal data backup applications.

  • 0

I primarily use a program called SaftBackup.

  • It handles versions better than any other backup software I've tried.
  • It stores files in SQLite databases. I prefer this because it reduces the number of files created, and is much faster when you have to backup thousands of tiny files.
  • Backups can be encrypted and compressed.
  • Utilizes volume shadow copy for backing up locked / in use files.
  • It has a built-in file browser for extracting files. It's not great, but it works.
  • Technically doesn't need to be installed. I extracted the files from the installer, and I can run it from a BartPE CD if needed.

There's one thing I hate about this program: When deleting old versions, it vacuums the databases to free up space which takes forever.

  • 0

I'd vote for SyncBackPro by a company called 2BrightSparks.

It appears to have every conceivable option and setting you could desire.

I found it very complex, and I loved it because I had total control. The help file also explained everything so that I could understand how all the options worked before deciding how or if I'd like to use them.

It also backed up many gigabytes of files very quickly. More quickly than Windows 7 would have copied them, so I was impressed with the speed.

It's also not bloated at all.

I liked it so much that I bought a license very soon after trying it.

  • 0

Windows Backup and Restore does the job well enough for me :)

It didn't do the job for me....

1. No compressed image so backups are twice the size they need to be.

2. If you use Win7 libraries referring to data on drives other than C:, then the image of C: INCLUDES this data so it can be absolutely HUGE. If I want C: backed up then that's all I want!

I use Acronis True Image 2010 for now until I find something better (interface is a bit naff and illogical). It compresses and can do incremental image backups as well.

  • 0

For imaging HDD's Acronis True Image is the absolute best.

To make regular backups, I use Second Copy, a little program with tons of features and different types of backups and sync settings.

I keep my daily backups scheduled with it and also I use it to update/sync personal info and my USB stick with my portable apps.

Totally recommended. It's worth every penny.

  • 0

Can anyone suggest any software that allows for incremental backups as files are changed? I've seen a few options but they all work based on intervals rather than on change.

Also, I really want something that could do this from my server so I don't have to have an extra piece of software running in the background on my workstation. Ideas?

  • 0

for drive imaging i prefer 'Macrium Reflect' (it's FREE) and works well. that's pretty much all you need if you just want to do a simple image of a partition and then can restore it from a bootable disc which the program can create for you. it's pretty easy to use and straight forward.

download here (from official site)... http://goo.gl/urZO (also shows screenshots if you scroll down page)

the problem with 'Acronis True Image' is that it's not free.

p.s. for partition resizing i recommend the free EASEUS Partition Master... http://goo.gl/rIkv (i used that a while ago to resize my C partition as it was getting a little low on space so i took the space from D and added more to C (my C and D are on a single 250GB hard drive). i have Windows 7 x64.)

  • 0

Norton Ghost was good but now the dominant is in my opinion and it seems other's opinion is Acronis Image.

And my both votes went to Acronis.

  • 0

Was using GFI Backup Freeware until a few days ago have now switched to Easeus to do backup.

One of the cons of Easeus is that it doesn't use VSS.

One of the main pro's I like is you can just double click the backup file and it mounts and you can see the contents in explorer.

  • 0

Are there any backup solutions that:

* Can be setup to backup an entire drive

* Can be setup to automatically backup periodically (daily for instance)

* Incremental backup support

* Ability to restore previous versions of files (if there is a backup of them)

* Automatically manages the space on an external drive by deleting old backup files and doesn't hassle me about this

Basically, I'm looking for Time Machine (Mac OS X backup utility) for Windows. Hate to say it, but I've yet to find anything close to Time Machine for Windows. Sure, it lacks options... but it just works and I like how it doesn't bother me about disk space issues on my external backup drive. On top of that, you can boot from the external drive and restore files...its really top notch for a consumer oriented backup utility.

I've tried the default Windows 7 Backup & Restore. Blah, I don't want to delete my backup file every time I want to make a new backup. What if my new backup sucks? Am I suppose to have a stack of external drives in order to use Windows 7's backup utility efficiently?

Thanks for your input.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Now 8GB of ram looks even worse in the Neo. I'm so happy I purchased 128GB of DDR 4 when I did.... paid $174. Upgraded my parents laptop to 32GB around the same time for $48. Luckily I have a TON of spare laptops. So i'm good on laptops for a while. I also have a lot of desktops too that I could use if i had to. Lets just hope nothing happens to my main 4 monitor couch workstation.
    • I will keep my current devices for several years... no planning in upgrading until these devices stop working. Too pricey.
    • Apple raises MacBook and iPad prices as memory costs surge by Karthik Mudaliar Apple has raised the U.S. prices of several MacBook and iPad models, including the MacBook Neo, which it launched for $599 less than four months ago. The company’s cheapest laptop now starts at $699, while some MacBook Pro configurations have increased by $300. The changes affect the MacBook Neo, MacBook Air, MacBook Pro, iPad Air, and iPad Pro. Apple has not changed the hardware or storage included with these models, so customers are simply paying more for the same configurations. Here is how the new US pricing compares with the previous starting prices: Product Previous price New price Increase MacBook Neo $599 $699 $100 13-inch MacBook Air, 512GB $1,099 $1,299 $200 14-inch MacBook Pro, 1TB $1,699 $1,999 $300 16-inch MacBook Pro $2,699 $2,999 $300 11-inch iPad Air, 128GB $599 $749 $150 13-inch iPad Air, 128GB $799 $949 $150 11-inch iPad Pro, 256GB $999 $1,199 $200 13-inch iPad Pro, 256GB $1,299 $1,499 $200 The updated prices are already appearing on Apple’s U.S. online store. The MacBook Neo increase will probably attract the most attention. Apple introduced the laptop in March for $599, pitching it as a more affordable Mac for students and buyers considering Windows laptops or Chromebooks. It uses an A18 Pro processor and originally undercut Dell’s new $699 XPS 13 by $100. Following the increase, the two laptops now have the same starting price. The M5 MacBook Air has also lost the price Apple promoted when it launched in March. The 13-inch model arrived with 512GB of storage for $1,099, while Apple’s store now lists the MacBook Air range as starting at $1,299. The 14-inch MacBook Pro with an M5 chip and 1TB of storage has gone from $1,699 to $1,999. Apple has made similar changes to its iPads. The recently released M4 iPad Air, which launched at the same $599 starting price as its predecessor, now starts at $749 for the 11-inch version. The 13-inch version has risen from $799 to $949. The iPad Pro increases are larger in dollar terms. Apple’s 11-inch M5 iPad Pro now starts at $1,199, up from $999, while the 13-inch version has moved from $1,299 to $1,499. Both base models still include 256GB of storage. Apple blamed the increases on the rapidly rising cost of DRAM and NAND flash, which provide system memory and device storage. The company told Reuters that it had tried to shield customers from the increases but could no longer absorb them. “We have never seen a component price increase this much, this quickly,” Apple said. Tim Cook had already warned that price increases were coming. Cook said Apple’s existing component inventory had softened the immediate impact, but that higher memory costs would increasingly affect the company after the June quarter. Much of the pressure comes from the construction of AI data centers. Memory manufacturers are directing more production toward high-margin server products, leaving PC, tablet, and smartphone makers competing for the remaining supply. Apple has not said whether the new prices are temporary or whether further increases are planned. For now, the changes show that even Apple’s purchasing power has not been enough to keep the AI-driven memory shortage away from consumer devices.
    • Ventoy 1.1.16 is out.
    • This is a none story - these low volume Chinese models will always get new experimental features first because Apple and Samsung can't produce them in huge volume to meet demand.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      kinowa earned a badge
      First Post
    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      462
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      171
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      135
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      77
    5. 5
      Xenon
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!